In June 1964, Life magazine published a feature article delving into the secret world of gays and lesbians entitled "Homosexuality in America" (Google archive). The opening spread featured a photo of a mural in a San Francisco gay-leather bar.
In Bahman of 1345 (1967), the article was translated and published in the weekly Omid-e Iran, including the opening photo spread. Omid-e Iran was a popular magazine published by Ali Akbar Safipour, then a member of Parliament. The translator of the article was one Mr. Abdol Rahim Govahi of Shiraz, who is reported to have been a petrochemical engineer with degree from Abadan, an MBA from Harvard, and was working as a system engineer at IBM in Tehran. The translated article and picture were delivered to the Omid-e Iran offices by Mr. Govahi's brother.
Days after the publication of the article, the publisher Mr. Safipour finds himself being interrogated by SAVAK. The allegation is that the picture in question has an x mark next to a figure that has a striking resemblance to His Majesty, the Shah.
Safipour claims although he had reviewed the article beforehand, he had not seen the picture, which is normally left to the judgment of the editor, who has now been sacked for negligence. He goes on to claim that putting an x at the end of the article is the customary way for the writer to denote the end of the article, and it this case the x being transferred to the figure resembling the Shah at time of printing is purely coincidental.
The initial interrogation concludes with the following recommendations:
1. Conduct detailed routine investigation of the fired editor.
2. Conduct necessary investigation of the translator, Abdol Rahim Govahi.
3. Investigate the brother of Abdol Rahim Govahi, who delivered the article and picture to the magazine.
4. Investigate those who had a part in distributing Life magazine in the country (Iran).
5. Initiate legal proceedings for closure of Omid-e Iran.
6. Conduct further investigation of Mr. Safipour.
7. Initiate proceedings to follow (track) all those involved.
Documents relating to this and other activities of SAVAK have been published in recent years in Iran in the series Newspapers of the Pahlavi-Era in SAVAK Documents, vol. 7 (link). Details of the present story, including excerpts from the interrogation quoted here, appeared in a recent article by Mr. Nosratollah Nooh, who at the time wrote for Omid-e Iran, among other newspapers. (Read Mr. Nooh's full article (pdf) in the May 2010 issue of Pezhvak.)
About the picture in question
The whole episode is farcical and sad, of course. An x that ended a career (of the editor, a Mr. Ali Asghar Afrasiabi) and set the wheels of the nation's security apparatus into motion -- which, in an autocratic society, are always in motion anyway. My suspicion is without the x, no one would have noticed the picture and its close affinity with the leader of the country.
I was curious. The picture does indeed have a striking resemblance to his majesty. A little googling revealed the following detail. The picture is of a mural in the Tool Box, a popular gay/leather bar in the south-of-Market district of San Francisco in the sixties. The bar was demolished in the seventies, but the lone mural stood for a couple of years longer (see photo).
The painter of the mural was Chuck Arnett, who arrived in San Francisco in 1962 and was at the time bartending at the club. He has published cover art for magazines and is known for his use of iconographic figures typically modeled after James Dean and Marlon Brando. (The figure in question resembles neither of those two.) Arnett died in 1988.
Who was the inspiration for the "shah" figure? We'll probably never know. The Shah was in the news of the day, having travelled to the US in 1949, ’54 (including visits to San Francisco, New York and Miami Beach), ’58 (including visit to San Francisco and a hair cut), '62 and June of ’64. So it is possible that Arnett may have seen a picture of the Shah, like this one with Eisenhower in 1954.
Then again, it could be the figure of some random patron. But the resemblance is tantalizingly striking even now, 46 years after an innocuous x set off a firestorm.
Notes:
1. the SAVAK documents refer to "Life magazine, year 1964, number 26". It is actually the June 26 issue of that year.
2. Wonder if anyone has a copy of the Bahman 1345 issue of Omid-e Iran.
Recently by Moe Maleki | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
Try a glass of Old Bushmills Whiskey, your Majesty? | 2 | May 17, 2010 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
A famous photo
by خلفای راشدین on Fri May 21, 2010 04:41 AM PDTShah was the subject of a rather biased rumor at that time, as having a homosexual relationship with Ernest Peron, his Swiss friend.
God Almighty knows the best. Who are we to judge each others?
Images of 30-year-old shah,
by Moe Maleki on Fri May 21, 2010 04:25 AM PDTImages of 30-year-old shah, an "eligible modern bachelor", on his first visit to the US in Life Magazine.
@kadivar: thanks for the links. sepid o siah article seems to be more tabloid/enquirer than a real newspaper.
@anonymous: SAVAK did indeed instill fear in the people... somethings haven't changed!
How professionals stood up to SAVAK
by Anonymouse on Wed May 19, 2010 06:06 AM PDTI've had few opportunities to talk to the now retired family members who worked as professionals and were under scrutiny. The general consesus was that as you made your way up and became more successful in your career you became more known to SAVAK.
My family tell me that they were taken to buildings and were questioned by people in suits who were firm but looked shadowy. It was an unspoken rule that if you didn't want to become one of them you had to stay firm, play within the rules and be the professional that you are. Just stay firm and eventually once they find out you're not working against them, just not in love with them they'd let you go. By letting you go I mean after several sessions on various occasions and different memos and meetings and so forth.
My family members tell me of sleepless nights that they were worried about what to say the next day and how they'd go over everything in their heads. They'd stuck to what they believed was just doing their jobs and just didn't want to do more. If they showed weakness they'd be in trouble and SAVAK wouldn't believe anything they'd say anymore.
As for this photo I think given the atmosphere of that era it is really stupid to publish this picture. Sure it can be a billboard taken from somewhere in San Francisco as is but they could have at least changed it a little bit. It's a shame that just a photo would ruin people's lives.
Everything is sacred.
FYI/Marie LEBEY "Dix sept ans porte 57" (17/01/1986)
by Darius Kadivar on Wed May 19, 2010 03:46 AM PDTWomen claiming to be the Shah's Mistress in a book she published in 1986 in literary program "Apostrophes" Hosted by Bernard Pivot:
//www.ina.fr/art-et-culture/litterature/video/CPB86003054/femmes-enfermees.fr.html
Interesting
by Darius Kadivar on Wed May 19, 2010 03:34 AM PDTI had not heard of this story but it may explain why the IRI tried to exploit this in the aftermath of the revolution in it's regular character assassinations ( when it did not attempt and often succeed to physical ones) against the Shah:
Shah & homosexualty" one of the many headlines on the cover of Sepid o Siah magazine, 2 months after the revolution (April 1979).