In this program: Is President Obama dropping the ball on the human rights situation in Iran?
Recently by Jahanshah Javid | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
Hooman Samani: The Kissinger | 4 | Aug 31, 2012 |
Eric Bakhtiari: San Francisco 49er | 6 | Aug 26, 2012 |
You can help | 16 | Aug 23, 2012 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
It is simple
by amirkabear4u on Thu Nov 05, 2009 04:56 AM PSTif Iran had a pro western government then westerners (or more correctly politicians);
- Could not have sufficient excuses to do what they wanted to do in middle east,
- Had to give friendly loans.
- Had to do better business deals which in turn would reduce their profit,
- Had to buy oil for higher price.
- Could sell less arms,
- Muslems would not be terrorists
And finally their life would not be so interesting if there were not mullahs in Iran. Privately they prefer this IRI.
ALSO another possibility is that they may not even be able to change Iran.