Because I like Iranian.com, I hate to see it turn into a mouthpiece of the Islamist-Socialist propaganda machine. IRI supporters who use terms like “Zionist”, “CIA agent”, “Monarchist”, “AIPAC agent”, “Jew lover”, “Racist”, “ZioNazi”, “Islamophobe”, “Imperialist”, and others, to assassinate the character of patriots who stand with the Iranian people against the Fascist Mullah regime, the supporters who have devoted all their time and energy to bash Israel without saying a single word about Iran and what’s going on there, the ones who bash U.S and its system and promote for a Socialist agenda, the ones who copy and paste opinions from extreme leftist websites and post it here under “news”, the ones who make up numbers and twist definitions and invent facts, the ones who can’t think past the clichés, all those people, tried hard to make this site their nest, and a few years back, it seemed they succeeded!
However, with the rising awareness among Iranians and non-Iranians about the true Apartheid and barbaric nature of the Iranian regime, and the danger of staying silent, the silent majority of Iranians woke up and are speaking up. The tide has dramatically turned. I have been visiting Iranian.com for years and there is a total shift. And it’s not only on this site, but other sites as well. For years, going back to early 50s in Iranian history, the silent majority didn’t have a voice, because their voice was hijacked by the Islamist – Socialist bully-in-nature propaganda machine. Although the Islamist Socialist ideology compromises a minority of the Iranian voice, but they are very vocal and active (and by the way, we need to be the same). That was the case up until few years back. Since then, we have seen a total shift.
That promises good outcomes for our country. In today’s world, the public opinion war is as crucial and important as military war. Public opinion, whether misguided and influenced by certain propaganda machines or not, determines and defines whether something is right or wrong, at least for the short term. We all saw instances like during the Iraq war and the Guantanamo detention center issue. There wasn’t any room left to discuss those issues objectively. It was all about clichés and how the leftist media defined the truth.
In conclusion, I like to thanks all the true Iranians who contributed in reversing that trend. We all know who you are. You were called “Zionists” and “Imperialis”,,,and things of that nature. That only shows that you are right, and those who use these terms are wrong and partners in the crimes committed by the IRI in Iran because of their apologetic stance to those crimes. They are justifying those crimes, therefore, they are collaborators. It is sad that most these folks do not see this reversal of trend and still think this is 1960, not 2009 (Although a few of them do. Recently, one of these pro IRI socialists was criticizing Jahanshah for “selling his website to Pentagon and Israel”!!). They don’t wanna see it, but most Iranians do see it.
What you are doing makes a difference, and is making a difference.
Keep doing what you doing and stay on course.
Recently by Farhad Kashani | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
Iranians have it far worse than Palestinians | 7 | Sep 30, 2009 |
Mesbah Yazdi | 24 | Sep 04, 2009 |
Neo Cons or Neo Comms: Who got it right on Iran? | 4 | Aug 27, 2009 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Agha Mehdi
by capt_ayhab on Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:22 PM PSTyou re-arrange my statement as you wish. They are pretty self explanatory. I have no further addition or deletion to them.
Thanks for your time
capt_ayhab [-YT]
capt_ayhab - speaking of peace loving.
by Mehdi Mazloom on Tue Feb 03, 2009 04:39 PM PSTYou wrote:
Are Iranians peace loving nation, DAMN right we are.
Correction. The people in Iran are peaceful. Not the regime.
Is IR helping and funding entities like Hamas, DAMN right they are.
Since all that support it directed against Israel, why shouldn't Israel use extreme measure to take on these two groups, and indirectly on IRI itself?.
Is Israel the worst kind of terrorist nation, damn righ she is.
You have already provided the answer to that question in your previous question..
Are Jews all terrorist and blood thristy, HELL no.
Oh, now you are trying to sound politically correct. Nice try,
Q. Are women in Iran are some of the most gorgeous in the world?.
A. My god, they are. (so the Israeli ones)
.
by capt_ayhab on Tue Feb 03, 2009 04:07 PM PSTShocked!
Take a chill pill dude, I asked for substantiated data, not the propaganda and speculation.
Post your non-sense comment till you are blue in the face. You have to find someone who cares about it first. One more suggestion, don't back yourself up. Its rather childish.
Who ever calls me an anti Semite needs to understand that I shall clean his/her clock without hesitation.
Kaveh N.
As I explained, there has been numerous speculations, allegation, and propaganda. For a responsible person, these data must be sorted through, fact must be separated from fiction that are product of propaganda and demonizing campaign.
