By Wahid Azal
لا اله الا الله
In this age of widespread unbelief, skepticism and the nihilistic ‘death of God’, where irreligious agnosticism competes with crass, literalist fundamentalist religious discourses, few are those succinct yet profoundly deep and multifaceted definitions of Truth and Ultimate Reality offered by a major figure of the Abrahamic Tradition that can stir imaginations endlessly and resonate on so many different levels as the hadîth kumayl of ‘Alî.
Not to be confused with the famous Du'a Kumayl (the supplication of Kumayl), and also known as the hadîth al-haqîqa (the Tradition of Ultimate Reality), this report (khabar) is a Zen-like conversation between the first Shi’ite Imâm and his disciple Kumayl ibn Zîyâd al-Nakhâ’î. As we shall presently see, it is a dialogue between a Master and disciple where the conversation explodes into a theopathic, initiatic doxography by the Master-Hierophant and Imâm-Initiator enigmatically self-disclosing (tajallî) six theophanic layers of Truth, or Ultimate Reality: a discourse where the atemporal reality of the Transcendent Divine progressively unfolds its stages and finally reveals Itself as embodied within the spatiotemporal locus of the Master himself. If Sufism’s entire doctrine of the Master/disciple relationship is laconically illustrated here in graphic, metaphysical form it is because it is from such influential wellsprings of High Imamology that Sufism initially drank its draughts of inspiration, viz. the esoteric sayings, teachings and transmissions of the Shi’ite Imâms who are in Islam the bearers of the station of Providential Guidance (wilâya) par excellence.
In the margins of his book Bahr al-Asrâr (The Sea of Secrets), the Ni’matullahî Sufî, Muzaffar ‘Alî Shâh Kirmânî, provides a complete isnâd (chain of narration) for this hadîth. Henry Corbin also cites material in his En islam iranien (Iranian Islam) vol. 1 which shows that this tradition was actually included in the earliest manuscript versions of the Nahj’ul-Balagha (the Peak of Eloquence) itself, but that it was subsequently excised by future generations of literalists and exotericists due to its explicitly gnostic (‘irfânî) and esoteric itinerary. From the time of Sharîf al-Râzî in the 10th-11th centuries CE onwards, however, the exoteric establishment of the Shi’ite mujtahids (i.e. the fuqahâ) has predominantly considered this tradition to be inauthentic. On the other side of the spectrum, the entirety of the Shi’ite gnostic milieu (i.e. the ‘urafâ) consider it to be tout court authentic in every detail. And against the consensus of the majority of his own colleagues, it appears that the Ayatollah Khomeini himself considered this tradition to be genuine - placing him in a rather interesting assemblage of people who, contrary to other issues, would wholeheartedly agree with him here. Whatever the case may be as to the textual origins of the hadîth kumayl’ and its authenticity, there is a well known aphorism in Shi’ite gnosis and esotericism that whenever in the presence of this or other such similar locutions of elevated Truth attributed to one or another amongst the People of the House (ahl al-bayt), it is indeed the Imâm who speaks!
Amongst the countless commentaries over the centuries, the hadîth kumayl’ was famously commented on by the Shi’ite student of Ibn ‘Arabî, ‘Abdu’l-Razzâq Kâshâni as well as by Sayyid Haydar Amûlî, ‘Abdu’l-Razzâq Muhammad Lâhijî, Ibn Abî Jumhûr al-Ahsâ’î, briefly by Mullâ Sadrâ and his son-in-law Muhsin Fayz Kâshânî, Shaykh Ahmad al-Ahsâ’î and Siyyid Kâzim Rashtî, to name a few. To Siyyid ‘Alî Muhammad Shîrazî, the Bâb, this hadîth functioned as a high spiritual proof-text, as it were, and as such he divided the six years of his turbulent, revelatory ministry from 1260 A.H./1844 C.E. to 1266 A.H./1850 C.E. according to its six theophanic trajectories. For us this hadîth has for years functioned as an inexhaustible and endless source of meditation and inspiration, composing a central aspect of our own esoteric commentary on the calligram of the traditional Greatest Name symbol (ism al-a‘zam).
