They say pride will come before the fall. Excessive pride will blind you to the truth and stops you from advancing. Iranians have a long tradition of worshiping pride. National pride, in specific, although has helped us through some tough times in our history and in many ways ensured the survival of our country and identity, but it appears that we never learned when to stop being proud and start looking at the shortages. So in the hope of breaking this centuries old tradition, I have come up with a list of 10 things that I believe are wrong with the Iranian political and social psyche .Of course, that does not apply to all, and I believe we have come a long way in breaking with this tradition, but this is for those whom still have that excessive sense of pride:
1. We love conspiracy theories. This is a direct result of centuries of tyranny and oppression of people’s voice. Our people never got their voice heard, and decision makings usually happened behind close doors thus leaving no room for genera ass to view the process. That obviously raises rumors, and from those rumors, come conspiracy theories. A sad part of all this is we have applied that mentality to world politics also, especially when it comes to the U.S. That has prevented us at times to see the reality in front of us, and that has caused us some great harms. I have traveled to many countries and met many people, I can honestly say, I have not met any people like Iranians believing this much in conspiracy theories. A funny part of all this is that some Iranians consider being creative with conspiracy theories as a sign of intelligence, in reality though, sometimes, it’s a sign of madness! Even by reading some articles on this site, one can see that some of us spend loads of times analyzing, with a narrow mind, what the IAEA or Bush Or Hillary has said about Iran, or what the movie “300” was about, or what some dude in some think tank in Washington said for or against U.S policy in Iran, but we never, with an open mind, try to think what is the root of all these issues Iran has with the U.S and the world? Why do we think the world is out to get us? Where did all this start, and why, and when? Who initiated this animosity? If we can figure those out, then everything else will be clear.
2. We worship tradition. We are unable to understand that tradition and culture and way of life evolve. We are unable to accept that some aspects of our traditional culture are not in line with modern beliefs of human rights. Aspects such as women rights.
3. We are infected with an America love/hate disorder. One on hand, because of conspiracy beliefs, we have made up this ultra human image of U.S in our mind where it controls our destiny and it is involved in everything that happens not only in Iran, but around the world. By that, we have stripped responsibility from ourselves. America hosts close to 1 million Iranians. Many of them are ex communists or the next generation of them, who had clear anti U.S and anti capitalist beliefs and were highly active in promoting those ideas in Iran, but as soon as the revolution happened, they found refuge in the very same U.S. Now that they’re here, they bash it, and Israel along with it. They never were able to clearly state why they resent Israel so much. Historically, Israel never initiated any threat towards Iran. Most people around the world despise Israel’s action in Arab lands, but the level of hate some Islamic Marxist, leftist and Islamic apologist Iranians carry towards Israel has gone way behind that. We are unable to understand the experience of other countries such as India or Japan or South Korea, who were at times colonies or under occupation or defeated in war, but have left blind anti U.S hate aside and risen to become world powers, ironically, with the direct help of the U.S itself.
4. We think with our hearts, not with our brains. We are romantic, artistic, not necessarily industrious, like we used to be at a time. We mix romance with conspiracy theory which has proven to be very dangerous.
5. We have to take responsibility for our own actions. We have found it so easy to blame others.
6. Some of us, think “laat baazi” and thugness is cool. Those are usually the ones who are really into old Persian movies! The problem is though, however, we view the world political scene as a “meydaan” in “jonoob Tehran”, and countries as “kolah makhmali laats”! It has been so destructive to apply that concept into our political beliefs. Examples for that would be some IRI apologists always claim that the IRI “wants recognition”, and is “standing up to the U.S”…We are unable to explain how is it “standing up to the U.S”.
7. We use historical concepts to analyze current world events. From my observation, some Iran pupation, along with some Arabs and North Koreans, are one of the fewest people left in the world not to realize we don’t live in the colonial or cold war era anymore.
8. Sometimes, we get too jealous and envious of other nations achievements, then to comfort ourselves, we deny their achievements! This is very true when it comes to the U.S.
9. We love to work individually, not in units. The idea of community and social responsibility has not been rooted in our culture, yet.