I bring to your attention all the allegation that was started preceding the US war with Iraq. Only time showed that they were all falsified to serve the purpose that GW and his gang had in invading Iraq. Iran's case is no different. Its just war drums being trumped by interest groups, headed by Israel. That my frind does not sit very well with me.
As I have stated very clearly, there is no doubt in my mind that IR funds and supports resistance groups in ME. However, when one makes allegation such as [Iran has killed more Americans.... blah blah] ought to be able to prove the allegation. Unlike GW bush and his gang's inability to provide a shred of deviance about WMD in Iraq.
I will bring to your attention the UK parliaments reaction to their PM's backing of the GW's story.
Respectfully
capt_ayhab [-YT]
ayhab
by Zion on Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:07 PM PSTHaven't you made a fool of your self enough in the other (agha) thread already?
//iranian.com/main/blog/meybokhor-manbarb...
Do you have to keep repeating it all over the place? [sigh]
----
Thanks Kaveh and Shocked. No one serious about this issue has any doubts about the Iranian involvement in these affairs, especially the attack on US marines in Lebanon.
.
by Kaveh Nouraee on Tue Feb 03, 2009 11:36 AM PST.
Captain
by Kaveh Nouraee on Tue Feb 03, 2009 11:35 AM PSTWe'll just see this differently.
To me, whether you pull the trigger, or pay for someone to do it, it's the same.
And it does look as though Zion provided some data to back up the original statement.
Ayhab
by shocked! (not verified) on Tue Feb 03, 2009 09:52 AM PSTman. you are way out of line. you come in here blasting away and spouting crap like the queen of sheba. what's got into you? you've turned into a vicious shrew. you attack when they don't agree with you? you insult people right and left. i have to ask YOU. who died and put YOU in charge? NOBODY. you are quilty of the very think you accuse zion of. she gave you the facts you asked for. kaveh gave you the facts you asked for. are you really going to sit here and deny? you are in serious denial my friend and need a break.
you're sounding way too much like your buddies.
wait a minute. maybe you are!!! oh god. please, grow up. LOLOL
moderator 1234. i will submit this a thousand times until you post this.
Kaveh N
by capt_ayhab on Tue Feb 03, 2009 09:46 AM PSTMaster Kaveh,
There are many speculations and allegations. As you said, sorting out through the data, trying to separate facts from propaganda is very hard, specially when it comes to direct involvement of a regime like IR.
There is no doubt in my mind that IR has been helping entities such as Hamas, Hezbollah and etc. However one must realize that when regime like GW Bush, and Zionist place entire country in [axes of evil] category, they get fully geared to demonize Iran every which way possible.
My problem is when characters such as Zion, with clear agenda of demonizing Iran and Iranians, propagate every BS they can come up, I see it my job to hold her feet to the fire, and force her to come up with proof to back her arajeefs up. So far she has been unable to do so.
When she claims that IRAN HAS KILLED MORE AMERICANS..... you know that she is not correct. You know better than I do that IF USA has ever been able to proof, beyond any doubt, direct involvement of Iran in any of those actions, they would have bombed the crap out of Iran long time ago. As they did with Afghanestan, Iraq and etc.
Are Iranians peace loving nation, DAMN right we are. Is IR helping and funding entities like Hamas, DAMN right they are. Is Israel the worst kind of terrorist nation, damn righ she is. Are Jews all terrorist and blood thristy, HELL no.
One major fact always must be kept in mind, many Muslim resistance groups around the world have modeled after IR. Good or bad? it is up to them to decide. As for Iran and Iranians, Islamic regime has been a disaster to say the least. but lets not extrapolate what IR does to rest of the Iranians, As is the racist agenda behind Agha Zion's comments.
Do you see the difference my friend?
Respectfully
capt_ayhab [-YT]
Zion Agha
by capt_ayhab on Tue Feb 03, 2009 09:23 AM PSTDon't make a fool of yourself, I asked for proven data, and not speculations.
and listen to me carefully, I have read your HANDBOOK, so do not waste my time by your jibirish and hateful labeling. If you do not have the education to conduct a LOGICAL dialogue, take your hate filled, baseless and childish propaganda elsewhere.
