NUCLEAR

Zion, quit dissembling so much, of course it is true

I know it's hard to believe with all that Zionist propaganda... But it is the truth. The Original 6 issues were addressed and cleared. Only a brand new issue only revealed a few weeks ago remains. And that only because there wasn't enough time to investigate the accusations. Read for yourself.

The IAEA issued a report on the implementation of safeguards in Iran on February 22, 2008. With respect to the report, IAEA Director Mohammad ElBaradei stated that "We have managed to clarify all the remaining outstanding issues, including the most important issue, which is the scope and nature of Iran´s enrichment programme" with the exception of a single issue, "and that is the alleged weaponization studies that supposedly Iran has conducted in the past."

//www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/News/2008/iranreport0208.html

You need to get out more, my friend.

Not True

`Given the declaration of IAEA on February 22, which stated that the agency no longer considers as outstanding the six issues in its work plan on verifying Iran’s nuclear programme and given the lack of any evidence of an active nuclear weapons program - confirmed even by America's own intelligence community and published in the National Intelligence Estimate in December 2007- there is no justification for keeping Iran’s file at the UN Security Council.`

That is simply not a correct understanding of what the IAEA and the NIE have stated. In fact, it is a deliberate mus-understanding of it together with fabricated claims. That is why the Security Council voted for the third round of sanctions against Islamic Republic of Iran with 14 votes and one abstention.
The exact OPPOSITE of what this lobbying attempt has demanded.

So the issue is clear to everyone except the pro-IRI lobbyists.

Jamshid,

Jamshid, the way logic works, is that you have to prove positive you can't set conditions for proving negative. This is logic 101.

Jamshid's question has already been asnwered by NIAC here

//iranian.com/main/2008/what-should-we-ta...

CASMII and NIAC

CASMII and NIAC are two IRI fronts operating in the US. I will gladly change my mind, eat my words, and even join and contribute my time to both CASMII and NIAC, if...

1. They continue their efforts against war and sanctions (no exceptions),  BUT...

2. At the same time, they vehemently and firmly condemn the IRI for the following (no exceptions):

Violations of human rights,

Torturing of political prisoners,

Execution of Iranians who oppose the IRI,

Stoning and lashing,

Surpression of freedom and democracy,

Mistreatment of women,

Persecution of religious minorities,

Mistreatment of ethnic minorities,

Lack of accountability to the public,

Mismanangement of the economy,

Failing to report to the public in detail where Iran's oil revenue is going,

Allowing Russia and China to make huge profits at Iran's expense, in one way deals,

Leaving the various "bonyaads" intact, and not returning control of their finances to their rightful owners, the people of Iran,

Spending Iranians' money in Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq and other countries at the expense of Iranians in Khuzestan, Bam and many other poverty stricken areas of Iran,

Creating an environment of rampant financial and moral corruption,

Having no social programs to curb the ever increasing rate of drug addiction and prostitution,

Failing to create a social and political environment where Iran's brains would remain or could return, and serve in Iran.

The list can go on.

The day that CASMII and NIAC comdemn the IRI for all of the above, I will retract my words. But as long as they oppose war and sanctions but refuse to firmly and relentlessly comdemn the IRI for the crimes it is committing against Iranians, it could only mean one thing:

That they are just two IRI lobbies and fronts operating in the US to protect the interests of the IRI.

Unfortunately that's what CASMII and NIAC are.

The unanimity of the Islamist

In defense of her wacky opinions the “are you being served” British sitcom star Mrs. Slockmm, used to say “I am unanimous in that”. The Islamist of the Islamist Republic celebrate their “nuclear victory”, announce the “resolution” of the nuclear issue or a winning “equation” that is DOA  the same way. BTW a copy of Black Law or its well translated  Persian version by Bahman Aghaee goes a long way in clarifying some misconceptions.

So... you were just slandering Fred. That's important to know.

Others who read this writing will understand the nature of these baseless attacks and your continued use of "Islamist" as an accusation. Thanks for clarifying.