10. We love to confuse and change definitions of complex political concepts! Even today, Iranians have their own unique definitions of imperialism, conservatism, liberalism, independence, and other things. For example, sometimes we cannot distinguish between keeping our independence and being isolated.
Word to all my fellow Iranians, please wake up and keep up with the world. We have suffered enough by not doing so.
Recently by Farhad Kashani | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
Iranians have it far worse than Palestinians | 7 | Sep 30, 2009 |
Mesbah Yazdi | 24 | Sep 04, 2009 |
Neo Cons or Neo Comms: Who got it right on Iran? | 4 | Aug 27, 2009 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Re: Farhad Kashani
by jamshid on Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:46 AM PDTExcellent points. We need to always look at ourselves in the mirror before blaming foreign powers.
The "yaa hosseinaa" victimization tradition of Shia does not help the matter. This is something that the IRI is doing all the time, tapping into a victim mentality.
Tolerance is another weakness we have. I think the reason behind lack of tolerance is seeing things in black and white while ignoring all the shades in between. We have to learn that almost everything falls in the shades of gray, and nothing is abosulte.
Once we learn that, then we have become a tolerant nation.
Talk about unfounded generalizations
by Shamse Vazir (not verified) on Tue Jun 17, 2008 02:28 PM PDTFarhad, you can speak for yourself only. You write a lot of generalizations and make stereotypes. Iranians like all the others in the world are of different types. Your "ten" points don't apply to most people because not all Iranians are the same. As for conspiracies, I have news for you: they do happen whether someone loves them or not. If you bother to watch "Frontline" on PBS, you will find plenty of evidence that Iraq war indeed happened due to a conspiracy. Anyone who thinks they don't happen is not paying attention.
Sarzamin's point #11 is even more off-base than Farhad's. I happen to read at least one non-fiction book a month. I also read a ton of technical papers so I guess by Sarzamin's standards I am not an Iranian!! Would you please explain that to my family? Or should I just put away my books because it does not fit the stereotype? I have This is not self criticism, it is criticizing other people who you don't know. Self criticism is when one talks about oneself not about others whom one does not even know. It is shameful.
Anonymous 8: This thread is
by kaa (not verified) on Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:21 AM PDTAnonymous 8: This thread is not about the perceived looming war against Iran. No sane person would want a war with Iran. Attacking Iran will not achieve any of US goals, period. I
t will turn Iran into a N. Korea or a Taliban-run state. The neocons know this too, however, in order to bring the mullahs into the negotiation table, they have to carry a big stick; otherwise, the mullahs will not negotiate. The mullahs will like nothing more than to be attacked...
Please don't conflate the issues.
Anonymous8, I wasn't
by Farhad Kashani on Sun Jun 15, 2008 06:29 PM PDTAnonymous8, I wasn't talking about the war on Iraq in point 3. Its blaming everything that happens in our country on others, incuding the U.S, is what I was talking about. Just because U.S was involved in a war in Iraq, doesnt mean other nations are stripped from the power to make decisions or shouldn't take responsibility for their actions. We, lot of times, blame Arabs, British, Russians, Moghols, and others for things that are happening in our country today. Ofcourse in the aftermath of Moghol or Arab invasion, those were to be blamed for horrible things that happened as result of those invasions, but I'm talking about modern history, not ancient history. I'm talking 1400 years after the Arab invasion, close to 800-900 years or so of Moghol invasion, and close to 60 years after the end of colonialism (A period were Iran was never under direct foreign occupation).I compare Iran to other countries, and I see that lot of nations made progress in short times inspite of setbacks that happened not too long ago. Examples would be Germany, Japan, India, China, Italy,,,,and tens of other examples. Why can't we be like them? The reason is they don't think like us, simple. As nation, they don't have these common conspiracy beliefs like we do. As nation, they understand the meaning of hardwork and resposibility.
#3 War is not a "conspiracy" if it happened only 5 yrs ago
by Anonymous8 (not verified) on Sun Jun 15, 2008 06:01 PM PDTI'm not sure why some people think Bush and Cheney couldn't or wouldn't want to do it. Iran has even more oil than Iraq.
