With all the uber-nationalists among the traditional Islamists/Anti-Semites and their likeminded lefty allies coming out of the woodworks it just goes to show, if you live long enough you will see everything.
This is the same triumvirate whose “imam” Khomeini’s disdain for the whole concept is best summed up in his 1980 public remark where he said:
"We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land burn. I say let this land go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world."
And now with sanctions starting to bite hardly a day goes by without a rabid Islamist or their cockeyed lefty lap poodle of likeminded ally not trying to outdo the other in rallying support for the motherland.
There is no more talk of “downtrodden” or facing off and defeating “imperialism”. It is now all Iran all the time and what is good for the national interest and glory of Iran. There are no more prefixes to the name either, just Iran.
Isn’t a robust khodeti in order?
Recently by Fred | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
ادا اطوار اسلامی | 5 | Dec 05, 2012 |
مسجد همجنسگرایان | 1 | Dec 05, 2012 |
Iranians are legitimate target | 10 | Dec 04, 2012 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
khar khodeti x 10
by Anonymous8 on Tue Aug 17, 2010 04:53 PM PDTthis was something i said before, remember? before your stupid blog. it was Freddy Israeli's attack back when he couldnt stay on the "subject of this blog." just like a zionist attacker.
of course i am patriotic to IRAN! i have given family and give myself. but i said you cant understand. that why you will be defeated!
you also excuse israel attack but turn patriotic gheirati only when iran attacks back. so you are patriotic but not for Iran!
khar khodeti x 10
"bring it on" 5
by Fred on Tue Aug 17, 2010 04:18 PM PDTAfter all the nonsense, a rabid Islamist trying to sound uber-nationalist, the exact subject of this blog.
it indicates i am iranian
by Anonymous8 on Tue Aug 17, 2010 04:00 PM PDTthats what you do not understand.
after your attack, i will go to whatever iran army i have to to defeat you and your israel forces.
"bring it on" 4
by Fred on Tue Aug 17, 2010 03:47 PM PDTI see to no surprise you are not going to try honesty, fine.
You say:
“we will crush you if you are stupid enough to attack, don't believe us?
The “we” clearly indicates you are part of the IRR armed forces and should you be attacked you will personally be doing some crushing.
You also say:
“i don't negotiate with terrorists”
Two things,
who said anything about negotiation?
And for IRR folks who are master terrorists when no such subject is raised, is it a Freudian slip due to innate inclination by the rabid Islamists when they raise the subject?
Take care.
i don't negotiate with terrorists
by Anonymous8 on Tue Aug 17, 2010 03:37 PM PDTi said nothing wrong or differnt. you only find it offensive because you want israel to be outside the rules: attack iran, but iran cant attack back. you only have problem if israelis is victim, not iranians. that is reveled.
we will crush you if you are stupid enough to attack, don't believe us? bring it on and find out. that is what i mean. i was honest from start. you only try to twist words and jump around like good israeli agent like this is CNN. sorry, you are failing.
khar khodeti
"bring it on" 3
by Fred on Tue Aug 17, 2010 03:19 PM PDTI know you are handicapped by your Islamist dogma, but come on you don't expect me to buy your nonsense.
I've qouted your own wording, if you want to deny writing it fine, but do not expect me to buy it.
But if you want to give honesty a first try to see how it feels and take back what you cleary had said, I will gladly accept your reconsideration.
Take care.
fred, they are the same words, what is UR problem?
by Anonymous8 on Tue Aug 17, 2010 03:08 PM PDTi know what!
you think this is tel aviv and anything negative about israel cannot be even mentioned and is bad just because is against israel. you act like i say something wrong, when i say I HOPE IRAN WILL SET TEL AVIV ABLAZE IF ISRAEL ATTACKS.
here, we can see your true zionist work. you only have a problem with people attack israel, even if israel attack first, which is what i said from beginning. you think just like zionist israel thugs who do not want any rules apply to themselves. only other people.
too bad, this aint your world anymore. you will suffer and suffer greatly if you attack iran. now go cut/paste until you empty your oghde.
"bring it on" 3
by Fred on Tue Aug 17, 2010 02:57 PM PDTThe rabid Islamist is of the opinion he is in his Islamist Rapist Republic where they say whatever they want and when confronted rearrange the wording thinking it will do the trick.
Here is what the rabid Islamist said first:
“Iran says it will set Tel Aviv ablaze if attacked"oh i hope so! but will isreal attack?
israel is not so stupid enough to attack with rich uncle doing all the hard work. like a moftkhor country that it is! iran can defet you and 100 sage tarsoo like you fred, bring it on!!! “
And repeated it one more time, but in an afterthought now says:
“I HOPE TEL AVIV SET ABLAZE IF ISRAEL ATTACK IRAN.”
Thinking if he shouts it out it will do, sorry it ain’t IRR.
Fred you are on the side of Israeli attack
by Anonymous8 on Tue Aug 17, 2010 02:44 PM PDTno other explanation why you use zionist attack slogans to excuse israel but blame iran. that is your mission.
for last time, i said and i say again.
I HOPE TEL AVIV SET ABLAZE IF ISRAEL ATTACK IRAN.
you have a problem with it? is because you are israeli, and this offends you. because you support israeli bombing but not iran answer.
