Iran Heritage, Persian Gulf, Iran Alliance, VAFA and Mehr Animal Shelters
به زبان فارسی
PICTORY
LATEST MUSIC
SEARCH
IAEA's Fear Mongering Politics
11-Nov-2011
One needs to ask IAEA who is the greatest threat to international peace. This organization must not get involved in fear mongering and politics of member countries. There is a report that shows IAEA Director General Mr. Ykkiya Amano thanked the USA for supporting him and emphasized he would support USA strategic objectives.
//www.informationclearinghouse.info/article29664.htm#idc-cover
No wonder, Mr. Amano is using innuendo as fact to pursue the strategic policies of countries that supported him to get selected.
People who stack the deck and wage wars:
What is IAEA doing in meddling in internal affairs of member countries?
The IAEA, UN and all other insidious agents of Western interests should get out and leave the people of member countries to deal with the dictators.. Not only will they be far better at doing so, they will do it for the right reasons - to liberate themselves and democratically forge their own future. IAEA must focus on its mission and leave politics alone.
//www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/11387/
| Recently by Mohammad Ala | Comments | Date |
|---|---|---|
خبر نامه ی از ایران | - | Jul 17, 2012 |
قهرمانان جهانی ایران | 3 | Jul 12, 2012 |
"تقدیم" نامه یک کتاب | 1 | Jul 08, 2012 |
RECENT COMMENTS
IRANIANS OF THE DAY
| Person | About | Day |
|---|---|---|
| نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
| Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
| Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
| احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
| Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
| Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
| گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
| Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
| محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
| Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Round and
by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Wed Nov 16, 2011 03:13 AM PSTround we go ..
Proof is not required for USA to impose sanctions. International law has no enforcement or solid basis. America will do whatever it wants based on its own law. If we do not approve of it we must lobby the USA. Or better get rid of the IRI.
While IRI is supporting terror the sanctions remain.
Wrong. Not another "proof", another opinion
by AMIR1973 on Tue Nov 15, 2011 07:35 PM PSTAnd again, this opinion does not bear any legal authority in this matter. Professor, listen to anglophile: "law is not your forte."
Another proof . . .
by Mohammad Ala on Tue Nov 15, 2011 06:55 PM PSTHere is another proof:
//jurist.law.pitt.edu/forum/2011/11/dan-joyner-iaea-report.php
JURIST Guest Columnist Daniel Joyner of the University of Alabama School of Law says the IAEA went outside of its legal mandate with its latest report on Iran, a move that has been viewed by some states as indicating the IAEA's shift from a technical body to a politicized one...
On personal attacks and law
by anglophile on Sun Nov 13, 2011 03:51 AM PSTInternational Law
by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Sat Nov 12, 2011 05:10 PM PSTImagine tomorrow some aliens show up with technology 1000 years ahead of us. Do you think they need "Security Council" approval. Do you think they need any approval of anyone? I tell you they will not.
A few years ago Saddam was the law in Iraq and recently Ghaddafi in Libya. Now they are both gone and mean nothing. There are two kinds of law: man and nature. The law of man is as good as its enforcement. Without that it means nothing. UN has no power and its law means nothing. Nature is in the business of enforcing its own law. No demacrary or dictatorship will change it. Try voting "pi" to be a different value. The only way to affect it is through knowledge and science.
Now let us stop bickering about "law" and get real. If USA decides to put sanctions on IRI it will. No international law will make a difference. It is idealists who refuse to accept this who get both themselves and others in trouble. Realist will know what they are up against and deal with it. Now do you want to be the realist or the idealist; choice is yours. But the result will be different. The idealists brought the world much pain so I have chosen to be a realist.
Once again, the blogger is trying to pass his opinion as "law"
by AMIR1973 on Sat Nov 12, 2011 04:08 PM PSTThe blogger has no authority, no jurisdiction, and no standing to rule sanctions as "illegal". On the contrary, the UN Security Council and other national and international entities that do have such authority, jurisdiction, and standing have passed numerous sanctions against the Islamist terrorist regime. Moreover, as I have pointed out before, repeating a lie over and over doesn't make it true.
