I remember reading about The Queen and I (2008) and the luke warm praise that it received from pretty much all sides. So I wasn't too enthused to watch it but when the film was released on Netflix as a streaming video late last month I decided to watch it. I had recently watched The King's Speech on screen which is nominated for Oscars for just about every category. So I thought this may be a good time to watch the Monarchy from another perspective, not necessarily as "they're just human like the rest of us", but just another perspective.
I also didn't know that this was an HBO documentary. I don't have HBO anymore but their documentaries are usually good. Here's where you can watch a trailer of The Queen and I.
Overall I'd say I was impressed with this documentary and would recommend it. It has some good scenes from nice places and also Farah herself plays well. The film maker Nahid Persson Sarvestani was herself banned from making films inside Iran and had to go to exile and was a revolutionary during the 1979 revolution and called herself a Communist who also lost one of her brothers at the hands of the Revolutionary courts.
In my opinion Farah comes out good in this movie and if she's reading this you did a good job! Some advice to Farah if no one advised her on answering such questions. At the beginning Nahid asks her how she'd like to be addressed to which Farah responds Shahbanou (King's wife/Queen). I think in this context for a documentary she could have answered "how would you like to address me?". If Nahid had said Farah khanoom or Farah joon she could've responded well Mrs. Pahlavi may be better. She actually introduced herself as Farah Pahlavi in a phone conversation so it'd have been fine. If Nahid had said Shahbanou then it'd have been what she wanted in the first place.
Another advice would be to not look so surprised to see an Iranian Communist! This is when Farah first decides to cancel the documentary after she does some research and finds out that Nahid was a communist and called Shah a butcher or something like that. Then after Nahid sends her a trailer she decides to continue with the film. So at her first scene after the comeback Farah decides to interview Nahid on film. Farah asks; so are you a Communist, Tudehi, Fedaie minority or majority, Mojahed what? As if these leftist groups are supposed to have a different skin color or something! She kind of looks odd and out of place. Nahid responds that she was with a small fringe communist party distributing leaflets. In this case Farah could've acted a little more in tune and not so surprised. After all she knew who was making the film.
My third and last advice would be towards the end when Nahid asked her if she ever felt anything romantic towards someone or if anyone asked her anthing romantically since she became a widow at the age of 41. Farah responds that she didn't allow herself or anyone because of the way she felt was "her place in history". I'd have just left it at she just didn't allow herself or anyone and not any reference to history.
Other than that I think Farah did well in choosing a former communist to make a film about her and not someone from her own circles. She did well and to me she came out fine. So much so that Nahid herself said towards the end that she feels she is now a "Farah follower" but never a Monarchist.
In this documentary you also get to see some full blown red blooded Monarchists (if you haven't seen one up close and personal :-) and how they talk and act! Not like the off the wagon Johny come lately faux Monarchist we see here and there on this website!
Recently by Esfand Aashena | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
Goodbye the old iranian.com, I'm gonna miss ya ;-( | - | Dec 05, 2012 |
Persian parties are like Persian history! | 34 | Dec 03, 2012 |
In memoriam of i.com freedom fighters! | - | Nov 09, 2012 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Niki jaan what more is there?!
by Esfand Aashena on Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:34 AM PSTIf you recall Farah stopped the production at the beginning and then after she received a trailer from the filmmaker she decided to continue. Also, if you recall the filmmaker said that since she pushed her too much in the first go around, she doesn't want to push her too much in this go around.
Now let's say she had asked follow up questions and pushed her what would be the basis? It's not like Sarah Palin is running for the office of Vice Presidency and it's Katie Couric's duty to expose her airheadedness!
What are some of the most discussed criticism of Pahlavis? That there was torture of political prisoners and human rights abuses as well as corruption, dictatorship and no democracy or even trying to have democracy. They discussed those and in this day and age you're not going to make anyone change their mind, just to say it out loud. Farah said that at the time due to cold war and Soviet Union's desire to steal Iran's oil, Shah's abuses were kosher! Sort of like Bush-Cheney saying torture was legal. Same arguement but now Farah has W to quote!
I think this was just a movie to go around Farah and make some kind of documentary along with the annual funeral stuff in Egypt and some basic conversations. I really don't think there was much more to be achieved other that what was already discussed and shown in the film. Even with that some Monarchists found Farah's decision to do this ill advised.
