Advertise here

من حاضرم هر قانونی که بر خلاف مصالح ملت باشد بسوزانم ~ دکتر محمد مصدق

Balatarin

 

~ من حاضرم هر قانونی که بر خلاف مصالح ملت باشد بسوزانم.  

 

~ قانون برای مملکت است نه مملکت برای قانون. نجات وطن عالیترین و بزرگترین قانون است.

~ قانون را محترم میشمارند برای اینکه مفید است و هرگاه تشخیص داده شود که به حال مملکت مضر است, وظیفه وجدانی هر فرد است که برای اصلاح یا فسخ آن بکوشد.

~ قانون را برای مملکت میخواهیم، اگر قانون خلاف مصلحت مردم باشد، آنرا زیرپا میگذاریم.

~ قانون را باید طوری وضع کرد که اشخاص بد نتوانند بر خلاف مصالح مملکت و در نفع خود از آن استفاده کنند... قانونی که مخالف میل مردم باشد قانون نیست .



 

آه  که چقدر جایش خالیست ...!

Balatarin

Comments 35 Pending 0

Sort comments:
fozolie

Mr. Fozolie

کی مردم ایران میخواهند بیدار شوند وشارلاتانهایی متل این قاجارزاده را دریافته دست از امامزاده سازی بردارند

Souri

Souri

Dear Mehrban

The IRI peopel are not called "politicians"
How could you count them among the politician?
How many of them have studied Politics? or even law?
They are all the Mullah, nothing less nothing more!

Mehrban

Mehrban

Souri jaan, regardless of what the classifications are, I think the statement that "all politicians are the same" is wrong and self defeating.

Souri

Souri

Then I agree to disagree my dear.
Of course what I said " All politicians are the same" is in the context of "breaking laws" and self indulgence. Otherwise, it is clear that there are bad, better and good politicians, which does not include this classification.

This comment was removed by the Iranian.com Staff for violating our Commenting Standards

Shirzadegan

Siavash

"Khaen" are the ones who take a side with Arabs. We have plenty of them on this site.
"Khaen" are the ones who put our nation in this mess today.
Didn't followers of Mosaddeq supported Khamianie and put our nation in such a disaster we are seeing today? How about Dr. Karim Sanjabi who was close intimate and compatrait of Mossadeq? Didn't he kiss Khomainie rear end in 1979? we are paying big price for these Khaens up today. It is time to open our eyes to the real face of Khaens who are hiding behind so called "democracy" and funnier than that "mosaddeq democratic government" LOL.

ghourbagheh

ghourbagheh

Sanjabi served on the interim government, and opposed Khomeini after Khomeini rejected a democratic government. Wow, the Pahlavi cult is in full force at Minitruth tonight, rewriting everything!

Shirzadegan

Siavash

No need to re-write anything in the history. The facts are crystal clear. Followers of mosaddeq such as Sanjabi and Forouhar with criminal mullahs put us in this misery for 34 years. These Khaens were so called leaders of the revolution in 1979.
The only person who broke the rank in Jebhe Melli was Dr.Bakhtiar. He resisted criminal mullahs all the way and he finally lost his life for that matter.

P.Galenous

P_J. An Iranian!

Although, Mr. Sanjabi may have done so, why his action(s) should establish a blemish or be a reflection on the character of a great man like Mossadegh! Why should Sanjabi’s misbehavior diminish Mossadegh’s greatness? Are you trying to establish guilt by association! History shows that Mossadegh, unlike the traitor that M R Pahlavi was, fought hard to eliminate all remnants British! And Mullahs were on the top of his list; while M R Pahlavi, protected and nurtured them with tons of money. Pres. Jimmy Carter was the first president who refused having CIA agents acting as the go between and BAGMEN to the Mullahs, from the Shah.

Shirzadegan

Siavash

"why his action(s) should establish a blemish or be a reflection on the character of a great man like Mossadegh! " P_J
We are talking about "line of thinking". There is no animacity against any specific historical character. What we agree or disagree here is "line of thinking". Jebhe Meli's line of thinking which initiated in 50's and it's main characters were "Ayatollah Kashani" and "Mossadeq" were very much similar to line of thinking of "Ayatollah Khomainie and Sanjabi"in 1979.
They both consider Islam as a rule of country and accepted embrace Islam as a saver of nation.
They both against monarchy.
They both promoted Islamic idea along with politic- remember old Ayatollah Modares statement: " our politic is identical with our religion".
This line of thinking brought disaster,misery and poverty for our nation. I think everybody knows about it.
"M R Pahlavi, protected and nurtured them with tons of money."P_J
Islamists are saying differently. They claims they were fighting monarchy for last 200 years and shah was bashing them left and right. Vivid example was the event of 1963 (15 khordad 1342), which mullahs claim 320 shia clergies were killed in their fight against shah and Khomainie was sent to exile in Turkey.