International Law News
by Mohammad Ala on Sat Nov 12, 2011 03:37 PM PSTVPK jan; in your reply you used ideas, argument, and opinion, which are difficult to separate. I have NO problem with responsible members to use pseudo names. You have disagreed with me without resorting to personal attacks.
A source of my gripe with Iranian.com has been permitting several members to hide behind fake names to attack others. These individuals think they are brave in spewing non-senses while hiding behind their computer keyboard.
International Law News referenced my article on illegal sanctions.
Pseudo names
by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Sat Nov 12, 2011 01:22 PM PSTThere is nothing wrong with using them. People have been persecuted for ideas throughout history. Therefore it is obvious why some people want to remain anonymous.
An argument is either valid or not based on its content. Not the name of persons making it
Opinion is a different matter.
Deaths due to Airplane parts are faults of IRI's
by IranFirst on Sat Nov 12, 2011 01:54 PM PST"For example, illegal civilian airplane parts have killed thousands of innocent Iranians and several hundred non-Iranians"
Any unfortunate deaths due to unsafe airplanes (old airplanes/lack of parts) are faults of IRI directly and NOT West, or civilized world.
Why should West allow IRI to buy parts or new airplanes, when they are used to spread terrorism. At least in two incidents this year IRI planes (civilian or converted) were stopped by Turkey, when they were transporting WEAPONS to Hezbolah, over Turkey. IRI's Civilian airplanes are routinely used to send IRGC terrorists to different hot spots. Why should West sell any potential weapons to its enemies and terrorists?
IRI always has had the option to LEASE new or fairly new airplanes , from more responsible countries, but off course IRI is cheap, and people's lives have no value for IRI, so when IRI leases airplanes, it gets very old planes from third world countrie, resulting in crashes.
If IRI really cared for Iranian people's lives , it would have imposed high safety standards on its planes (Currently IRI planes are banned from landing in many European airports , due to safety risks), then stop the un-safe planes from flying, ever, and finally replace the bad planes with stafe Leased planes.
IRI is responsible for ALL previous and future deaths due to un-safe planes
Repeating a lie over and over doesn't make it true....
by AMIR1973 on Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:35 PM PSTillegal sanctions which are hurting ordinary people who you claim to support. For example, illegal civilian airplane parts have killed thousands of innocent Iranians and several hundred non-Iranians
These false claims have as much credibility as the proclamations of the IRI's innocence on matters ranging from its deliberate murder of tens of thousands of Iranians to its reckless nuclear program.
Still avoiding the question Mr Ala?
by anglophile on Sat Nov 12, 2011 07:58 AM PSTWrong assessment....
by Mohammad Ala on Sat Nov 12, 2011 07:42 AM PSTanglophile, are you telling me what I can post? I do not need to be a legal expert to know what is right or not.
I am not the only person whose picture and real name have been attacked by members who use pseudo names. It would be only fair to compare our pictures, names or professions. You are dead wrong in your assessment…
Mr Ala please stay clear of legal issues
by anglophile on Sat Nov 12, 2011 07:13 AM PSTDear Mohammad Ala
by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Sat Nov 12, 2011 07:07 AM PSTIAEA and UN are used for political purposes....
Yes and the right thing is to respond in an intelligent way. Please read my previous post.
The IRI is a problem and has to go. The American made up excuses aside. We might as well be honest about why it should go. Because it is a trouble making; nasty anti-Iranian dictatorship.
The wrong thing is to keep digging up "legal" documents. Try to prove IAEA is wrong or making it up. It does not matter. America is not going to let go of this. You are not going to win going up against a power of that magnitude.