It should be mentioned that this hadîth is the subject of an exclusive forthcoming study by Herman Landolt and Bruce Wannell, which is to be published by the Institute of Ismâ’ili Studies in London, entitled A Tradition of Esoteric Commentary: Imam ‘Ali’s Hadith al-haqiqa. Reza Shah- Kazemi of the same outfit has also devoted an entire chapter to it in his recent spiritual biography of the Commander of the Faithful entitled Justice and Remembrance: Introducing the Spirituality of Imam ‘Ali. The only published European language article on the subject remains Dwight M. Donaldson’s ‘Al-Kumail: A Companion of the Secret’, The Moslem World, 28, 1938, pp. 249-257.
Here now we offer our translation of the hadîth kumayl’ followed by the Arabic text.
Kumayl: O Commander of the Faithful, what is Ultimate (or absolute) Reality [or Truth]?
‘Ali: What have you and Ultimate Reality to do with each other?
Kumayl: Is it not the case that I am already sharing your secrets as a companion?
Ali: Yes, indeed. But that which sprinkles unto you is billowing through me unto you!
Kumayl: So what is Ultimate Reality [or Truth]?
‘Ali: (1) The disclosure of the Majesties of Glorification without indication!
Kumayl: Please explain further.
‘Ali: (2) The [apophatic] negation of all speculation and the realization of that which can be realized!
Kumayl: Please tell me more.
‘Ali: (3) The nullificative annihilation of the secret by the victorious rending of the veil off the mystery of the secret!
Kumayl: Please explicate further.
‘Ali: (4) The attraction of the Divine Oneness by the attributive apprehension of Divine Unicity!
Kumayl: Please explain further.
‘Ali: (5) A Light Illuminating from the Morning-Dawn of Pre-Eternity and shedding its traces upon the tablets of the Talismanic-Temples of Unicity!
Kumayl: Please tell me more.
‘Ali: (6) So extinguish the lamp for the dawn hath indeed arisen!
علي مع الحق و الحق مع علي
يا اميرالمؤمنين ما الحقيقة
فقال ما لك والحقيقة
فقال او لست صاحب سرّك
قال بلى ولكن يرشح عليك ما يطفح منى
فقال ما الحقيقة
كشف سبحات الجلال من غير اشارة
فقال زدنى بيانا
محو الموهوم و صحو المعلوم
فقال زدنى بيانا
قال هتك الـّستر لغلبة السرّ
فقال زدنى بيانا
قال جذب الاحدية لصفة التؤحيد
فقال زدنى بيانا
نور اشرق من صبح الازل فيلوح على هياكل التؤحيد آثاره
فقال زدنى بيانا
فاطف السراج فقد طلع الصبح
Recently by NUR | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
Haifan Baha'is name Apostates: Moojan Momen's 2007 article | 16 | May 07, 2009 |
The Baha'i Hezbollah (pt.2): Abbas Effendi the Murderer | 6 | May 07, 2009 |
Happy 162 to the Bayani community | 18 | May 06, 2009 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
None of your business
by NUR on Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:00 PM PDTNone of your business.
Now answer a few of mine,
1) Who are you and what is your real name?
2) What creed or organization do you belong to?
3) What position do you occupy?
4) Are you now or have you ever worked on behalf of the Baha'i Internet Agency headed by Matthew Weinberg at the Baha'i World Center in Haifa, occupied Palestine?
5) Why do you see the need in hiding behind a pseudonym and masking your identity?
6) What are your goals to that end?
7) What is your primary motivation in ascertaining logistical information about my group?
8) Are you a sayanim and work for Mossad?
9) Is your organization attempting to manufacture consent through fictitious and exagerrated narratives about persecution in Iran?
10) What would you consider your motivation to that end?
11) Is your organization attempting to foment international discord and lobby for a pre-emptive military strike on Iran?
12) What is your position on the current policy of President Obama in wishing engagement with Iran?
13) Do you believe that Baha'ism should replace the national religion in Iran, and is your organization attempting to replace the mullah's theocracy with a Baha'i theocracy?
Don't get frustrated. Just answer the questions. Looking in the mirror of your organizational duplicity and Stalinism can't be that bad. Or can it?
See Sourcewatch entry, Baha'i Faith.
NUR, here is another chance to answer a few basic questions...
by CAUTION DETOUR AHEAD on Thu Apr 02, 2009 12:21 AM PDT1) How many people in your group?
2) Are you a clergyman in this group?
3) How often do you meet?
4) Where do most of these people live?
5) Is this group growing in numbers or dwindling?
6) What are the goals of this group?
7) How does this group organize itself or does it have a community?
8) Is this group recognized by any organization or civil or international body?
9) Is this group persecuted in Iran or elsewhere? If so, can you reference any evidence to support this claim?