P.Galenous

P_J. An Iranian!

This comment was removed by the Iranian.com Staff for violating our Commenting Standards

G.Rahmanian

G. Rahmanian

Dear Ruhany,

You asked:
"Will we do the same again, if another Mosadegh came?"

It seems as if you have forgotten our country's post-'79 history and what happened to Mosadegh's friends and supporters.

Of course, many including IR's staunch supporters are using Mosadegh's name and his legacy to further their own agenda.

Furthermore, you can see IR's cyber mercenaries even on this site who give lip service to Mosadegh's achievements while at the same time attack and constantly try to discredit those who are upholding his legacy.

h.jahanshahi

h.jahanshahi

«قانون را برای مملکت میخواهیم، اگر قانون خلاف مصلحت مردم باشد، آنرا زیرپا میگذاریم.»
در دمکراسی وظیفه قوه مجریه (دولت) اجرای قانون است و وظیفه قوه مقننه (مجلس) تغیر یا اصلاح قانون. منافع مردم هم در درجه اول در حفظ اصل تفکیک قواست و نه اجرای نظر سوبژکتیو اعضای دولت. به جز این هر مستبدی هم میتواند با ادعای خدمت به مردم ازقوانین عبور کند.

Souri

Souri

Vallah ishoon ham bikhod migoft.
He said that only because some of the laws were not at his taste, so he wanted to break them up.
Rest assured that he would never have broken the laws that he had installed by himself.
All the politicians are the same! Don't doubt a second.

ruhany

Ruhany Just another traveller of life ...

.. پس بخاطر همین هم بود که آن پادشاه فقید قانون اساسی مشروطه را زیر پا گذاشت،و بر خلاف قانون در امور مملکت دخالت کرد...!

تاریخ ما از این بی چشم و رویی ها زیاد دیده .....امیر کبیر ....مصدق ...! فقط شکر ... که دشمنان ملت ایران جملگی از یک سیستم فکری ساده و بدون تناقض برخوردارند و کار اندیشیدن را برای ما ساده کرده اند.

اوریانا فالاچی در یک مصاحبه از وینستون چرچیل سوال می کند: آقای نخست وزیر، شما چرا برای ایجاد یک دولت استعماری و دست نشانده به آنسوی اقیانوس هند می روید و دولت هند شرقی را بوجود می آورید ، اما این کاررا نمی توانید در بیخ گوش خودتان یعنی در ایرلند که سالهاست با شما در جنگ و ستیز است انجام دهید؟ وینستون چرچیل بعد از اندکی تامل پاسخ می دهد: برای انجام این کار به دو ابزار مهم احتیاج هست که این دوابزار مهم را درایرلند دراختیار نداریم. خبرنگار سوال می کند: این دوابزار چیست؟ چرچیل در پاسخ می گوید: اکثریت نادان و اقلیت خائن.

ما جهنم حاکم در ایران امروز را نیز مدیون "بی مهری" شصت سال پیش همین اکثریت نادان و اقلیت خائن به مصدق هستیم. تاوان یک ملت نمک نشناس, سرنوشت فلاکت بار امروز اوست!

چه دوست داشته باشیم و چه نه ... دکتر محمد مصدق خورشیدی است که همیشه میدرخشد... نهرو میگوید:از آسیا سه شخصیت بر خاستند که تاریخ ساز شدند گاندی از هند،مائو از چین و محمد مصدق از ایران. مجله تایمز در ساله ۱۹۵۳ مینویسد:وجود نحیف دکتر محمد مصدق،از کوه البرز محکمتر و از نفت آبادان آتشی تر و سوزان تر است. کارل تالر از یونایتد پرس در سال ۱۳۳۰ مینویسد:انگلستان هنگامی مسئله نفت را حل شده میداند که دکتر مصدق ساقط شود.چرچیل میگوید:ما دکتر مصدق را از کار میاندازیم و بعد با جانشین او مساله نفت را حل میکنیم.انتونی آیدین نخست وزیر اسبق انگلیس میگوید:خبر سقوط مصدق زمانی به من رسید که با همسر و پسرم در کشتی در میان دریای مدیترانه در حال استراحت بودیم.پس از مدتها آن شب خواب بسیار خوشی کردم.و.....ریوأرول پاریس:مخالفین مصدق،او را انگلیسی خواندند.روسها او را نوکر امپریالیست آمریکا لقب دادند.انگلیسها او را کمونیست نامیدند.ولی بالا خره معلوم شد که مصدق یک قهرمان ملیست که بدون پشتیبانی هیچ دولت بیگانهای برای استقلال و آزادی وطن خود میکوشد.