Your desperation in your dialogue is perfectly obvious when you resort to your Victimology and racist call. Doesn't your handbook tell you not to OVERUSE the anti somatic bull crap all the time?? lol
cheers and go back to your research kiddo. your grade is 25%
capt_ayhab [-YT]
Capt ayhab,
by Farhad Kashani on Mon Feb 02, 2009 07:54 PM PSTCapt ayhab,
Resorting to insult and using profanity is a common practice of uncivilized people like you who support the IRI regime. Also, your use of the word “racist” shows how frequent you guys use words like “racist” and “Zionists” and others, in such an absurd manner, without any regard to common sense and reason. You just throw those words like you giving out candy on Halloween! Simply pathetic!
Mammad,
Like I told you before, I’m here for the same reason that you are here. Whether I’m wasting my time surfing the web, or whether I am a “revolutionary leader”, that’s none of your concern. If you are here to make a point, then, so am I! If you are here to waste time, so am I! If you are here to become a “revolutionary leader”, then, so am I! I’ll let you deal with that.
All you gotta know is this, any time, and every time, people like you mention any word in support of the IRI regime and against the people of Iran, you will have us to deal with. What we achieve from this, or what we “think” we achieve from this, is something that we need to be concerned with, not you. Trust me on this.
Sure ayhab-agha
by Zion on Mon Feb 02, 2009 05:11 PM PSTNot that you with your track records of false data and anti-semitic diatribes and dirty links are in any position to ask this. Nevertheless, I am always glad to present sorces for what I say:
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Beirut_barracks_...
//the-case-against-iran.blogspot.com/2006/12/...
//www.blogrunner.com/snapshot/D/5/2/46E243C30... (News item)
//www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/artic... (full article)
//afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5g1XRa7v7LYwf0s...
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_1983_U.S._Embas...
//www.brookings.edu/opinions/2006/0726iran_by...
//fdd.typepad.com/fdd/2006/12/murder_of_us_ai...
:-)
Captain
by Kaveh Nouraee on Mon Feb 02, 2009 04:23 PM PSTIt's widely known that Shia Iraqi insurgents who've killed and wounded many US soldiers have been funded, trained and armed by the IRI.
Specific data is pretty hard to come by as far as dates and casualties, because the DoD is deliberately vague on it.
I'm curious as to what you think concerning the notion that Iran is "the more peaceful nation", considering all it has done to essentially operate two major terrorist organizations.
Zion
by capt_ayhab on Mon Feb 02, 2009 03:39 PM PSTYou say: [The regime in Iran has killed more Americans in recent times than anyone else except Al-Qaeda]
kindly elaborate, document and analyze by date, incident and number of casualties.
capt_ayhab [-YT]
PS. no quotes form your [hand book], and no point taking. Simple stat will do it.
Ridiculous
by Zion on Mon Feb 02, 2009 02:44 PM PST'Between the two, Iran is the more peaceful nation without any record of attacking her neighbors, nevermind Israel or US! now that was a ridiculously far-fetched hypothetical situation! don't you agree? '
The regime in Iran has killed more Americans in recent times than anyone else except Al-Qaeda. Not only has the regime in Iran its hand full of blood of Iraqis and Afghans and Lebanses, its murdering range goes all the way around the globe to Jews of Argentina. Regarding the ultimate hatred of Iranian regime (and its mouth pieces here as this particular one) of Jews and of Israel is beyond any rational person's doubts. If Iran gets its hands on nukes, the probability of nukes going off in Israel either by attacks or by terrorist infiltration increases manifolds. It is also not only Ahmadinejad that speaksthis way. Just recently Tehran's hardline Newspaper published an op ed about the need to thrwo away any cover in arming Hamas and the rest of aplestinians with all modern warfare to annhiliate Israel. A few years back the so called "moderate" former president of Iran, Rafsanjani, opnely talked about nuking Israel and how its benefits ae worth the possbole harms of a retaliation.
To whitewahs such a fascits regime so shamelessly here is proof of many things, and its good to have that for the record.
It is also extremely pathetic.
Next time you copy and paste
by Kaveh Nouraee on Mon Feb 02, 2009 02:58 PM PSTuse the complete sentence. Don't use a portion in order to manipulate its proper and intended context the way you like.
The "more peaceful nation"? The IRI is at war with Israel, using their proxies, because the fact is this pathetic regime that you claim to dislike (but love to excuse) is too chickenshit to even dare to raise a finger of their own at Israel, so they pay Hamas and Hezbollah to do it for them.
I don't know what's more "ridiculously far-fetched": your misplaced belief that Iran is the more peaceful nation, or your equally misplaced belief that everyone else is either naive, gullible, or just plain stupid as to agree with you.
