The war drums against Iran are beating ever louder. The new embargo on Iranian oil, to come into force on July 1, is only the latest in a long list of measures imposed by US and EU imperialism. It bans all new oil contracts with Iran, and cuts off all existing deals. Also, all of the Iranian central bank’s European assets are to be frozen.
We are told that the sanctions are designed to weaken the regime and “force Iran back to the negotiating table” over its nuclear programme. This is clearly nonsense:
* Former International Atomic Energy Agency analyst Robert Kelly has debunked the latest report purporting to show that Iran is developing nuclear weapons. Of the three pieces of ‘evidence’ that are not out of date, two are entirely unverifiable, and one an obvious forgery (see //hopoi.org/?p=1841). But the regime draws sustenance from these rumours: the threats against Iran help the theocracy to stay in power, neutralise the opposition and unite the people behind a regime under attack from imperialism.
* The new sanctions will make it even more difficult for Iran, Opec’s second largest producer, to be paid in foreign currency for its oil exports (which were worth more than $100 billion in 2011). Previous rounds of EU and US sanctions targeting Iran’s financial system have already caused a shortage of foreign currency. A shortage of foreign currency means that Iran cannot import food at a time when food prices have already risen to astronomical levels. The Iranian rial has tumbled to a new low.
* But the sanctions are unlikely to dramatically weaken the regime. The rich and powerful are able to protect themselves to a large degree from the effects. In fact, leaders of sanctioned regimes are almost always strengthened (and enriched) by sanctions.
* However, the sanctions will mean even more misery for ordinary Iranians: many workers will not receive their wages in time (if at all) and even the BBC has warned that social security payments and the remaining food subsidies could be the first to be cut by a theocracy under financial pressure. This will only increase the hardship and miserable conditions that our brothers and sisters in Iran have had to endure for many years.
* Further, the military provocations of US-led imperialism – assassinations, sabotage and preparatory military manoeuvres in the region – have also dramatically upped the tension in the country and are being used by the theocracy to increase repression.
* As the examples of Iraq and Afghanistan prove beyond doubt, democracy can only come from below, from the people themselves. But a people driven to their knees by brutal sanctions are hardly in the position to overthrow dictatorship.
We know from history that sanctions are only the first step in wars being waged against ‘unfriendly’ regimes. A military attack against Iran is very much on the agenda. Should the regime in Tehran really decide to close the Strait of Hormuz, this could happen sooner rather than later.
That is why it is so important that we side now with the people of Iran in their struggle against their own theocracy and the threats by imperialism!
Make your voice heard now! Send us a message in the form of an email, voice mail, short video or a photograph holding attached poster and encourage your comrades and friends to do the same. We will post all messages on a special section on Hopi’s website and on YouTube, Facebook and other social media sites. Plans are also afoot for solidarity events, film screenings and fundraising events. Can you get involved? Donations are much appreciated too!
In solidarity,
Yassamine Mather
Chair, Hands Off the People of Iran
Download this statement as a text file:
Recently by yasmine | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
the Iran Tribunal | 4 | Nov 08, 2012 |
Iran: Sanctions mean war on the people | 1 | Oct 18, 2012 |
Hopi weekend conference: April 21-22, central London | - | Mar 28, 2012 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Responses
by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Mon Feb 06, 2012 08:13 AM PSTRon Paul: is opposed to all foreign involvement so great. What does it have to do with misery of Iranians? Why is it whenever we mention oppression of Iranian people somebody brings up "Israel"
Yasmine: has a right to her opinion no matter how wrong :-) Personally I do not get why people who view America so negatively stay here. But it is not up to me to decide. If USA immigration said fine then it is alright I suppose.
The problem with all the above is they put "causes" above Iran. One person wants to "free Palestine". Another has a passion for fighting Imperialism.They all view Iran as their "instrument". To me Iran is my nation not a tool to achieve a "cause". I say *** Palestine and to hell with fighting imperialism. Go fight for Palestine yourself. Go fight imperialism on your own. Not with my nation or people. Iran is not there to serve your pet ideas.
MG belated response!
by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Mon Feb 06, 2012 06:27 AM PSTDear MG
Apologies to respond so late but got totally side tracked. I am not so young as I was ..
Anyway my knowledge of Middle Persian and specially Old Persian is not as great as you might think. I have written blogs before and will write another one this week. Basically Modern Persian is pretty similar to Middle Persian. As long as you remove the Arabic from it. Kurdish has fewer Arabic words so closer to Middle Persian. Old Persian is related to Middle Persian but more complicated. It is more similar to Sanskrit.
