Transmuting anger into laughter

VOA's Kambiz Hosseini and Saman Arbabi


Transmuting anger into laughter
by Ari Siletz

I’m guessing VOA’s new Perisan news network director, Ramin Asgard, was among the crowd at Kambiz Hosseini’s Berkeley talk for the same reason I was: to see what Parazit’s US fan base looked like. For one thing the crowd looked really big. The Iranian-American themed Berkeley Lecture Series usually doesn’t fill a 500-seat theater, and normally you don’t see teenagers sitting on the aisle steps playing Pokemon. The diversity in age groups was noteworthy because there were also folks (usually in couples) who remembered the time when only Ahmad Shah was rich enough to fondle a Pokeman between his fat little fingers. Of course the audience sense of humor was way above our national average; I don’t remember Shirin Ebadi’s crowd laughing so hard when she lectured at Berkeley. On a more minor note, Parazit fans are better dressed (on average) than typical lecture attendees; some being under the impression that Parazit is a satirical soiree.

Hosseini in the flesh does not disappoint expectations. In un-digitized format he is a faithful replica of his transmitted self both in earthy charisma and intimidating quick wittedness. Don’t mess with this guy because he can read your insecurities just by the way you stand when you ask him a question. His person-reading skill, the way he can create a life story out of a posture, a smile, a yawn, a head scratch or a simple statement is the talent engine that powers Hosseini’s satire. Even though on television we don’t get a chance to observe this process at work, Parazit’s satire seems to pivot on Hosseini’s ability to read both the unfortunate object of his ridicule and the audience he rallies to laugh at him. Somehow his acting talent knows that if his tone, facial gestures and body language reveal overpowering prowess in fault finding, the audience will scamper out of the line of fire to line up behind him where it is psychologically the safest place to be. The subconscious mental surrender this actor is able to create in his audience, when socialized and shared, comes out as laughter. All this, despite strict observance of the traditional Persian posture of humility. Truly a dramatic marvel!

Hosseini mentioned a few satirists that have influenced him, Zakani, Iraj Mirza, Khorsandi, Neystani etc. Someone in the audience was annoyed that Hosseini did not mention Fereydoon Farrokhzad. Hosseini said Farrokhzad was perfectly fine, he just happened not to be an influence. Then he made a quip about having danced to Farrokhzad music occasionally, but seemed to falter part way through the joke, sensing perhaps a taboo against poking fun at a man who was murdered by the IRI. If so, he was spot on; we all have sensitive places where humor is not welcome, no matter how clever.

As far as influence on the Parazit format goes, the resemblance to the Jon Stewart show needs no mentioning, though Stewart pushes different psychological buttons than Hosseini. Stewart is self-deprecating, and Hosseini as mentioned above is at his best when he is in his alpha male mode. This is why Saman so masterfully playing as Kambiz’s sidekick works so well. Stewart’s supporting actors provide a stage respite from him, whereas Saman’s character is part of a true double act where Saman is, well, someone for Hosseini to step on, set his hair on fire, throw things at. [As an aside, this is also the reason working a female character into the show--a suggestion I often hear--would require radical dramatic changes. I can’t think of a double act where a third character was not temporary (unless we include animal characters).]

Moreover Hosseini and Stewart perform different roles for their respective audiences. Stewart addresses a democratic society where satirists also serve as pressure release valves, letting out anger and resentment in controlled amounts while the disagreements are sorted out. This is why satirists like Keith Olberman, who become overzealous, are discredited (sometimes with the help of satirists like Jon Stewart). Parazit emulating Stewart too closely would actually be a service to the IRI with Voice Of America beaming comic relief into Iran, transmuting anger into laughter. In this scenario VOA would be staging what is acted out in Iranian taxis—to the same pressure release purpose—except with the best available talent. How do you say “suckers” in Akhoondi?

Kambiz, Saman, and Ramin Asgard have a difficult task beaming a clear message into Iran as long as the US waffles on a well-defined Iran policy. “Free speech is good,” is not a message Iranians haven’t already figured out for themselves. Creative ideas with vectored messages are needed to justify the costs to the American taxpayer. Perhaps this is why Ramin Asgard was at the lecture studying the crowd.


Recently by Ari SiletzCommentsDate
چرا مصدق آسوده نمی خوابد.
Aug 17, 2012
This blog makes me a plagarist
Aug 16, 2012
Double standards outside the boxing ring
Aug 12, 2012
more from Ari Siletz

Mash Ghassem Gerami

by Roozbeh_Gilani on

I know about the quiz and I have been having nighmares about it, very similar to the ones 15 years or so ago for days before defending my thesis. Except that was in engineering which I knew a thing or two about after years of "khar khooni". This one is more adabiat related! I am working on it ostad, first i have a big shopping list for the memorial day BBQ Party to take care of. Yes, any excuse indeed for consuming bear in large quantities! 

"Personal business must yield to collective interest."

Mash Ghasem


by Mash Ghasem on

Rozbeh jan, some say it's the stroke, some say it's the choke!Cyber scum is probably an accurate description for him.

Feraydon and Forough were both genuises, born in the wrong country.

That quizz keeps asking: " Brother, Where Art Thou?"


Mash Ghassem, it's the daily stroking

by Roozbeh_Gilani on

 of Emam's line which gives this particular mashang  Haji the pleasure!

KGB were abit more selective, I hear they even had an IQ test!

As for Mr Farrokhzaad, he, like hundreds of thousands of other Patriotic  Iranians,  lost his life for speaking out against this fascist Islamist regime. For that, and for that alone, he has my highest respect.

"Personal business must yield to collective interest."


وای با حال کسانی که اون جنایت وحشییانه


If anyone's approving the killing of Forough's brother, I'm not.

hajj khnom

پندار نیک

hajj khnom

وای با حال کسانی که اون جنایت وحشییانه را علیه انسان دیدند و سکوت کردند.


Mr. Pendar...

by UnitedIran on



/* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman";}


At least he had the "BALLS" to stand up to the
miserable regime in his country.....not like you that "sare goud beshin,
lengesh kon" type...when you grow a pair, make comments about people that
gave their lives for their cause and country, no matter their orientation.

Mash Ghasem

The itch is all yours Pendar Mashang

by Mash Ghasem on

Some say it's because of that Imam's " Line" you keep squeezing in your hands,  every day in here.

Others  point out  to K.G.B. as the source of your itch.  Which one you think is accuraet?


اون ملتی که فرخزاد قهرمون ملیش باشه، یه جاییش میخاره




He really couldn't speak well of Fereydoon Farrokhzad since

by amirparvizforsecularmonarchy on

Mostly because Farrokhzad was anti USA after the way the USA betrayed the Shah and his autocracy, and he was pro Iran.

And These guys can't appear anti-USA, being on VOA and having a pro democracy message.

While their show is very popular from an entertainment standpoint they are not really considered by many as pro Iranian because of their pro democracy stance, even the current shah is not today considered pro Iranian like Fereydoon Farrokhzad for the same reason, ie not working in Irans highest interest by harping his pro democracy message. 

Many Iranians today feel that after the Iranian people failed to recognize either the Shah or khomeini, they are not ready to be a democracy.  They neither have the institutions developed or the social culture developed.  They know what they are capable of with an autocratic shah in terms of creating freedom and are willing to pursue democracy on a more gradual evolutionary path.

Fereydoon Farrokhzad represents that train of though, which is very different to what someone taking funds from the USA can say.  They basically have to be pro democracy.



yes, they are good - thanks for the report

by MM on