What the so-called experts on Iran and Iranian affairs failed to realize when they hastily predicted the imminent downfall of the Islamic Regime after demonstrations broke out in the aftermath of June elections, was the sheer power of the regime’s security apparatus. The usual suspects from the Western think tanks and academia (you know who they are) flocked to the international airwaves and started prophesizing about the future of the theocracy. They declared that the beginning of the end of the Islamic Republic is at hand and from now on it’s just a matter of time before the clerical establishment goes the way of the dodo.
During the Cold War, Carl Jung opined in one of his writings, about totalitarian governments. Jung said that any regime, regardless of how brutal, repressive, and paranoid it is can rule indefinitely as long as it has a loyal and well-fed security apparatus. Of course he was referring to the Soviet Union at the time, but his saying rings true even today. Let’s not forget that it wasn’t people power that did in the USSR,rather it was a Politburo member, actually its chief, who came to his senses and by his actions set events into motion that ultimately caused the collapse of the Soviet system.
Eight months on, the Green Movement is in disarray. Its loose membership is of opposing opinions as to its ultimate objective. Its presumed leadership is inept and uncharismatic and unable to gain grass-root support. The labor force, the merchant class, and entire segments of the Iranian Society have effectively refused to endorse the opposition movement.
Even if demonstrations similar to what took place on Ashura continue, they will not be enough to unseat a well-trenched system with its hands on billions of dollars of oil revenue. The movement, if it were to succeed, must attract greater numbers among the population. The demonstration should necessarily be augmented by widespread strikes in the oil industry and elsewhere. The army and police (including the Guards) must join the movement or at the least declare their neutrality. Most importantly, the movement needs strong leadership and clear objectives. It needs to decide whether its aim is to reform the current system or replace it with a new one. Finally it needs to have contingency plans for the ‘post’ period when dangers of succumbing to separatist intrigues will be at their greatest.
Now for some levity... the more I observe the current situation in Iran, the more I see the whole affair as nothing more than a fight between two villagers from Khameneh over grazing land for their herds, with a Lor, recklessly butting in and asking about the whereabouts of his shovel, and a Yazdi confectioner mumbling inaudible nonsense from a safe distance.
Recently by Shahriar Zahedi | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
In Southern Russia | - | Apr 08, 2012 |
Long live the Shah(s of Sunset) | - | Mar 12, 2012 |
نادر قلی خان افشار | 8 | Jul 19, 2011 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Good observation Sean! You stayed real, not illusional!
by obama on Sat Feb 13, 2010 01:51 PM PSTA dictatorship regime doesn't care how people think as long as they are in control. Who is the leader? Mousavi who has one foot on each side? There cannot be one leader, since that would be dangerous. To end the movement they just assassinate the leader. There needs to be leaders, unity and mass movement.
We have to know whether the movement brings democracy for people or we are only being used (without us knowing) to benefit the zionist regime and western interests. After all, overthorowing the IRI is their dream that they cannot achieve on their own. That's why it is important for us to have a clear goal, objectives and strategy.
When a few days ago I predicted nothing would happen on 22, it was for the fact that during my visits to Iran I speak to different people who belong to different caste, not only to the educated and internet savy. I go the villages, small towns and big cities, and talk to garbage collectors, doctors, militarymen and yes basijis as well. That way I stay real.
In fact, I have noticed on this site even the editor whose moto is "nothing is sacred" is not liberal enough to publish some of the the articles that are published in Guardian or Huffington Post by an Iranian scholar, since he disagrees with him. Even the posters jump all over you asking for one's boycut, if they notice the person is not 100% green! Amazing!
This is the reason that I am not optimistic about the Green movement in bringing a true democracy in Iran! If our leaders act so undemocraticly when they have little power, how much more when they have much more power! So, can the same leaders blame the regime? They do it, because they can! Power corrupts!
We need change of attitute first! Otherwise, we are going back another few decades. We cannot affor having revolutions every few decades. We don't live 200 years to see the end where we would have a true democracy!
In your observation, you
by benross on Sat Feb 13, 2010 09:16 AM PSTIn your observation, you missed people who demonstrate, and people who are not demonstrating, but are watching those who demonstrate... just as you are.