That's not a conspiracy, it is a legitimate concern that over half of Americans have. If there is even a 5% chance of Iran being the next Iraq, history will not forgive any of us for sitting around fighting among ourselves.
You can't topple any mullahs from here. Only if we sell out to US and UK, can this be done. What we CAN do is stop any possible war by echoing western citizens who themselves are greatly concerned.
This is a simple and undisputable reality. But if anyone says it, they will be attacked as "Mullah agents". That is the attitude we have to overcome.
Can we do it?
Thanks
by Sarzamine man (not verified) on Sun Jun 15, 2008 02:03 PM PDTThank you for the points that you mentioned, indeed these are the root problem that needs to be fixed regardless of any kind of government, even if we manage to throw out IR thugs and bring in good government, we must still fix some of these problems because if we don't, they again will make us problem.
Point #11,
I want to add one very important point as well which is we do not read, many of us do not know about the history or logic about our beliefs because we do not read, according to one study done in Europe, Iranian read only one minute a year in average excluding text book or related work book and this is very sad statistic. This also shows that why many of us still to this date believe in Khorafat.
By continuing to act like
by abc (not verified) on Sun Jun 15, 2008 01:19 PM PDTBy continuing to act like victims, we'll never be empowered to change our lot. Being fatalistic as a nation, we've rarely stood up to enemies, foreign or domestic. By the same token, we need to break this vicious circle and empower ourselves and not view ourselves as "victims". Once we do that, no foreign or reactionary power can rule over us.
The first step is to acknowledge responsibility for creating our situation. I am not talking about blaming. I am not saying that it is our fault for being used and abused. Nonetheless, it is important to recognise that we made the choices which brought us to this point in our history, therefore we can make the choices to get ourselves back out. What I am getting at here is that we must take responsibility in order to be empowered to realise that we do have a choice. Either we do the work necessary to save ourselves or we'll forever be victimized by those whom we allow to victimize us; be it corrupt "agents of god", fanatic religiosity, monarchy,etc.
It is true to say that no one can save us , but ourselves.
nothing wrong with being proud
by ali reza (not verified) on Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:00 PM PDTWe have things that we should be proud of,like our long history and the fact that we had an empire that exentended most of the world.this empire treated its citizens right,wrote the first human right laws,devised a calender that is still being used,had advances in medicine,agricuture,costruction,govenment,to name a few.We have other countries that are new compare to Iran,the people of these contries can not look back and say with pride that their ancestor accomplished this and that.
BK, thank you. I agree with
by Farhad Kashani on Sun Jun 15, 2008 07:33 AM PDTBK, thank you. I agree with you 100%.
using many words that you can not understand
by Lucifercus (not verified) on Sun Jun 15, 2008 06:11 AM PDTIn earlier times poeple kept stil, when they did not know anything about a certain subject. Nowadays they can tell it in english.
Mr. Kashani
by BK (not verified) on Sun Jun 15, 2008 03:53 AM PDTThanks for your thought provoking views. Regardless of whether one agrees with them or not, the points you've raised should be among the issues we Iranians should take time to reflect on, from time to time.
I'd just like to add to point no 5 from your piece. Many of us Iranians continually blame others for the predicament Iran finds itself in. It’s always somebody else’s fault. We just love conspiracy theories, but are rarely prepared to support them with credible evidence.
We see the hand of the old tried and tested bogeymen the US or (given our history) the UK behind everything that we see as posing a threat to Iran. To give an example: on one hand some of us blame the US or UK (and sometimes Israel), for the creation the Islamic Republic and on the other, some of us accuse them of trying to topple the IR. I’m not saying these views are necessarily right or wrong, but logic would dictate they can’t both be right.
Don’t get me wrong, countries like the US and UK are only interested in one thing, their own-self interest and they will do whatever that achieves that objective. But our obsession and paranoia with them is getting in the way of the recognizing and dealing with the most fundamental problem that has underpinned Iran’s woes in recent history.