Everything is sacred
Niki
by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Fri Feb 18, 2011 03:00 PM PSTMaybe she was ashamed of her part in bringing down the Shah. Maybe she realized that Farah Pahlavi is not the monster she was brainwashed to think. Perhaps she had a spark of sanity and regret.
People who demonized the Pahlavi are themselves guilty. Of bringing this hell to Iran. Many of them will never admit their mistake. But at least some may know in their hearts what they had done.
I saw this a while ago
by Niki Tehranchi on Fri Feb 18, 2011 02:33 PM PSTand I agree that for the most part, Mrs. Pahlavi came across positively if somehwat not very in touch with reality, but such is with people who live on a kind of higher plane above all of us little people :) What surprised me was that the documentary maker did so little to challenge Mrs. Pahlavi (I am not saying in a rude way, but just a little follow up questions would have been nice). This again is no surprise to me as I find that most people who are so vociferous against the public figures they have made their own personal nemesis, suddenly shrink in their actual presence. I don't know, are they embarassed? Are they dazzled? It certainly seemed funny to me that the documentary maker felt envious and upset that Mrs. Pahlavi left her behind when she was invited to the Italian fashion show. Maybe they spent so much time together, they each came under the delusion that they had established a real friendship which is why they each felt slighted by the other when their expectations were not met? An interesting documentary nonetheless.
COP jaan yes "My Tehran For Sale" was great too!
by Esfand Aashena on Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:33 AM PSTThat was a good movie and the Director was there and I asked a question too! You didn't notice my question?! Most if not all of the Iranian films that win something in a festival have a message.
As far as her going back to Iran someone asked if she is afraid and she said she just doesn't know what to expect. It was a good movie and I could see that movie being shown in Iran if it wasn't because of the post election protests. I've seen more critical films been shown in Iran.
I told you I'd wear some muscle shirt, can't vouch for muscle but the muscle shirt was there!
Everything is sacred
Esfand,, did you see "my tehran for sale"?
by Cost-of-Progress on Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:05 AM PSTI thought it was a powerful movie for its message. At the end the director came on stage and had a Q&A session with the audience. She claimed the movie does not try to make a point to which I say: Oh come on.... She does live in Iran and has to go back!
I looked for you in the crowd, but I know I saw Hamsade. There were only a few guys with thick eybrows and brown hair...hee hee.
____________
IRAN FIRST
____________
We should
by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Fri Feb 18, 2011 08:50 AM PSTtalk about Shah. Not only was he recent past but the institution is integrated with out national soul. After all our greatest single book Shahnameh starts with Shah!
He was a mixed bag. Mollahs are not; they are 100% rotten.
We talk about Shah because he is recent history.
by Esfand Aashena on Fri Feb 18, 2011 08:55 AM PSTCOP jaan many of us remember Shah so we keep talking about him. We don't talk about Reza Shah or Ahmad Shah! Before us our parents would talk about Reza Shah and before them I remember my grandfather talking about Ahmad Shah! We also keep talking about Khomeini for the same reasons. It's not anything special.
As far as fall of the Islamic Republic due to economic woes well I don't want to discuss it in this blog, perhaps under another subject. I think it just is what it is.
PS this week is the last week in the Iranian Film Festival and this week's film is supposed to be funny! This year I liked "Do No Disturb" the most and then "Salve" or Marham. I don't know how I'd rank this week's film, probably not #1 since Do Not Disturb is one of the funniest Iranian films I have ever seen! If only the audience could not laugh out so loud, so I could laugh more!
Everything is sacred
Esfand, what's done is done
by Cost-of-Progress on Fri Feb 18, 2011 08:14 AM PSTTruly, what shah was, or wasn't is in the past. Funny though, we're still talking about him after all these years. I really do not believe that monarchy is a feasible option for Iran anymore. So, that's that.
BUT - your assertion that this regime will only fail due to the failure of economic policies, or lack there of, is a bad state of affairs for us Iranians. It reinforces the notion (my notion) of how passive we are and that "the principle of things" means didley squat to us.....That is very troubling to me as it should be to every purrrrsian.
If that's the case Esfand, then the next group of charlatans who take the helm may be just as bad the the previous ones.
