The Myth of "Iran has Not Attacked Anyone in 400 Years"

Balatarin
Share/Save/Bookmark

Anonymous Observer
by Anonymous Observer
12-Oct-2011
 

Often times when there is a discussion about IR’s belligerence and warmongering, we hear the IR created myth and propaganda that Iran is a peaceful nation and that it has not attacked anyone in 400 years.  The same nonsense is repeated by its supporters, lackeys and wannabes everywhere, including on this site.  And now we’re hearing it again after the arrest of that retarded terrorist monkey from Texas.

While it is true that Iranians, pre-IR, were a peaceful nation, the IR cannot, and should not, take credit for the Iran’s peaceful past, as it has shown for the past 32 years that it is one of the most dangerous and aggressive regimes that has ever existed on this planet.  Indeed, the IR has, on many occasions throughout the past 32 years, attacked various nations.  Here are some examples:

-Taking U.S. diplomats in Iran hostage (attack on the U.S.);

-U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut (attack on the U.S.);

-Hijacking on TWA flight and killing an American citizen through its agent Imad Moghniyeh (attack on the U.S.);

-Hijacking of Kuwait Airways (attack on Kuwait);

-Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia (attack on U.S. and Saudi);

-Jewish center bombing in Argentina (attack on Argentina);

-Last but not the least: the latest terror plot in the U.S. (attack on Saudi Arabia and U.S.).

So, let’s not confuse IR’s incompetence and lack of military ability to launch a full scale war against another nation as “evidence” of its “peaceful” nature.  The IR has perpetrated acts of war against various nations even without having a pot to piss in (in a military sense.)  We can only imagine what it would have done if it actually had some military power. 

Khoda khar ro shenaakht ke behesh shakh nadad!

Balatarin
Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by Anonymous ObserverCommentsDate
The 1979 Devolution Was The Perfect Fit For Iranians
72
Nov 24, 2012
Bring Dr. Mohandes & Vildemose Back!!!
31
Nov 08, 2012
Iranian.com, David Duke or "Storm Front?"
66
Oct 12, 2012
more from Anonymous Observer
 
Disenchanted

A lousy case of bait and switch!

by Disenchanted on Wed Oct 12, 2011 08:50 PM PDT

 

        You cannot call the fact that Iran has not invaded a country for 400 years a myth and then come up only with shaky cases (certainly no invasion) for the last 30 years. If you had problem with last 30 years your blog title should have been "The myth of IRI peacefulness"!

       If you guys have problem with IRI leave Iran alone!

       .....


  •  
AMIR1973

Khomeini & his associates continued the war for another 6 years

by AMIR1973 on Wed Oct 12, 2011 08:21 PM PDT

Khomeini and his civilian and political lieutenants declared on numerous occasions that their goal was to continue the war beyond the expulsion of Iraqi forces from Iran (which was largely achieved in 1982) and to march into Karbala and from Karbala on to Qods (and to institute its wonderful Islamic rule in those places). Khomeini refused all offers of an end to the war from 1982 to 1988 -- when the vast majority of casualties and destruction occurred. I suppose that constitutes proof of the IRI's pacificity.


  •  
Veiled Prophet of Khorasan

Dear Disenchanted

by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Wed Oct 12, 2011 08:12 PM PDT

 

There is a third group whose allegiance is to something else. Some are just running away from their own being. Others want to "out American" the Americans. Others are pan-Turk; pan-Arab or pan-other.

I don't know what each person is. But I agree it is easy to tell who does not care about Iran. A give away is use of vile language; incessant attacks on Iran. And on anyone who says anything good about Iran.


  •  
Disenchanted

Title of blog calls Iran's pacificity of last 400 years a myth

by Disenchanted on Wed Oct 12, 2011 08:05 PM PDT

 

       and offers no evidence to the contrary!! It is a trivial matter that when people invoke that "myth" they mean the era prior to IRI!

        There are folks on this site who are against IRI but care about Iran. There are others who are against IRI but don't care about Iran and Iranians and their allegiance lies somewhere else, often Israel.

         I think it is easy to tell the two groups.


  •  
Veiled Prophet of Khorasan

Fanoos

by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Wed Oct 12, 2011 07:10 PM PDT

 

Please! Have you heard of "illegal entry"? That is what they did and got arrested. It is not taking "hostage". The real hostage situation was the Embassy not the so called "hikers". Do we have to debate that all over again?


  •  
Veiled Prophet of Khorasan

Dear Mohammad Ala

by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Wed Oct 12, 2011 07:06 PM PDT

 

Recently I have been seeing a lot of these blogs. There is a perception among some that "we" must beat ourselves mescilessly. That somehow it will gain us some kind of "redemption".

The problem is that punishment must be for a just reason. You do not punish an innocent person for what they did not do. We do not punish a 20 year old white American for slavery done 100 years before they were born. We do not punish all the people in a city because on citizen was a theif. This simple fact escapes some people. WhenI post to argue against their claims the result is personal attacks you see below.

I flagged it but I guess the admin does not think there is anything wrong with it. Maybe personal attacks are now allowed. At least when directed at some people.


  •  
fanoos

AO, you forgot to mention the taking of three American hikers

by fanoos on Wed Oct 12, 2011 07:03 PM PDT

as hostage.

Also, many Americans including Terry Anderson and others who were taken hostage in Lebanon by the IRR Hezbolah forces in the 80's.

America has every right to go after IRR including using military force.

Who can blame them?


  •  
Immortal Guard

Which one do you prefer:

by Immortal Guard on Wed Oct 12, 2011 06:55 PM PDT

A Persian occupying force or an Arab occupying force?


