Over the weekend I saw a debate on Public TV about Iran's nuclear ambitions from Munk Debates. It was conducted in late December, I think Dec 28th, and I don't recall having heard about it on this website as a link or anything. Maybe it was and I missed it.
Anyway, the question of the debate was;
Be it resolved the world cannot tolerate an Iran with nuclear weapons capability.
As you can see from the debate pre and after results it is close and when people hear the arguments for and against they tend to tolerate Iran rather than go to war to prevent it. The left numbers (green) are for not tolerating Iran and the right numbers (orange) are for tolerating Iran.
There were some interesting points and you can watch and decide for yourself. All the back and forth we do on this website converge on whether or not there should be a war in Iran or not. There is no in between. Many here don't even give the Iranians any credit for doing anything and only refer to them as being ass backward, 1400 years ass back ward, yet the Israeli general himself said Iranians are "very smart" and very capable. He wasn't talking about any smart Iranians in NASA or anywhere in US or Europe or elsewhere. He was talking about stinking religious fanatic Iranians who are IRI, IRI oh IRI!