NATO should be held responsible ..... they are all war criminals ! They had appointed the guy earlier as chair man of the human rights in the U.N and then shortly after bomb the hell out of him and his country ! Who these people are fooling but themselves ?

By whom, don't you remember Gadafi once publicly saying the UN security council, should be renamed the UN terrorist council for authorizing terrorism unlawfully, he was not trying to be funny, he was being candid/factual. Meanwhile, Obama's been the greatest violator of human rights in the world. The knowledge this reporter gathered as a result of being in it is priceless, but she is in danger for speaking as her account goes against the wests national security.

Well ... these morons want the given title and given prize back ... the poor guy is dead now ! lol
read !


GENEVA, Oct. 20 – UN Watch today welcomed the end of the Gaddafi regime, one of the world’s most brutal violators of human rights, and called on UN chief Ban Ki-moon and human rights commissioner Navi Pillay to acknowledge the UN was wrong to support Gaddafi by granting him key posts on its most influential bodies.

“It’s time for the UN to formally apologize for having legitimized Gaddafi’s regime by electing Libya to its Human Rights Council last year, to the Security Council in 2008-2009, and as General Assembly president in 2009,” said Hillel Neuer, executive director of the Geneva-based watchdog organization. “The UN should also apologize for choosing Gaddafi’s regime to head the planning of its 2009 world conference on racism, and for designating Col. Gaddafi’s daughter Ayesha a UN Goodwill Ambassador.”

“On this day, it would also be appropriate for Mr. Ban and Ms. Pillay to call for Jean Ziegler, the co-founder of the Muammar Qaddafi Human Rights Prize, a propaganda tool for the regime, to resign from the UN Human Rights Council’s Advisory Committee.”

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/10/20/group-calls-for-un-to-take-back-gaddafis-human-rights-prize/

can't correct post , for savak I meant 25 years not 35 years, the late shah really cared about the people to be free, to travel the world, to experience the best education and to help care for Iranians, and in an ignorant namaknashnass way some of our people with out even knowing what is and what is not a dictator freely call him a dictator at the becon call of the media only to call obama a democrat with the same clueless grin, That Iran is an underdeveloped 3rd world, backwards country is evident from reading our activists work on IC. Though fortunately Iranians within Iran have a sort of common sense that helps them, Not all Iranians will forget their language, their culture, their persian values and their history. One wonders how they can delude themselves into thinking the USA wants them to succeed in Iran, that after all the work the USA does to make iranians think like patsys that are about to be used and abused, the USA is going to help them be a jeffersonian democracy.

fascinating isn't it, they sit in awe of their nobel peace price and their amnesty international and are happy with all their own propaganda tools, yet they seem to project on a leader that actually used Libyas resources for Libyans, shocking concept, any one who increases peace, progress and human rights is a dictator and any one who is a mass violator of human rights, brutally slaughtering thousands of innocent victims, corruptly and unlawfully uses absolute power is a "democrat" referring to Obama, I think mass of people just don't understand that elections, democracy and dictatorship are not related, largely due today's mass propaganda. I would encourage people to read plato, socrates and aristotle, they really covered it all perfectly. No one would ever question an unelected King being a selfless servant of the interests of his people in the past. Yet it took a generation of Anti-intellectuals to screw Iran up, just cause they couldn't think for themselves. If only they would read socrates, plato and aristotle to grasp how the late shah and his team were the most democratic acting leaders in the world based on reality, in contrast to their opponents falsely made and heavily motivated and externally funded assertions. ex dictator, corrupt, savak tortures, autocratic.

An unelected king/queen isn't necessarily a dictator, it depends on his/her actions only. An elected leader isn't necessarily a democrat, see carter and obama, 2 wicked dictators killing their many of their own people in foreign lands for their beliefs indiscriminately despite not having been found guilty of anything. Savak killed too, but the burden of proof it had to prove that a person was a national security threat meant it killed less in 35 years than any western country does in 5 years.