When was the US Media ever reliable?
Propaganda is Its Function.
http://iranian.com/posts/view/post/10698
Consider how the US portrayed the late shah with self honesty.

H Post is not necessarily symbolizing the US media. Also, you seem to be too hyper about the US - a stance that I wouldn't share....too crowded by too many notorious anti-US...

Time, CNN, ABC, Fox are worse, It's not anti-US, they change their neo-colonialism and dictatorships they will have earned my support. A country which forbids the sale of a steel plant to Iran and forbids the Germans, the British and the French to sell a steel industry to Iran is not a friend of the Iranian people. One that backs Khomeini against the late shahs team is not a friend of the Iranian people. One that supports Saddam after he attacks Iranians, is not a friend of the Iranian People. We are not talking of an opponent with respect to the USA, which would be after the same goal but a different path, the USA is not after the same goals as Iranians. Its goals are to thwart Iranians and cause the Africanization of Iran, which is well underway. If you are an Iranian and you do not 100% oppose US policies for Iranians and its actions towards Iranians, it is out of ignorance/anti-intellectual thought, plain and simple. A country that will work with the MeK out of a desire to ill advise Iranians is there more that needs to be said. I admit, I am a little disappointed Iranians are so uninformed and clueless regarding the USA and its actions towards Iranians. There is nothing wrong with sincerely being for Freedom and Justice for Iranians, that so few care for these for Iran is part of the reason their are not more Iranians are aware that this puts you squarely in opposition to the USA and there is no way around this as the late shah showed us when he, his doctor, his former pm were murdered with cancer, not unlike several South American Presidents.

If selling steel plant to Iran is good because it benefits Iranians, pretty soon we will see demands for arming them with N bomb, believing that Mullahs will go anyway and Iran will remain strong? We have seen how that story ends...

No you misunderstand. The USA prevented for 20 years Iran getting a steel industry to develop as an industrialized nation during the time of the late shah. They blocked everyone else that wanted to sell to iran also, among the ones they could control. For the sake of Iranian development and to be able to develop a complex economy the late shah purchased from the only seller left, not under US control, which was russia. He was told if he moved forward with Iranian development and help Iran industrialize they would get rid of him. And they did, they physically murdered him and then they politically murdered him and lastly they brought the IRI to power with a clear agenda to start a war with Iraq to help regress iran backwards and suppress the freedom the shahs era created. The shah was their friend also and look how he was treated for serving his peoples freedom.

On we have seen how that story ends.... If the USA did not want an IRI with Nukes they shouldn't have put the IRI in power in the first place and tyrannically brought khomeini to power, while killing the late shah, they must have known that a militant extremist religious group would never be containable. Isn't that why they are negotiating with it, because they have already decided in keeping the IRI with nukes and all.

The resentment of the past is all over your comments, Times have changed, and the US along with many in the west are now on the right side of history. I have set my expectations low and do not await a miracle for Iran.....ain't gonna happen!

I'm not too happy with today either. Yes I do have resentment for Injustices a generation of Iranians face today as a result of no fault of their own, just the cruelty of an empire located in north america http://iranian.com/posts/view/post/10653 these are real historical facts that are not going to be popular for any USA brown noser for sure.

On your hallucinations of non existent change. If the USA had changed like you say they would be openly discussing their past actions, but they are not, instead they are up to their same old games and in fact are knowingly lying about their involvement in 1953, which was far less than they portray, the reason they are knowingly lying is because they are actively aiming to manufacture anti monarchy sentiment.
Their Portrayal of Libya as "a dictator" to control its oil is change for you? Their coup against Chavez and portraying him as "a dictator" is change for You? The main dictatorship on this planet has been coming from the USA for over 40 years now, who ever used absolute power so many times against their own constitution they are supposed to uphold?

It's tough to gauge where you are coming from as you give no examples of US change you talk about and getting on the right side of history????? What has changed is Nada has changed policy wise, zilch has changed in the demonization for dollars department. The empires corrupt aims are clear, all the wars and murder across the globe are vestiges of its corruption and tyranny, they still want the entire middle east and north africa to trade all their energy in US dollars based on coercion, now we can add Libya to the list of raped and exploited nations, this is something that makes no sense for countries in service of their people and not the USA empire in contrast. All this BS and the USA can't even get its self out of a depression it has been in for 5 years for another decade. I am appalled at the unchanged neocolonialism on steroids today dominating humanity out of its freedom, now that communism is on the decline.

These are all old issues, and the young generations of Iran ignore them. It's time for the old timers of all walks of life to lick up their wounds and move on.