اگر باز هم " مصدقی" دیگر بیاید ...ما باز چنین خواهیم کرد؟

Roger_Rabbit

Roger_Rabbit Framed

ببخشید حزب توده رو از یاد بردم: اقلیت خائن.

Roger_Rabbit

Roger_Rabbit Framed

اکثریت نادان و اقلیت خائن.

در انقلاب ۵۷ این دو گروه متشکل می‌شدند از:

اکثریت نادان: ملت

اقلیت خائن: جبهه ملی‌ و نهضت آزادی


Zendanian

Zendanian An injury to one is an injury to all.

روحانی گرامی، در ایرلند هم این دست آوردها به آسانی و سهل فراهم نشد.
کتاب خاطرات ژنرال "تام باری" [ روزهای چریکی در ایرلند] یک نمونه بسیار عالی از تلاشهای برنامه ریزی شده و پیگیر ملت ایرلند در راه آزادی و استقلال میباشد.
قابل تذکر است که "تام باری" در سن ٢٣ ساله گی جوانترین فرمانده در "ارتش جمهوریخواه ایرلند" بود، و با نیروی تقریبا یک صدم نیروهای انگلیسی (در آغاز نبرد استقلال) توانست بر ارتش امپراتوری انگلیس غلبه کند و پیروز شود.
در کتاب خاطرات او، یک فصل اختصاص به "از بین بردن جاسوسها و خبر گذاران" دارد.
Tom Barry
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Barry

Mehrban

Mehrban

Souri jaan, I beg to differ, there is an abyss between Dr. Mossadegh and the people of IR (both politicians). Macro umbrella thinking such as "all politicians are the same" (without analyses) is the root of our political stagnation.

Souri

Souri

Dear Ruhani

I like almost all your posts and I follow them.
But about Mossadegh, although I have lots of respect for him, but I think the time of rozeh khaani about the past, is really over.

amirparvizforsecularmonarchy

amirparvizforsecularmonarchy I Love Waterfalls and Find One of the most humorous things in the world; is the notion that Americans are a greater force for good & more civilized than Nazi's, Mullahs and Communists.

Milking Mossadegh will continue for a long time and after all the propaganda put out to support him his divisive value is priceless to those who wish to dominate iran, regardless of the treason of his party/supporters which worked with the west to remove Iran's Monarchy, Freedom and Independence in 1979 and brought Iran suppression, tyranny, poverty and loss. Iranians Democratic Movement needs to be done by the people of Iran who are genuinely nationalist and independent based on their actions not their words.

amirparvizforsecularmonarchy

amirparvizforsecularmonarchy I Love Waterfalls and Find One of the most humorous things in the world; is the notion that Americans are a greater force for good & more civilized than Nazi's, Mullahs and Communists.

Mossadegh had no real balls.

For real balls, you have to obey the FSM see for yourself
http://iranian.com/posts/view/post/7076

ghourbagheh

ghourbagheh

That is such a ignorant statement. Mossadegh had more courage and love for his country than the entire coward Pahlavi clan, including Reza Pahlavi who is hiding in US with his stolen loot being dished out to him by Henry Kissinger every month. The Pahlavis are dead in Iran. And the more that you spew your deranged pontification, the more you demonstrate how out of touch the Pahlavi cult are. Reza can only hope for supporters like you. It says volumes about him!

Shirzadegan

Siavash

Helllooo........ooooo This blog is about is about Mosaddeq, NOT crown Reza Pahlavi

ruhany

Ruhany Just another traveller of life ...

Mr Amir Parviz for Secular MONARCHY... Just be honest and respectful to yourself when you talk about balls ...... One who flees his "beloved country" two times hoping to be brought back to power by others, has "real balls"? OR one who battles Great Britain to save our national resources, stays to get "punished" and overthrown, taken to "court", sent to exile, and dies in his homeland?

amirparvizforsecularmonarchy

amirparvizforsecularmonarchy I Love Waterfalls and Find One of the most humorous things in the world; is the notion that Americans are a greater force for good & more civilized than Nazi's, Mullahs and Communists.

Ruhany, I appreciate your comment, its value for me comes from the fact that it gives us a chance to see one each others points of views and beliefs. Of course I do not agree with the way you see it, for me your point of view is in harmony with old mass propaganda, not reason & obviously propaganda is the height of dishonesty used by enemies who are at war and clearly both the king and country of Iran are under attack today.

