The Cyrus Cylinder is one of the most important historical documents in Iranian history. It also has special significance for humanity at large because it is one of the earliest declarations that recognizes certain human rights, such as religious freedom. I won't go far as calling Cyrus a champion of human rights. He certainly was no freedom fighting democrat! Nevertheless, he was one of the more enlightened dictators of his time.
Now that the British Museum has indefinitely postponed loaning the cylinder to the Islamic Republic, the question being asked by many Iranians is: who really owns ancient objects? Foreign museums or the country of origin? Are they safer in London or in Tehran?
Last night I posted a poll asking whether the British Museum should go ahead and loan the Cyrus Cylinder. For most of the day some 60% of the votes were against the loan. Then suddenly, in a couple of hours, hundreds of new votes were registered and reversed the result. We looked at our database and sure enough the poll had been compromised and the results reversed. It is impossible to say with absolute certainty that agents of the Islamic Republic or its supporters are responsible, but who else would tamper with the votes?
It is embarrassing for the Islamic Republic when a clear majority of Iranians -- at least among those living abroad -- oppose the display of such an important historical object in Iran. They oppose it not because they prefer the British to protect their heritage, rather they simply don't trust the current rulers in Iran.
The Islamic Republic does not have a distinguished record in protecting and preserving pre-Islamic monuments or objects. And with Cyrus turning into a symbol of a glorious era before the fall of the Persian Empire by the armies of Islam, it's hard to believe that the Islamic Republic has any real love for the Cyrus Cylinder. Would it be destroyed if it is loaned? I don't think so. But it could become the focus of another international showdown.
Relations between the two countries have never been great since the 1979 revolution and lately they have been deteriorating. Last June $1.6 billion of Iranian government assets in UK banks were frozen. Just a few days ago the British banned dealings with a major Iranian bank and Iran's largest state-run shipping organization. And of course Britain is a leading member of the Western alliance trying to put pressure on Iran to stop its uranium enrichment activities. If the cylinder is loaned to Iran under these circumstances, there's a good chance that the Islamic Republic would refuse to return it and take advantage of the people's historic mistrust of the British, as well as the popularity of the cylinder, to shore up its dismal popularity following the rigged elections.
I was pretty excited when I saw the real thing during my visit to London this summer. There were numerous other spectacular objects on display and I wondered: why are they here and not in Iran? It's only natural that almost every Iranian wants them permanently returned. But right now is not the best time.
Recently by Jahanshah Javid | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
Hooman Samani: The Kissinger | 4 | Aug 31, 2012 |
Eric Bakhtiari: San Francisco 49er | 6 | Aug 26, 2012 |
You can help | 16 | Aug 23, 2012 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Yes But Darius Can't ;0))
by Darius Kadivar on Wed Oct 14, 2009 04:14 AM PDTVIVE LA REVOLUTION ROYALE !
//iranian.com/main/blog/darius-kadivar/happy-birthday-your-majesty-0
LOL
I agree...
by Princess on Wed Oct 14, 2009 08:26 AM PDTthat IRI cannot be trusted with such a priceless historic artifact.
I also believe that despite the injustice of having one of our national treasures owned by and displayed in another country, it is in fact a good thing it is in London for the time being.
London and the British Museum get millions of visitors from around the globe every year. IMHO this is a much better place to publicize this particular artifact on behalf of the Iranian people and have it serve as a reminder of our history, at least until Iran becomes an open society which draws, facilitates and welcomes visits by people from around the world again.
Dear Jahanshah
by Passing Through on Wed Oct 14, 2009 02:00 AM PDTThe loaning of the Cyrus Cylinder to the Iranian authorities would be the epitome of foolishness.
This is an irreplacable object.
Not only it belongs to our Beloved Iranians, but also to the rest of the World at large.
With the disdain that the present regime has for the glorious times in our past, The Greater Iran, The First Iranshahr, it would be highly unlikely that this magnificent Cyrus Cylinder would be properly protected and taken care of.
And if something happens to it, then what
This Cyrus Cylinder should be loaned when there is a proper 'Secular Democracy' in our Beloved Iran.
With what happened during the Presidential Election in Iran a few months ago, it would be a travesty to give such an invaluable object to this bunch.
Pure and Simple .....
Tks
...
by Red Wine on Wed Oct 14, 2009 01:35 AM PDTباز از حکمت ایرانی و ایرانی زاده و غیره، در تعجبم !
این همه سال این سنگ در اختیار انگلو ساکسنها بوده است،چرا حالا به یاد باز گشتنش افتادیم ؟!
این جور بحثها وقت تلف کردن است و در کلّ تف سر بالا ... پس این خدا کی جواب ما بینوایان را میدهد ؟!
مرگ بر جمهوری اسلامی .
I think your theory is right, JJ
by Ari Siletz on Wed Oct 14, 2009 01:16 AM PDTThat's one possibility Ari
by Jahanshah Javid on Wed Oct 14, 2009 01:03 AM PDTIn my opinion the other -- likely -- possibility is that the regime would refuse to return this symbol (remember they have only agreed to borrow it) and turn it into an anti-British campaign.
What am I missing?
by Ari Siletz on Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:50 AM PDT