I yet have to see one lie from Fred. He may have opinions specific to him, but I haven't seen him lie yet.

Perhaps you are so misinformed that you can't spot the lies. That's how lying works.

Or, perhaps you are so biased that you see lies. Or, perhaps, you have an agenda?
In any case, what he said about S. Namazi was true. I frankly haven't read everything Fred has ever written, but in what I have read, I have never seen any lie. So there.

I admit that I'm biased. I'm HEAVILY biased towards the welfare of ordinary Iranians who can't afford to buy a kilo of meat in Iran. I'm very biased against any actions that indiscriminately hurt the people of Iran, but do very little to alter the regime of Iran. And in my bias, I used published facts and conclusions to combat the deluge of misinformation that Fred and others like him constantly post on this site.

However, that is not the problem. I can expose Fred's deceptions half sleep and quiet intoxicated. I have before. The problem is that when I expose Fred's disinformation with logic and data that can be readily verified with a search, Fred tries to bully me with baseless accusations of me being an IRI agent, a traitor, etc.

That's alright. Fred's of this world are dying. So, you haven't read everything that he has written? You have read one item about Namazi and therefore Fred doesn't lie? I don't know about the Namazi issue, but I would question whether Fred has presented all the information relevant to Namazi or just the ones that are beneficial to Fred! One can lie by omissions, by half-truth, and by outright lies.

As long as you try to patronize me wit statements like "you read one of his opinions and now you think he doesn't lie" (or something in that order), I don't think we have much to say to each other then. As far as I'm concerned, on this particular subject, he is right and you are wrong. End of the story for me.