In this case the war with Iranians focuses on creating divide and rule, against the Iranian MONARCHY, an institution which has proven its nationalist and democratic credentials in action by putting the people of Iran first, caring that the people enjoyed the largest growth of middle class and the largest growth of skilled workers and education in the world. http://iranian.com/posts/view/post/6853 and made gradual changes to.

The propaganda from the USA, the UK and France generally doesn't acknowledge the Peace, Progress and Human Rights that was far far better than any of their countries, we had no record of aggression, did not break international laws and never tortured our own citizens or others. Our King never had the Dictatorial Powers to indefinitely detain anyone, or have them killed with out a court and proof of them being a threat to the lives of many.

Iran was about being able to have different people express different points of view and interpret laws themselves with no leader imposing on this. Of course there were limits to our freedom. Those who we were at war with (Commies) or that were at war with us (MeK/Mullahs) were not allowed to participate, and all others were free to. No Individual was ever prevented in registering politically.

Even when Rastakhiz was established no one was ever told they could not join if they were left or right or had various ideologies because they could hold any ideology (except communism and religious fascism for the obvious reason that they are both anti-democratic, extremist and intolerant of any other view point).

To be honest, you have to not make leaps of faith in gaining information, but go right to the source. Those who worked with him not interpretations. The late shahs greatest strength was that he was a peace lover and wanted this for Iranians. Fleeing his country and not resisting is something peaceful people do and other peaceful people can not grasp. On the other hand courage is taking on the USA, the UK and France all together at once in favor of Iranians when they actively opposed the development, democratic progress and freedom of Iranians.

If you knew who the shah was, or what his team had accomplished with clarity based on the experience of people that worked with him, you could interpret by yourself why leaving Iran when he knew he was 100% a dead man with the same cancer his prime minister and personal doctor were dying from was wiser than resisting the Wests manufactured and orchestrated revolution to thwart Iran.

The betrayals the shah faced upon leaving Iran were priceless in showing the hypocrisy, deceit and dishonesty of the west against him. When you say he was brought back by the power of others, you are partially right because The UK/Russia were fully behind Mossadegh using all their propaganda rags to support him, he was the populist demagogue "the nationalist, the patriot, the democrat" are all bs who was politically, for the few who understand the science, a British agent.

So under these circumstances, If you were honestly caring to understand Iran's dangerous predicament, the shah needed the political backing of the USA/Superpower to over ride others who were in a clear alliance backing mossadegh. That the Shah had the USA come to him and beg him to return and that he used the USA's political cover, and then was brought back with his own supporters in Iran, the land owners, the military & clergy, showed genius on the shahs teams part. He followed the wise path of peace as it was in his nature. The Shahs move was so effective that the Brits had to betray mossadegh their own agent after helping him.

The battle for our national resources was a populist ploy, and the way it was done by Mossadegh harmed Iran in favor of the UK to which we lost our right to a percentage of kuwaiti, Iraqi and other nation oil incomes for ever. Not to mention all the parties investors in BP were holding as they received huge compensations in fines as a result of mossadeghs approach. That Irans oil was nationalized was based not on Mossadegh, but because it was something the late shahs team was in favor of and it was a goal of the Monarchy. Mossadegh like Khomeini was a major case of treason to King and People of Iran. So for me he scores low with respect to having balls and those who stand up for Iranian Freedom intelligently like the shahs team did based on their record get my kudos.

This issue will not go away as the west uses it to this day to divide and rule and Mossadeghollahis are suckers for their guy, that many still believe the manipulations is because the lies are put forward today on every channel on the subject from stephen kinzer in order to develop disagreement.

My view is In your case the public and corporate mass media which control the minds of intellectuals and dishonestly meets the agendas of its owners) would really take a lot of knowledge and time to answer thoroughly. And what I have put forward already took me to long.

Being Honest implies being fair and giving you the right to your own view, explaining mine and not making you less for holding your views regardless of my attack against it, so you need to be clear when i attack your view it is not you I attack, just your view. You and others are decent people, with what the media says about mossadegh and the insincerity and Bullshit behind it If you really believe it, I can honestly say you are entitled to think of him as a good guy, however for me, I have very good reason to believe mossadegh was a traitor, who Russia and the UK used against Iran and still do to this day. Except now we have the USA that loves the IRI and suppression of Iranians, wanting to be a Mossadegh supporter and join with Russia and Britain and France and all who want to keep Iranians weak and remove their Proven Institution for Iranian Independence from foreign interference and Democracy, "the Monarchy".