Is Iran attacking Israel a ridiculous hypothetical?
by DW Duke on Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:23 PM PSTNot really. Whenever a nation's leader rattles his saber it must be taken seriously even if he is seen by many as a dwarfed version of a Danny O'Day doll. While Iran has been quiet for a couple of decades the 8 year war with Iraq was not all that long ago in the big scheme of things. So I really am interested in knowing how a "real Iranian" would weigh in given that eventuality.
You wrote: "Between the two, Iran is the more peaceful nation without any record of attacking her neighbors, nevermind Israel or US! now that was a ridiculously far-fetched hypothetical situation! don't you agree?"
Thank you Kaveh...
by IRANdokht on Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:08 AM PSTfor replying to DW Duke on my behalf.
George W. Bush actually prevented a military strike against Iran, but it's a fact.
Mr Duke, as Kaveh pointed out, the attack on Iran was already planned and almost attempted by Israel and Bush stopped it. Iran's current president runs his mouth off, that is not equal to actual plans for military attack.
Between the two, Iran is the more peaceful nation without any record of attacking her neighbors, nevermind Israel or US! now that was a ridiculously far-fetched hypothetical situation! don't you agree?
IRANdokht
The test has already been taken
by Kaveh Nouraee on Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:44 AM PSTAnd some of you have failed miserably.
What the hell is this idiotic rhetoric that Israel is going to attack Iran? You people can't keep your stories straight!
On one hand, the sentiment is either "Israel is America's bitch" or "America is Israel's bitch. Either way, Tel Aviv does not want to interrupt the operation of the ATM known as the U.S.
On the other hand, reports are they had claimed that they wanted the option to strike. But Bush told them to back off and that it was not an option.
I know people like IRANdokht would rather drink a cyanide martini than admit that her favorite president George W. Bush actually prevented a military strike against Iran, but it's a fact. And although I seriously doubt her newly inaugurated knight in a shining black armored limousine Barack Obama would ever reverse Bush's decision, if he were to do so for some reason, I can only begin to imagine the double-talk that will come from that.
Reply to Mammad
by DW Duke on Mon Feb 02, 2009 09:27 AM PSTTo what major Jewish organizations are you referring?
You wrote: "All major Jewish organizations in the US have declared that one cannot claim that they are not anti-Jew, but anti-Zionism."
Fantasy lander
by Mammad on Mon Feb 02, 2009 08:24 AM PSTThere is just a "minor" difference between you and me which you, despite to all your claims of "there is no way that you know more than me" nonsense do not seem to be capable of understanding:
I speak for myself, and only for myself. I do not have a fantasy about leading a revolution from this blog, or changing the "pro-IRI" or "anti-IRI" tide. I always say, "in my opinion" when it comes to important issues. I do not thank others on behalf of Iran, or Iranian people. Just look at the first lines of your "response." I do not accuse of people being pro-or anti-IRI.
And who "supports" you here? A bunch of Zionist propagandists. Of course, you consider calling someone a Zionist a labeling or name calling. It is not. Zionism is the foundation for the establishment of Israel. All major Jewish organizations in the US have declared that one cannot claim that they are not anti-Jew, but anti-Zionism. So, calling somebody a Zionist is not only not name calling, but is calling them for what they proudly call themselves. One of them called Kourosh the first Zionist!!
The one whose devoid-of-substance articles, fabrications, exaggerations, dismissal of history but also rewriting it, .... have been called for what they are is you, sir.
Comment as much as you want. Say whatever you want. Criticize me and other anyway you want. But, speak only for yourself, not for a single other person. You have no mandate here. You do not represent anybody but yourself.
Mammad
Farhad
by capt_ayhab on Mon Feb 02, 2009 08:06 AM PSTFarhad you say: [You’re bullying to silence people to say whatever they like to say, for
whatever reason it is, will only backfire on you, so Mammad, I have a crush on Alex Trebek, Kurush, KB, Nader Vanaki, Nikki, Sadeq, Javad
Yasseri, Capt-ayhab,..and all the others who are betraying Iran and its people by apologizing for the regime,]
I asked you one question dude. Who died and put you in charge of freedom??????
Every single decent women and men here are appalled by your racist categorization of people of Iran, including but not limited to ladies and the gentlemen you have mentioned by name.
Supporters of your ludicrous and ignorant [Arajeefs] been likes of Zion and Samsam111119 who are known propagators of [ajnabi] attacking Iran. Yet you have the audacity to call every decent and honest people, who disagree with your[k---s o sher] un-Iranians?
