Lady Iran: Please sign this petition:
Thank you.Recently by Azadeh Azad | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
پیروزی نسرین ستوده پس از ٤٩ روز اعتصاب غذا | 32 | Dec 04, 2012 |
نامه به سازمان عفو بین الملل برای آزادی نسرین ستوده | 1 | Nov 30, 2012 |
مفهوم سازی واژه گونه (۳-٩) | 1 | Nov 27, 2012 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Divaneh - very well said!
by Fouzul Bashi on Sun Dec 13, 2009 06:27 AM PSTDid you hear that Sargord, dear?!
Helmet Matters
by divaneh on Sat Dec 12, 2009 10:22 AM PSTSargord is right, they hit people with round helmets and not pointy helmets. And he is right that IRI is insufficient when it comes to non-lethal forms of crowd control. Things like "let's listen to you and see if you have a valid point" or "Ok we are going to respect the human rights and show it with action"
your cartoon and petition
by Sargord Pirouz on Sat Dec 12, 2009 10:01 AM PSTAzadeh:
Your cartoon is flawed. The Islamic Republic doesn't use the old style German helmet or the new style of American helmet, which resemble that worn by the figure in your illustration. For the most part, the Iranian military uses the old style American helmet, which is more rounded.
Also, the Islamic Republic is self-sufficient in lethal firearms. Where it is not self-sufficient is in non-lethal forms of crowd control devices.
It's sort of self-defeating to advocate the IRI be deprived of non-lethal devices, and to have to rely on lethal means instead.
Does that make sense?
ramin, I am sincerely pleased to hear that
by Fouzul Bashi on Sun Dec 13, 2009 06:23 AM PSTI am sincerely pleased to hear you withdrew your original petition which sanctioned gas and oil, and look forward to reading your article stating the reasons for it. I need to think about this new petition, discuss it with some people and activists in Iran and assess risks in relation to Iran's security. Withdrawing technology for monitoring and spying might also affect Iran's ability to defend itself from external attacks and espionage. But I see the point you are making. I need to become convinced that ordinary people would not be harmed and Iran's security will not be endangered.
Thank you for withdrawing the other petition, Ramin.
No I withdrew that previous petition
by ramintork on Fri Dec 11, 2009 11:01 AM PSTI withdrew that petition and I will explain why in an article coming up. That petition was created to open debate.
I am more interested in creating a strong lobby for Iranians outside the country,a lobby for Human rights interest. This petition is no trick or facade, it is as I stated to stop specially EU countries sending technology to oppress people, and I plan to see it through.
A petiton has a wording so for instance I can't take this petition and use it for sanctions of oil and gas.
I am against sanctions however in the article I shall explain when, why and how we need the oil and gas petiton as a kind of insurance, and believe me I would be concerned about ordinary people and their suffering so just wait for that article.
I hope that clear things for you, and if you support this particular petition i.e. if you don't want IRI buying web filters and get taps on cell phones in Iran then please sign it.
Ramin jan, Aren't you the same petitioner who...
by Fouzul Bashi on Fri Dec 11, 2009 04:40 AM PSTAren't you the same Ramin who petitions the EU countries to sanction purchasing fossil fuel from Iran - that is, Iran's main source of income?! Unless you WITHDRAW that petition, THIS ONE is just a trick and a facade, a fig leaf for your original petition that will bring immeasurable suffering to those people you claim to be defending.
Ari Siltz wrote a comment on your blog regarding EU sanctions, saying correctly that such call must come from workers and activists in Iran, as part of a short term measure in coordination with strike actions in the oil and gas industry and mass mobilisation there, and not imposed from outside the country. You must take your lead from those living, working and fighting in Iran. You never responded to that.
In short, I understood your petition very well. But as it stands, withdraw your fuel sanctions petition giving reasons for withdrawal before taking on other petitions.
Dear Fouzul Bashi
by ramintork on Fri Dec 11, 2009 02:51 AM PSTI'm sorry but you haven't understood the petition.
This petition is to stop companies like Nokia selling web filters, and taps on cell phones etc. and similar technology used to catch protesters in Iran.
Techology used to catch and torture people.
It is to stop those EU companies!
If you think that by raising such a petition I am a traitor, or that people in Iran want such oppressive technology then I'm sorry I even bothered you!
"We the Iranian people ..."!!!
by Fouzul Bashi on Fri Dec 11, 2009 01:49 AM PST"We the Iranian people, with this petition echo the cry for freedom from our homeland to you the people of the world and demand the support of all political, humanitarian, and judicial bodies across the globe to take new or existing political and legislative action to stop any organization, corporation, private or public company within your national dominion as well as economic and political union from trading in technology used for the purpose of persecution and oppression of our people". !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Really? Which Iranian people have called for these sanctions? Those living in Iran, who will, according to Shustari here, 'shrivel like cattle dung', under these sanctions?!!! Or the traitors, self-interested hypocrites in the diaspora sharpening their teeth to take bites from the diseased and emaciated corpses?
If you really don't know, go and read about what happened to Iraq under sanctions. Sadam too stayed in place more powerful than ever and Iraq was bombed and destroyed.
dear azadeh: sanctions question. Fred can answer too? or ignore
by I Have a Crush on Alex Trebek on Thu Dec 10, 2009 06:56 PM PSTwith all this talk about MORE sanctions, don't you wonder about how halliburton and KBR etc are getting away with business with Iran, while their board and chairmen scream about human rights and democracy???
I mean we have sanctions with that islamic republic and there will always be countries willing to do business. Always. However, what I don't get is how halliburton isn't being exposed for rearranging its ties to Iranian business deals? How its chair people are complaining in the media, but coming back to shake hands and sign papers with the mullahs.
And why do the iranian neo cons ignore this lack of morality by these same people who promise to give Iranians the American dream or nightmare depending on what shade your skin is ???
thanks azadeh jaan
by shushtari on Thu Dec 10, 2009 06:16 PM PSTthis is exactly what needs to be done: strikes from within and embargos from outside.....the mullahs will shrivel up like a dried up pehen
god save our vatan in 2010
Thanks for your support Azadeh
by ramintork on Thu Dec 10, 2009 03:50 PM PSTI spoke to an Amnesty International person who has promised to put me in touch with the Iranian desk and discuss our petitions.
Right on: how can they make money from it and criticize IRI too?
by Shazde Asdola Mirza on Thu Dec 10, 2009 03:28 PM PSTEvery voice counts! Every action counts!
.......
by yolanda on Thu Dec 10, 2009 03:13 PM PSTHi Azadeh,
Thank you for your political cartoon!
Delaram Banafsheh (Yolanda)
"Cactus in the Desert"