Who Wants A One World Government?

Share/Save/Bookmark

Who Wants A One World Government?
by NUR
05-Apr-2009
 

The following is a two-paragraph snippet from an article published today by a friend of mine. Unlike much of the whacky a-contextualizations of an Alex Jones or David Ike, this article demonstrates with meticulous research, proper social science methodology and critical analysis that One World Government is indeed an agenda by a cabal of elitist liberal Neo-Keynesian globalists. 

Michael Barker - "Who Wants A One World Government?"

Swans Commentary, April 6, 2009.


(Swans - April 6, 2009)   Throughout the past century, liberal elites organizing to build the institutional foundations for a one world government have regularly acted as whipping boys for conservative commentators who accuse them of conspiring to enmesh the global populace within the oppressive chains of communism. In the past, popular promoters of such misconceptions have been derived from far-right groups like the John Birch Society, but more recently the accusations have come from top religious and political leaders like Pat Robertson and Ron Paul. In the eyes of these conservative commentators, liberal elites stand guilty of promoting a one world government, or New World Order, designed to rein in individual freedom and enslave humanity. The most notable ringleader elites of this conspiracy include influential neo-centrics like George Soros (who founded the Open Society Institute), and members of the Rockefeller family -- most notably David Rockefeller and the liberal foundations that receive funding from his family.


Like most widely accepted analyses presented in the mainstream media this conservative interpretation of world events comprises an element of truth. Consequently, this article analyses the conservative interpretation of world events. It reviews the ongoing activities of groups that openly acknowledge their desire to promote a one world government and goes on to critique the left's approach to global government. It will demonstrate how the critical onslaught from the Right has, to date, served to prevent the progressive community from engaging in this critical debate; that is, the debate to shape the future of global politics to enable us to create a new peaceful world order. Finally, it offers a progressive theoretical framework to expose the disturbing ambitions of the liberal elite....
CONTINUED HERE //www.swans.com/library/art15/barker17.html

Share/Save/Bookmark

more from NUR
 
NUR

CAUTION NON-BAHAIS

by NUR on

Professor Juan Cole, February 23, 1999:

"There is nothing to be puzzled by. Right wing Baha'is only like to hear the sound of their own voices ...Obviously, the world is so constructed that they cannot in fact only hear their own voices. They are forced to hear other voices that differ from theirs. This most disturbs them when the voices come from enrolled Baha'is or when the voices speak of the Baha'i faith. The way they sometimes deal with the enrolled Baha'is is to summon them to a heresy inquiry and threaten them with being shunned if they do not fall silent. With non-Baha'is or with ex-Baha'is, they deal with their speech about the faith by backbiting, slandering and libelling the speaker. You will note that since I've been on this list I have been accused of long-term heresy, of "claiming authority," of out and out lying (though that was retracted, twice), of misrepresentation, of 'playing fast and loose with the facts,' and even of being 'delusional.' I have been accused of all these falsehoods by *Baha'is*, by prominent Baha'is. I have been backbitten by them. This shows that all the talk about the danger a sharp tongue can do, all the talk about the need for harmony, for returning poison with honey, for a sin-covering eye, is just *talk* among right wing Baha'is. No one fights dirtier than they when they discover a voice they cannot silence and cannot refute."
//www.fglaysher.com/bahaicensorship/Cole71.htm

See, www.juancole.com

&

Sourcewatch article, Baha'i Faith

[Note the posting and time of the posting of this comment is recorded and the page saved in the evident of the deletion of this comment by the censor of this site]


CAUTION DETOUR AHEAD

A more complete picture emerging...not pretty though

by CAUTION DETOUR AHEAD on


NUR

In your dreams...

by NUR on


CAUTION DETOUR AHEAD

NUR is now fully exposed at ...

by CAUTION DETOUR AHEAD on


NUR

Because like you he/she is full of...

by NUR on

And also if he/she had bothered to take their head out, they would've already seen all the answers  in my first blog and on www.bayanic.com. DUH!

I don't repeat myself to imbeciles with an agenda - particularly Haifan Baha'i ones!

413


default

I just love Detour:D

by Light (not verified) on

And wonder why there is no answer to him ever???


NUR

No one but elitist fascist globalists wants World Government

by NUR on

The issue of One World Government has been drilled into the minds of Baha'is for so long that - like everything else with them - they cannot conceive of the possibility that a majority of people on the ground are absolutely dead-set against this idea and find it odious. To most traditional Christians, let alone fundamentalists, the idea immediately invokes the coming of the Antichrist and End of Days as detailed in the Book of Revelations.

As for it happening, over the dead body of millions who will fight to the last woman, man and child to prevent it from happening! That you can take to the bank... 

413


NUR

DETNUR'S Answer

by NUR on

1) Who are you and what is your real name?

2)  What creed or organization do you belong to?

3) What position do you occupy?

4) Are you now or have you ever worked on behalf of the Baha'i Internet Agency headed by Matthew Weinberg at the Baha'i World Center in Haifa, occupied Palestine?

 5) Why do you see the need in hiding behind a pseudonym and masking your identity?

6) What are your goals to that end?

7) What is your primary motivation in ascertaining logistical information about my group?

8) Are you a sayanim and work for Mossad?

9) Is your organization attempting to manufacture consent through fictitious and exagerrated narratives about persecution in Iran?

10) What would you consider your motivation to that end?

11) Is your organization attempting to foment international discord and lobby for a pre-emptive military strike on Iran?

12) What is your position on the current policy of President Obama in wishing engagement with Iran?

13) Do you believe that Baha'ism should replace the national religion in Iran, and is your organization attempting to replace the mullah's theocracy with a Baha'i theocracy? 

Don't get frustrated. Just answer the questions. Looking in the mirror of your organizational duplicity and Stalinism can't be that bad. Or can it?

See Sourcewatch entry, Baha'i Faith.


sophia

misdirection by DETNUR

by sophia on

A classic case of misdirection by DETNUR. 


CAUTION DETOUR AHEAD

NUR - It is now clear that you are ashamed to answer these Qs

by CAUTION DETOUR AHEAD on

1) How many people in your group?

2) Are you a clergyman in this group?

3) How often do you meet?

4) Where do most of these people live?

5) Is this group growing in numbers or dwindling? How do you know?  Any references you can site?

6) What are the goals of this group?

7) How does this group organize itself or does it have a community?

8) Is this group recognized by any organization or civil or international body?

9) Is this group persecuted in Iran or elsewhere? If so, can you reference any evidence to support this claim?

10) What would be considered an achievement for this group?

11) Could you tell us some of the principles of your Faith?

and finally...

12) Why don't you answer these basic questions? 

Even if you don't have a reference to cite, it would good to at least tell us the basis for the answers.

DETNUR


default

Who Wants A One World Government?

by CONTINUED HERE (not verified) on

I do, only if does not involve Sharriha.
Its gona happen no need to get paranoid.


default

the question should be ???

by light (not verified) on

who does not want it? who wants divisions?