Taghootshekan

"gun in the picture"

Guns don't kill. Some say bullets do, some say people do. I hope you'll enjoy the rest of your weekend, so peacefully.

Never increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything.

.....

Hi Comrade,

     I saw gun in the picture yesterday.....I read this post:

//iranian.com/main/comment/reply/125752/347860

from this news/blog:

//iranian.com/main/news/2010/11/06/iran-climbs-70th-world-human-development-index

I have never seen an avatar like that on entire IC.

"Chilling avatar"

My dear avatar buster, why and how do you find this particular avatar chilling?

Never increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything.

.....

This was the chilling avatar used by Taghootshekan yesterday:

//www.brendangrant.com/BlogImages/MaskedTerrorists/MaskedTerrorist3.jpg

and then he changed his avatar to the red stylized "allah" symbol......

Taghootshekan, you have been detected as a useful idiot

This writer either lives in fantasyland or he/she has tied his/her emotions to politics which means that there is zero logic or rationalism in this piece of sentimental bollix. Frankly, one would think that after 32 years of 'dar-beh-dari' Iranians would have learned to stop the ideological rants and huffing and puffing...but I guess not. You Taghootshekan are very evidently one of those characters (and one can tell from your Khomeinist moniker) who is what we rightly call oghdeh'yee in Farsi. I hope at some point you grow up, get an education in history and political science and are confident enough therefore to write stuff in your own name. For now, because you're such a coward and ranter and raver, I will not give you the benefit of my real identity because you have shown that you don't deserve it.

Either way, the fact that the somnambulistic editors of Iranian.com are willing to publish this blather shows that they too have no idea what running a responsible site is all about...and don't give me the garbage of freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is a luxury for Iranians stuck back in Iran and when hyperventilating Iranians who cost those compatriots inside Iran, they should not be given a public forum...let them go and create their own blogs but do not subject your readers to this utter garbage. Your editorial skills belong 'laa'yeh jerz'!

Huh, if this user has become

Huh, if this user has become blocked, I speculate his/her DNS was located in Iran. 

Yeah, iranian.com will tolerate two posts a day from Israelis (Fred) but God forbid one from Iran that doesn't sit well with the exiles at IC.

The name of this site should really be changed to EXILED_IRANIAN.COM. 

Go to hell taghootshekan

You call the people of Iran who rose up empty handed and all they asked for was their basic universal human rights "CIA engineered" and "zionist backed".  You and your camp have absolutely no regard for the Iranian people and our basic human rights.  The only reason the Green movement is silent today is a massive crackdown brutally and systematically using rape, torture, destruction of any press or voice, and open warfare on Iranian civilians.  To hell with you and to hell with the oppressors of the people of Iran.

I also find it very amusing that somebody would call all the opposition outside Iran "westoxified" and "fossilized" and "islamophobe", conveniently throwing a large part of Iranian society into a dustbin, while elevating a guy like Mousavi, who while has tried and spoken out recently, I did not see advocating much for basic human rights of Iranians in the past 30 years, 8 years of which he was prime minister, during which time some of the worst human rights abuses occured.

Neither Mousavi, Khatami, nor Karroubi speak for or are the leaders of the Iranian opposition, it is the other way around (and they have said so themselves).  All they have done is tilt towards the people of Iran after decades of siding with the regime at the expense of the people of Iran.  Anyone truly attempting to actually legitimately speak on behalf of dissatisfied Iranians (of which there are many) would be eliminated ruthlessly by the very system to which all three of these gentlemen have sworn loyalty, and been instrumental in founding (otherwise they would have been dead long ago.).  They only spoke out recently now that the damage is done to them as well as many others.  Evidently too little too late.

Talk about "fossilized".  This is a bankrupt form of government, has failed miserably, and it is time to go big time.  Even Montazeri, Ganji and many like him that were instrumental in FOUNDING this "system" have said that this government is unreformable.

Long live the people of Iran, and death to the Dictator.

IRANI MEEMIRAD

ZELLAT NEMIPAZIRAD

Get used to it.

Look who's talking

I wish I were in a position to ask the owner of this site to reconsider his decision on blocking Taghoot...

Tolerance is the name of the game. Isn't it?

Never increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything.

Kazem0574 - I predicted that this would happen

he/she is just another manifestation of one of IR's regular monkeys on this site.  I guess the IR's welcoming committee below totally missed the boat on this one.  :-))

Looks like "TagootShekan" has ceased to be on I.C's user ID's

Click on his user ID to check.