10) What would be considered an achievement for this group?
11) Could you tell us some of the principles of your Faith?
Don't get frustrated, just answer these questions. Looking in the mirror can't be that bad. (or is it?)
DETNUR
Faryarm's pot calling the mullahs' kettle black...
by NUR on Wed Apr 01, 2009 06:20 PM PDTFaryarm stated,
"I dont think any parent wants innocent, healthy young spirits exposed to the Cancer of lies, distortion and Division.
Once Cancer is recognized it is removed from healthy tissue."
Barak'allah! I was waiting to hear exactly something like this from you. If the Orthodox Baha'is and the critics of your cult are deemed by you cancer requiring removal, pray tell, why do you people then complain when the majoritarian society of Iran and the Islamic republic deem you Bahaim an insidious cancer requiring removal and permanent cure from amongst their midst? To orthodox Shi'ite Muslims Bahaism is a real cancer equal - if not more insidious - than the "cancer of Covenant Breakers" and Orthodox Baha'is amongst the Haifan Baha'is.
This is the key issue that goes to the very heart of your hypocrisy, faryarm, as well as the hypocrisy of your whole creed and that of JJ and his site here. The IRI is doing to you exactly what you people are justifying yourselves in doing to the Orthodox Baha'is and others amongst your critics. Face it, you Bahaim are exactly the same Fascists as the mullahs and the IRI, the only difference being attire and the grooming of facial hair - and that is all!
413
Bahaim Tactics & Techniques: CAUTION NON-BAHAIM
by NUR on Wed Apr 01, 2009 05:41 PM PDT(Bahaim, Hebrew plural of 'Behemot', meaning 'beast' or 'animal')
Start HERE (Sourcewatch): //www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Baha%27i_Faith
&
Baha'i Internet Agency //www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Baha%E2%80%99i_Internet_Ag...
Then look at,
SECTS OF BAHAIS: A Taxonomy of Baha'i Sects, //www.sectsofbahais.com/
&
Documentary film by independent Israeli film maker Naama Pyritz:
BAHA'IS IN MY BACKYARD
//video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2877478116441126906&hl=en-AU
-
US NSA vs OBF (Orthodox Baha'i Faith)
Recent court victory by the Orthodox Baha'is, and the suit brought by the Haifan Bahai organization against them:
//trueseeker.typepad.com/true_seeker/court_case.html
Judge's decision
//www.truebahai.info/court/139-opinion.pdf
**Appellate hearing (Feb 2009)***
//www.ca7.uscourts.gov/tmp/LF1FFZY0.mp3
-
BAHAI Tactics & Techniques - CAUTION NON-BAHAIS
"Slanderous Vilification" = The Baha'i Technique - Ad Hominem, Libel, Slander, Demonize, Scapegoat, Ostracize, Shun, Banish, Backbite, Defame, Vilify, Discredit, Smear, Revile, Suppress, Attack, Bully, Intimidate, Threaten, Malign, Blackball, Deceive, Coerce, Silence, Harass... etc., etc.... CAUTION NON-BAHAIS
1. As far as possible they hold back from responding
2. Then they claim no knowledge of the given issue by feigning
ignorance
3. After the exposer has exposed they will try to divert to secondary
and totally peripheral and irrelevent side-issues
4. The exposer is then painted as someone with an axe to grind,
biased, deluded (while they, the bahaim, still have not responded to
the main issue exposed)
5. Next they relate mental instability and insanity to the exposer,
i.e. shoot the messenger
6. Then, the last tactic, is to wheel out several dubious personas on
the scene who claim to be neutral non-bahai observers who then begin attacking the exposer as well as the issue exposed and supporting the bahais and their issues as so-called non-bahais
-
THEORY OF BAHA’I LYING & EQUIVOCATION
See Susan Stiles Maneck,
//bahai-library.com/bsr/bsr06/62_maneck_hikmat.htm
WISDOM AND DISSIMULATION IN THE BAHA’I WRITINGS: The Use and meaning of Hikmat in the Baha’i Writings
Quote
"In many cases hikmat calls for the apparent suspension of a Bahá'í principle in order to ensure the protection of the Faith."
-
BAHA'I ADMINISTRATIVE IDOLATRY & STALINISM
QUOTE
"We don't want to be like those people who want to see God with their own eyes, or hear His melody with their own ears, because we have been given the gift of being able to see through the eyes of the House of Justice and listen through the ears of the House of Justice." - Bahai Counselor Rebeque Murphy
To hear this section of her talk go to:
//media1.bahai.us/tab/Highlights/Sunday/30_Counselor_Murphy_Rema...