The bottom line is that if we want to issue “blame” or give “praise” (as supporters of IR are very keen to do on this site) for what is happening in Iran, more than any other factor, we should look to ourselves. We have to face reality that Iran is in the state that it is primarily because of the actions (or lack of actions) of the Iranian people.
If things are to change in Iran, the Iranian people must put an end to the "blame others" mentality and look to themselves to bring about change. Sadly, decades (if not centuries) old mentality takes a long time to discard and I just don’t see this happening soon enough to halt’s Iran inexorable slide towards catastrophe.
Anonym7, the fact that you
by Farhad Kashani on Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:23 AM PDTAnonym7, the fact that you guys immediately every time someone criticizes the IRI or talks about things we can do better as a nation, connect the topic to America, is in itself a prime example of conspiracy theory belief that I mentioned in this article. I talked about some of things some of us, not all, can do better, and you immediately talked about U.S oil consumption and the Iraq war! Let me just give you on example: during the Shah reign, many of us thought that Shah is irremovable because of U.S support. We were led to this conspiracy belief that Shah will only leave when U.S wants him to. Well, back in 1979, when millions of Iranians went to street to remove the Shah, how strong was that U.S support to prevent him from being removed? What difference could’ve U.S support or no support for him would’ve been able to make in face of millions of angry Iranians? What were those U.S F 14 or American military advisers or the U.S embassy able to do to prevent Shah from being removed? Nothing. Because we took responsibility and we took action, and if a population does those, nothing can stop it.
We do need to keep ourselves
by Seagull (not verified) on Sat Jun 14, 2008 09:03 PM PDTWe do need to keep ourselves in check and this article is a step forward.
#11
by Ye Irani (not verified) on Sat Jun 14, 2008 08:21 PM PDTIf anything good happened in human history, it must have been initiated by Iranians. We usually like to take credit for everything that others may have come up. This is so pathetic. I guess it's a symptom of being proud of our ancient culture. This is something that was also pointed out in "My bug fat greek wedding".
An example of this anomaly is like the discussion started in a current "Turkish song" posted by Dariush Kadivar to give the credit to Faramarz Aslani for him originating the song "Age ye roozi".
10 wrong things
by MyComments (not verified) on Sat Jun 14, 2008 03:31 PM PDTI have never read such nonsense before on this site or any other… It is amazing that Mr. Farhad Kashani can write without any thought behind the article and poor generalization.
laat baazi for oil
by Anonym7 (not verified) on Sat Jun 14, 2008 02:31 PM PDTKashani, here are two "conspiracy theories" for you:
1-Based on widely seen CNN documentary:
U.S. with ~4.5% of world population consumes 25% of the oil produced in the world, which is about 20 billion barrels of oil per day
2-Based on what Greenspan a conservative republican of the type of politics that you follow "Iraq War is largely about OIL"
Kashani, CNN is not an Iranian network and Greenspan is not Iranian, but the above "conspiracy theories" talk much, much loader than any Iranian Molla, Iranian leftist, etc to show why the politics that you support wants to get Iran at any cost. But as the writer of the article in Nation (a US paper) put it, those day that U.S. could get the oil by 'laat baazi' is over. U.S needs to bless a new paradigm ... blaming Iran is not the the way to go.
#11 We'd rather make lists and talk, than DO
by eroonman on Sat Jun 14, 2008 02:25 PM PDTTalk is cheap, actions (almost always) speak louder than words. Iranians mostly like to talk and talk and talk, and no one other than Cyrus the Great has really ever actually done anything.
Not to make light of these very nice and obvious listed observations as to our many weaknesses, but the reall issue we have refused to face as a people for over 2500 years is the one about how WE simply want to BE.
We are all too eager to allow yet another savior to emerge, promising to save us each time.
The sad cold truth is that there is no real Rostam coming. Rostam is us. And apparently Rostam is dead.
You Can't Always Get what You want
ye Irani, thank you very
by Farhad Kashani on Sat Jun 14, 2008 01:08 PM PDTye Irani, thank you very much azeez.
