The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan speaks against war with Iran

The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan speaks against war with Iran
by Peacock_Feather

The leader of the Nation of Islam (NOI) speaks against Israel and against war with Iran.


Recently by Peacock_FeatherCommentsDate
"Democracy" by the Sword
Oct 05, 2012
Regarding "regime change" in Syria
Oct 03, 2012
The Pedagogy of the Oppressed
Oct 02, 2012
more from Peacock_Feather

When illiterate reactionary thugs unite: Coolie+ Leech=Ignorance

by Zendanian on

For both illiterate monarchist and IR apologist thugs in here:

I only metioned the book by CLRJames on Haiti's Slave Rebellion.

Leech is the one that posted the Wiki link, but accusing me of using Wiki. How octogenarianly senile can you get?

I also mentioned sources on American Reconstruction, American Abolitionist Movement and many other things concerning the Black Liberation in the US. Obviously both reactionary thugs in here are too blind and senile to recall any of that.

All you could agree on is that you're both opposed and enraged to any Enlightenment and Education you receive for free from me in here. Talk about Namak Nashnas!

However, as arch reactionary thugs, you two do make a cute couple. Congrats.


Citing Wikipedia

by Peacock_Feather on

As a chief source has been banned in some tertiary institutions and a few highschools in Anglophone countries. Of course wikipedia has its uses, but relying upon it as your primary source comes with serious problems.

But you are right about this guy. Very self-righteous, ignorant individual.


Told you he is a Wiki-scholar (LOL)

by anglophile on


Black Jacobins



This fellow has NOTHING original to say :))


The only moles in here are coolies of thugs in Tehran.

by Zendanian on

Some how you think just because Farrakan is supporting IR thugs ,for a fee, that absolves him of all his crimes. NOT.

You still have cited a single source on your stupid claims about Reconstruction, Black Liberation in Ameicas, Abolitionsits,...


No, they weren't. They were FBI moles

by Peacock_Feather on

The US government killed Malcolm X just as they killed Martin Luther King jnr.


Gun men pulling the trigger on Malcolm were members of NOI

by Zendanian on

NOI had told everyone that it was going to teach Malcolm a lesson.

Farrakan as the leader of NOI then created the conditions that led to that assasination.

All these basic historical facts for you are nothing because your so called "honorable" (Malcolm killer) Farrakan is kissing asses in Tehran as is beign a Pacificst for a Prize."

Your knowldedge of Black Liberation in Americas is less than a highschool student.

Reconstructuion by far was the most significant experince of self-organization and self-rule for Black in the US. You can not site even a single study by any scholar of Black History to back up your obtuse claim.

Origins of Black Liberation in Americas goes back to Slaves Rebellion in  Haiti and Nat Turner in US.

Go and read "Black Jacobians,"  by CLR James.

"Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution 1863-1877" by Eric Phoner.

Educate yourself and stop being a fool apologist of the thugs in Tehran.


NOI did not kill Malcolm X. The FBI did

by Peacock_Feather on

This is now acknowledged by the Shabbaz family. You're referring to a speech given by Farrakhan in the '90s and publicized by 60minutes and CBS in 1993. The segment of that speech was taken out of context and during proceedings this fact was proven to the Shabbaz family who have since made their peace with Louis Farrakhan and acknowledge that the American corporate media (at the behest of the usual culprits) was attempting to generate a divide-and-conquer conflict within the black community.

Nonsense was your hokey contextualization. The absolitionist movement and Frederick Douglas were not nonsense. Reconstruction in the South after the US Civil War was responsible for the segregation which followed it; so, yes, it was nonsense. But Black Nationalism in North America began with Marcus Garvey and Noble Drew Ali of the Moorish Science Temple, not with anyone else and not before. Do you get it now?


Farrakan himslf is telling everyone NOI deals with "traitors"

by Zendanian on

He admits to his role in that assasination.

That is the most valid document for every one to know who killed Malcolm.

By your same "logic":

Nat Turners' Salve Rebellion was nonesense.

The Abolistionist Movement was nonesense.

Fredrick Douglas was nonesense.