-
BAHAI NOTIONS of FREEDOM of CONSCIENCE according to EX-UHJ member DOUGLAS MARTIN -- Monday, September 23, 2001
//www.fglaysher.com/bahaicensorship/DMartin.htm
"We have inherited a dangerous delusion from Christianity that our
individual conscience is supreme. This is not a Baha'i belief. In the
end, in the context of both our role in the community and our role in
the greater world, we must be prepared to sacrifice our personal
convictions or opinions. The belief that individual conscience is
supreme is equivalent to "taking partners with God" which is abhorrent to the Teachings of the Faith."
//www.bahai-library.org/talks/martin.watson.html
NOTE especially, S.G. Wilson,
BAHAISM AND RELIGIOUS ASSASSINATION The Muslim World vol. 4, issue 4, 1914
&
BAHAISM AND RELIGIOUS DECEPTION The Muslim World, Volume 5, Issue 2, 1914-1915.
at,
//wahidazal66.googlepages.com/babidocuments%28westernsources%29
See as well, BAHAISM AND THE BRITISH
//bahaisandbritannia.googlepages.com/home
See as well,
//www.bayanic.com [CLICK tab BAHAISM]
&
William McElwee Miller,
THE BAHA'I FAITH: It's History and Teachings
//www.fglaysher.com/bahaicensorship/archives/Baha'i%20faith%20and%20Its%20Teachings%20by%20William%20McElwee%20Miller.htm
==CAUTION NON-BAHAIS==
413
disapointed in you
by sarbaz (not verified) on Wed Apr 01, 2009 05:29 PM PDTwhat ? just one liners? where are the prepared copy's of long speeches with the numbers and bold letters? this is not entertaining me at all...shame shame , I am so disappointed
I am all for protection
by NUR on Wed Apr 01, 2009 05:27 PM PDTWhat do you mean I don't like protection? I am all for contraception! You and your Bahaim friends here are perfect examples of its need and the failure of your parents in using it when they should have.
413
I sleep like a baby..
by NUR on Wed Apr 01, 2009 05:21 PM PDTHow do you sleep at night?
413
and another
by sarbaz (not verified) on Wed Apr 01, 2009 05:20 PM PDT12) what made you so bitter and little in life? did you get raped or something in prison? missing your daily dose of anti depressants?
Iranpresswatch: CAUTION NON-BAHAIM
by NUR on Wed Apr 01, 2009 05:19 PM PDT//www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Iran_Press_Watch
One More...
by faryarm on Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:26 PM PDT11) How Do you Sleep at night?
NUR....Just answer these questions and don't get upset!
by CAUTION DETOUR AHEAD on Wed Apr 01, 2009 09:52 AM PDT1) Tell me how many people in your group?
2) Are you a clergyman in this group?
3) How many in this group?
4) Where do most of these people live?
5) Is this group growing in numbers or dwindling?
6) What are the goals of this group?
7) How does this group organize itself or does it have a community?
8) Is this group recognized by any organization or civil or international body?
9) Is this group persecuted in Iran or elsewhere? If so, can you reference any evidence to support this claim?
10) What would be considered an achievement for this group?
Short answers that don't take a detour would be best.
DETNUR
Here, I Wrote It in Arabic So That You Can Understand
by Anonymous111 (not verified) on Wed Apr 01, 2009 08:10 AM PDTعزيزي السيد نور ، وأنا أكتب هذا في العربية ، لأنني أعرف أنك سوف تفهم على نحو أفضل كما هي لغتك اللسان. إذا كنت تحب الإسلام ، والإسلام في كل طابع الكثير ، لماذا لا يمكنك الانتقال إلى المملكة العربية السعودية أو النجف ، بحيث تستطيع أن تكون بجانب ضبط سفاح pedophile الحبيب علي بن Abitalib؟ في العالم ما تفعلون على Iranian.com؟ هذا الموقع مخصص لقضايا ايران. نحن لا نهتم التاريخ العربي. في الواقع ، نحن نحاول القضاء على هذا الفصل المظلم من تاريخنا. لذا ، يرجى التوقف عن الكتابة عن هذه الهرطقة. تبذلونها معتوه من نفسك.
