hoomangolshan

He would have stabilised the

He would have stabilised the country for many years. He would have cpmpletely eradicated the influence of Islam in society and reduced the mullahs into lounge lizards never ever daring to interfere in the governance of Iran. He would never have sent Khomeini into exile TWICE like his son did but would have killed him on the spot.
On the negative side he might not have accepted democratic change and relinquish power to form a comstitutional monarchy. However, I firmly believe autocratic rule was right for Iran up until the nineteen seventies to ward off threats from the Russians, communists and Islamists who are nearly destroying the country.

Iran could be like China Today....

Last year I visited China. I was amazed to see a country with 1.3 Billion population, that was poor and communist for several decades, has changed to a dynamic and progressive country in less than three decades. The educational system, factories, infrastructures and government work in harmony and with dicipline, therefore, they have been able to export their products all over the world, making China a strong economy. Majority of Chinese, love and respect Mao for what he has done for Them.

I believe, Reza Shah could have done the same for Iran, if he had remained in power longer. 

کلکسیون