Musings of a former chicken
به زبان فارسی
PICTORY
LATEST MUSIC
SEARCH
Trust this F
27-Apr-2010
The refusal of IRR, the Islamist Rapist Republic to carryout the lawful demand made by the United Nations Security Council to stop its illegal full cycle dual use nuclear program will have only two resulting outcome.
One, the sane world plus Russia and China agree to come to terms with messianic Islamist Rapists having nuke. Or try to prevent IRR from becoming a permanent nuclear threat.
Islamist Rapists’ nuke lobbies and few others have floated the idea of living with a nuclerized IRR is not a threat many make it up to be for the simple reason that them Islamist Rapists are quite “pragmatic” and “do not have a death wish”. Also, based on Head Rapist Khomeini’s purported “fatwa” declaring nuclear weapon as prohibited, some simpletons claim there is absolutely nothing to be concerned about.
Two points, first, there is a lot to be said and has been said in debunking the myth about them Islamist Rapists being “pragmatic” and/or “not having a death wish”. Those who are interested can find tons of scholarly articles, historical facts shooting down that nonsense.
As to the Head Rapist Khamenei having issued a prohibiting “Fatwa against nuke” one has to only remind the gullible of the widely practiced concept of dissimulation of the truth by IRR’s adherents. In fact one has to only look up what their “Imam” Khomeini said prior to taking power and reneging on all promises he made justifying it all with the concept of dissimulation.
So, although this much talked about Anti-nuke fatwa has never been produced, the practice of dissimulation makes its actual existence of no value.
Now do you want to trust in the words of messianic mullahs who literally have their own biological children executed for not believing in their doomsday dogma, go right ahead.
| Recently by Fred | Comments | Date |
|---|---|---|
ادا اطوار اسلامی | 5 | Dec 05, 2012 |
مسجد همجنسگرایان | 1 | Dec 05, 2012 |
| Iranians are legitimate target | 10 | Dec 04, 2012 |
RECENT COMMENTS
IRANIANS OF THE DAY
| Person | About | Day |
|---|---|---|
| نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
| Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
| Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
| احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
| Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
| Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
| گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
| Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
| محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
| Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Ooooooooops!
by Was Rosie on Thu Apr 29, 2010 02:10 AM PDTCorrection: my first sentence should read: ON THAT PART I HAVE TO AGREE WITH HHH, FRED.
HHH - spot on
by Fouzul Bashi on Thu Apr 29, 2010 02:02 AM PDTNo Iranian, or indeed any human being with an ounce of genuine concern for the people in Iran, would read the daily AIPAC drivel of airtight sanctions on Iranian population and not be disgusted!!!
This has nothing to do with support or dislike of the IRI.
HHH,
by Was Rosie on Thu Apr 29, 2010 01:28 AM PDTon that part I have to agree with Fred. 'I' or even 'most of us' or 'almost all of us'. Personally, Fred's writings don't disgust me--even though I might really dislike most of his ideology. lol
One thing I really like is that I find Fred a damn good writer.
Although I have to say, Fred, that your 'staple' nomenclature has grown a bit stale for me over two years, although I liked it at first. E.g., 'Islamic Rapist Republic' and 'Lovelies'. Perhaps you could find a NEW scathing one for IRI? And as for 'Lovelies', facetious names for people who you hold in contempt abound. You could come up with a new one in five seconds flat.
My two cents, IRR, my Lovely. Intelligent Repetitious Right Winger.
lol
"positive feedback"
by Fred on Thu Apr 29, 2010 01:21 AM PDTIslamist is an accepted designation used extensively by governments and individuals to describe savages just like the ones raping, maiming, torturing and killing Iranian men, women and children.
Trying to make it into an affront against a religion which is punishable by death is an old tactic used by IRR and its cronies to no avail. It might shock some to know overwhelming majority of opposition to IRR are Muslims.
The “HHH” who speaks on behalf of “us” might not like it but there is absolutely no positive with the IRR to give any “positive feedback”.
My suggested solution stands as always, regime change at the hands of Iranians via airtight sanctions and help from the sane world. If that “disgust” anyone, well, be disgusted till kingdom come.
FRED
by HHH on Wed Apr 28, 2010 09:21 PM PDTFred, I'm against this regime too but your articles always disgust me.
It's IRI not IRR. They're not Islamists they're plain criminals. They're not all rapists, less than 1% commit rape in prisons.
When you judge people like this you lose your crediblity.
Another thing that disgusts me is seeing someone named FRED who is probably born and raised in America to pretend to care about Iran and Iranians. You're probably a Christian or Zoroastarian wannabe. Ofcourse Zoroastarians dictate "Good words, Good deeds,and good thoughts" you break at least 2 out of 3 rules 3 times a minute!
I see more insults pointed at Islam and at the regime in your articles than solutions and positive feedback pointed at the good people of Iran.
So please spare us of your nationalist messages.
Fred, You are Right!
by Maryam Hojjat on Wed Apr 28, 2010 08:01 AM PDTon this as usual!
Payandeh IRAN & True IRANIANS
Fred
by capt_ayhab on Tue Apr 27, 2010 05:00 PM PDTIt was a lovely clip
-YT