Raising the Costs of A Habit

Share/Save/Bookmark

Ardeshir Ommani
by Ardeshir Ommani
09-Jan-2012
 

Altria Group is the leading cigarette maker in the U.S. The stock of the company rose 20% in 2011's depressed markets and it's up 50% over the past two years, nearly four times the market's gain. About two weeks ago, the stock of the company, which is the parent of Philip Morris USA and that of the Marlboro brand hit a 52-week high of $36.40.

The rise in its stock price is influenced by the company's stable cash flow and a dividend yield of 5.5%. At the time when money market rates are less than 0.5%, and the 10-year Treasury is yielding less than 2%, the stocks of Altria Group attracts all the attention of the investors who do not ask how many smokers would die this year because of addiction and succumbing to lung cancer. It is worth noting that on Dec. 23, 2011, from Richmond, Virginia, Altria's operating companies launched 'Citizens for Tobacco Rights', a nation-wide website to assist the tobacco companies in promoting lowering taxes on cigarette sales.

Although U.S. cigarette sales have been in a severe long-term decline, to be exact, its shipments dropped by a third over the past 10 years, the industry has been able to offset the volume decline with increases in wholesale prices. Naturally after addicting a large segment of the youth around the world, the owners of Altria Corporation are led to raise the cost of their habits and suffering.

The companies have raised cigarette prices by nearly 35% over the last 10 years, even as smokers shouldered huge jumps in federal and state cigarette taxes. Altogether retail prices and additional taxes hiked the cost of a pack to $5.95. This was more than double the rise in overall consumer prices. This shows that the high rates of profitability in addictive substances is the ideal method of exploiting not only the workers, but also the consumers. The change in the demographics of cigarette addicts has forced the industry to intensify the rate of exploitation of those who can least afford the habit in a long period of economic stress and high rates of unemployment.

The captains of the stock market seem unshaken. The stocks look rich based on their double-digit price per earning ratios. The high rates of profitability in the industry have led the management to implement the strategy of stock buybacks and huge stock awards for management compensation.

Altria, by far the biggest U.S. cigarette maker in both market weight ($61 billion ) and revenue-wise (over $16 billion a year) is the biggest culprit in spreading addiction and physical infirmity. A substantial share of the company profits are generated outside the U.S. Philip Morris International, a subsidiary of Altria, sells Philip Morris brand lineups in about 180 countries around the world. In other words, the men, women and more frequently, elementary-aged children – at the cost of their lives – are providing these gentlemen in New York and Chicago with lavish life-styles. (Looking at just a few of the advertisements in major corporate newspapers as the Financial Times, New York Times, The Telegraph, etc. directed at this wealthy 1%, we see a woman's handbag selling for $4,000.00)

In 2009, Altria purchased the smokeless-tobacco producer UST, which makes Copenhagen and Skoal brands at the cost of $11.7 billion. The reason Altria shouldered such a high cost price is that smokeless tobacco is a much-less regulated part of the worldwide cigarette market. Lack of regulations leaves the smokers at the mercy of the tobacco industry. Altria generates in an average $3.5 billion a year in cash flow, most of which ends in the investor's bank accounts in the form of dividends and interests and conspicuous consumption.

As a group, cigarette smokers have lower household incomes than non-smokers and are nearly twice as likely to be unemployed, says a financial officer of Morgan Stanley, a banking corporation. Studies have shown that in communities with higher economic status, its members send their children to better-financed public schools and private universities where environmental sciences and healthier life-styles are emphasized in the educational curriculum from early grade school through university level. Anti-smoking campaigns partially financed by higher city and state budgets are more predominant on expensive billboards in these higher income communities.

On average a member of this lower economic class spends more than $2,000.00 annually, smoking a pack a day, the amount that could be allocated towards the present and future sustenance. Smokers, in their attempts to halt casting a large amount of money to the rich, many have traded down to either cheaper cigarettes or bulk tobacco for rolling their own cigarettes. For this reason, shipments of roll-your-own and pipe tobacco jumped 30% in the first half of 2011. In the brave new world, particularly the Facebook generation age 21 through 29 is no longer fascinated with that rugged cowboy who was for many decades the symbol of Marlboro.