We are all halal meat to them.
by concerned parent (not verified) on Wed Apr 01, 2009 07:48 AM PDTNur and his bosses dont like people to protect themselves. They are looking for 6 year olds, and promise a day care.
So ?Once CANCER is recognized it is removed from the healthy
by faryarm on Wed Apr 01, 2009 06:40 AM PDTSo what? Source watch as much as you want.
I dont think any parent wants innocent, healthy young spirits exposed to the Cancer of lies, distortion and Division.
Once Cancer is recognized it is removed from healthy tissue.
Crocodile tears By Azalis/Bayanis!
by x (not verified) on Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:31 AM PDTرقیبان ازلیِ بهائیت، نخستین مروجان نظریه توطئه
//bahaisandbritannia.googlepages.com/home
-Made in Azalis/Bayani=Nur
اما این اتهام از کجا سرچشمه می گیرد؟ ریشه اتهام ارتباط بهائیان با خارجیها چندگانه است.
در دوره اولیه دیانت بهائی، شاخه های مذهبی همسایه آن مانند "ازلیها" تیر این اتهام را به سوی بهائیت روانه کردند.
آن گونه که خانم مانگول بیات در کتاب "نخستین انقلاب ایران؛ تشیع و انقلاب مشروطیت 1909-1905"
(Iran's First Revolution: Shi'ism and the Constitutional Revolution of 1905-1909)
آورده است، ازلی ها که در جنبش مشروطیت فعال بودند و از نظر مذهبی رقیب بهائیان به شمار می رفتند، کوشیدند تا با جا انداختن برچسب "ارتباط با خارجی" حقانیت و اصالت دین بهائیت را به پرسش بگیرند.
ازلیها پیروان میرزا یحیی نوری، ملقب به صبح ازل، جانشین محمد علی باب، بنیادگذار آیین بابی، بودند و در آغاز به ضرورت جهاد و براندازی مسلحانهحکومت قاجاریه باور داشتند.
میرزا حسینعلی بهاء (بعدها بهاء الله)، برادر پدری میرزا یحیی نوری بود. پس از مدتی میان دو برادر بر سر جانشینی پدر اختلاف و دشمنی عمیق افتاد. بابیان به دو شاخه ازلی ها و بهائی ها تقسیم شدند. گروه ازلیها دیری نپایید و فروپاشید، اما بهائیان تا به امروز در سراسر جهان روی به گسترش و فزونی نهادند.
از سوی دیگر، بر پایه آنچه در کتاب "بریتانیا و انقلاب مشروطیت ایران 1911-1906؛ سیاست خارجی، امپریالیسم و مخالفت"
(Britain and the Iranian Constitutional Revolution of 1906-1911; Foreign Policy, Imperialism and Dissent(
، نوشتهمنصور بنکداریان آمده است، ارتداد شماری از یهودیان به آیین بابی و بهائی و نیز گرویدن شماری از انگلیسیها به بهائیت، بدگمانیها در بارهرابطهبابی ها و بهائی ها به "بیگانگان" را افزود.
گفتنی است که از آغاز پیدایش بهائیت، شمار فراوانی از روحانیان شیعه و پیروان ادیان دیگر مانند زردتشتی به این دین گرویده اند.
//www.bbc.co.uk/persian/iran/2009/02/090223_a...
مهدی خلجی
پژوهشگر مسايل اسلامی، واشنگتن
More Agenda from NUR
by sarbaz (not verified) on Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 PM PDThere is what mr NUR is fighting for.Bravo to you for your fake petriotism and your sense of right and wrong mr prophet!
the link below is some more good news for NUR and his beloved IRI
//www.iranpresswatch.org/2009/01/why-are-they...
Faryarms' ashk-i-temsah/crocodile tears
by NUR on Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:40 PM PDTFaryarm, your Baha'i Internet Agency was Sourcewatched this week. I wonder if you have something to say regarding several items on it, particularly this letter,
28 February 2008
To All National Spiritual Assemblies
Dear Bahá'í Friends,
We have been requested by the World Centre to alert you to the current activities of the Covenant-breaker Martin Lavallee on Facebook.com. This individual administers the "Orthodox Bahá'is" page on Facebook and also has a personal page on the site. There have been recent instances where Bahá'í youth with accounts on Facebook have unwittingly accepted invitations from Lavallee to be a "friend" or to become "members" of the Covenant-breaker page. Further, as a consequence of the Facebook networking scheme, if an individual accepts a direct invitation from Lavallee or any other member of his group, the "Friends" list (with e-mail addresses) of that individual becomes exposed. In this way, those with insincere intentions have the potential to directly contact an increasing number of Bahá'is, interactions that could pose a threat to the spiritual well-being of youth and other believers who are not deepened in the Covenant.