A fantastic solution....
by Mohammad Ala on Sat Nov 12, 2011 06:51 AM PSTVPK jan, what you are proposing should be accepted when the USA and other western countries allow Iran and other oil producing countries to sell gasoline at USA and other Western countries pumps. I think this will be a fantastic solution to both short term and long term energy and political problems.
IAEA and UN are used for political purposes....
by Mohammad Ala on Sat Nov 12, 2011 06:56 AM PSTThanks Ali, Reza, Kako, VPK, and HG:
HG.... there are members such as Fred who post two messages on daily basis (rain or shine) on what you are asking me, aren’t these posts enough?! I have asked many times why you or Fred have not brought up the issues of illegal sanctions which are hurting ordinary people who you claim to support. For example, illegal civilian airplane parts have killed thousands of innocent Iranians and several hundred non-Iranians.
Yes, I am against (any) war and will remain against war and violence wherever I live (using my real identity).
Alternative nuclear policy
by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Sat Nov 12, 2011 06:34 AM PSTHere is one for you all:
Reserve the right for nuclear technology but put any work on indefinite hold. In return West should invest in renewable technology in Iran. The focus should be use of central deserts which gather very large amounts of sunlight.
There are other forms of energy such as tidal and wind. But for start I would just stick to Solar. Get that going we probably do not need to bother with the rest.
I would get out of NPT
by Abarmard on Sat Nov 12, 2011 06:23 AM PSTHowever it will cost Iran politically, so it's not recommended.
//english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=9007273077
Thank you Mr. Ala
by Abarmard on Sat Nov 12, 2011 06:16 AM PSTBy now most people fully understand the agenda of IAEA. Similar to UN security council, it has lost its credibility and respect.
iri's fear-mongering tactics
by hamsade ghadimi on Fri Nov 11, 2011 09:26 PM PSTi wonder why casmii's mr. ala, or casmii for that matter, doesn't like to discuss iri's fear-mongering tactics: the "khas o khashak" talk, kooye daneshjoyan, baseejis roaming the streets knifing and shooting protesters, kahrizak, rapes in prison, televised kangaroo courts and forced confession, public hangings, khamenei calling for "barkhord" with "monafeghin."
mr. ala, international peace "pishkesh." even if there's a 1% chance that iaea's report is truthful, i would accept it for the fear that iri's fear-mongering tactics will be permanent. a country having nuclear weapons does not mean that they will use it; however, having nuclear weapons is a game-changer. i know it, you know it, and every country who pursues it knows it.
Vildemouse: What "Iran's"
by alimostofi on Fri Nov 11, 2011 03:25 PM PSTVildemouse: What "Iran's" response? It is Hezbollah Party in Iran's response. It is a sham. Moreover it is a shame on all Iranians abroad not to produce an alternative Nuclear Policy as true representatives of Iran.
Ali Mostofi
//twitter.com/alimostofi
Iran's response to
by vildemose on Fri Nov 11, 2011 03:12 PM PSTIran's response to IAEA:
//tehrantimes.com/index.php/politics/4362-iran-provides-20-answers-to-clarify-ambiguities-about-its-nuclear-program
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." - Louis D. Brandeis
A key allegation in the
by vildemose on Fri Nov 11, 2011 02:38 PM PSTA key allegation in the IAEA report on Iranian nuclear activities has fallen apart.” -J. Cole
//www.juancole.com/2011/11/the-little-iran-nuclear-report-that-couldnt.html
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." - Louis D. Brandeis
Mohammad: the IAEA was very
by alimostofi on Fri Nov 11, 2011 02:15 PM PSTMohammad: the IAEA was very political when ElBaradei was in charge. But he supported the Hezbollahis. In fact the whole situation would be a lot clearer if they were treated like the Taliban are in Afghanistan. Iran would not then be associated with the Hezbollahis. Fact is that UN is dealing with people who kill Iranians as their representatives. It is madness.
Ali Mostofi
//twitter.com/alimostofi