For those of us living in the U.S. we cannot forget the 8 years of Bush monarchy. Besides being a moron, Bush was a devout born again Christian with beliefs and ideas that defied common sense. For example, he stopped funding research on embryonic stem cell which delayed meaningful results by years not only for U.S. citizens, but for most of the world.
Why did he stop the funding? Because according to born again nut jobs, harvesting stem cells from embryos which will probably end up in the toilet after a while was the same as killing babies. These same nut jobs don't have any problems bombing the crap out of Iraqi civilians. They justify these killings as collateral damage. In the words of the great John Stewart, "Right wingers will defend life with all they got until its born".
While it is Ironic to see Khomeini's grand son opposing theocracy, some credit needs to be given to him because he is on the right track. Only God knows why he is against theocracy; perhaps because he was excluded from the good old boys network. No matter what is the reason he deserves some credit because none of the other clerics have declared anything even close to this.
Khomeini's grandson and scores of Iranians must constantly be reminded that we must not stop at ending theocracy alone; NO! We must fight until Islam is pushed way back into the background of daily life. Islamic ideals and culture has set Iran back hundreds of years, if not more. Whoever wants to practice Islam could do so in the privacy of their homes. No more mosques because these places are cesspools of corruption of all kind. No more Friday prayers, no more "Besmellah e rahman ...... " and Allah and religous symbols in public places, at the top of government letterheads etc.
Islam in Iran should be treated like the Nazism in Germany. A new constitution should include this provision or else Islam will raise its ugly head just like it did in 1980.
Recently by Faramarz_Fateh | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
What to do with shrine of Khomeini after Revolution III | 29 | Jan 30, 2010 |
# of Palestinian mercenaries in Iran to surpass 10,000 by 22 Bahman | 42 | Jan 26, 2010 |
1 down, 1 to go; Yesterday Karroubi, Tomorrow Mousavi | 4 | Jan 25, 2010 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
captain
by che khabar e on Mon Jul 27, 2009 09:47 AM PDTThere are so many different ways of discussing issues... yes? When you discuss a difference of opinion with one you consider a "peer", the discussion IS civilized. When the attitude of the opponent is dismissive and rude, you tend to take that attitude as well. Before you know it, you're rolling around in the mud with a pig. I've seen examples of both. :-) There are some individuals who express themselves with respect. Respect for themselves AND their opponents. There are others who are simply vulgar. And yet others who stroke their self-importance with condescension and dismissiveness. It's a very interesting collage. LOL.
sepas
Mr's Anvar, che khabar
by capt_ayhab on Fri Jul 24, 2009 01:18 PM PDTMy exact points gentlemen. Foundation of any democratic society is equality, freedom of expression, freedom of speech and freedom of religion. When one is eliminated then it becomes a tyranny and not a democracy.
Religion in any form or shape is part of fabric of societies for as long as human history goes. Religion, when used as a political ideology, have had disastrous consequences, from atrocities committed by the catholic church during the dark ages to present day Iran.
A democracy can flourish only when its fundamental beliefs are adhered to and only when religion is clearly and decisively separated from politics and governance of the nation. This is by no means to say that religion should disappear from the public views and only be limited to ones private home.
-YT
P/S che khabar e, I like to take this opportunity to thank you for your civility in your debates.
Fateh agha
by che khabar e on Fri Jul 24, 2009 09:53 AM PDTAt least you clarified your comment. :-) So I feel free in 100% disagreeing with you. Not the separation of church and state. No argument there. But to banish religion to home? No. I'm sorry but that's where I draw the line. That is EXACTLY the sort of suppression that we are fighting right now. Confining religion to your home is nothing more than a denial of the right to exist. We differ on this point. So be it. :-)
Anvar summed it up exactly: Hoping for the day when religious entities tend to the spiritual needs and governmental entities tend to the civil needs of the people.
A Method to a Goal
by Anvar on Fri Jul 24, 2009 08:19 AM PDT*Ali P.* - (I assume that, at least partially, you included me in your question.)
Your point is absolutely valid that an elected person or a civil servant ought not to check their religious views at the door. In my opinion, the constitution and civil laws of a country should not be based on any religion. These laws must protect and be applied equally to all citizens or residents of a country. At the same time, people should be free to choose any religion or even no religion at all, and practice their beliefs freely. A person’s religion, or lack thereof, should not be a factor in their finding employment, admittance to schools, or enjoying any other amenities.
The goal maybe separation of religion/state, as you wrote, and if religion is separated from politics (art and science of governing), then perhaps the goal can be achieved.