Each National Assembly will need to determine the necessity and most appropriate manner of discreetly informing believers of this situation in consultation and with the assistance of the Counsellors. In doing so it will of course be important to avoid creating undue anxiety or curiosity about the nature of Covenant-breaker material on the Internet..
It is our intention to provide more general guidance in the near future about how online social networks can be constructively and safely used by Bahá'ís.
With loving greetings,
Matt Weinberg Program Director Bahá'í Internet Agency
cc: Members of the Continental Boards of Counsellors
//www.truebahai.com/2008/03/bahai-internet.html
413
Tahirih or hate-monger of Far-Right propaganda
by NUR on Tue Mar 31, 2009 09:43 PM PDTTahirih, did you know that the name and handle you are using is actually an epithet of Fatima Zahra' , i.e. the wife of 'Ali (as) and daughter of Muhammad (sws)? And if you want to tout your Baha'i line, obviously you are aware the Tahirih Qurra'tul-'Ayn is regarded in the Bayan as the Return of Fatima Zahra' Herself?
I bet you didn't know any of these things. As a Bayani it is my business to have detailed and meticulous information about Islam - especially about the People of the House (ahl al-bayt) (peace and salutations be upon Them all) - because the Bayan is the continuation of Islam, and whereas you see only darkness in Islam based on the propaganda fed to you by the West and the Islamists, or because it is trendy right now to be an Islamophobe like you, I see the pure Light of the Divine in the Qur'an and in the example of the life of His Holiness the Beloved of the Godhead, Muhammad the Messenger (the Splendor of the Godhead be upon Him), and that of His exalted daughter and the Conjunction of the Twin Lights (majma al-nurayn), Fatima the Radiant (the Light of Splendor be upon Her), and 'Ali Murtaza, the Lion of the Godhead (the Radiance of Splendor be upon Him), and upon all of Their illustrious Household and Progeny (the Light of lights be upon Them in every moment, before every moment and after every moment). I do not hide or mask by Love (hubb) for the Most Pure and Most Holy Fourteen Infallibles of Islam. In the Bayan the absolute Love and total devotion to the People of the House is total and it is a fundamental and overriding bedrock and article of our faith, and we make no apologies to anyone about it - least of all to scumbag hikmat-playing Bahaim like you!
Think of me, and all Bayanis, as Islamo-Bayanis. We have no problem with the Tradition - especially the esoteric and mystical Tradition - of Islam. In fact we see ourselves as an intrinsic and central part of it. Where you under a different impression? If so, the impression formed was your own - and all wrong. Perhaps you should crack open real books rather than be brainwashed by Ruhi Institutes from here on out!
Now for my Muslim brother and sisters lurking, I would like to say,
ashhadu an la ilaha illa allah/I testify that there is no god but the Godhead!
wahdahu la sharik lahu/It is One without partner!
wa ashahdu an muhammadan 'abduhu wa rasuluhu/and I testify that Muhammad is Its servant and Its Messenger!
By saying this above, I also simultaneously say,
ashhadu an la ilaha illa allah haqqan haqqan/there is no god but the Godhead Truly, Truly!
wa ashhadu an 'aliyan qabla nabil mazhar nafs allah/and I testify that 'Ali before Nabil is the manifestation of the Logos-Self of the Godhead!
It is interesting that amongst the Westoxicated contingency of pseudo-Iranian fascists here - or in Tahirih's case, maybe Perth, Australian contingency of expatriot Americans - we are watching the attitudes and circumstances exhibited in the movie 'V for Vendetta' literally play out before our very eyes. In case anyone has forgotten what this movie is about, the central plot begins with Britain having become a totalitarian Fascist state ruled by the Far-Right Norsefire regime who has banned, amongst other things, Islam and the Qur'an. In the film the Qur'an becomes a poignant symbol of resistance to the tyranny of the regime!
As for Ibn Warraq, this guy is a product of his own PR and that of his Neo-Con and Zionist handlers. Same goes for Ali Sina of faithfreedom.org, who in real life is actually a Baha'i but in cyberspace is doing taqiyya/hikmat. That said, once again, I'd like to extend the challenge to either one of these two gentlemen to a live public debate regarding their propaganda models and warped interpretation of texts and history.