Tipsy mien Führer 2
by Fred on Tue Aug 17, 2010 02:14 PM PDTMien Führer you are so out of it you are copy and pasting your own nonsensical comment over and over.
Hope you are at some place safe and do not need to drive.
You are too green, do not skip class.
Fred, your Ahmadinejad style populism doenst work here
by MOOSIRvaPIAZ on Tue Aug 17, 2010 02:04 PM PDTit's easy to speak up against tyrants, their crimes, past and present. the easiest trick in the book if you want an army (galleh) of naive minds to follow you around. what isnt easy is hiding your true colors at the times of crisis. you Fred, support the very same efforts that will keep the tyrants in power longer, namely airtight sanctions. and I'm beginning to wonder whether you are amongst the closet pro-war activists residing on iranian.com.
Tipsy mien Führer
by Fred on Tue Aug 17, 2010 01:38 PM PDTMien Führer for an Islamist who advocates status quo so your Islamist Rapist brethrens can go on raping and pillaging Iranians and Iran, you are not that clear-minded, concentrate.
According to you one day I have “warmonger” masters who I do not follow and you have to remind me of their desire and advise me to listen to them. The other day you say “I'm beginning to wonder whether you are amongst the closet pro-war activists residing on iranian.com.”
Have you been hitting the bottle again?
You are too green, do not skip class
Fred, your Ahmadinejad style populism doenst work here
by MOOSIRvaPIAZ on Tue Aug 17, 2010 01:19 PM PDTit's easy to speak up against tyrants, their crimes, past and present. the easiest trick in the book if you want an army (galleh) of naive minds to follow you around. what isnt easy is hiding your true colors at the times of crisis. you Fred, support the very same efforts that will keep the tyrants in power longer, namely airtight sanctions. and I'm beginning to wonder whether you are amongst the closet pro-war activists residing on iranian.com.
Better "get used to it!" ultra-nationalism is the new face of
by Hoshang Targol on Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:10 PM PDTSepah and AN ( as recently uttered by Mashay's rant on "Maktabe Iran," singing of Ay Iran anthem in the recent gathering of expats in Tehran...).
Sepah's turn towards "nationalism," ( I'm putting the term in quotation marks since in today's world, age of multi-nationals, no nation-state as such really has any power as much as they used to)will be complemented by packing the clergy into Qum ( Vatican City of Iran!) and projecting the security-military complex ( Sepah Jakeshan) as the modernizing force for Iran. Sounds far fetched? you be the judge.
well said
by MRX1 on Tue Aug 17, 2010 11:02 AM PDTFred you said it. When you hear islamo communists talk about Iran and patriotism you just want throw up on their faces! They used the same techniqueqs in 1980's in war with Iraq, prolonging the war and stabelizing their regime, now they think they can do the same. I doubt this time any body would fall for their empty rhetoric but time will tell.
Is the IRI mimicking Saddam and the Palestinians?
by AMIR1973 on Tue Aug 17, 2010 06:29 AM PDTAnonymous 8's statement of "“Iran says it will set Tel Aviv ablaze if attacked"oh i hope so!" is similar to Saddam's vow that "If Israel attacks any Arab country… we have the means to burn half of Israel." These IRI "promises" are hardly original, even in their wording.
Similarly, during Gulf War I crowds gathered outside the U.S. embassy in Amman and chanted, "Saddam, our beloved, hit Tel Aviv with chemicals". There were other marches by Palestinians where people shouted ,"Saddam, you hero, attack Israel with chemical weapons".
//www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/fogofwar/archive/post012291.htm
"bring it on" 2
by Fred on Tue Aug 17, 2010 06:00 AM PDTThe rabid Islamist says he has said it and emphasizes the “if attacked” part of his “bring it on “ statement.
What the rabid Islamist fails to notice is his “I hope so” part where he is wishing for such scenario.
Islamists are all about misery, peace and happiness are the antithesis to their messianic dogma.
yes, IF ATTACKED!!!
by Anonymous8 on Tue Aug 17, 2010 04:12 AM PDTyes, i said it!
are you such big iran hater that you want iran get attacked and not do anything in return? Tehran ablaze is OK but Tel Aviv ablaze, you get gheirati???
Freddy you are not fooling anybody only you paying masters.
khar khodeti!
"bring it on"
by Fred on Tue Aug 17, 2010 03:57 AM PDTIt is certainly commendable when one says:
“it is not about the land, it is about the people, the iranian people. not the zionist warmongers. khar khodeti Freddy!”
But how does the rabid Islamist reconciles this new position with the not that old position of inviting devastation on Iran just to see tel Aviv ablaze?
The “bring it on” statement:
“by Anonymous8 on Mon Aug 02, 2010 01:56 AM PDT
“Iran says it will set Tel Aviv ablaze if attacked"oh i hope so!
but will isreal attack?
israel is not so stupid enough to attack with rich uncle doing all the hard work. like a moftkhor country that it is! iran can defet you and 100 sage tarsoo like you fred, bring it on!!! “
khar khodeti Freddy!
by Anonymous8 on Tue Aug 17, 2010 01:54 AM PDTit is not about the land, it is about the people, the iranian people.
not the zionist warmongers.
khar khodeti!