Why Radical Islam speak loudest.

mehdi

No mehdi, the point of the article was not to single out fanatic muslims as subhuman. its upsetting to me that thats the message i got accross.

the point was to not repeat history, and to notice a global threat before it gets out of anybodies hands. To notice a pattern of error that will eventually end up in mass bloodshed, all due to selcective hearing

to say that israel treats subhumans as such- is also untrue. Samir
kuntar, who murdered 4 people from 0 renge including 2 babies with his
hands, got married in the israeli prison under israeli protection. he
later graduated from the open university in israel, recieving 2 degrees
in social and political science.

.THIS subjest has nothing to do with the way Israel chooses to defend its borders, because they are not a global threat, therefore irrelevant.

please try see the big picture instead of taking my post so personally.

thanks for hearing me

I will buy your argument when

you change the title to "Why Radicals speak loudest," and take out one specific religion. You seem to have made up your mind that the so-called radical Muslims are sub-humans and do not have any rights. If you were truly interested in something fair, you would start by saying religions are being used for political ends, such as Jewish faith that has been used to justify land-grab and personal greed. Why single out only one fanatic group and not others? I don't use ZioNazi to insult - I use it because it is very descriptive of the way these pests operate. 

to Mehdi (1st)

your juvenile use of the term "Zionazi" walks before you. you will never have any interest in learning there side or there story, and you have already made up your mind. i dont dignify responses to people like you. People that use the term "Zionazi", regardless to how right or wrong they can be on a subject, or how much I personally agree with them on the matter, are a waste of time for everyone.

so go post your own article, and mention whoever you like. I think The Article uses pretty good examples.

And regardless: even if i did mention Israeli violence- the message in this peice would remain the same. Does this article personally offend you? is that why you are so quick to mention violence that has nothing to do with the article whatsoever, in any way, shape, or form?

Very Interesting

Very well argued. Looking forward to reading more from you.

Nate.

you hit it right on the  nail. Your essay is what we call them constructive criticism. Well done. Please keep it coming.

Innocent people from all walks of life and religions - including Muslims themseves are dying by the hand of this fanatics every day. It is time, for the moderate and as you had pointed out "silent majority" to set aside the backword dogma of not critisizing any Muslims whom according to them, he / she carrying the world of allah. No they don't. 

Also I might add. have you notivrd how lowd the speak in the MIc. Listen to my favorite demagogue Nassrallah. He shouts when he addresses the crowed.

Their objective is obvious one. overwhelm these gullible and young man senses, and their raging testosterone, such  that, they would not  be able to read the speaker's ball shit between the line.

"ah" they tell the cheering crowd "go down with flames, and glory. 72 brand new, and late model Virginas are waiting to serve your pleasure. All you have to do..........................!!!!!!!, is to get there to collect the booty.

A good muslim...

A true man of god would look into mirror each day try to improve upon himself every day and make a better person of himself as all (wo)men are flawed and deserve improvement.

Otherwise, anytime someone tries to improve upon others by imposing his views and forcing others to go to the already crowded heaven you should doubt his/her honesty, as this person has no country and no god and no religion, he is only deceiving others (and maybe him/herself too) in (un)conscious long for wealth and power.

All islamists, including those who staged the disasterous revolution by deceit and lies and those who have been ruling iran for the past 30 years fall into the second category. They are simply deceiving in pursuit of their personal ambitions, nothing more; otherwise, none have any country or religion, and do not give a damn about anyone, iranian or non-iranian.

Loudest or Most Featured?

Dear Nate;

Assuming you are here with an honest agenda and truly want feedback, my suggestion is to turn off your television. Just because the fanatics are sensationalized by the Fox and CNN's of the world, the gloomy image you portray above is far from reality.

Iran is a great example. A country ruled by one sect within what you described as if they are a common front. But for every step they have taken forward, the Iranian people have managed to push them back two. If they restrict women's rights, women find ways of breaking down barriers through education and broader representation in the society, for example.

However, as most of the western media is still primarily in the business of entertainment rather than journalism, picking up on good vs. evil and end day prophecies of a limited group with sinister motives is still far sexier and gets more viewers, advertisers, revenues.

Hope that helps,

Pedram Moallemian, Los Angeles

Will you object to ZioNazi killing too?

Or is it not something you have any interest in? 60 years of violence should have some criticism, no?

Thoughts?

I am new to this site, and thought ide share this bit. i would love to hear remarks, commets, tips and most importantly critisism. please speak up!

thanks for hearing me