Advertise here

Dear Members

Please - for Gods sake......When you make posts here - please separate Iran with IR (Islamic Republic).    When you write Iran bans Buda, we know you mean the 1% anti-Iranians who rule Iran - the problem is the rest of the world does not!  

While we are at it - some of you may wonder how the 1% can rule 99%?   Just ask Obama....

Balatarin

Comments 13 Pending 0

Sort comments:
carmen

carmen ای ایران‌ای مرز خوش گوهر

MasouAgha, I hope I am mistaken, but I remeber a few negative comments of yours on Bahaís

masoudA

masoudA

I have good and bad things to say about Bahaiis - in fact I have a ton of negative comments about all organized religons....One major negative comment I have about Bahaiis is the fact that they weakend Iranian Nationalism at the time we needed it the most in our struggle against both communism and Islamism.

MehrdadA

Mehrdad A

Changing the title of specific news for political bias is theft. It's like the Obama haters claim that the US didn't pass the health care law; Obama did. No, US did, so did Iran (under what the world knows as IRI).

masoudA

masoudA

So Agha Mehrdad - Does Khamenei speak for You? Are his views close to yours? How about Khomeini, Motahari,.......do they speak for you - they are IR buddy, they hate Iran and despise the Iranian culture. Do you think they speak for Iran? No sir - they speak for the Islamic Republic and they have no shame to admit it.....

P.Galenous

P_J. An Iranian!

MasoudA,

You are absolutely right! Something that I have been trying to get through for quite a while.
We ought to be able to separate Shahollahi/Hezbollah, these disgusting characters from honorable hardworking Iranians suffering under this vicious regime, and admire their perseverance! They also performed their duties under the corruption of the previous vicious regime!


masoudA

masoudA

PJ
Maybe one reason you did not get through is your hang-up with the ex-shah - do you have one? Because if your problem is with Shahollahis and not the shah, then at least you and I are in the same boat. Just know there are Monarchists like me who just consider that system as the one for Iran - at least for now. To me a shahollahi is one who has no care for Iran or the shah - just like a hazbollahi who neither cares for Iran or Allah........they are just self preserving baboons looking for a ticket to richess - one they have no chance in hell to earn.

P.Galenous

P_J. An Iranian!

masoudA

You might call it “hang up”, I call it reality check! The “EX-Shah” was the brethren of Khomeini and his ilk. He personified the degenerate tyrant that he was and the very epicenter of all the corruption and murder that eventually resulted in his demise and the coronation of the backward thinking Neanderthals like Khomeini, Khamenei, Ahmadinejad and the rest. Shahollahis are the off shoot of that mentality/thinking and are mostly on the payroll of the Pahlavi embezzled loot. Those same folks are defenders of SAVAK, the hated and nefarious organization that even US, its creator, has tried hard distancing herself from it. True monarchist are NOT only victims of the Shahollahi/Hezbollah characters but equally of the Pahlavi regime, and the Pahlavi Criminal Enterprise. Combining all that and in conclusion one can clearly see the very reason that Reza Pahlavi is neither believed nor believable, by people inside or ones outside Iran. And the very reason that he has not got any traction or any respect for the past 30+ years! There is an appropriate saying in this regard; it starts like this: Fool me once damn you! Fool me twice damn me! Iranians, in general, are finding themselves to be on the second part/segment of that wise saying!

masoudA

masoudA

OK - I see, you have a hang-up - and quite biased about it. I am amazed after all these years, having time to examine practicalities tied to the politics in Iran, you my dear have learned nothing! Let me ask you - how many ministers or parliment members in Iran under the shah do you think were pressured by the shah vs. how any were paid or pressed by England, Russia, Mullahs,...? How do you think things are now - what % get leads from outside Iran????

P.Galenous

P_J. An Iranian!

It has become crystal clear that the “hang up” is all yours and looks like you are as blind to reality as those you condemn, the Shahollahi/Hezbollah characters. What you wrote tells me that you have no idea what you were talking about, and had zero knowledge of Iranian internal politics during M R Pahlavi’s treasonous, murderous regime, furthermore your lack of insight in analyzing of what was the cause or reason that brought us here. You are talking about the “members” of Parliament, that’s a BIG JOKE! …What parliament!...What members! Those characters were ALL hand-picked by the traitor Shah, your idle, and under orders from US and subservient to it. They were either traitors or were forced into those position(s) and would not dare criticizing anyone or saying anything against the traitor king and obeyed whatever US wanted them to do, or would face notorious SAVAK, probably your other hero! If people like you would want to continue that charade, by rewriting history either out of ignorance or malice, then let that be your problem, but one should, at least, educate oneself to the facts on the ground. Your traitor Shah signed a treaty, with US, that EVEN the occupied Iraqi government refused to do so, it was called for the capitulation of Iranian laws! Hate to say that but debating people like you seems to be fruitless, I only recommend more education and enlightenment of what went on in your country and why Iranian nation has to put up with another group of monsters as bad as or worse than the one before!

faramarz

Faramarz

MasoudAgha,

I completely agree and that's how I write my own material. But this was a news item by somebody else and I needed to stick to what he wrote.

masoudA

masoudA

Faramarz jaan - My message was especially directed at those who will be writing the next articles.......not reporting them. They constantly monitor our sites.......

MehrdadA

Mehrdad A

Exactly! A conscientious writer will not violate the law of decency.