Who is this "she" anyway? Does anyone know?

Two pints in response to your comment:
1- when someone makes war and sanctions synonymous, as you do in your comment, then they are left to explain why people like Nelson Mandela and lady Aung San Suu Kyi, both proponents of sanctions, are warmongers?

2- Debating and disagreeing with someone, even vehemently, is different than censoring as your comment portrays it. Censoring is the act of stopping someone from freely explaining their point of view. Deleting comes under censoring.
Making debating synonymous with censoring points to not understanding the difference between the two.

1 - Calling for sanctions is not necessarily warmongering. Calling for war of aggression (the supreme crime at Nuremberg) is warmongering.

2 - Mandela supported directed sanctions against the apartheid regime in South Africa. He opposed Clinton's sanctions against Iraq, and he has opposed sanctions against Iran. An interesting side note: Reagan/Bush undermined the sanctions against South Africa as much as they could, which says a lot about where they really stood on racism.

3 - Aung San Suu Kyi as recently as last year called for lifting the sanctions against Burma.

Is this how you and Faramarz win arguments with great skill and superior logical skills!? Well you think you win, but really you make wild claims based on distorted half-truth and whatever else, and you top off your fantastic debating stratagem with a healthy dose of "IRI-agent" accusations.

4 - The sanctions imposed on Iran are unprecedented! Even the racist apartheid regime of South Africa, which got help to develop of nuclear weapons from Israel was not subject to such sanctions (I have copies of the documents with Shimon Perez representing Israel, but you can find them on line). For example, the SWIFT banking sanctions were designed to devalue Iran's currency with the explicit knowledge that the pressure would be on average Iranian, not the regime. No other country has had SWIFT sanctions against it.

5. You have repeatedly and VEHEMENTLY attacked others with the poisonous accusation of "IRI-agent". You use that assertion like a baseball bat to "debate". That is a form of censorship and bullying. It's effect can be even worse than outright censorship, because it naturally disintegrates all rational discussion. This is akin to how Zionist use the "anti-Semite" club to beat down their critics. You are reaping the seeds that you have sewn.

In any debate, not making up facts is a must.
Both Lady Suu Kyi and Mandela were strong proponents of sanctions as a tool for emancipation of their respective nations. That is fact. So when you bunch up sanctions and war, you have to explain why those two, among others, are warmongers.
The rest of your comment is as illogical as this first point you tried to make and do not require a response.

The FACTS, as far as Mandela and Suu Kyi's stance on sanctions go, are as I have stated above in number 2 and 3. They do not support your assertion. Anyone can use an online search to verify the FACTS. You are the illogical person here. You use a half-truth, ignoring all the rest, and you refuse to see the rest of the FACTS.

Among your many misunderstandings is the fact that you are entitled to your opinion and NOT to making-up facts, even if you bold it and shout it.
Have a good day.

But you are entitled to your opinion AND facts!? Especially since you wield that "IRI-agent" club.

Bests to you too.

Given your illogical methodology and made-up facts, by "disliking" my responses to your comments, you only validate them.
In other words, "dislike" from your like-minded is a source of joy.
Please dislike to your heart's content & always keep on truckin!