I am going to be perfectly honest with you sir, You are a disgrace to Iran and Iranians. You and your treacherous ilk, with your cheer leader Zion, represent all that is obnoxious about any human being, and that is treason to Iran and Iranians.
Have a good life pal.
capt_ayhab [-YT]
Reply to Irandohkt
by DW Duke on Mon Feb 02, 2009 07:25 AM PSTWhat if it goes the other way and Iran attacks Israel first as Ahmajinedad continuously threatens. Applying the true test of "real Iranians" vs. "un-Iranians," how would the real Iranians speak? Would they speak against the attack or would they support the aggressors? Like you I also hope I don't see that day but I wouldn't put it past the IRI either.
You wrote:
I believe the true test of "real iranians" vs "un-iranians" would be when Israel attacks Iran.
We'll see who speaks against the attack and who supports the aggressors. I hope I don't see that day, but I wouldn't put it past them.
Thank you to all the
by Farhad Kashani on Mon Feb 02, 2009 06:22 AM PSTThank you to all the “true” Iranians who stood with the people of Iran in your comments.
And for all the IRI apologists who think they can still fool the people, here are a few notes:
- It is amazing that the ones who contribute to this site much more than I do, accuse me to try to “perpetuate propaganda” by coming to this site! Again, every word that comes out of their mouth proves a certain uncivilized attribute they have, and this one proves their hypocrisy.
- Also, the ones who post actual “opinions” not “news” from extreme socialist and Islamist website and post them as “news”, accuse me of perpetuating propaganda!!! Most of us post simply “news” as “news”, because we believe in the truth, but they, who unlike us, are devoting all their day to searching the web finding sites that they can use for their propaganda. Again, hypocsticy to the infinite level.
- Again, they are resorting to personal attacks saying “you think are a freedom fighter”, “you think you are leading a revolution”, where in fact, I am doing exactly what they are doing, contributing to this site. So, do you guys think you are contributing somehow to the political situation in Iran, are you just here to past time, or perpetuate propaganda? Which one is it? Always remember this, and think this way, whatever reason you all are here for, I’m here for that reason also, whether its to pass time, or perpetuate propaganda, or contribute to the situation in Iran, whatever it is……always remember, I am here for the same reason that you are here. So, go think about that. These techniques of character assassination wont work with me. Save your energy. You’re bullying to silence people to say whatever they like to say, for whatever reason it is, will only backfire on you, so Mammad, I have a crush on Alex Trebek, Kurush, KB, Nader Vanaki, Nikki, Sadeq, Javad Yasseri, Capt-ayhab,..and all the others who are betraying Iran and its people by apologizing for the regime, the ones who have bullied the Iranian people for years, and now their upset because they have been pushed back, always, remember, you can make belief whatever reason you are here for, and always remember, we are here for that same reason.
- One last note for anyone who ever had any doubt how uncivilized and cold hearted these IRI supporting Socialists are, this is the response you get when you post your opinion, this is what “I have a crush on Alex Trebek” said in her response: “Gooreh babat with your "politics" and "struggle". I rest my case!
To anyone who apologizes or supports the IRI regime in any way, shape or form, we will call you out, we will push you back, we will not let you talk on behalf of us, we will stand up, and we will continue talking and participating and strive to make a difference, thousand times stronger and more devoted than the day before. Whether it is on Iranian.com or elsewhere. Mark my word for it.
Nader Vanaki
by DW Duke on Mon Feb 02, 2009 05:24 AM PSTWhat about the people who are outside of Iran because they had to flee after the Revolution? Are they bystanders? Do they have the right to speak about change in the government?
John Stewert Mill noted that the idea of democracy works provided individual rights are protected. But if not, then the democracy fails and can be worse than a tyrannical dictatorship. How are the individual rights protected in Iran? People are arrested for speaking out on political issues. If people cannot speak to the issues then how can the public become educated to vote for a change in the regime?
During the lifetime of Iranians living today, there has never been a government free of human rights abuses. How can the populace know there is anything better if they have never seen it?
Isn't it incumbant upon everyone in the world to assure that certain basic human rights are upheld everywhere in the world? Does the geographic location of a nation permit the government of that nation to deny the rights of individuals? Just as people all over the world and here on Iranian.com stood up for the rights of Gazan's, yet they were bystanders. Should they have remained silent?
Mr Yassari
by Yamini (not verified) on Mon Feb 02, 2009 02:43 AM PSTAnd the best thing you can do Sir is:
She'r o ver baftan
Your opposite number : Yamini!!!
