US senator opens Iran nuclear debate
Financial Times / Daniel Dombey
10-Jun-2009 (3 comments)

“The Bush administration [argument of] no enrichment was ridiculous . . . because it seemed so unreasonable to people,” said Mr Kerry, citing Iran’s rights as a signatory of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. “It was bombastic diplomacy. It was wasted energy. It sort of hardened the lines, if you will,” he added. “They have a right to peaceful nuclear power and to enrichment in that purpose.”

>>>
Disenchanted

Bush's no enrichment demand is ridiculus Sen.Kerry

by Disenchanted on Wed Jun 10, 2009 07:53 PM PDT

Now you know what difference it makes who is in White House. Never underestimate the damage a self righteous fool can inflict on the world. Iranian presidential election is two days away!

 



Balatarin
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
default

the end goal is the same, the strategy is different!

by Gullible finder (not verified) on Thu Jun 11, 2009 05:55 AM PDT

Don't be fooled by these rhetorics! it is called real politik!


  •  
nojanthegreat

hey some one is getting it

by nojanthegreat on Thu Jun 11, 2009 12:49 AM PDT

hey some one is getting it right. now let start on new deal shall we ?

  •