As for ex-uhj member Douglas Martin's so-called review of Miller's book, Manouchehr jan, do not waste your time with it. Or, rather, read Miller all the way through and then read Martin's trash pseudo-review. You will see for yourself that Martin is much ado about nothing. And just remember, Douglas Martin is the same person who said "freedom of conscience is a dangerous delusion from Christianity"! Miller has its problems, of course, but not for the reasons pointed out by Martin.
And with that said, I say,
La Fata illa 'Ali la Sayf illa Dhu'l-Fiqar!
413
skeptism alright read Robert Spencer, Ibn Warraq...
by ya who? (not verified) on Tue Mar 31, 2009 06:35 PM PDTFrom Ibn Warraq's why the West is the best.
Here is an account of some Moslems, with plenty of books on the Prophet Mohammad (PBUH). Astaghforellah none is true but its good to know anyways.
//astore.amazon.com/yadnew-20/detail/08797598...
//astore.amazon.com/yadnew-20/detail/15739294...
keep an open mind
Faryam Aziz;
by Manoucher Avaznia on Tue Mar 31, 2009 05:08 PM PDTI am happy that people like you who have the knowledge in the field engage their authority and try to clarify matters. The day is day of sckepticism. I beleive more than adverse propaganda, the spirit of the age had more to contribute to the people's appathy toward divinity, however I personally think its is dangersous and eventually ruins the spirit, without trying to advise anyone to believe in a divine school of thought or not.
Thanks
Dear Manoucher Khan..
by faryarm on Tue Mar 31, 2009 03:55 PM PDTThank you , Manoucher Khan, I do agree, howwever, the review of Millers Book, is useful for the mostly unfamiliar to history and in particular Bahai history as it exposes the kind and quality of scholarship, sources and the dark motives behind the kind of attacks and baseless accusations suffered by Bahais for the last 160 years, by Azalis and others.
Unfortunately, such tired old tactics may by their poison have slowed the progress of Bahai faith, but it certainly has not prevented its discovery by fair minded and pure searching souls.
Fortunately, Bahais can only watch in silent amusement as these dark characters, by their tone, language, offensive graphics, discredited sources and texts ,reveal their only purpose in life; a life blind to the truth and absent of love and reverence.
regards
faryarm
Faryam Aziz;
by Manoucher Avaznia on Tue Mar 31, 2009 01:31 PM PDTI dearly appreciate your valuable comments and information about missionaries and specifically Miller. Quite honestly, I can add volumes to their roles in paving the way for the spread of colonialism, enslavement of the non-European peoples, and deculturalization of communities all over the globe. Also, their ties to their governments and different interprises are not concealed to me. Nevertheless, we cannot ignore what they say. A critical reader will not accept everything they say and neither will he reject everything they say. It is evident in many places of Miller's work, of which I have read about two hundred pages so far, that the author is trying hard to refute Bahai'sm. Still, from many points of view this is a good book to read. Keeping onself in darkness is not good. In no way I am trying to convey that you intend to do that. I am talking to inquiring skeptical minds; not the people of faith as they have come to their colcusions already and do not need my (little) preaching and I respect them for their faith.
Again, I enjoyed your post and thank you for that.
to Anonymous observer!
by AnonymousBidin (not verified) on Tue Mar 31, 2009 01:10 PM PDTخدمت شما عرض کنم همانطور که شما خودتان را خیلی بهتر از ملل دیگر میدانید در اینجا هم دانمارکی ها خودشان را خیلی خیلی بهتر از من و شمای ایرانی میدونند.
امروزه بسیاری از ایرانی ها خودشان را حتی یک میلی مترهم از کوروش کبیر جدا نمیدانندو این در حالی هست که یکی از ارمانهای بزرگ این ابر مرد تاریخ احترام به حقوق انسانی کلیه شهروندان ایرانی بود به عبارت دیگه احترام به حقوق بشر.
به قول دکتر محمد مصدق :از نظر من مسلمان و بهايی فرق ندارند همه از يك ملت و ايرانی هستند.
