News

The web browser is not the problem

nor is the link.  The problem is you are bisavad and cannot read Farsi even basically enough to get this report.  Otherwise you would see that it says nothing about the GCC doing a first strike on anyone, and everything about the details of what would happen in the air in case of a conflict.  And it is not pretty for the people of Iran, with whom you have zero familiarity.

Looks like you are the one who needs an education.  Badly.

My web browser can't use the

My web browser can't use the link provided. Is the URL in Persian or is it simply a bad link?

Anyway, there are many analyses published on the deterrent defense policy of Iran, the potential closure of the SoH and even a match up between Gulf air forces. 

Not long ago I responded to a mid-ranking US Army officer's piece advocating Gulf AFs be employed in a first-strike in place of of IASF and USAF/USN resources. Most respondents to my reply agreed such a scenario was far from optimal for a variety of reasons.

I'd outline the reasons but I realize education is not an interest of certain individuals of an anti-Iran persuasion. So we'll just leave it at that.

people read too much into this thing

When US/Israel decide to target the nuclear facilities, the leadership assets, and Basij and IRGC sites, the entire operation will be over inside of a week.  The remainig loyal forces will shed garb and join the democratic forces.  What remains to fight will be annihilated inside the same compounds they are stationed to protect.  So none of this "entire region engulfed in hell fire" nonsense.  It did not happen in Iraq, and it did not happen in Afganistan, and it will not happen for Iran either.  Relax enjoy your glass of wine, sit back and watch this worthless Islamic Rapists Cultists apparatus crumble. 

Good thing Mark Merat can't read Farsi

otherwise he would have been all over this post...boring us with his nonsense.