Alongside Altria in the tobacco market stand such giants as Reynolds American, maker of Camel and Pall Mall as well as Natural Spirit brands selling the ugly and more hazardous chewing tobacco brands. To entice new smokers or keep the old ones in the loop, the cigarette companies constantly hatch out new names with new packets. Recently, Philip Morris USA came up with what it calls the "Marlboro Leadership Program" which puts a price cap on what the retailers can charge for a pack of Marlboro in return for promotional incentives, such as a free pack for every carton sold.

While in the U.S., after years of public pressure, the federal and state governments have imposed some restrictions on advertising and marketing tobacco products, the same companies in the markets of the developing countries promote and glamorize smoking among school children, going so far as to distribute free packs of cigarettes along the pathways leading to schools, the way they did just a few decades ago in the run-down parts of the big cities and the depressed small towns across the U.S. Also, the ruling classes of the countries whose economies are dependent on the U.S. and its' partners benefit from such relations through providing lucrative markets for the tobacco products of the major international cigarette producers.

It is telling that the gains posted by these tobacco companies in 2011 was skyrocketing when few other stocks were thriving last year. A group of mutual fund managers who tried to avoid negative performance by the end of the year resorted to placing the shares of several tobacco firms among their top holdings. Gains of more than 20% among the addiction enablers helped these funds outperform their rivals and attracted the moderate savings and the retirement funds of the employed and retired working class. Such is the political economy of the habit-forming industry, addiction of the oppressed and higher rates of profitability.

AUTHOR
Writer: Ardeshir Ommani is a writer on issues of war, peace, U.S. foreign policy and economic issues. He has two Masters Degrees in the fields of Political Economy and Mathematics Education. Contact Info: Ardeshiromm@optonline.net

Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by Ardeshir OmmaniCommentsDate
The Great Heist
6
May 17, 2012
Boom!
3
Mar 01, 2012
Can the U.S. Swallow Syria?
8
Feb 12, 2012
more from Ardeshir Ommani
 
G. Rahmanian

As Shameless As These Two Are!

by G. Rahmanian on

As Shameless As These Two Are, they would do or say anything for personal gains! In the past four decades, this Omani guy has spent only a few months in Iran. Out of fear for his worthless life, he packed and left Iran as soon as Iraqi forces attacked our country and didn't go back for twenty years.


default

Ommani actually issued a statement calling for execution of all

by Hooshang Tarreh-Gol on

who opposed the result of election.

Mr. Ommani do you recall that statement? Do you have anything to say on that, or you just like to hide behind your other avatars in here.

Simorgh jaan, thanks for your complement, and I really don't like to pedantic, but violence and physical elimination of political opponents is wrong, and to be condemned, no matter who it is aimed at. Have a great day.

 


Simorgh5555

Hooshang-well done!

by Simorgh5555 on

Brilliant link to Ardeshir and his wife Elanor talking to chat show host Harold Hudson Channer. 

 //www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPLc3nZnoHE

Channer is flabbergasted when Ardeshir Ommani tells him that there is no American embassy in Iran  at 47.00  

How naive an American chat show host must be that he is unaware that for the last 30 years the USA does not even have an embassy in the country. Channer must have been living in Mars in 1979 during the American embassy hostage take-over.  He could have done his background research in the country. 

These two overweight fake peace activist husband and wife team say that the most of the demonstrators were all rich well-to-do people from Northern Tehran who own property more expensive than Manhattan and want more power. He also implies that most Iranians are stupid because they believe that America is paved with gold and they only aspire for material prosperity. 

 Iranians need to be aware of mouth pieces of the IR masquerading as peace activists. 

 

 


default

Mr. Ommani, when you were demanding IR officials to execute all

by Hooshang Tarreh-Gol on

opposition figures, two yearsa go, were you also concerned about their "health,"or you made an exception in the case of your political opponents?

Dearest Ommani, how do you translate SANG PAY GHAZVIN to English?