  •  
Mohammad Ala

This is not...

by Mohammad Ala on Wed Oct 12, 2011 06:46 PM PDT

This is not one of AO's better blog or posts.  I also believe he is smarter than posting something like this.


  •  
Iran 2050

Irnstd,   Are you

by Iran 2050 on Wed Oct 12, 2011 06:02 PM PDT

Irnstd,

 

Are you really saying that many Iranians don’t say that? Honestly? They don’t say “we ae nezhad barter” and “Arabs are inferior” and we are “Ariyayi”? Honestly? Are you truly saying many Iranians don’t say that?


  •  
Anonymous Observer

Maziar jaan - you mean by the akhoonds?

by Anonymous Observer on Wed Oct 12, 2011 04:24 PM PDT

if so, they have been attacking Iranians for the past 32 years.  Iranians are IR's biggest victims.


  •  
maziar 58

A O

by maziar 58 on Wed Oct 12, 2011 04:21 PM PDT

One the first attack was on Iran by them

cinema Rex in Abadan.

Maziar


  •  
Veiled Prophet of Khorasan

2050

by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Wed Oct 12, 2011 04:03 PM PDT

 

Just flagged your personal attack


  •  
Anonymous Observer

I didn't even mention

by Anonymous Observer on Wed Oct 12, 2011 04:00 PM PDT

the attacks on U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan by IR goons and its proxies.


  •  
irnstd

Iran 2050

by irnstd on Wed Oct 12, 2011 03:37 PM PDT

Bashing Iranians again...who said we were "superior people" and we could do no wrong? You're shadow-boxing there, buddy. I am surprised you made a post without referencing the Aryan race (is that a first for you?!) and calling everyone who disagreed with this post a bunch of racist Iranians who think they are better than everyone else.

 

Basically this article should be titled "Iran REALLY HASN'T attacked anyone in 400 years - except for that barbaric Mullah regime!" 


  •  
Veiled Prophet of Khorasan

Folks

by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Wed Oct 12, 2011 09:22 AM PDT

 

Trying to reason with 2050 and AO good luck! I have not seen one anti-Iranian thing 2050 has not supported. The rest of the stuff speak for themselves.

Before long you will have Iran (not IRI) blamed for the Titanic. 

Human rights has become a joke. It was Jimmy Carter and his "human rights" that pressured the Shah. Now we got ten times worse. You got Saudi wholesale slaugthering in Bahrain and not one word spoken. Saddam gassed thousands of Kurds again not one word spoken. Sure IRI has tons of human rights violations. But why don't people focus on the real victims: Iranians. Because they don't care. They are too busy "proving" they are patriotic Americans. 


  •  
farokh2000

Nice touch Announymous Observer

by farokh2000 on Wed Oct 12, 2011 08:44 AM PDT

While there is no question that the Mullahs are criminals and should be thrown into the big Ocean, they are the creation of CIA.

Khomini was exiled to Iraq for over 30 years and protected and supported by Saddam, who was a known agent of CIA.

He could have easily been killed and there would not have been the IRI, no?

At the same time, since WWII no Country in the World has killed more and started more wars than the U.S.A., you can check this out.

For U.S. to claim Human Rights and democracy while occupying 2 Countries and killing their innocent people every day is totally criminal.

This story has too many holes in it to be legit.


  •  
Iran 2050

Very true. For some

by Iran 2050 on Wed Oct 12, 2011 08:33 AM PDT

Very true.

For some Iranians, if an Iranian does something wrong, especially if it’s in the name of Iran, its absolutely justifiable, however, if someone else does the same exact thing, they will downgrade him to sub-human.

I guess spreading fundamentalism and terrorism in the world the last 30 years, enticing others to attack you like Khomeini did with Saddam, trying to overthrow as many governments as you can and replacing them with fundamentalist regimes, and going back deeper in the last 400 years, Nader Shah attacking, invading and plundering India for no other reason than power is being “peaceful” according to those Iranians!

You see..we are “better” people! We are a “better and more superior race”!!!!!! that’s why we don’t do anything wrong! We are incapable for making mistakes!!!! Other make mistakes all the time cause they are “inferior” to us!


  •  
Anonymous Observer

The problem of proof

by Anonymous Observer on Wed Oct 12, 2011 07:47 AM PDT

Mammad jaan - of course, none of these things can be "proven" beyond a shadow of doubt.  But we all know who did them.  Who in the world had the motivation, the zeal and the resources to pull off the attack on the Marine barracks in Beirut?  The Kuwait Airways flight sat in Mehr Abad airport for more than a week, where different, fresh, hijack crews came in and out of the aircraft in shifts!  And as far as Imad Moghniyeh, the IR has never denied its ties to that terrorist.

The IR is like a "fozool" boy, where it commits all kinds of mischief and then denies them because it has the uncanny ability to use proxies and to cover its tracks.

One day when this regime is toppled--and it will be toppled--the IR gang will be put on a Nuremberg style trial by an international tribunal, and that's where they will start pointing the fingers at each oother and will start singing like little canaries to save their own skins.  Everything will be revealed in detail then. 

Thanks for the link.  As always, enjoyed the read. 


  •  
Mammad

Come on!

by Mammad on Wed Oct 12, 2011 07:12 AM PDT

Of the seven items, five have not been proven or had nothing to do with Iran, and one, the last one, does not in my opinion, at this point, pass the smell test. Only the first one is correct, but that one was not an attack, although illegal.

//www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/tehranbure...

Remember, in 1990 they brought the daughter of Kuwait ambassador to the US to Congress to testify about rapes of women by Iraqi soldiers in Kuwait, which was complete fabrication.

The VF regime has committed too many crimes that one does not need exaggeration or hyperbole. You are more intelligent than such blogs.

Mammad


  •  
« first‹ previous12