Azita, The reaction you
by Farhad Kashani on Sat Jun 14, 2008 01:08 PM PDTAzita,
The reaction you had to my article illustrates the point of my article exactly. You believe if someone self criticizes, he’s not proud of his country or he doesn’t love it. So although you insulted me, but you illustrated my point exactly. The first sentence of my article is excessive pride leads to a fall. As far as India goes, India’s economy just recently surpassed England’s (Its former colonizer) and its now one of the top 10 in the world. Its part of the nuclear club, it’s a democracy, very advanced in science, well respected and has one of the highest growth rates. Based on that, it is a world power.
Varjavand jaan,
Thanks for the feedback. On 4, we use our emotions more than our thoughts and logic when making decisions, especially politically. Ofcourse that’s changing, but historically its been like that. We are very passionate people, over passionate maybe. On 5, we have a tendency to blame others for our mistakes. We sometimes, even in social life, are too proud or stubborn to admit our own mistakes. On 7, we love history. Some of us sometimes are unable to realize the changes that happen in the world scene. We analyze current complex political relations with a historical lens, where politics was simpler. On 9, I see where you’re coming from. What I meant was we do not do well in a team environment. The idea of cooperation and community interest hasn’t really rooted among us. And for number 11, I’m sensing you mean me by that! I really don’t think like that. I self criticize all the time.
Adf
Very good point. Right on the money.
Abol Danesh azeez,
We need a good dose of self criticism in order to learn from our mistakes, correct them, and build a better Iran for us and future generations.
Tahirie azeez,
Thank you. And I agree with you 100%.
Anonym7 jaan,
We’re not into laat baazi. We do not believe that our government should constantly be confronting and provoking governments and nations (i.e laat baazi), and that’s what it has been doing for the last 30 years. That’s not what Iran has done historically, we are a peaceful nation. We love people and life. We never had in our history a government that wanted to “export its revolution” (i.e laat bazzi). We do not believe that the world should be scared from our government, and I don’t mean a single figure of the government, I mean the entire regime. To tell you a little story, the head of the Komite in the very beginning of the revolution in a specific town that I know about, was a former well known laat and was in prison for stabbing someone. When the revolution happened, he was freed and joined the Komiteh. Because of his brutality, he was promoted to the head of the Komiteh . If you go Iran, you will hear thousands of the similar stories. So this regime is made of thugs and uneducated fascists, literally. And although they are Iranians just like me and you, but they are obviously not qualified, to say the least, to be in government. We’re not even gonna talk about what they did to our country. Also, as far my analysis, I am a realist, versus you guys whom are idealists, at best. The huge problem with the intellectual movement in Iran for the last 50-60 has been that it did not speak on the behalf of the average Iranian. That had catastrophic consequences for our country. Thankfully, that is changing. More and more, people who write and who speak out, speak of what’s on the everyday Iranian’s mind. That’s how you identify the real problems and find out with realistic solutions for them.
Enjoyed reading it
by Kurdish Warrior (not verified) on Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:22 PM PDTSome of the points are just spot on.
Mr. Kashani, I do not know
by Ye irani (not verified) on Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:15 AM PDTMr. Kashani, I do not know your political stance but you are right on the nose with analyzing our dillema. Thank you for pointing out our social/cultural issues without political polarizations. We are one nation. The only way to forge ahead for a great future is to look at Iran as a whole with all it's people.
I agree with you on this ...
by Anonym7 (not verified) on Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:14 AM PDTKashani says: "Some of us, think “laat baazi” and thugness is cool"
yes Kashani, you and Mr. Imani that you have consistently supported are good examples of some confusing politics with "laat baazi". Your shallow analysis here is also another good example of analytics "laat baazi" style. The cowboy politics of your Mr. Bush is the best example of "laat baazi" at international level.
Mr kashani many good points.
by Tahirih on Sat Jun 14, 2008 09:48 AM PDTBut from the ones I like and agree # one is the best.I believe one of the most handicap characteristics of us is the Conspiracy theory that we all are so good at it!!
If we set aside the conspiracy theory , then we can look at our history and learn from it.Just like what Faryarm is suggesting.
