Anonymouse

Obama's best response: I don't take AN seriously

I loved this quote.
Obviously Obama knows how to humiliate AN.- mahal sagam baraye AN ghael nashood

AN is probably fuming- that he is not even taken seriously. Expect him to say something super nutty next week in response to this quote.

So what? W said Iraq has WMD. "Amnesia" was in Clinton time.

Everything is sacred.

Anonymouse amnesia!

Khatami was still in office that W put Iran on the axis of evil.

Well done: IRI can't be trusted with rifles, let alone Atom Bomb

Every voice counts! Every action counts!

Midwesty this is ALL about Ahmadi.

Also to Fear, no?! During Khatami if he didn't accomplish anything his diplomacy made Madeleine Albright apologize to Iran for siding with Iraq during the war, so much so that Tariq Aziz of Iraq blamed Albright for having "amnesia" refering to arms for hostages and Oliver North and Rafsanjani.  At the time Khamenei overruled talking to US and the discussions died down.

For 8 years W didn't talk to Iran but passed 3 sets of sanctions.  What is Ahmadi's foreign policy achievement?  As I said, Japan, South Korea, China and Russia are one by one leaving Iran's attas to its lagha! They can find cheaper and better oil with "less chemicals" that is hard on refineries!

Obama during his Norooz speech said Iran has the right to peaceful nuke energy.  For 5 years Ahmadi has talked smack and even when they agreed to something they renegged.  So of course this is all about Ahmadi.  If they had not renegged on the uranium swap and talks were moving forward, do you think for one second that Iran would've been singled out in this treaty? Which by the way Russia signed too.

So he is digging a hole for Iran and I don't approve but it is what it is.  He is accusing Obama of being a naive politician.  Are you freaking kidding me?  Obama is step by step ratcheting up the pressure without Ahmadi even noticing it! Looks like he just woke up and started talking smack again. 

A good politician doesn't play into the hands of the enemy, especially if talking smack is not working.  So again I give all the "credit" to Ahmadi for allowing such an easy inclusion in such a historic and important world document.  I am sorry for Iran but it is what it is.

Everything is sacred.

" It comes across as just being annoying dictators...."

Indeed.

IT meaning AN.

Anti Iranian cheerleaders at it again.

Anonymouse,

Do you seriously believe in the car rap that you posted?

Allow me to point to your obvious ignorance.

Iran has repeatedly shown good gestures towards US. We helped US with the Iraq invasion when we allowed them to use our air space and we even declared that we will provide assistance to any american pilot shot down by Iraq. We later helped americans by our influence over the shi'ite militias, particularly the Sadr movement, to tone down the violence and participate in the elections.

In Afghanistan, we provided priceless intelligence to US and aligned our allies in Afghanistan to work closely with US forces to topple the Taliban. It was Iranian backed militia that was in the front line of war with the taliban . We even participated in the Afghanistan construstions to pay for infrastructures that US had bombed!

All of our previous presidents had tried to negotiate with the US administration. One of them in particular, went in to lengths to humiliate Iran by forgoing and forfeitting our legal nuclear rights just to please Americans so we can talk and negotiate on ALL issues. I clearly remember how humiliated i felt when the US administration totally ignored one of Iran's civilised but incompetent and naive presidents. That effectively killed the incompetent reform movement in Iran and gave rise to those who had enough.

The above examples are indicative of Iran's HUGE strategical assistance to the US over the last 10 years. What did Iran get in return?

What we got back was as much as you know about politics. Unless you think Obama's Norooz messege counts for something.

You are a lemon if you think we have to bend over even harder. I am not advocating war with US. But enough with talking sense and being civilised with the yankees. We have to use the same diplomacy as them since this is the only language they understand.

What's your problem Anonymouse?

I often read your writings and enjoy them but can't you see? This is not about what AN says. It is about the west reverting back to its bullying gear. If the west wants to manufacture something and blame Iran for it, they will, as they have done it hundreds of times, with or without AN's cooperation or even existence.

Your reaction looks like a typical Iranian parents when their toddler falls on the ground, for a moment and from sheer sympathy they look around to find someone to blame but they see nobody except the poor kid who is already in pain, then they smack the kid blaming him for the stumble.

And no! AN is not being analogous to a kid.

Happy New Year Mr. President !!!

Sargord more shooting from the hips from you?

Few years ago in Ahmadi's first term when he had some legitimacy many of the MPs questioned his foreign diplomacy when 3 sets of sanctions were passed.

This is the same thing, by the grace of his "wisdom" Iran is now singled out.  It is a fact and I didn't do it, I'm just giving the credit where the credit is due.

Didn't you vote for Mousavi?  So apparently there was something wrong with choosing Ahmadi with you.  Whatever it was, it doesn't make you a patriotic Iranian if you just go around and kiss his behind now.  It just says that your vote was meaningless for you. 

You are by no mean a patriotic Iranian when you close your eyes to realities and blame others for being anti-Iran.  If anything you are anti-Iran because you keep cheering the same failed policies which for all intent and purposes has lost all legitimacy and has no more place than to weaken Iran domestically and internationally.

Everything is sacred.

IRR leadership wants war

if not confrontation, and why not? what else will rally troops behind them per say? what else will give them more excuse to round up and kill tens of thousends of more people in the name of national security, unity, foregin plot, blah,blah, the usuall shit we have been hearing for thirty years now (By the way they added a new one now, a phony notion of indepence omati style)...

Failed in every aspect of life from economey, to culture to domestic and foreign policy, list of failour goes on an on but you got to keep people busy with some thing, a nice confrontation is an ideal way to go for them.

I don't know why people who

I don't know why people who are anti-Iran even go through the motions of trying to provide analysis on topics that are so obviously over their head.

Wouldn't it just be easier to say "I hate Iran" and be done with it? 

But no, we have to read about how terrible Iran is, how poorly it's performing, etc. etc. etc.

By your reckoning, Iran should have behaved like Kyrgystan. Look how well that worked out for them! That's the price you pay for lacking independence- a lesson Iran learned well back in 1953.  

Great Blog

and great analysis. Yes the regime is itching for a war despite of what their goons are saying on this site claiming the opposite.

We do not need a war in the region - we need stability and prosperity for iran and her people which this regime is incapable of providing.

____________

IRAN FIRST

____________