Fantasy land
by Mammad on Sun Feb 01, 2009 08:39 PM PSTA while ago, Mr. Jahanshah Rashidian posted an article on iranian.com in which he claimed that there are too many pro-IRI people commenting in this site, or even posting articles here, and asked Mr. JJ to declare what his site is for and based on the declaration be more selective in the type of articles that are allowed to be posted, especially on the front page.
Now, FK is saying the opposite, unless we believe that in a few short months there has been a tidal wave of "change," everybody "woke up," and everybody started to see things more clearly.
In the fantasy land of FK, iranian.com is the center of the struggle against the IRI. He actually believes that the first thing that Iranians do every morning, and the last thing they do at night before going to bed, is checking iranian.com and, in particular, his often devoid-of-any-substance articles and those of people like him. He fancies himself as the leader of a great struggle, staged from no other place than iranian.com. He has reached the conclusion that just because after he posts his devoid-of-substance articles he gets a few people - just like him - to post positive comments under a wide variety of anonymous names which, when added up, seems like a large number like 30 or 40, Iranians have woken up. They have finally started to see the light, they are finally developing the vision, all because of him, and his few like-minded commrades - sorry, friends; commrades is used by communists whom FK truly hates.
Note how FK thanks (on behalf of the entire Iranian nation and Iranian people, of course!) those who have stood up with Iranian people. And, who are these "patriots?" Those, (1) who did not criticize Israel over its war crimes in Gaza due to, as Hasan Yousefi Eshkevari, a leading political figure in Iran and a man who spent years in the IRI jail said, their hatred of IRI, or (2) accepted at face value the propaganda of Israel's agents about how, in order to defend itself, Israel had to kill at least 1400 Palestinians (at least 1/3 of whom were children and at least half of them women and children), injure several thousand more, destroy practically everything, from hospitals, to prison, to university, to UN schools, etc.
So, if you shut up about Gaza, you are a great "patriot" in view of FK. If you agree with his nonsense, you are a great "patriot." If you say "bah bah" and "chah chah" in response to his devoid-of-substance articles, you are a great "patriot." If you believe in his fabrications, revisions of history, and writing of a whole new history (even though he has said history is just a matter of opinion of people), you are a great "patriot." Otherwise, you are an un-Iranian. Boy, how am I going to fall sleep tonight?
So, once again, FK has posted a devoid-of-substance article that says nothing, other than giving us a glimpse into his fantasy land, where he is leading a democratic revolution against the IRI, from no place other than a blog on iranian.com
Mammad
Zion: such bucket full of rubbish can only come from your mouth!
by Shazde Asdola Mirza on Sun Feb 01, 2009 06:40 PM PSTHilter killed or lead to the death of 60 million people! For 10 israelis you want us to support the bombing of Iran and ruining it like Iraq? You and 'real iranians' supporting you, disgust me and all the true IRANIANS!
Go to hell, you worhtless racist monster!!!
We will send the mullahs to keep you company too!!!
Approval of Efriteh is the kiss of death for the integrity of an
by Mola Nasredeen on Sun Feb 01, 2009 05:44 PM PSTy blogger on iranian website. With all the budget cuts for mental health institutes it has happened again. It goes back to Reagan years. He was the one who closed all the mental asylums and let patients to roam free on the streets and now, on the Cyber space.
I wonder when they let her out?
Real Iranians
by Zion on Sun Feb 01, 2009 03:46 PM PST'I believe the true test of "real iranians" vs "un-iranians" would be when Israel attacks Iran.'
As was pointed out earlier, if god forbid such a thing ever comes to be, the responsibility will be all on the regime in Iran and its mouthpieces as well as the useful lefty idiots. How would the real patriotic Iranians react? The same that really true patriotic Germans reacted to Nazis who dragged the German people as well as the entire Europe, and the world, into a devastating war. Certainly not like the mouthpieces and the useful idiots of the Nazi regime.
To Yachov
by Nader Vanaki on Sun Feb 01, 2009 01:20 PM PSTI define bystanders as the population residing outside Iran and most of the people who leave comments on Iranian.com
We are outsiders and those who live in Iran are the ones who know what is best for the country. Once they participate in elections then they will vote in their government. Those who do not vote are just simply bystanders. So any change will come from within Iran and not by the US, Israel, Yachov, Farhad Kashani, or Superman.
Farhad Kashani has vowed to head the Nuremberg Trials once he accends the throne of Iran. Until then I am going to take a nap.