Shirzadegan

Siavash

"One who flees his "beloved country" two times hoping to be brought back to power by others, has "real balls"?" Ruhany
Wrong, that is NOT called "not having real balls" . It is called "democratic mentality". The person who has a heart for his people and doesn't want to see his country men/women laid in blood leaves his country to "stop the bloodshed". That is compeletly deomocratic mentality. Criminal mullahs will kill every single Iranians till the end and don't want to leave. That is not called "mullahs have balls". They don't have heart for Iranians. That is called "savage and blood thirsty".
"one who battles Great Britain" Ruhany
When? The history shows different scenario. Oil concession was signed in 1901 by Mosaddeq's opium addict uncle known as "Mozafaredin shah". Mosaddeq was quite. All those years that Qajar family was receiving money from Great Britain Mosaddeq was quite. In fact, he was silent more than 50 years. Eventually he wanted to ousted our shahanshah simply by setting his old scorn and take his revenge from Pahlavi's dynasty.

P.Galenous

P_J. An Iranian!

Great response! Trouble is that the Shahollahi/Hezbollah camp is made up of a small group of shameless, IGNORANT characters, completely oblivious to historical facts, and for the past 35+ years in hard pursuit of emasculating or rewriting the WELL established history of the past 100+ years. They have tried HARD to turn a coward traitor like M R Pahlavi into some imaginary character that he wasn’t.

Roger_Rabbit

Roger_Rabbit Framed

آقای روحانی



اینجانب یکی‌ از ارادتمندان و ستایشگران مرحوم دکتر محمد مصدق بوده و همیشه از ایشان به نیکی‌ یاد می‌کنم. هرچند نهضت ملی‌ شدن نفت را نمی‌‌توان حاصل کار یک نفر دانست ولی اگر به رهبری آن بزرگمرد نبود شاید حالا حالا‌ها نفت را از زیر یوغ استعمار بریتانیای تجاوز گر‌ نمی‌‌توانستیم بیرون بیاوریم. بنابرین در وطن دوستی‌ و عظمت کار آن انسان بزرگ جای تردیدی نیست.

سوال بنده از شما اینست که اگر به جای امضای "محمد مصدق" که در پای گفته‌های آن بزرگوار آمده است امضای دیگر کسانی‌ بود که همانند ایشان خدمات زیادی به ایران کرده بودند ولی‌ معتقد بودند که اگر قانونی میخواستند عمل کنند هرگز مصدر چنین خدماتی نمی‌‌توانستند باشند، مثل رضا شاه و یا پسرش محمد رضا شاه پهلوی که دقیقا همین نوع استدلالات را میکردند. آنوقت شما با همین شور و هیجانی که در اینجا قلم می‌زنید قلم میزدید. اگر نه چرا و اگر بله چرا؟

اردتمد

راجر خرگوش

ruhany

Ruhany Just another traveller of life ...

ای گرامی ... فکر نمی کنم که با مرور منصفانه تاریخ کسی در این نکته شکی داشته باشد که مصدق شاید سلطنت طلب ترین فرد تاریخ معاصر ایران است، اما اینکه او و سلطنتی که او بدان باور دشت اکنون در دو جایگاه متفاوت تاریخی قرار گرفته اند به همین اصل پیروی از قانونی بر می گردد که منافع ملت را در صدر اولویت قرار میدهد نه منافع شخصی را... اگربه قانون اساسی مشروطه که برایش آن همه تلاش و جانفشانی شد و به اصل جدایی سلطنت و حکومت آنطور که در حکومت های مشروطه دیگر سراغ داریم عمل میشد آیا رویداد های پس از آن در ایران روی میداد؟ آیا خواست اجرای مفاد قانون اساسی مشروطه از شاه، خواست جدایی سلطنت و حکومت، اشتباه مصدق بوده است که قانون مردمی را فرای هر چیز دیگر قرار می داد؟ ای گرامی... آن گفته ها در زیر عکس مصدق تنها "گفته" نیست ...همگی به عمل در آمده و با تاریخ محک خورده است ... هر کس دیگری هم که میخواهد بر آن جایگاه تاریخی که مصدق تکیه زده است تکیه بزند و از همان احترام برخوردار باشد میبایست همچو او به قانون مردمی احترام بگذارد ... آن را عمل کند و سر بلند از محک تاریخی بیرون بیاید تا شایسته آن "شور و هیجانی" باشد که بدان اشاره کرده اید ... "اگر" چنین شده باشد و یا بشود، پاسخ من به پرسش شما با احترام به همان قانونی که مصدق به آن احترام گذاشت بلی خواهد بود .