Most regards,
Tahirih
Regarding Janpan's form of
by abc (not verified) on Sat Jun 14, 2008 09:32 AM PDTRegarding Janpan's form of government. Ah, the irony:
The politics of Japan take place in a framework of a parliamentary representative democratic monarchy, whereby the Prime Minister of Japan is the head of government, and of a multi-party system. Executive power is exercised by the government. Legislative power is vested in both the government and the two chambers of parliament; the Diet with the House of Representatives and the House of Councillors. The Judiciary is independent of the executive and the legislature. In academic studies, Japan is generally considered a constitutional monarchy, based largely upon the British system with strong influences from European continental civil law countries such as the German Bundestag. For example, in 1896 the Japanese government established Minpo, the Civil Code, on the French model
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Japan
Society as a Patient
by Abol Danesh, Sociologist (not verified) on Sat Jun 14, 2008 09:23 AM PDT... The way this article reads is like the entire society is treated as a single patient--more specificly-- a mentally sick patient-- and here the patient laying down on the coach en route "Free Association" telling his psychoanalyst doctor what is wrong with him as he delves deep and deeper into his state of supressed and censored subconsciousness (shy) in order to bring it forth into the level of consciousness like a well of oil in erutption while he is induced deep and deeper into hypnotized state for free expression for the first time...
I another word.... I like the approach of this article for at least it high lights the importance of free speech in renewal and healing of society--
The question that remains is this: Who is the doctor what is the fee? why? Because "naneh be baabaa moftee nemeedeh"
Feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee?
I would add one more thing.
by adf (not verified) on Sat Jun 14, 2008 08:36 AM PDTI would add one more thing. Iranians suffer from the disease of revenge. Forgiveness is not in our vocabulary. Japanese instead of taking revenge on the US after Hiroshima (250,000 Japanese died),they got even by becoming the biggest creditor to the Us AND BY INVESTING IN innovations and in their people instead of wasting treasure on outdated nuclear weapons. Same applies to China and other Latin and South American countries who were either US or British ex-colonies. Peru has no oil but their income per capita is the same as Iran.
Japan Unveils Cars That Runs Purely on Water
//gizmodo.com/5016343/genepax-unveils-a-car-t...
//in.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idINSP...
Iranians as a society are on a self-defeating mission of getting revenge. They will destroy Iran in the process.
Dear Mr. Kashani Very
by varjavand on Sat Jun 14, 2008 08:19 AM PDTDear Mr. Kashani Very well thought out article, I have the following suggestions:
Some of the points you raised, I believe, are based on the fact that we think that are smarter than others. We don’t take things at their face value. We wish to get to the bottom of everything Varjavand
Look back in history for our current troubles...
by faryarm on Sat Jun 14, 2008 07:34 AM PDT"......All observers agree in representing Persia as a feeble and backward nation divided against itself by corrupt practices and ferocious bigotries. Inefficiency and wretchedness, the fruit of moral decay, filled the land. From the highest to the lowest there appeared neither the capacity to carry out methods of reform nor even the will seriously to institute them National conceit preached a grandiose self-content. A pall of immobility lay over all things, and a general paralysis of mind made any development impossible.
To a student of history the degeneracy of a nation once so powerful and so illustrious seems pitiful in the extreme. Abdu'l-Baha, who in spite of the cruelties heaped on Baha'u'llah, on the Bab, and on Himself, yet loved His country, called their degradation "the tragedy of a people"; and in that work, "The Mysterious Forces of Civilisation," in which He sought to stir the hearts of His compatriots to undertake radical reforms, He uttered a poignant lament over the present fate of a people who once had extended their conquests east and west and had led the civilisation of mankind. "In former times," he writes, "Persia was verily the heart of the world and shone among the nations like a lighted taper. Her glory and prosperity broke from the horizon of humanity like the true dawn disseminating the light of knowledge and illumining the nations of the East and West. The fame of her victorious kings reached the ears of the dwellers at the poles of the earth. The majesty of her king of kings humbled the monarchs of Greece and Rome Her governing wisdom filled the sages with awe, and the rulers of the continents fashioned their laws upon her polity. The Persians being distinguished among the nations of the earth as a people of conquerors, and justly admired for their civilisation and learning, their country became the glorious centre of all the sciences and arts, the mine of culture and a fount of virtues. ...How is it that this excellent country now, by reason of our sloth, vanity, and indifference, from the lack of knowledge and organisation, from the poverty of the zeal and ambition of her people, has suffered the rays of her prosperity to be darkened and well-nigh extinguished?"
