Advertise here

THE INCREDIBLE, MIND-BOGGLING STUPIDITY OF AN IRANIAN STATE TV REPORT ON SYRIA

Balatarin


I just watched a report on how things are going in Syria that appeared a few days ago on February 10th when the rebel assaults in Damascus and elsewhere were already well underway. The title was, "Foreign-backed militancy losing momentum across Syria: Dr. Webster Tarpley Link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dESkcugIQ00

Two things amazed me about the story:

--The claim that the regime was winning the war, despite a single major victory in the last six months. Watching the Iranian newscaster, you'd think that Assad had victory practically in the bad, except for some minor mopping up.

--The nature of the "distinguished expert" on whom state media relies. (Tarpley). So I looked him up. The guy is so "distinguished" I never heard of him (and I am reasonable well read in world affairs. I had to look him up on the internet. So here's what I discovered:

Tarpley is a former follower of a Lyndon LaRouche, a well-known crackpot with fascistic tendencies. Apparently Tarpley is just as nutty when it comes to conspiracy theories. Online research revealed a Tarpley claim that a majority of the world's top scientist and engaged in a Malthusian scheme to decimate the world's population. The guy really has a stiffy about the Brits who--among other things-- seem to have conspired with Italy's Red Brigades to murder Italian Premier Aldo Moro a few decades ago. Check out "the truth" about 9/11 according to Tarpley.

 

See: http://www.suesupriano.com/article.php?&id=11

Geez, why didn't the IRI just invite Kim Kardashian as a "respected expert" on Syria?   Do Iranians really watch state TV for news? When they see a guy like Tarpley, do they actually believe he is an "expert analyst" simply because Press TV says so.

I don't see how--once most educated Iranians wise up to how "off" Press TV really is--the regime can ever expect that anything it reports should ever again be taken as credible. For example, it relied on similar "respected (by whom?) experts" who are apparently IRI lobbyists) as the prime evidence that the 2009 election was stolen. The IRI may as well have put Tarpley on the stand.

Watching such nonsense makes it self-evident why the idea of an open press, internet or satellite new access is regarded as completely intolerable in Iran. I can see why the ruling mullahs go to such lengths to isolate Iranians from any outside sources of information.

This sort of North-Korean-style info management suggests on of many reasons why the Islamic Republic can never become a modern economy capable of matching places like South Korea. It's just one more example of the regime's schizoid and contradictory goals. On the one hand the mullahs desire such an economy to finance their own projects. On the other hand, how can you have one without people free to use their minds, have access to information and ask questions?

The best and brightest continue to flee and hold the regime in contempt and news reports like this one tell us exactly why. The uneducated may be duped (though they are gradually wising up when it comes to the regime's economic hopelessness) but this stuff will never play with the sophisticated middle class an advanced economy needs.

Balatarin

Comments 2 Pending 0

Sort comments:
FG3049

FG3049

WOW!!!! This will solve everything: Rezaei proposes an "Islamic economy" to get Iran out of the doldrums. Seriously. That'll work! Surely. 1227 GMT:Economy Watch. In addition to his advocacy of an Islamic economy reported earlier, Secretary of the Expediency Council Mohsen Rezaei has also declared that the government faces problems paying its staff and 50% of Iranian oil was not sold last year contributing to the country’s dire economic situation.






I thought the economy was already run by a bunch of fat, thuggish security force generals and a clique of self-enriching, anti-reform, ultraconservative; mullahs led by a Reactionary-in-Chief (or should I write "Reactionary-in-Thief?"

FG3049

FG3049

Breaking News!!!

ASSAD EXECUTED HIS OWN TROOPS AND DUMPED THEIR BODIES IN A MASS GRAVE NOW UNCOVERED BY THE FSA

The regime wasn't kidding when it threatened to execute any troops who tried to defect. Look what FSA troops just found.

0735 GMT: Bodies at a Regime Infantry School. Almost 50 bodies of regime troops, some in mass graves and others in shallow ones, have been discovered at Aleppo’s Infantry School, according to a fighter with the insurgent Tawhid Brigade.--from Enduing America.

And here's a link to EA's source in turn:


http://beta.syriadeeply.org/2013/02/aleppos-infantry-school-mass-graves-corpses/#.UR9H3oLn-fD

DEVELOPMENTS TO WATCH FOR

1. The regime, whose media is as reliable as the IRI's, will deny all and blame the rebels.

2. Additonal confirmation will come from physical evidence and the testimony of hundreds of former regime troops who defected and witnessed such executions in front of their eyes or who were threatened with such executions.

3. If the FSA investigates other overrun bases for mass graves they'll find many more such instances.

4. Such executions, along with military setbacks, partly explains low morale among Assad's troops and why so many troops flee as a base falls. You can't win a war this way.

5. The FSA will trumpet the news which will in turn affect already low morale among Assad's forces.

THE EXAMPLE OF KATYN FOREST

When Stalin and Hitler agreed to invade and "divvy up" Poland in September 1939, both sides eliminated intellectuals and trained leaders. In Russia, all captured Polish officers were sent to special camps and questioned on their political views over several months. Over 90 percent were secretly executed and secretly buried in mass graves in a Katyn Forest near Smolensk.

Stalin scoffed at the likelihood of a Nazi invasion in June of 1941 despite warnings from the allies. He also never anticipated that the Nazis would get so far, find the bodies and tell the world. Stalin responded as Assad will do, blaming the Nazis who--in this one case--were indeed innocent. Substantial physical evidence proved the Germans couldn't have done it. To cite just one example, the age of young trees that had grown over the mass graves..

1.