Old Persian seems to have gone out of use after fall of Achamaneshians. Partians aka Ashkani spoke something that a modern Iranian could partially with some work. It is off topic to discuss it here so I will put in in a separate blog. There is a lot of really good stuff to discuss. I wish more people were interested in it.
Thanks,
VPK
'the' in the No to Theocracy
by yasmine on Sun Feb 05, 2012 12:12 AM PSTYassamine Mather Dear Tiger
The poster refers to a aspecific theorcracy the one in power in Iran , but of course we would oppose any theocracy
Ron Paul tells CNN's Morgan: Let the British die for Israel!
by Disenchanted on Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:54 PM PSTHere is the video!
He must be a Basiji! DUH!
Yasmine
by Tiger Lily on Tue Jan 31, 2012 03:42 PM PSTI never doubted or questioned any of your past.
Wishing you more
very sincerely
TL
reply to TL jaan
by yasmine on Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:42 AM PSTYassamine Mather
I opposed the Islamic regime the day it came to power and I went to Kurdistan to fight it and I have spoken against the regime on a regular basis at least4-5 times every year since 1990 in public meetings in Europe , LONG before 2009
Yassamine Mather
by yasmine on Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:20 PM PSTYassamine Mather
Reply
by yasmine on Tue Jan 31, 2012 02:43 PM PSTYassamine Mather Thanks to those who have defended me, just to clarify I never supported Iran's Islamic Regime (as I explained in the "Debate with pro war UK columnist Nick Cohen" video link:
reply
by yasmine on Sat Jan 28, 2012 12:13 PM PSTYassamine Mather
As my past is now being questined let me infomr you I opposed the Islamic regime from the day it came to power (long before 2009) as I said here :
//www.hopoi.org/resources/videos/NickCohen.ht...
and I went to Kuridatn to fight it with Fedayeen (aghaliyat) who unlike aksariyat never supported the regime. Even if you look at this blog you wil see I started in iranian .com in 2007 writing against IRI
VPK
by Mash Ghasem on Fri Jan 27, 2012 04:45 PM PSThave all this knowledge and linguistic skill, perhaps you could share
some of it with us. Perchance a short blog to start with, as in intro?
Looking forward to some ancient Persian via Khorasan.
P.S. Do you know Khoran has been divided into parts? Guess how many?
...
by Mash Ghasem on Fri Jan 27, 2012 01:52 PM PSTSorry, no chelo kabab for me - only veggie kababs
by Anonymous Observer on Fri Jan 27, 2012 01:36 PM PSTI'll take you up on the offer. Your choice of a decent vegetarian place. High end preferably. :-)
I will enjoy the ride in your Lada. I assume it's this one:
//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cb/Lada_1200.jpg
Topic of discussion at our dinner meeting will be Hamid Dabashi. :-))
MG regarding HalfMoon
by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Fri Jan 27, 2012 01:35 PM PSTThe prayer sounded like "Ashem Vohu" one of the major Zoroastrian prayers.. I know it by heart and it is in Old Persian: the language of Cyrus. By the time of Sassanids only the priests spoke it.
It does not surprise me that Kurds would use it. Particularly in light of what you said. I always thought Iranians are Zoroastrian and heart.
Thanks
...
by Mash Ghasem on Fri Jan 27, 2012 01:21 PM PSTSonny boy, the last thing I need in life is approval from you or anybody else on this Earth.
If you've worked hard to have a comfortable life on this earth, you ought to be able to enjoy it, as much as you can.
Whenever you come to Toronto, your Cholo Kabab is on me.
As long as we don't live in Iran, the only place we all really want to live, we are all underpriviedged. Some are more underpriviledged than others, depending on how home sick you feel.
Incidentally, MG
by Anonymous Observer on Fri Jan 27, 2012 01:19 PM PSTCould you just imagine the kind of prejudice and racism
an Iranian will automatically face when going up against a native-born
Canadian, Australian, European, American, in any public capacity.
Actually, I can. I have testified before two fedeal panels on issues regarding animal protection in general, such as habitat destruction, etc. where southern good 'ol boys were challenging some of my findings and were opposed to legislation that I was supporting.
