Daring America


by Fred

The recent news of five Brits having been taken in by IRR, the Islamist Rapist Republic adding them to the three Americans taken few months back adding them to tens of thousands of Iranians taken in over the years topped by the decision to build another ten nuke sites--are only the latest in a long series of dare-you-do-anything-about-it moves.

Despite what the Islamist Rapists say the verifiable facts are:

1-IRR’s military power when comparing it with a modern war machinery of the West amounts next to nothing, not even a serious nuisance.

2-IRR‘s often stated belief that with America engaged in two fronts she is unable to start another military engagement is patently false. The U.S. conventional military was designed and equipped to face up to Warsaw Pact on multiple fronts.  The Islamist Rapists should not believe their own propaganda, the awesome air and naval power of U.S. is intact and more than enough by a factor of gazillion to in a matter of days if not hours rendering all the antiquated armament of IRR useless.

By now it should be clear to all that the new U.S. administration is not the panacea many were hoping it to be; its first and foremost obligation is safeguarding America’s vital national interests starting with her security.

Softer gentler language should not be mistaken for a fundamental reevaluation of what constitutes vital American national interests; the Islamist Rapists are recklessly threatening those interests and at some point will be meeting the reality of American military might.

Unfortunately IRR is shielded by Iran and Iranians and that is why all needs to be done to bring the regime down without allowing it to impose a cataclysmic war on the nation.

Before the nuke acquiring IRR goes beyond the point of no return there is still precious time to avoid war. The sane world has to openly and unremittingly help enslaved Iranians with material and moral support to overthrow their common enemy. Time to head off disaster is at hand.  





Recently by FredCommentsDate
ادا اطوار اسلامی
Dec 05, 2012
مسجد همجنسگرایان
Dec 05, 2012
Iranians are legitimate target
Dec 04, 2012
more from Fred

Timothy: I agree with

by Bavafa on


I agree with you that Iran militarily or otherwise is no match to US or perhaps Israel, if for nothing else, both countries have nukes and one has already proved not to be shy in using them on civilian population (all facts not accusation)

But I would be extremely worried for all the innocent people that could get killed in such adventure, just as all of those innocent 500K to 1M innocent civilian that have got murdered in Iraq (all facts not accusation)

Of course the innocent civilian would be the Iranians people and perhaps Israelis that would be the target of Iranians reprisal (now this is speculation but perhaps not too much)



MOOSIRvaPIAZ: Don't be

by Bavafa on

MOOSIRvaPIAZ: Don't be fooled by the lack of "airtight sanctions" advocacy here/now, this is a wolf in the sheep skin.

AIPAC goal is to weaken Iran at any cost or methods and their reprehensive on IC would not be an exception to that goal and will use any tactics that are thought to by their masters.

I have a crush on Alex Terek:

If Bush/Cheney/RP/Khamenie/AN and the reset of Neo Con/Zionist are going to be let in Heaven, then I will rather to go to hell not to be in their company.



Tahgord Pirouz, you must have access to really

by Faramarz_Fateh on

powerful psych drugs man.

1,500 Iraqis killed 30,000 U.S. soldiers?!  LOL  LOL  LOOOOL

Thanks for the laugh.

I don't know what is your prior posting ID.  But your recent posts, especially this one is destined to nominate you for the person with the most moronic statement in 2009 for sure. 



by timothyfloyd on



Making progress


I'm encouraged by your decision to drop the "airtight sanctions" routine - even though I think you still believe in it.

An optimal solution is needed to get to democracy for Iran. Sanctions that cripple the society, war and any sort of confrontation moves us away from that goal. We cant really do anything about the leadership in Iran, but we can make a difference outside Iran.



Sargord Pirouz

US military limitations

by Sargord Pirouz on

Roughly 1500-3000 full time Iraqi and Arab fighters managed to inflict over 30,000 casualties on the US military during the course of the ongoing Iraq war. 

What's your guess on a potential figure against 1.5 million IRGC and Basij? 

A pure bombing campaign? Imagine the MRBM and SRBM attacks, as well as the immediate effect on the Persian Gulf region. The Afghanistan/Iraqi fronts? The world economy?

What's the first thing Iran will do- build a functional indigenously manufactured nuclear weapon (instead of merely possessing a latent nuclear capacity). So you'll have accomplished what you set out to prevent! Highly illogical. 

Even dumb old GW Bush was smart enough not to shoot himself in the foot that badly. 

I Have a Crush on Alex Trebek

"nuke acquiring". that's it. such simple words.

by I Have a Crush on Alex Trebek on

and they are believed and accepted. and the smart bombs can land and break people and homes. shame on you fred. shame. if you are still healthy enough mentally to feel it.

I Have a Crush on Alex Trebek

China Communists and Saudi Medievalists are not the problem

by I Have a Crush on Alex Trebek on

Iran and its sangak style nuclear program are the problem. We need to look to real leaders like moose hunters and neo conservative darlings to figure out how to bomb Iran and make it a "legacy of American democracy building". 

To be honest, Fred is right. We must stop a nukular Iran. After all, the world will end and jesus christ when he returns will only take the souls of the Bush family, Pahlavi family, and other good neo conservatives to Heaven. The rest of us will be in hell with Fred and his AIPAC jesus denying lobbyists. 


Relax Baba

by flyingkite on

One attack on Iran, and Iranians will be swarming over the borders with Iraq to let them have a taste of iranian medicine. 

American vital interests? are you joking, One could say that China poses the greatest threat to US vital interest in th ereal meaning of the word.  What has US done? NOTHING.