Reconstruction was nonesense.

Every thing and everyone EXCEPT the ones you have "read" in your little books of regligious obscuratanism in nonesense.


Take a look in the mirror, you find the answer. Cheers


Your entry is nonsense

by Peacock_Feather on

Apparently a wild cat has your tongue now. This issue was resolved over two decades ago. Farrakhan wasn't even in NYC when Malcolm X was gunned down in the Audubon Ballroom in Harlem on that fateful day on 21 February 1965. Not even the family of Malcolm X believes in this rubbish anymore about Farrakhan.

Hoover's FBI are the true murderers of Malcolm X because the US government and white establishment of the 1960s was absolutely terrified of the possible emergence of a  political Black Messiah in the USA. Given the emergence of the Black Panther Party for Self-Defense a few years later which was inspired by the figure of Malcolm X, their fear of the Black Messiah Malcolm X wasn't that misplaced. It was also for the same reasons that MLK was assassinated by the FBI because he was becoming radicalized at that period in 1968 beyond any "I have a dream" platitudes.

Lord, you are dumb!


Cat bite your tongue?

by Zendanian on

Take a look at the 11th entry from below.

Farrakan in his own words says NOI killed Malcolm.

What part of that you don't understand?

You still haven't told us how many Theater of the Oppressed workshops you've organized? How many have you attended?

None, and none.



Louis Farrakhan on Malcolm X

by Peacock_Feather on

(Malcolm X College Lecture)



انگل عقده ی ظل اللهی ساواکی ماب، تو سر پیازی یا ته پیاز؟


هر که گفت پنیر، تو سرتو بذار زمین ...
هر که گفت .ن، تو بگو من.
ظل اللهی ساواکی ماب تو را چه به اظهار نظر در مورد مالکولم ایکس و جنبشهای آزادی بخش سیاهان در آمریکا.
تو برو جنایتهای آن "شاه" فاحشه باز دلقک پست بیشرف را توجیه کن.
در جفتک زدن های قبرسی خویش موفق باشی.


Farrakan in person says he killed Malcolm, because according to

by Zendanian on

Farakkan Malcolm had "betrayed" tha nation, yet you refuse to admit the fact that Faraakan was responsible for Malcolm's assasination.

The one who need to lear Englisah is no on ebut YOU. No one said John Brown was a black man.

John Brown as a white Abolitionist has done more for liberation of Black people in MAericas than your "Noble Drew," amd your so called "Honorabale" (Malcolm Killer) Farrakan.

You're so stuck in your ignorance that even after mentioning the Salve Revolt of Nat Turner, you still can't understand that roots of Black Liberation in Americas goes to at least two centuries before Garvey.

Baqlck Workers Movement of course remains compeletly beyond your congnition, since you're for ever suck in youur middle class religous obscurantism.

As the unpaid voluntary coolie of thugs in Tehran, everything in the world for your originated from religion and Islam.

Black Liberation in Americas to Theater of the Oppressed.

On that note: exactly how many Theater of the Oppressed work shops have you organized in your life?


How many of those workshops have you attended?

ALso none.

All you know is to spread you closet Nzai hate speech against Bahais and write about how all good things in life originate from Islam and Religion.



PF jaan

by anglophile on

I can see our resident wikipedia-scholar (LOL) has engaged you in one of his recent wikipedia discoveries. The trouble with our resident pseudo-leftist is that the moment he feels wikipedia is not enough to bluff his way out of a topic he first starts trembling followed by getting nasty and aggressive. Case in point Karl Marx vs Adam Smith (LOL). You can have hours of fun keeping him dancing to your tune!




by Peacock_Feather on

John Brown (blessed be his name) had more to
do with liberation of Blacks in the US than your "Noble Drew" and so
called "Honorable (Malcolm's killer) Farrakhan combined.

I am beginning to think you are maybe reading impaired or are just plain dumb. Black Nationalism (which is what I said) began as a movement with Marcus Garvey. John Brown was not a Black Nationalist because Black Nationalism did not exist as a movement at the time of John Brown's activity in the 1840s and 1850s. John Brown was a militant abolitionist and not a Black Nationalist. Black Nationalism is a very specific thing. I'll let you figure it out.