Taghootshekan- One question.

Taghoot, you are right about the Green movement being scum but for all the wrong reasons.

Let me ask you a question: Since you are proud of Iran's 2500 year old civilisation and would defend it ardently then imagine you were teleported to the year 640 AD. 

Muslim Arabs led by Umar-Bin-Khalid are attacking Iran. Would you stand up and kill the Muslim Tazi invaders or would you side with them and overthrow the Sassanian dynasty and help spread the spread of Islam?

I look forward to your anwer. 

Take a Moment and Consider This

Taghotshekan: Even if you are right, and I have to say I disagree with you, there is a fundamental principle you are missing. The "Green" movement has a right to their opinion and their position. I do not support the Green movement as it presented itself; but people have a right to their opinion, to expressing their votes, to putting up candidates, to peacefully march etc. - whatever their views are, whoever is supporting them financially, etc. By the way, Iran's CURRENT consitution actually guarantees that; and Iran's regime does not even honor the Constitution. The problem is the regime in Iran is neither a Republic nor Islamic. Prior members of Majlis (that were qualified before) are now disqualified from running for office, elections are not monitored, there is NO INSTITIONAL democracy. The Green Movement (whoever they are supported by) has a right to exist. Alliances are part and parcel of normal politics, if an Iranian political movement wants to allign itself with a political movement outside the country, that is up to them and their conscious...whether its a movement in India, US, Europe, Russia, China, etc. - that is upto the political movement. The Mullahs and right wing Islamic Conservatives also have a right to exist. BUT they can not deny these basis rights from any Iranian - no matter what their view point is.  The simple issue, is that in a free and fair electoral process the people get to vote for whomever they agree with...not one party alone.  It is upto the ballot box to settle this. Opponents can debate one another freely, accuse each other of being surrogates for foreign powers... - it can all come out in debates and in a free press. The Ballot Box should decide - not you, not the supreme leader, not the Secret Service of the Interior ministry...the Ballot Box decides. The issue is, the Mullahs are cowards, and can not stand open scrutiny and debate, and always acuse their opponents of working for foreign powers, when in fact they are Iran's biggest traitors. If they were true men, confident of their positions, they would not close off debate, election monitoring, the free press, disqualify candidates, shut down political opponents, board up other political party offices, etc etc. The people should decide, NOT you, who should lead their government - be it pro - or anti- Israel, the West, China etc. It is up to Iranians - not this coward regime.  

Taghootshekan, welcome to Iranian.com

I absolutely disagree with your message. But I welcome it because it's generally not tolerated by so-called "freedom fighting" Iranians on IC.

A second and equally important reason is that your crazy conspiracy theories about the Green movement mirrors exactly what "taghootis" say about the Green movement. Be it "hezbe baad" Monarchists who pretended to be Green when it was popular, westoxified islamophobes who tried to usurp it or even the war cheerleaders who hated it all along, they're all more or less against the GM as it exists in Iran. Greens are threats to both extremist poles. The fossilized opposition abroad are uniformly Ahmadinejad supporters because he doesn't threaten their narrative. They think that until the time Western powers are convinced to take the country by force and hand it to the same corrupt owners as before, the best thing is to have the worst of the hardliners in charge.

Only Mousavi threatens to actually evolve the system the way they claim is not possible.

Showing people that the authoritarian hardliners in Iran and "regime change" opposition -- including Israel cheerleaders -- abroad are basically on the same team is a very valuable service.

Thanks again and welcome.

It's all down hill for the islamists from here

 Out of the green movement new groups, nationalist and other groups alike will be created. Just compare the resistance of Iranians to this regime to 10 years ago. This could go down for the islamist regime anytime now.

 --------------------------------------------------------------

"They are not afraid of the ideology alone, but of the detemination and will of the men behind it"

دیگه دارم پررو میشم...

Do you have any idea what specifically necessitated the second trip? What you explained was the reason for the 10-day trip. Was he initially shunned by some Grand Ayatollahs?
Thanks.

Never increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything.

Khamenei's trip

Ayatollah Khamenei went to Qom to allay the concerns of the   traditionalists and hitherto quietists among the clergy that  the government was not militarized in nature, as the opposition claimed, and that the opinion and advice of the ulema was still very important.

vaccinated question

I don't know anyone better than you to explain the reason for Ayatollah Khamenei's second trip to Qum. Can you please elaborate?

Never increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything.