Islamist rope-a-dope

Balatarin
Share/Save/Bookmark

Fred
by Fred
08-Nov-2009
 

Reliable news outlets report IRR, the Islamist Rapist Republic, is to officially reject the Geneva agreement which it had earlier agreed to in principle.

If this turns out to be the case it is the proverbial pouring of cold water on all the naïveté and the resulting built up hopes for resolution of IRR’s nuclear impasse. When it comes to rope-a-doping, no one can hold a candle to the Islamist Rapists.

Now the outgoing Director General of the IAEA has what must be his last hurrah in the string of Islamist Rapist skewed dimwit ideas on solving the illegal full cycle dual purpose nuke program.

Mohammad ElBaradei has started circulating the idea of using Turkey as a nuclear escrow repository to hold IRR’s illegally enriched uranium which would then allow Western fuel rods to be handed over to the IRR.

With previous instances in mind lets play out this last ElBaradei idea and see what in practice it might look like. Of course all the while Iranian men, women and children will continue to be raped, tortured and murdered by IRR; them centrifuges too will be spinning, producing more nuke goodies.

1- After few months of back and forth a mutually agreed date for the initial meeting between the parties is agreed upon.

2- The meeting takes place and EU foreign policy guy, Javier Solana, announces with parties agreeing on “modality” talks to be held in the future substantial progress has been achieved.

3- After few months and some saber rattling, IRR says its working groups of experts are hammering out the technical details.

4- In six months to the day the working groups announce their initial report will soon be completed.

5- IRR announces its Foreign Minister will be presenting the package of “modalities” to the five plus one.

6-…

 

Before it is too late and nuke acquiring IRR imposes a devastating war on Iran and the region the sane world has to impose airtight sanctions and at the same time unremittingly help enslaved Iranians with moral and material support to overthrow this Islamist menace.

 

Balatarin
Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by FredCommentsDate
ادا اطوار اسلامی
5
Dec 05, 2012
مسجد همجنسگرایان
1
Dec 05, 2012
Iranians are legitimate target
10
Dec 04, 2012
more from Fred
 
ex programmer craig

So how come..

by ex programmer craig on Tue Nov 10, 2009 03:35 AM PST

The only argument against sanctions these IRI apologists can come up with is that sanctions harm "ordinary Iranians"? Since when do IRI supporters give a damn about ordinary Iranians?


  •  
default

.

by timothyfloyd on Wed May 12, 2010 07:55 PM PDT

.


  •  
benross

Is this what I'm admitting?

by benross on Sun Nov 08, 2009 05:47 PM PST

Is this what I'm admitting? Oh sorry you are one of those. I didn't notice. I got in the wrong discussion. Sorry again.


  •  
MOOSIRvaPIAZ

benross

by MOOSIRvaPIAZ on Sun Nov 08, 2009 05:21 PM PST

So I take it you are admitting that you dont care about Iranians so long as you undo IRI? Why limit yourself to sanctions. How about carpet bombing the place so true Iranians such as yourself can go back and rebuild the place? 

 


  •  
benross

Fred and supporters of said

by benross on Sun Nov 08, 2009 04:31 PM PST

Fred and supporters of said policies admit that its going to hurt Iranians. But they dont really care what happesn to Iranians. Their loyalties lie elsewhere... 

Let's be clear, we discuss different matters, in good faith, among Iranians who want to undo IRI. If you are not one of us, do not interrupt. If you are one of us, show how else we can undo IRI. Is that fair enough?


  •  
MOOSIRvaPIAZ

pedro...

by MOOSIRvaPIAZ on Sun Nov 08, 2009 03:11 PM PST

So because an idea is foolish and has the potential to make ordinary Iranians suffer I should provide you with a better idea?

Fred and supporters of said policies admit that its going to hurt Iranians. But they dont really care what happesn to Iranians. Their loyalties lie elsewhere... 


  •  
Fred

Their own medicine

by Fred on Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:36 PM PST

First one Islamist brands me as “Anti-Islam” knowing it is a death fatwa then his sidekicks follow with the same death charge. Nothing doing, this ain’t their Islamist Rapist Republic where their Islamist brethrens make any unsubstantiated charge their dark Islamist heart desires.

Here in the sane world and especially America, the land of the free, they can’t just issue death fatwas. The sacks of Islamist liars have to prove their bogus charge in the form of direct quotes from me.

Islamist/Anti-Semites and their likeminded lefty allies have short memory and forget when they were on the attack and can’t take a taste of their own medicine. Here in  America they can’t silence me and my kind.  

The triumvirate members are funny.


  •  
vildemose

you have a better idea or

by vildemose on Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:40 AM PST

you have a better idea or these are my reasons why sanctons are ineffectine.

Precisely, instead of personal attacks and useless accusations we should discuss whether sanctions would work or not. Since I have mixed feelings about this issue, I like to hear a well-reasoned and thoughful discussions backed up with evidence and supportive arguments. I have to say that I'm against long-term sanctions a la Iraq.

What kind of sanctions the obama adminstration and Fred have in mind and to achieve what goals??

 


  •  
Q

Pedro,

by Q on Sun Nov 08, 2009 09:37 AM PST

What are you calling a personal attack? I did as I always have done describe his positions which he has admitted to many times.

Did I make fun of his name? Did I call him "haji" or "gandpa" ? Did I ridicule his profession or his religion? That's what Fred does all the time to other people and frequently lies about it later. He does this to public individuals with real names and careers even though he uses a fake name his own person is not known, and hence couldn't be "attacked".
Do you understand the difference?

For you to ignore these and cry "personal attack", unfortunately proves you are not objective in the slightest.


  •  
pedro

Can you tell me why so much personal attack on fred?

by pedro on Sun Nov 08, 2009 09:29 AM PST

Why don't you post an essay every day and inform us that you have a better idea or these are my reasons why sanctons are ineffectine. BTW. Please, please do not attack me, I am not taking freds' side. I'm just folowing everyones essay about current events in Iran.


  •  
Q

AK and Moosir: totally right!

by Q on Sun Nov 08, 2009 09:23 AM PST

Don't forget the economic class that most supports Ahmadinejad.

There is a lot of dishonesty going on here. The west could easily agree to simply swap old fuel for new fuel, so that at no time will the Iran have to wait for new fuel. Other solutions like a multi-stage transfer could also solve this problem. But the Obama administration seems to be stuck in the mode of trying to impose a solution that forces Iran to rely on the same western countries that repeatedly broke their contracts with Iran. They must know, this plays right into the hands of the hardliners playing the nationlist card.

Fred, is stubbornly single-minded about harsh sanctions to the point where external reality simply doesn't matter. In other words, no matter what happens, he wants sanctions which is the AIPAC policy.

This is a sign of someone with an agenda, not someone with a solution.


  •  
MOOSIRvaPIAZ

Before it is too late...

by MOOSIRvaPIAZ on Sun Nov 08, 2009 08:23 AM PST

Fred needs to come to his senses that sanctions are not going to topple this reimge. Of course he doesnt give two shits about the iranians who will suffer under sanctions. All he cares about is his own selfish interests.


  •  
NOT_AK69

Sanctions in this case are ineffective;Marg Bar Jomhuriye Eslami

by NOT_AK69 on Sun Nov 08, 2009 08:16 AM PST

"the sane world has to impose airtight sanctions and at the same time unremittingly help enslaved Iranians with moral and material support to overthrow this Islamist menace."

I say the support is good enough; sanctions never prove to e effective against the regime. They simply push the poor people over the edge with less than what they had before. That is not the right way to force a coup. 

AK69


  •