Candidate Positions on Iran

Share/Save/Bookmark

nmilaninia
by nmilaninia
18-Jan-2008
 

In order to assist our community in selecting the right candidate, please find below ya summary of each candidates position on Iran provided by the New York Times:

Democratic Candidates

John Edwards

Engage in low-level diplomacy; tighten economic sanctions with international cooperation; military option not off the table; has said a non-aggression pact is a possibility down the road.

Hillary Clinton


Direct diplomacy without preconditions; use economic sanctions; would not meet with the Iranian president; military option not off the table, but would not consider without congressional approval. Voted for bill designating Iranian Revolutionary Guards as a terrorist organization.


Barack Obama


Engage in direct diplomacy; tighten economic sanctions with international cooperation; would meet with the Iranian president with no preconditions; military option not off the table.

Dennis J. Kucinich


Would engage in direct diplomacy; says U.S. must disarm as well; opposes military strike.


Mike Gravel


Advocates diplomacy; says sanctions do not work; believes Iran can help with situation in Iraq; opposes military strike.


Republican Candidates

Rudolph W. Giuliani


Engage in diplomacy; has advocated regime change through sanctions; military option not off the table, and congressional approval not a must.


Mike Huckabee


Engage in direct diplomacy; tighten economic sanctions with international cooperation; military option not off the table, and congressional approval not a must.


John McCain


Form an alliance with European countries to put economic and diplomatic pressure on Iran; no unconditional diplomacy; military option not off the table, but would consult with leaders of Congress.

Ron Paul


Engage in direct diplomacy; has said Iran has right to nuclear weapons; would not consider military strike.

Duncan Hunter


Engage in conditional dialogue; tighten sanctions; would not rule out pre-emptive strike.


Mitt Romney


Isolate Iran diplomatically; tighten economic sanctions; has called to bring the Iranian president to trial for war crimes; military option not off table, but position on asking Congress for approval unclear.


Fred D. Thompson


Push for regime change with international support; would not engage in direct diplomacy; military option not off the table, but would consult with leaders of Congress.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by nmilaniniaCommentsDate
July 1st "Hands-Free" Cell phone requirements
-
Jun 24, 2008
More Pressure against Debra Cagan Needed
88
Oct 19, 2007
Ledeen’s Connects Iran with 9/11
56
Oct 17, 2007
more from nmilaninia
 
Food for Thought

Look deeper - don't be simplistic

by Food for Thought on


default

My vote is for Clinton

by hillary fan (not verified) on

I was a Clinton fan and now I think that Hillary is far better than any other candidates. She has the credentials, experience, strength, determination and the good heart that our country currently needs.

...and I hope that Bill (with his 180+ IQ) would be able to help her fixing G.W's mistakes and our messed up image of the US in the international scene.


Sangkak

Don't vote for any of them!

by Sangkak on

 


Under no exception should you associate your good name with any of these warmongering candidates from the two pro-business, pro-israel, pro-war, pro-empire parties.

 

 


default

I'm voting for McCain or

by Anonymous3 (not verified) on

I'm voting for McCain or Romney since both know how serious the threat of Islamic Jihadist threatnes the future of humanity.


Food for Thought

“Its not who votes that counts. Its who counts the votes.”

by Food for Thought on

The establishment selects the president. The media hype and the elections are all controlled.

“Its not who votes that counts. Its who counts the votes.” Joseph Stalin

Read this: //www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7819

Then decide:

a) who is honest?

b) who is independent?

Then you might find someone who benefits us all in the world, not just Iran!

F4T


default

either romney or mccain

by Anonymoussssssssssss (not verified) on

ROMNEY OR MCCAIN ARE THE BEST

hopefully hilary will lose to one of them


default

hillary on IRAN

by no_name (not verified) on


default

Republicans will lose bad...

by Anonymous8 (not verified) on

Edwards seems to be the only sane candidate that has a chance, followed closely by Obama.

A question for you ASSHOLES who love to see the people of Iran suffer under economic sanctions and military threat... What the FUCK has this policy of "isolation" and demonization accomplished for the last 28 years? Do you care about Iran, or do you simply want to prove to your friends that YOU are the "real Persian", not the Ayatollahs?

Get off your stupid mules, you pathetic morons. No one cares what you think in either country.


default

Same here

by Anonymous21 (not verified) on

Make an international alliance!!! who are these democrats fooling? I vote for Roney or Thompson too.


default

Same here

by Anonymous21 (not verified) on

Make an international alliance!!! who are these democrats fooling? I vote for Roney or Thompson too.


default

Isolate Iran diplomatically;

by Anonymous11 (not verified) on

Isolate Iran diplomatically; tighten economic sanctions; has called to bring the Iranian president to trial for war crimes; military option not off table, but position on asking Congress for approval unclear.

I'm voting either for Romney or Thompson...


default

I repeat for you Mr. Living in the US

by XerXes (not verified) on

Toe keh az mehnat e digaraan bi ghami
na shaayad keh naamat nahand aadami

Let me know if you can understand Persian!
Plus this is Iranian.com not American.com, and many of us unlike you, care for the land that we came from. Just like the Italians that would care about their homeland, being in America!? (little Italy in every damn city in this country, what a logic you got. The bowl hotter than the soup, an Iranian American who is not concern about Iran, war and the middle east, hmmm)...so why are you associating with Iranians if you have no concern for us "foreigners"!!
A president who wants a war with Iran is relative to the economy of this country, get it?
You are arrogant as this administration's policies towards middle east and Human Rights in general.


default

Khersambak: mesle inkeh in

by topol topol (not verified) on

Khersambak: mesle inkeh in roozha khaili bikari...topol topol jane topol...topoli migeh, chi chi mighe,,,,lol


default

An election to choose the president of US, not Iran!

by living in US (not verified) on

I live in US and I will live here for the rest of my life.

The purpose of the election is to choose a US president. So, my criteria is what the candidate is going to do for people living in US, not for Iran. As long as a candidate has a good plan to fix the US economy and our healthcare crisis (plus a good amount of experience showing his/her real abilities), then my vote would go to his/her. I am not planning to go back to Iran, so it doesn’t matter whatever policy would be decided regarding Iran.


FACEBOOK