 NIAC: Hijacking and

by vildemose on


NIAC: Hijacking and putting to shame the cause of Anti-War.

by Roozbeh_Gilani on

NIAC has caused more damage to Anti-War cause than any "pro war Lobby" could ever have dreamed of, by hijacking it and bringing it into total disrepute by association , in the eyes of many Young Iranian amricans who should be speaking against a military attack on Iran.


 Nunberg • Sep 18, 2012 at 8:51 am //

Print Send RSS

Share PHILADELPHIA, September 14, 2012 – Federal District Court Judge John B. Bates for the District of Columbia yesterday granted summary judgment for Seid Hassan Daioleslam, editor of the English Iranian Lobby website "In Search of Truth: Reports on Mullahs's lobby in US," the defendant in a defamation suit brought by Trita Parsi and the National Iranian American Council (NIAC). Judge Bates also ordered sanctions against Parsi for failure to comply with the discovery phase of the litigation. The Legal Project coordinated and financed the defense of Mr. Dai; Sidley Austin LLP represented him pro bono.

Trita Parsi sued Seid Hassan Daioleslam for defamation in April, 2008 after Mr. Dai's investigative reporting exposed Parsi's and NIAC's deep and incontrovertible ties to high-level agents of the Iranian regime. The suit went through 53 months of litigation that included 24 months of discovery and over 30 court motions. These ultimately confirmed the accuracy of Mr. Dai's investigative reports. The case reached national prominence when Parsi's e-mails (produced during discovery) not only confirmed his ties to the mullahs but also that he has delivered lectures to the CIA, briefed Secretary Hilary Clinton and visited the Obama White House starting in 2009. As recently as this past July, he was hosted by Senior Adviser to the President Valerie Jarrett. "Judge Bates decision in favor of Seid Hassan Daioleslam is a victory for both the First Amendment and our national security," said Sam Nunberg, director of the Legal Project. "Mr. Dai has been the victim of a predatory lawsuit simply because he exposed the direct connection between the Iranian Regime and NIAC. In light of the sanctions ordered against Parsi, this decision should also serve as a warning to all Islamists who seek to use our courts as a shield in order to intimidate researchers who work to expose them. I also would like to commend Sidley Austin LLP and specifically Mr. Timothy E. Kapshandy for his tireless effort in defending Mr. Daioleslam's rights under the First Amendment." The Legal Project is an activity of the Middle East Forum. It works to protect the universal right in the West to freely discuss Islam, radical Islam, terrorism, and terrorist funding. The client list includes scholars, journalists, bloggers, activists and politicians. For more information, contact Sam Nunberg at Seid Hassan Daioleslam's press release may be found here: //


All Oppression Creates a State of War--Simone De Beauvoir


Most surely,...

by LoverOfLiberty on

....the only way to defeat racism....

 to act racist oneself.   <<<rolls eyes>>>


 (Oh, the irony.)


The same Muslim Idiot who was defending Qadafi

by IranFirst on


This idiot of a Muslim (kind of redundant) "leader" was defending Qadafi last year when the whole Lybia was after him, just because Qadafi had paid him millions. The only ones looking for war are IRI and its stooges, and this guy is just looking for some hand outs

Soosan Khanoom


by Soosan Khanoom on

He was invited by the Student Association, both the Jewish students as well as the black, at the UC Berkley and this speech was given at the campus a couple months ago..  I heard it then and I should give credit to this particular speech of his regardless of me not being really a fan of him in general. 

But he is a brilliant speaker and very smart !!...  A pain in the butt indeed but these neocons need that pain to be balanced out in this country... 

The UC Berkley students did a great job.


PF, thanks for the post....  


"Pacifist for a price"

by Zendanian on

Now, that is one priceless description. Thanx Mazi.

maziar 58

The Big.........

by maziar 58 on

Question is how much$$$ he got paid and by whom?

Their nation is no nation

And thanks for being pacifist for a price.