We won at the end. :-)
No to War. Yes to targetted sanctions & regime change from below
by Roozbeh_Gilani on Fri Jan 27, 2012 01:20 PM PSTProbblem with people like Yasmin is that due to their lack of historical perspective, due to their wishfull thinking, they become unintentional propaganda tools in IRI's hands.
The apartheid regime of S. Africa, was brought to it's knees not through a military attack, but through a solid-targetted- set of sanctions, in all domains. Political, cultural, economical, even sports events. These sanctions were supported by all nations and people of all political persuations. These sanctions then enabled the "regime change from below" with minimum bloodshed. Make no mistakes, S. African apartheid system would have been in full swing today if it was not for the sanctions.
"Personal business must yield to collective interest."
VPK, forget these kids, they will either grow up or
by Mash Ghasem on Fri Jan 27, 2012 01:11 PM PSTremain infantile for the rest of their lives. It's really beneath everyone to pay them a lot of attention.
P.S.
I watched that movie last night. I couldn't tell the language, in that
scene either.
What is generally acknowledged is that Zoroastrianism has
I recall reading some English translations of Kurdish groups from Turkey, and how they basically portraygreat roots in Kurdestan, and not just Iranian Kurdestan.
Zoroastrianism as their official faith. Which would sound just fine. But
these were groups claiming to have a 'materialist' take on religion and spirituality!
Yes, MG, but if you were a true socialist
by Anonymous Observer on Fri Jan 27, 2012 01:07 PM PSTyou wouldn't be so concerned about having material things. You'd be driving a mass produced "people's car," such as the Lada, or something similar, and you'd be sharing your wealth with other, underpriviledge folks, such as...me!
I'll be calling you a little later to "borrow" a couple of bucks, if you don't mind. :-)
AO jaan, you could ridicule your opponents all you want
by Mash Ghasem on Fri Jan 27, 2012 01:00 PM PSTit doesn't make your arguments any stronger.
Mind you I've never seen Yasmin or spoken with her. All my familiarity is solely based on her writings in these past three decades.
I don't own or posses much in my life, but every
single thing I have in this world I've earned it and worked hard for
it, very
hard mind you. Could you just imagine the kind of prejudice and racism
an Iranian will automatically face when going up against a native-born
Canadian, Australian, European, American, in any public capacity. Do you
have the vaguest idea what kind of racist adversary you'll face, even
when just running for a very simple Union position.
Now, as far as your childish dismissal of the grass roots in Iran, don't you think one ought to first
have (if not an extensive knowledge) a preliminary knowledge of the
matter at hand, before so easily dismissing it? Fair is fair. cheers
MG
by Veiled Prophet of Khorasan on Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:53 PM PSTWell said. Heck people which are well to the right of you and Yasmine are not spared. All you have to do is disagree on a single point and you are attacked. Go read this blog:
//iranian.com/main/2012/jan/mojtaba-ataro...
TL - I've been to a couple of Chomsky presentations
by Anonymous Observer on Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:46 PM PSTand actually had him sign a copy of his book for me. Nice guy. Don't agree with a lot of his ideas, but he's a nice, articulate guy.
MG - Since you know her so well...
by Anonymous Observer on Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:43 PM PSTDoes she drive a BMW? Seiouosly, does she? Come on, you can tell us...:-)
Simorgh5555, not going to kiss you to shut you up. pffft!
by Tiger Lily on Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:39 PM PSTBtw, where is this thing about me being a Noam Chomsky mouthpiece? If anything, I've said that I might lean towards Socialist Libertarianism, but I've got issues with that too!;)
The whole of the opposition is a total sham! A beyond shameful, helpless sham. The fact is that yes, monarchists too, lots of people are doing business with the IRI and have been for decades. Try and follow the money and you will be beyond disgusted and that includes many of the Human Rights industry organizations.
In this case though, (I know your stance on war), but mine is anti and I'm happy to be a tarty political prostitute in this case and join millions of Brits who are just anti-war.
AO is any one forcing you to make such
by Mash Ghasem on Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:35 PM PSTobtuse statements about people.
I have know Yasmine for almost three decades (though we don't agree on
many points), she was always a member of Fadai (minority) a group which
initially was engaged in Armed Struggle against IR (an incorrect tactic
for that period of time). For a period of time she was actually
stationed in Fadai's camps in Kurdestan. she has an extensive amount of
writings well before elections of 2008, or even before Khatemi's
"Refoems," always arguing and advocating an overthowing of IR as the
ultimate solution for all Iranians.
