Israel says U.S. sees need for "tangible action" on Iran
Reuters
17-May-2008 (11 comments)

The United States and Israel agree on the need for "tangible action" to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's spokesman said after a visit by U.S. President George W. Bush.

>>>
Q

are bombings "tangible" ?

by Q on

US and Israel have "agreed" Iran does not need nucler energy.


Share/Save/Bookmark

 
default

Which Is More Important, Islam or Iran?

by Pissed Off (not verified) on

During Iraq-Iran war, Ayattolahs sent hundreds of thousands of Iranians to their death in the name of defending Islam and no one seemed to be able to do anything about it.

Ayattolahs told Iranian people Islam needed sacrifice.

I read somewhere that about 3% of Iran's population, at the time, died as direct and indirect consequences of the war.

Now, let's imagine seven million Iranians die in the upcoming bombing of Iran by the Allied forces, that's only 10% of the present population and the rest will have a free country to rebuild.

After all, which is more important, Islam or Iran?


default

speak loudly the sound of hypocracy

by mehdi Mazloom (not verified) on

afshin writes:
"I could give a rat's ass about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. But if any cretin thinks they can threaten me, my race, my religion, my people, my identity with obliteration and I will sit here and agree with them and nod in approval just because I don't like the Iranian government, they have another thing coming."

As an Israeli. Me too, I also couldn't care less about Hamas and its destructive agenda. Notwithstanding, isn't the Iranian leadership is the one which threatens my race, my religion, my people, my identity with obliteration, and I will sit here and agree with them and nod in approval just because I don't like the "Zionist" government, they have another thing coming."

You see, your own words can be used to address the concern of the other (Israel) side.

Beside, it is the wishes of 80% of the Iranians themselves, and rest of the world to see this regime gone. Replaced by a secular and democratic government, where people have the fundamental right of freedom.

ahamad.bahai writes:
"If you cannot bring them under your control and/or to enslave them, destory their homes and other property, make them suffer by cutting off their food and medicine supplies, kill thier children so that they will not have a future generation, enslave them and put them in prisons when nothing else works".

This is the exact agenda of those Mullahs in Tehran.
If people do not wish to see the Israelis attack the Hamas to stop their nonsense rocket attacks on Israel, then, Hamas should not give reasons to Israel to attack them.

Hamas leadership is so stupid and full of hatred, they can even see how they are falling intro Israel & US's trap, time and time again. Adios to one Palestinian state, and welcome to state of Patahland, and Hamastan.


default

Bush is not letting go and Israel is such a hypocrit!

by Anonymous-2 (not verified) on

Nothing is new about the Bush Admin. or infact previous U.S. Administrations. However, Bush/Cheney have had an agenda when they came to power to get rid of countries who were not marching to the tune of the U.S. and of course Israel has an interest to ensure that no other country in the Middle East dares stand against their agenda in the region.

I don't need to reiterate all that Afshin and Ahmad have already said - as I agree with their comments totally. I now agree that Iran needs nuclear deterrant; this is the only way to prevent bullies from threatening you. Look at how they are engaging in direct talks with North Korea, Pakistan, India and all other countries who have nuclear weapons.

Do you think John McCain would have dared say bomb, bomb, bomb Pakistan, or Hillary would have dared to say we will obliterate Pakistan or North Korea? NO way!

In fact it is necessary to have a balance of power against Israel in the Middle East. Else they will have a free hand in their continuous rampage across the region. If there is ever going to be an arms race in the Middle East and the third world it will be the doing of the U.S. and Israel.

Another hypocrisy listen to this statement that Bush made while in Egypt right after his visit to Israel:
"Bush says Palestinians' plight "breaks my heart" - what a bunch of bullshit.

He has never condemned Israel for the attrocities that Israel has committed against the Palestinians, he has never visited Gaza to see how these people live - in a walled in prison; their orchards and olive groves destroyed by Israel,and a people who have absolutely no right whatsoever.

His heart bleeds while he continues to dish out billions of dollars to Israel in military arsenals so that they can continue to murder the Palestinians.

One thing for sure the U.S. is not an honest broker when it comes to the Middle East - everything is for the benefit of Israel and no other country has any right whatsoever.


default

Yup!

by IS (not verified) on

Don't worry it is not Iran that will attack them.
Their so-called Arab Allies will eventually turn against them and finish them off. At that time Iran will be mostly a bystander.


ahmad.bahai

Isreal Policy: Destory, Kill, Block food and Medicine to Publ...

by ahmad.bahai on

Blood suckers in Tel Aviv have a public policy against the rest of the world. It is as follows:

"If you cannot bring them under your control and/or to enslave them, destory their homes and other property, make them suffer by cutting off their food and medicine supplies, kill thier children so that they will not have a future generation, enslave them and put them in prisons when nothing else works".

Blood suckers are applying that policy to Palestinains, and wish they could do to Iranians. They may one day apply that policy  to their "allies" in Washington, DC as well. Wait and see!!!  Count my words!


Zion

Q

by Zion on

You mean `tangible evidence`? :-)


afshin

Non-Proliferation Treaty

by afshin on

Whenever Israel renounces illicit use of nuclear technology and allows inspectors from UN and the IAEA to inspect all of their sites, and not just what they have at Dimona, then they can open their mouths. Until then they can take their ideas and comments and shove it! Forget peaceful nuclear technology. Hillary Clinton has threatened Iran and Iranians with obliteration. Even if the Iranian government never had any intention to procure nuclear weapons, NOW they have an obligation to pursue it. We now NEED a nuclear deterrent. You don't get to threaten 70 million people with genocide just because we're the underdogs. All you people who gave money to that woman (Clinton), how stupid do you feel now? If she and the likes of our resident Nazi here Mr. Zion had it their way, there would be no Iran.

I've been watching with much amusement for the past few months people like Madadi, and Zion and the cast of many other misfits who see it as appropriate to come on a website and promote the apratheid policies and agendas of a bastard nation state such as Israel. I've said it before, and I'll say it again. I could give a rat's ass about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. But if any cretin thinks they can threaten me, my race, my religion, my people, my identity with obliteration and I will sit here and agree with them and nod in approval just because I don't like the Iranian government, they have another thing coming.


Q

I'm just going on what there's evidence for

by Q on

you're familiar with the concept of evidence, right Zion?


Zion

Ministry of Truth methods

by Zion on

Very convenient how `nuclear weapons` in the news article automatically changes to `nuclear energy` in your comments.
Amusing....


default

Tangible means destruction

by Mammad (not verified) on

Everything is finite. Even the universe, as vast as it is, is finite. The only thing that seems to be infinite is the arrogance of G. W. Bush, his administration, and that of the usual Israeli crowd.

The US and Israel have "agreed" that Iran does not need nuclear ebergy, as if Iran is a banana republic in Central or South America in the 1950s, 0r 60s, or 70s, when a US General in command of the Southern Command had more power that the leaders of these countries.

Tangible also means military attacks that would result in vast destruction. Make no mistake: If the US and Israel knew how to control the aftermath of military attacks on Iran, they would have attacked Iran by now. The only thing that prevents them from attacking is the uncertainty about how Iran and the rest of the region would react, and its effect on the economy of the US and the price of oil.