As a result, Israeli military officials believe the Islamic republic could have a nuclear weapon by the middle of 2009.
>>>Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
IRI & WMD - Fallacy
by n3m 1s1s (not verified) on Mon May 26, 2008 09:11 AM PDTNo the US or Israel would start WWIII by attacking Iran,
which would be a war crime under standards international and civilised behavior.
Who exactly died and made the US sherrif that it can arbeit the truth or a lie?
That it can decide which countries can have technology and which can't and which countries have a right to defend themselves and which can't.
The fact is - no one.
Even if Iran did seek nuclear weapons (and that is an unsubstantiated allegation.)
Iran is a sovereign country and does not need to look to the United States for 'by your leave.'
Israel is a down-right menace and flagrantly breaks every international law in the book, and yet is allowed to do so with US largesse.
Iran is a threat to no one but those that threaten Iran.
Quite unlike the US and Israel.
IRI & WMD
by Pissed Off (not verified) on Mon May 26, 2008 07:14 AM PDTAllowing IRI to acquire WMD is a prelude to the Third World War!
MEK
by n3m 1s1s (not verified) on Mon May 26, 2008 04:43 AM PDTIt's funny how the MEK are using technology like
//www.giyus.org/ now.
Reading the first couple of comments, it's quite clear.
This is where US is spending it's citizen's tax dollars to undermine the people of Iran by supporting real terrorists.
Why?
by n3m 1s1s (not verified) on Mon May 26, 2008 04:35 AM PDTIsrael says this, Israel says that.
Ahmadinejad did not threaten Israel's existance.
Israel's unjust system of apartheid against Arabic speaking people threatens Israel's existance.
Israel should sue for peace with it's neighbours - make a just settlement with the half of its population which is not of Hebrew descent and end it's militaristic relationship with the United States.
Threatening an illegal attack on Iran on manufactured and unsubstantiated grounds will not end happily.
Jewish people are a Semitic people who belong in the Middle east, but the idiots who support an Israel right or wrong policy in the United States are stupid, blind, prejudiced and very dangerous.
Their money and support just makes orphans and kills children.
Islamists' fascination
by Fred on Mon May 26, 2008 03:45 AM PDTTakeout “blood”, "Zionist" and " Israel" from the Islamist’s diction and they become speechless.
"unrelenting attacks" against a nuclear power with latest
by Q on Mon May 26, 2008 12:49 AM PDTmilitary toys and best army in the region.
Just something really funny about that.
Does anyone still wonder.
by mehdi Mazloom (not verified) on Sun May 25, 2008 09:59 PM PDTconsidering the Mullahs unrelenting attack against Israelś very existence. Does anyone in his right mind still wonders Israel pure defensive measures.
What would any country in Israelś position would do. Israel is justified to take the necessary steps to protect its citizens and its existence.
This are not Israeliś word - they are come from the little midget in Tehran