____________
IRAN FIRST
____________
VPK I'm not going to get into it with you. Thanks but no thanks!
by Esfand Aashena on Fri Feb 18, 2011 07:21 AM PSTEverything is sacred
COP jaan she was imprisoned.
by Esfand Aashena on Fri Feb 18, 2011 07:15 AM PSTHer 17 year old brother was executed and her other brother jailed and looks like not executed but bailed out. She said they asked for 4 million toman for both and then as they were looking for money they killed one so perhaps they borrowed 2 million in a rush and bought his life just in time.
As far as progress of progress and a "secular dictator" well again those are the "regrets" that Monarchists have. Apparently they were much more dictator than secular!
Shah left Iran in 1953 and would leave again so he was about himself and his family. I recommend this article Sweet Snow in Farsi if you haven't read it already. It is not only funny but very telling and also not only they were much more dictator than secular but also not so much secular!
I believe the demise of Islamic Republic will come when their economic policies fail. Ahmadi has certainly accelerated the rogue economic policies. We may also not live long enough to see the change and have to wait for the old guard to die and a new generation to replace them. We may be in our 80s or 90s and by then we won't give a hoot to anything!
Everything is sacred
Esfand Jan
by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Fri Feb 18, 2011 07:09 AM PSTWhen you're a 17 year old with anmempty pocket and hopes for a better future you think different than a 37 year old with an additional 20 years of experience.
When a person is 17 years old they should listen to their elders. I did. I was 17 and full of ***. I was not sure what is going on. My parents to their credit explained what the dangers were. I listened and decided Shah was better than Khomeini.
Maybe people should use their brains. Even a 16 year old has one!
True about the perspectives, esfand jon
by Cost-of-Progress on Fri Feb 18, 2011 06:53 AM PSTI am not a monarchist. I was too young and full of testastrone to even care back then. All I know is that the country was on the path of progress and yes the Shah was a dictator but secular and blah this and blah that.
I think of relative terms - This filmamker is lucky she wasn't executed by the mullahs for her revolutionary ideas (komonisti). Thousands were following the devolution when they retrurned to iran (those who were in the streets of DC yelling marg bar shah).
In my opinion, Prince chubby, as you put it, is irrelevant as he has been too far away from making his views or stance known to all (if he has any). He's been too uninvolved, shall we say, to be a player in Iran's future now that he is 51 years old.
Having said all this, we all know how the regime of the mullahs was propped up and brought to power (ehhh...by people...oh, sure), so anything is possible. Who know what's in store for Iran's future. One thing is for sure: Iran is currently in one of the darkest periods she's been for a long time.
All in all, I thought this was a good production.
____________
IRAN FIRST
____________
COP jaan she was not alone.
by Esfand Aashena on Fri Feb 18, 2011 06:31 AM PSTI didn't see this film from the perspective of discussing the revolution. I never think in terms of having "regrets" when discussing the revolution. I guess I have as much "regret" as Shah would "regret" himself.
Communist or not people change. When you're a 17 year old with an empty pocket and hopes for a better future you think different than a 37 year old with an additional 20 years of experience.
I think the general underlying message was Farah herself. Back in 1989 Barbara Walters interviewed her and followed her for a few days and there was a scene where Farah was counting change for laundry! That whole interview seemed staged!
This film was more than 20 years later and again 20 years of more experience and reading and "regretting". So this time she decided to approve an HBO documentary and chose the right person. I don't think a similar film can be made for Prince chubby! He never seems to have any "regret"! Getting off the subject, I had promised myself not to get into Prince Chubby! Oh well!
Everything is sacred
I saw it on HBO
by Cost-of-Progress on Fri Feb 18, 2011 06:10 AM PSTwhen it was on-demand (I think in 2009) cause I missed it when it aired first. I thought it was a pretty good presentation. I also thought about the irony of a once "revolutionary" individual making a movie of the entity I am sure she (once?) hated.
I also thought about the underlying message (in my opinion) that the movie might want to convey:
Baba ajab gohi khordim ANghelab kardim.......
____________
IRAN FIRST
____________
Well, I don't have any advice for the filmmaker.
by Esfand Aashena on Fri Feb 18, 2011 05:10 AM PSTEverything is sacred
a few advice
by Fatollah on Thu Feb 17, 2011 04:24 PM PSTI would also give a few advice to Mrs. Nahid Sarvestani. but, i am not gonna! cause am too tired ...