Why is it that whenever you disagree with someone you have to accuse
them of all these non-truths, and reduce them to nothing, to prove
yourself "correct."
You make fun of Stalinist Left for all the monopolies on truth and morality they claim to have.
In real life and in how you approach your opponents you display the exact, holier than thou attitude.
Whoever doesn't agree with bombing of Iran, or a Western initiated "regime change," must be this and that.
As far as waiting three decades for West to overthrow IR, and actually implementing their idea of Regime Change, does "Waiting for Godot," ring a bell?
one more thing Tiger Jan
by Simorgh5555 on Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:35 PM PSTYou know full well that these Green/Tudeh/Meli Mahabi chose to live here because of the social security and the handouts.
I've seen so many of these Marg Bar Shah Irani Leftists on social security welfare and perpetually on the dole.
AO jaan, I dunno
by Tiger Lily on Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:29 PM PSTHonestly, I can't answer for her at all. I don't have her parvandeh and I'm not going to parvandehsazi either.
I myself, as I said below somewhere have got issues with this "imperialism" thing and as I'm sure you've suspected for lots of reasons.
I just think it's not a good idea to go into character assassinations, except when the facts are very clear indeed. Call it a cliche, but really 'let those without sin, throw the first stone"....
Tiger Jan- Prove me wrong and shut my mouth
by Simorgh5555 on Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:27 PM PSTGiving credit to Yasmine's organisation for the freeing of Mansour Osanlou but what about stopping the 500 executions in 2011?
How about freeing the hundreds of political prisoners who are featured in Iranian.com every day?
What have the Green Reformists done to enable candidates to stand for election without the interference of the so-called Guardian Council?
How many Green/Reformist candidates are represented in Parliament?
Name me ONE Reform legislation which has been successful and has not been obstructed by the IR 'courts', the Supreme Leader and the Council of Guardians?
Have the Greens entered any power sharing government?
What have they done to address the lack of due process in the law where women like Shahla Jahed are hanged?
What have the Green movement done to stop the imprisonment and rape and murder of demosntrators and bloggers?
What have the Green movement done to stop the encroachment by mullahs on the lives of every Iranian's private life?
What have the Greens done to ease the restrictions on the Hijab and women clothing?
Where is the Green Movement Head Quarters?
Where is the Green/Reform movement leader(s)?
What protection and recognition have they been given by the country's laws or the Judiciary?
What have the Greens done to improve the economic conditions of ordinary Iranians and stop the envronmental pollution?
So you see, Tiger Jan, the saving of Osanlou, though welcomign has done nothing to barely address the real issues which affect the lives of 70 million Iranians.
I for one will support military action whether or not your champion Noam Chomsky and the LSE Leftists approve of it or not.
TL Jaan - Where has Ms. Mather been for the past 32 years?
by Anonymous Observer on Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:12 PM PSTShe certainly looks of the age to have been around for the past three decades:
//b.vimeocdn.com/ts/205/126/205126258_200.jpg
Why is she all of a sudden remembering Iranians and their struggle?
The fact is that many of these West residing so-called socialists and "citizens of the world" had been cheering the IR on for the past three decades--solely based on the pretense that the IR was "anti-imperialist." and they were pretty content with living with the IR despite its atrocities. They only came out of the woodwork when IR started to display its brutality on the streets and when the videos were posted on YouTube. So, they had no other choice but to mildly condemn the IR--just so that they could still claim they are "progressive." Trust me, if beatings and murders were still happening behind Evin's walls none of these characters would have said anything--just like they didn't say anything for 30 years.
Can you point me to any anti-IR speech, document or anouncement by Ms. Mathers from prior to the 2009 protests? osanloo is in jail because of some West residing perople's tacit support of the IR for three decades.
btw, that estoooopiidz argument can be thrown at others too
by Tiger Lily on Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:01 PM PSTe.g. at every France and US residing monarchist here on IC.
Why don't you tell them to shut their gobs since they don't live under monarchical rule?
Oh why not take it further? Why not tell every Iranian residing inside Iran, that they shouldn't be asking for any form of democracy since they, quite a few do choose for personal reasons to stay there, live under a theocracy?
Simorgh5555 and AO carry on and ignore the fact
by Tiger Lily on Fri Jan 27, 2012 11:53 AM PSTthat these are the people who work damned hard to get people like Osanloo out of jail.
Now, do you have anything of any form of substance to say about her blog's purpose or is it the usual Iranian-style character assassination?