If you read carefully (which you did not), you would see that there is no element of parliament necessary in this equation. It's a performance based system, if Iran does not deliver, Iran does not get the benefits. This is clear to IAEA who had already made this arrangement. The question is why do some people think they know better than IAEA what is good enough of an agreement.

Another question is why someone who made POSITIVE STATEMENT of slander purposefully pretend that a RHETORICAL QUESTION is the same thing? A chance to play victim perhaps? Now that does sound like something MEK would do!

Iranian Nuclear issue is resolved

All these none sense that the West is imposing on Iran are just excuses to point out the greater disagreement. If they really cared about the Iranian nuclear issue, they would have welcomed the Iranian gesture during president Khatami, when Iran held its Nuclear activity for two years. No need to discuss more, the facts speak for themselves.

For God sake, This is not

For God sake, This is not about Nuclear weapons. Wake up. The power that be have decided to get rid of this regime with or without nuclear weapons. The IRI knows that too. We need some creative solutions to this problem. Empty rhetorics, tireless slogans, irrelevant arguments are not going to save our families from being bombed...

Iran may be biggest threat to Iraq: U.S. general

//www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/artic...

Give us one shred of proof Fred

Hey Fred- Do you really think that if you and your multiple sign-in names come here every day and leave repetitive comments accusing NIAC or CASMII of being the "IRI lobby," that suddenly people will stop asking for proof and take your word for it?

While repetition is a core tactic of propagandists, there are enough smart people who visit this site who will continue to call you on your baseless accusations.

A fact is a fact

More power to the Islamists who believe in the delineation of power in their Islamist Republic and trust its “executive” branch. As the one who is not into parsing words Islamist style, the statement was and still is valid; the ersatz Islamist parliament has not ratified the additional Protocol. Should stating a fact makes one an MEK member or whatever else the Islamist can hurl in lieu of insult so be it.

Fred

What is ersatz parliament?

Your answer is very weak. I have never heard UN or IAEA complain about the parliament on this issue.

Fred, think of your Ressurection

Fred, Think of your afterlife! NIAC 7 CASMII are two arms of Hazrat Abass. Please mind your afterlife if you do not mind a sword stuck in your back in this life.

Fred: why do you call them Islamist Lobby, are you MEK?

please don't make up lies. If you have proof, just show it. I am very interested. But I'm affraid you are slandering as usual.

No, actually you are also misinformed. First off, Iran already agreed and implemented the AP for 2 years. This was good enough at the time for IAEA. It was only after EU-3 would not recognize Iran's rights that this has stopped. But even so, the work agreement under current plan goes beyond the AP requirements.

The hardline dominated parliament has never considered the ratification in exchange for returning Iran's file to the IAEA. The UN is not dealing with "parliament" it is dealing with Iran's executive which ALREADY agreed and implemented the AP for years, "as if it was ratified." This is not something that can be "faked." Either the inspection requirements are allowed or not allowed.

I'm curious why people like yourself see implementing AP as a bad thing? How could it be a loss for anyone?

I think you just don't like compromise and are trying to find any excuse to promote confrontation with Iran.

The reinterpretation

Sorry for not mentioning at least one instance for they are well known to the interested.  The Islamist lobby NIAC/CASMII’s rational is based on the rigorous implementation of the intrusive Additional protocol. Were the international community bunch of dunces who trusted the IRI, the  Islamist Republic’s ersatz parliament has openly refused to ratify the additional protocol; there goes the basis for this misinformation piece.

Here is the question: are they interested in peace or not?

i don't think US and European allies are interested in peace. Why not do full inspections like the kind that worked in Iraq?

They WANT Iran to push Iran to get nuclear weapons. It's the most logical explanation!

Fred: perhaps if you actually said something worthwhile

like what "interpretation" you are talking about.

If there are any factual errors, people may be interested in hearing them. But why didn't you point out any?

TAQIYEH......

thank you fred well said.

An allusion of objectivity might help

Perhaps if the Islamist lobby, NIAC/CASMII foregoes the verbatim parroting of the Islamist Republic’s line which includes bogus information and clumsy reinterpretation of facts, an allusion of objectivity might make it possible for them to be taken seriously by other than the mostly marginalized.