Anvar
Seperation of religion/state or religion/politics?
by Ali P. on Fri Jul 24, 2009 06:47 AM PDTI don't know if you could ever seperate religion and politics. In a democracy - if this is what you are suggesting- a religeous man, or woman, can run for office, and get elected. It won't be feasable, nor democratic, to ask him to check his religious views at the door.
We could, however, set up the system, so the state neither promotes, nor hinders, any one religion over another, like what the U.S. Constitution dictates.
Words Have Meanings
by Anvar on Fri Jul 24, 2009 05:31 AM PDT*Faramarz_Fateh* - I agree with the essence of what you’re suggesting that politics & religion must be kept separated.
I regret that you might have encountered some “crazy and fanatic” Bahai’s. I must, however, take exception to your using of the word “proselytize” which we are strongly discouraged to do. Words have meanings and connotations. Proselytizing, which is the act of attempting to convert people, has a negative connotation that is commonly used to describe attempts to forcefully convert people. Perhaps, you still meant to use it in that context which, of course, you are free to do. Chances are that even this attempt to share my viewpoint will be labeled, by some, as an attempt to proselytize.
I personally don’t mind any houses of worship anywhere (regardless of name or religious affiliation), as long as politics and other nefarious activities are kept out of them.
Hoping for the day when religious entities tend to the spiritual needs and governmental entities tend to the civil needs of the people.
Anvar
Clarification
by Faramarz_Fateh on Thu Jul 23, 2009 07:28 PM PDTThere should absolutely be religous freedom in Iran as well as all other countries on the planet. I do not advocate oppression of organized religion or its practitionaires.
What I am advocating is practice of religion in one's home. Religion is a private matter.
Historically, in the past hundreds of years, in Iran and all other Islamic countries Mosques have been centers of political activity and unrest as well as teachingcenters of brain washing. Same goes with most Christain churches.
I cannot talk about "Aatashkadeh" because I have never been in one or Jewsih temples. I have been in Bahai centers in many cities and have never seen evidence of political activity or hate speech although to some degree Bahais do have crazy and fanatic people who proslitize too much .
Nevertheless, I do not like to see Bahai centers cropped up in all town and cities either.
Bottom line, banish religion to homes. Take action so religion is never given any political power. Mix of religion and politics is deadly.
Sad how we let actions of
by che khabar e on Thu Jul 23, 2009 04:31 PM PDTSad how we let actions of few fill our hearts with so much hate for entire nation.
A powerful statement and one which would apply to many other scenarios as well, wouldn't you say? :-)
I don't blame the "religion" for any atrocity committed by man. I had not gotten the impression that Fateh agha did either. I hope not because I believe him to be a rather fair person whose views are not held by some of the more rigid members of this site. And I think that is exactly the problem in Iran, the rigid and fixed idealogy expressed by some.
I can't express strongly enough my belief in your last comment either.
"Freedom of religion"
sepas
che khabar e Jan
by capt_ayhab on Thu Jul 23, 2009 03:13 PM PDTIn the absence of reply from Mr. Fateh, I think he is only proposing closing of mosques[cesspools as he puts it].
He is good with letting churches, synagogues and Atashkadeh's operate since they are ok with him. ;-)
Sad how we let actions of few fill our hearts with so much hate for entire nation. Separation of religion and politics has nothing to do with closing mosques and forcing people to stop practicing what they believe in. Last I checked it is called freedom of religion.
-YT
While I understand and
by che khabar e on Thu Jul 23, 2009 02:45 PM PDTWhile I understand and probably agree with you in theory, I absolutely disagree with your "conditions". Religion should be separate from politics. There is no doubt about that. But "pushed to the background"? Hidden away in homes? You're promoting exactly what the IRI is doing now, limiting people's freedoms of speech and religion. To even suggest that there should be no mosques, or churches, or synagogues is, well, beyond me.
This is disappointing to hear from you. Although a minimal anonymous poster before, I've read your stuff and I've liked it alot.
:-(
Mr. Fateh
by capt_ayhab on Thu Jul 23, 2009 01:08 PM PDTHow about churches, synagogues and Atashkadeh's? Are you going to shut them down as well? Or is it only Mosques?
-YT
I Agree!
by Maryam Hojjat on Thu Jul 23, 2009 12:19 PM PDTWe must remove all religious holidays from Iranian calendar since Iran composed of multi religions. In a free IRAN in future soon religions would be a personal trait. I am very sure, majority of Iranians would depart from Islam in a free Iran. I promise you the statistic in future would indicate Iran not as a moslem country.
Payandeh Iran & Iranians
Down with IRI, His supporters