بيانيه سازمان سوسياليست های ايران
سهشنبه ۲٨ خرداد ۱٣٨۷ - ۱۷ ژوئن ۲۰۰٨
//www.ois-iran.com/start.html
What the %$#@?
by Anonymous Observer on Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:08 PM PDTI feel like I'm in a Predetor vs. Aliens movie where two foreign species are fighting on planet Earth. Here we have the Bahais fighting this Bayani creature over who is right for Iran. Two foreign religions, both with roots in Arabia, both based on some gibberish half baked philosophy by a power hungry, blood thirsty, manipulative pedophile who couldn't get the "arajeef" in his book straight. Anyone who has read that compilation of BS called Quran can see how self condradicting it is. The only consistent themes in it are violence and sex. And before you call me a Christian or a "Zionist", the same goes for all other Abrahamic philosophies, such as Christianity or Judaism.
So, please, ladies and gentlemen, if you want to fight over who is correct, "Bahais" or "Bayanis", please take your fight to where it belongs, Arabia, and leave Persia out of this!
Nur, or shall say agent of darkness it is obvious who you are!
by Tahirih on Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:22 AM PDTFor a non Muslim you have such a detail information about Hazrate Ali!!
It is great to write about such a great character,but have to say that in doing so you have exposed yourself, at least to me :)))
You are from the depths of Islamic republic . I like it at least I know who we are dealing with.
Is lying 101 the start course that you guys take there:))))
Tahirih:))
THE MISSIONARY AS HISTORIAN: William Miller and the Bahá'í Faith
by faryarm on Tue Mar 31, 2009 09:26 AM PDTFor a fair judgment of William Miller's "scholarship" it would be useful to review the book's approach, its conclusions and examine Miller's sources and real agenda, eighty years after its was written.
I first came across William Miller’s Book at my college library. It did not take long for me to recognise Miller’s real motive and agenda, when at the time of writing the book in 1931, the respected Rev. Miller dismisses the Bahá'í Faith as "a dying movement," a minor "sect" which was on the point of disappearing entirely from the world scene: "It is only a matter of time until this strange movement ... shall be known only to students of history."4
continued:
//iranian.com/main/blog/faryarm/missionary-historian-william-miller-and-bah-faith
Thank you Nur
by Manoucher Avaznia on Tue Mar 31, 2009 08:52 AM PDTFor the posting.
Miller's whole book
by NUR on Tue Mar 31, 2009 01:54 AM PDTDear Manouchehr,
Apologies for the delay. Here it is. Enjoy!
//www.fglaysher.com/bahaicensorship/archives/Baha'i%20faith%20and%20Its%20Teachings%20by%20William%20McElwee%20Miller.htm
413
Nur;
by Manoucher Avaznia on Mon Mar 30, 2009 09:39 PM PDTSometime ago, in the context of another essay, you posted The Bahai Faith: Its Principles and Teachings by Miller. What you had posted was only one hundred seventy pages of the over four-hundred-page-long book that was way short of being complete. Can you, please, post the rest of the book and some missing pages in between as well.
Thanks
what a bigger waste...Westoxication/gharbzadegi
by NUR on Mon Mar 30, 2009 05:45 PM PDTSquandering the earth's resources and wealth bankrolling ponsey schemes benefitting the global elite. If only the global elite had spent this kind of dough that Bernie Madoff blew on BS trying to serve the planet reconstruct its devastated environment. How much of the Amazon rainforests could've been reclaimed just with an eighth of Madoff's scam money?
You two anonymouses are utterly pathetic - not to mention blind as bats in the middle of daylight - but all too typical of a certain uprooted culture of pseudo-Iranians in North America. Islam, and in its Iranian esoteric/mystical version, is the cultural heritage of Iran - at least the cultural heritage of real living Iranians as opposed to Iranians in name such as you lot! Unfortunately most of you sitting in the bubble of Tehrangeles are too intoxicated by your sellout gharbzadegi/Westoxication to appreciate the fact that your cultural heritage, what Henry Corbin called En islam iranien, is one of the most profound spiritual cultures the world has ever seen, rivaling China and India in depth. But as is all too typical, these two Baha'i anonymouses are so enamoured by their blonde haired, blued eyed Anglo-saxon master's bi-farhangi/culture-less and unrootedness that they must ape the WASP in everything, and so thus have become apes and servants to the WASP themselves.
Also, FYI, this very site is bankrolled by the IRI. Where are you/koja'i? And also, answer this, where the Shah and Farah agents of the IRI too because esoteric Islam was the Islam they both followed?
You people and those like you two anonymouses are an utter disgrace to humanity, let alone Iran so no wonder the mullahs are still in power in Iran after 30 years. The people of Iran would rather have the mullahs stay indefinitely than have them replaced by Westoxicated WASP apes like you and your Bahaim Zionista friends!
413