Farrakhan Confession of Malcolm X Murder!!! "A Nation DEALS with

by Zendanian on

Farrakhan Confession of Malcolm X Murder!!! "A Nation DEALS with Traitors!!"



Actually you put your foot in your mouth, again

by Zendanian on

In less than five minutes, it's amazing but true. You must be he record holder on that one.

Nat Turner's Slave rebellion which happened decades before American Civil War was the first African-American wave of mass protest.

Marcus Garvey was Jamican and deported back to Jamica.

Moorish Science, Poorish Science. Almost a century before "Noble Drew" African Americans had the history and experience of Reconstruction, as the source of Black Nationalism in the US.

If it wasn't for Nat Turner and likes of Fredrick Douglas in 1800's there would be no Garvey or Drew.

If you are so ignorant of Reconstruction in 1860's and Jump to 1940's and 50's it just shows how used you are to taste of your foot in your mouth.

Educate yourself before showing everyone how utterly ignorant you really are.

John Brown (blessed be his name) had more to do with liberation of Blacks in the US than your "Noble Drew" and so called "Honorable (Malcolm's killer) Farrakhan combined.

You're level of knoweldge on US history is less than a highschool kid. And I haven't even mentioned the Abolitionist movement yet.

The New Black Workers' movement of 1960's and 70's; DRUM and RUM,...had a thourough critique of all variants of Black Nationalist Movement.

Did I mention how ignorant you are? 



Actually, Marcus Garvey

by Peacock_Feather on

And then the Moorish Science Temple of Noble Drew Ali. But don't let an important fact get in your way. You know nothing about the history of Black Nationalism nor about the NOI or Malcolm X.


Roots of Black Movement in US goes back to Nat Turner, not Islam

by Zendanian on

Go and read all reports about who orchestrated Malcolm's assasination, and see how you are putting your foot in your mouth, again.

Panthers had a number of different influences in each city and each period, overwhelming majority of them secular and internationalist.

Panthers had women in positions of leadership, somehting that has never happened in NOI.

Farrakhan's NOI is even more debased and degenrated than Elijjah's NOI, comparing the period and the struggles. Read about DRUM in Detroit and find out how ignorant you are about the history of struggles of African Americans.



Malcolm X

by Peacock_Feather on

Spoke out against the NOI of the 1960s because he broke with it and Elijah Muhammad. Farrakhan revived the NOI in the late 1970s but was Malcolm's student in the early '60s.

In any case, Farrakhan is the successor of Malcolm X in the cause of Black Nationalism. Malcolm never renounced Black Nationalism and in fact the Black Panther Party for Self-Defense was born directly from the influence of Malcolm X. Malcolm X also remained a Muslim and moved from the NOI's syncretic doctrine and into orthodox Islam.

Don't pontificate on issues you know next to nothing about, like embarrassing yourself in not knowing about Paulo Freire's Liberation Theology and Christian Marxism.


Malcolm X Speaks Out Against the Nation of Islam

by Zendanian on

This is the same Farrakan that created the hostilities that led to Malcolm X's assasination. Some historians have pointed to Farrakhan's direct involvement in Malcom X's assasination.

Malcolm had recruted Farrakhan into the Nation.

Malcolm eveloved into an Internationalist while Farrakan remained an obtuse Black Nationalist at best.

Malcolm X Speaks Out Against the Nation of Islam



Welcome, iraj khan

by Peacock_Feather on

Minister Farrakhan is one of the greatest black leaders of this generation and he tells it like it is whenever he stands at a podium. His warning should likewise be heeded because any war with Iran would mobilize the Nation of Islam and hundreds of thousands of their allies (maybe more) on to the streets of America against such a war.

iraj khan

Telling it like it is,

by iraj khan on

If Israel wants war with Iran, then go ahead and do your own fighting with Iran. Don't spill our young American soldiers' blood for your blood thirsty aggression.

Thanks for posting it here.


Luis Farrakhan is a filthy

by nozarmahallati on

Luis Farakhan is a filthy Bahai swine; make that Haifan Bahai swine.

As soon as I take my meds, I will be back to write another post with at least 2500 words or 34 multi sentenced paragraphs (whichever is more).