Other writers describe fully those unhappy conditions to which Abdu'l-Baha refers.
At the time when the Bab declared His Mission, the government of the country was, in Lord Curzon's phrase, "a Church-State." Venal, cruel, and immoral as it was, it was formally religious. Muslim orthodoxy was its basis and permeated to the core both it and the social lives of the people. But otherwise there were no laws, statutes, or charters to guide the direction of public affairs. There was no House of Lords nor Privy Council, no synod, no Parliament. The Shah was despot, and his arbitrary rule was reflected all down the official scale through every minister and governor to the lowliest clerk or remotest headman. No civil tribunal existed to check or modify the power of the monarch or the authority which he might choose to delegate to his subordinates. If there was a law, it was his word. He could do as he pleased. It was his to appoint or to dismiss all ministers, officials, officers, and judges. He had power of life and death without appeal over all members of his household and of his court, whether civil or military. The right to take life was vested in him alone; and so were all the functions of government, legislative, executive, and judicial. His royal prerogative was limited by no written restraint whatever.
Descendants of the Shahs were thrust into the most lucrative posts throughout the country, and as the generations went by they filled innumerable minor posts too, far and wide, till the land was burdened with this race of royal drones who owed their position to nothing better than their blood and who gave rise to the Persian saying that "camels, fleas, and princes exist everywhere."
Even when a Shah wished to make a just and wise decision in any case that might be brought before him for judgment, he found it difficult to do so, because he could not rely on the information given him. Critical facts would be withheld, or the facts given would be distorted by the influence of interested witnesses or venal ministers. The system of corruption had been carried so far in Persia that it had become a recognised institution which Lord Curzon describes in the following terms:
"I come now to that which is the cardinal and differentiating feature of Iranian administration. Government, nay, life itself, in that country may be said to consist for the most part of an interchange of presents. Under its social aspects this practice may be supposed to illustrate the generous sentiments of an amiable people; though even here it has a grimly unemotional side, as, for instance, when, congratulating yourself upon being the recipient of a gift, you find that not only must you make a return of equivalent cost to the donor, but must also liberally remunerate the bearer of the gift (to whom your return is very likely the sole recognised means of subsistence) in a ratio proportionate to its pecuniary value. Under its political aspects, the practice of gift-making, though consecrated in the adamantine traditions of the East, is synonymous with the system elsewhere described by less agreeable names. This is the system on which the government of Persia has been conducted for centuries, and the maintenance of which opposes a solid barrier to any real reform. From the Shah downwards, there is scarcely an official who is not open to gifts, scarcely a post which is not conferred in return for gifts, scarcely an income which has not been amassed by the receipt of gifts. Every individual, with hardly an exception, in the official hierarchy above mentioned, has only purchased his post by a money present either to the Shah, or to a minister, or to the superior governor by whom he has been appointed. If there are several candidates for a post, in all probability the one who makes the best offer will win."
From Preface pages of the Dawnbreakers.
//bahai-library.com/books/dawnbreakers/preface/preface2.html
To the writer of this
by azita (not verified) on Sat Jun 14, 2008 07:28 AM PDTTo the writer of this article must say that using many words that probably you can not understand even the meanings of it to impress people and offend your country is not impressive. Stay here and shut up about Iran. If I defend my country I a proud of it. By the way you mentioned that India put aside hate towards US and no is a worls power. Go read your history and travel to India. I have traveled and lived there for years and India is not a world power. Before trying to say things go and read a little rathere than just spitting out a bunch of words that you do not understand.