The recent news of five Brits having been taken in by IRR, the Islamist Rapist Republic adding them to the three Americans taken few months back adding them to tens of thousands of Iranians taken in over the years topped by the decision to build another ten nuke sites--are only the latest in a long series of dare-you-do-anything-about-it moves.
Despite what the Islamist Rapists say the verifiable facts are:
1-IRR’s military power when comparing it with a modern war machinery of the West amounts next to nothing, not even a serious nuisance.
2-IRR‘s often stated belief that with America engaged in two fronts she is unable to start another military engagement is patently false. The U.S. conventional military was designed and equipped to face up to Warsaw Pact on multiple fronts. The Islamist Rapists should not believe their own propaganda, the awesome air and naval power of U.S. is intact and more than enough by a factor of gazillion to in a matter of days if not hours rendering all the antiquated armament of IRR useless.
By now it should be clear to all that the new U.S. administration is not the panacea many were hoping it to be; its first and foremost obligation is safeguarding America’s vital national interests starting with her security.
Softer gentler language should not be mistaken for a fundamental reevaluation of what constitutes vital American national interests; the Islamist Rapists are recklessly threatening those interests and at some point will be meeting the reality of American military might.
Unfortunately IRR is shielded by Iran and Iranians and that is why all needs to be done to bring the regime down without allowing it to impose a cataclysmic war on the nation.
Before the nuke acquiring IRR goes beyond the point of no return there is still precious time to avoid war. The sane world has to openly and unremittingly help enslaved Iranians with material and moral support to overthrow their common enemy. Time to head off disaster is at hand.
//www.nytimes.com/2009/12/01/world/middleeast/01sailors.html
Recently by Fred | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
ادا اطوار اسلامی | 5 | Dec 05, 2012 |
مسجد همجنسگرایان | 1 | Dec 05, 2012 |
Iranians are legitimate target | 10 | Dec 04, 2012 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Timothy: I agree with
by Bavafa on Tue Dec 01, 2009 08:42 AM PSTTimothy:
I agree with you that Iran militarily or otherwise is no match to US or perhaps Israel, if for nothing else, both countries have nukes and one has already proved not to be shy in using them on civilian population (all facts not accusation)
But I would be extremely worried for all the innocent people that could get killed in such adventure, just as all of those innocent 500K to 1M innocent civilian that have got murdered in Iraq (all facts not accusation)
Of course the innocent civilian would be the Iranians people and perhaps Israelis that would be the target of Iranians reprisal (now this is speculation but perhaps not too much)
Mehrdad
MOOSIRvaPIAZ: Don't be
by Bavafa on Tue Dec 01, 2009 08:27 AM PSTMOOSIRvaPIAZ: Don't be fooled by the lack of "airtight sanctions" advocacy here/now, this is a wolf in the sheep skin.
AIPAC goal is to weaken Iran at any cost or methods and their reprehensive on IC would not be an exception to that goal and will use any tactics that are thought to by their masters.
I have a crush on Alex Terek:
If Bush/Cheney/RP/Khamenie/AN and the reset of Neo Con/Zionist are going to be let in Heaven, then I will rather to go to hell not to be in their company.
Mehrdad
Tahgord Pirouz, you must have access to really
by Faramarz_Fateh on Tue Dec 01, 2009 08:22 AM PSTpowerful psych drugs man.
1,500 Iraqis killed 30,000 U.S. soldiers?! LOL LOL LOOOOL
Thanks for the laugh.
I don't know what is your prior posting ID. But your recent posts, especially this one is destined to nominate you for the person with the most moronic statement in 2009 for sure.
.
by timothyfloyd on Wed May 12, 2010 09:05 PM PDT.
Making progress
by MOOSIRvaPIAZ on Tue Dec 01, 2009 07:58 AM PSTI'm encouraged by your decision to drop the "airtight sanctions" routine - even though I think you still believe in it.
An optimal solution is needed to get to democracy for Iran. Sanctions that cripple the society, war and any sort of confrontation moves us away from that goal. We cant really do anything about the leadership in Iran, but we can make a difference outside Iran.
US military limitations
by Sargord Pirouz on Tue Dec 01, 2009 03:59 AM PSTRoughly 1500-3000 full time Iraqi and Arab fighters managed to inflict over 30,000 casualties on the US military during the course of the ongoing Iraq war.
What's your guess on a potential figure against 1.5 million IRGC and Basij?
A pure bombing campaign? Imagine the MRBM and SRBM attacks, as well as the immediate effect on the Persian Gulf region. The Afghanistan/Iraqi fronts? The world economy?
What's the first thing Iran will do- build a functional indigenously manufactured nuclear weapon (instead of merely possessing a latent nuclear capacity). So you'll have accomplished what you set out to prevent! Highly illogical.
Even dumb old GW Bush was smart enough not to shoot himself in the foot that badly.
"nuke acquiring". that's it. such simple words.
by I Have a Crush on Alex Trebek on Tue Dec 01, 2009 03:46 AM PSTand they are believed and accepted. and the smart bombs can land and break people and homes. shame on you fred. shame. if you are still healthy enough mentally to feel it.
China Communists and Saudi Medievalists are not the problem
by I Have a Crush on Alex Trebek on Tue Dec 01, 2009 03:26 AM PSTIran and its sangak style nuclear program are the problem. We need to look to real leaders like moose hunters and neo conservative darlings to figure out how to bomb Iran and make it a "legacy of American democracy building".
To be honest, Fred is right. We must stop a nukular Iran. After all, the world will end and jesus christ when he returns will only take the souls of the Bush family, Pahlavi family, and other good neo conservatives to Heaven. The rest of us will be in hell with Fred and his AIPAC jesus denying lobbyists.
Relax Baba
by flyingkite on Tue Dec 01, 2009 03:21 AM PSTOne attack on Iran, and Iranians will be swarming over the borders with Iraq to let them have a taste of iranian medicine.
American vital interests? are you joking, One could say that China poses the greatest threat to US vital interest in th ereal meaning of the word. What has US done? NOTHING.