Perils of the Persian Gulf

Letter to UN Secretary General


Share/Save/Bookmark

Perils of the Persian Gulf
by Pirouz Mojtahed-Zadeh
11-Sep-2008
 

H. E. Ban Ki-Moon
Secretary General
The United Nations               
New York

Your Excellency,

As an academic of at least 40 years of research experience in geographical, historical, political and legal affairs of the Persian Gulf, I do not find it easy to see continued conspiracies against Iran, her territorial rights and integrity and the consequential threats to peace and security of that region without trying to voice out the concern of the people of Iran as well as that of other peace-loving people of the region. These concerns are provoked by racially inclined activities against Iran’s historical identity, her national dignity, and her territorial integrity along the line of former Baath party’s anti-Persian legacy the cause of which the Al-Nahyan of UAE and their brethren in Qatar seem to be bent to champion in the region to the detriment of regional peace and stability.

Like Saddam Hussein they consider the Iranian province of Khuzestan as an Arab land and continue sponsoring the Al-Ahvaz terrorist group created by the former there; like Saddam Hussein they speak of many Iranian islands including the islands of Greater Tunb, Lesser Tunb and Abu Musa, as Arab territories ‘occupied’ by Iran; from Saddam Hussein, they have inherited the racially motivated idea of changing historical names of geographical places in and around the Persian Gulf; and like Saddam Hussein they intrigue with other Arabs to turn these mischief’s into some form of cause celebre at the Middle East level against Iran and her legitimate territorial rights in the Persian Gulf. To do that, they even resort to conniving false pretences of friendship with some officials in Iran, enticing them to join their all-Arab meetings where communiqués are issued in which Iran and her rights in the Persian Gulf are disrespected.
 
It was only a few months ago (17 March 2008) that the Al-Nahyan of Abu Dhabi enticed the Arab League foreign ministers’ meeting to undertake the impertinent action of writing to UN Security Council alleging danger to the security of the Persian Gulf of the lawful return of the three islands of Greater Tunb, Lesser Tunb and Abu Musa to Iran some 37 years ago. My letter of 30th March 2008 which was addressed to Your Excellency contained a series of documented facts that demonstrated the falsehood nature of the story the Arab League had put together in its said letter to UN. Even in that letter Arab League was enticed to use the racially motivated term Arabian Gulf against the officially stated position of the United Nations in respect of the historical name of the Persian Gulf.

Your Excellency, having exposed the impertinent nature of Arab League’s ill advised correspondence with UN Security Council of 17 March 2008, I now would like to inform you that the UAE intrigues have taken a different turn. This time Abu Dhabi has launched (on 29th August 2008) a complaint at UN level alleging ‘stark violation’ by Iran of the 1971 Memorandum of Understanding signed between Iran and the Emirate of Sharjah, without, as usual, trying to document any evidence to prove their unfounded allegations. The launching of these unjustifiable pretences proves once again that Al-Nahyan’s appetite for making excuse of any trivia to manufacture territorial disputes with Iran that would line up Arab world against Iran at the peril of stability of the world of Islam is insatiable.

Perhaps it would be advisable to invite the Al-Nahyan of Abu Dhabi to study Articles 1 & 2 of the Anglo-Iranian-Sharjah Memorandum of Understanding of 1971 to see that it enforces in no uncertain terms that:

Article 1. Iranian troops will arrive on Abu Musa. They will occupy areas the extent of which, have been agreed on the map attached to this memorandum.

Article 2. (a) within the agreed areas controlled by the Iranian troops, Iran will have full sovereignty and the Iranian flag will fly. (b) Sharjah will retain full jurisdiction over the remainder of the islands. The Sharjah flag will continue to fly over the Sharjah police post on the same basis as the Iranian flag will fly over the Iranian military quarters.

Perhaps Abu Dhabi needs to be reminded of the legal implication of the term ‘full sovereignty’ for Iran within the agreed areas controlled by her in Abu Musa Island and the fact that misrepresentation of these clear terms amounts to no less than deliberate efforts to cause conflicts that can overthrow peace and stability in the region.

Perhaps Abu Dhabi is to be reminded of the fact once again that the Emirate of Sharjah is Iran’s partner in the 1971 Memorandum of understanding and H. H. the Emir of Sharjah refused in the extra ordinary meeting of 12 May 1992 of the Supreme Council of the Union to entrust his Emirate’s authority over the issue of Abu Musa Island to the Al-Nahyan leaders of the United Arab Emirates and abandoned that meeting. Hence, UAE leadership’s act of assuming authority for the case of Abu Musa Island in the absence of the ruler of Sharjah and without his consent renders UAE pretences in respect of Abu Musa and related MoU completely illegal.

Perhaps it is worthwhile to point out that in their efforts to disturb peace and stability of the region by making excuse of any trivia concerning Abu Musa Island the UAE leaders have often intrigued with Qatar and extra regional powers like United States of America and Israel who have openly advocated real war against Iran. Abu Dhabi, for instance, committed an armed assault on an Iranian boat in the territorial waters of Abu Musa on June 3rd 2004, and conspired with Qatar for a second armed attack on Iranian nationals in the same vicinity a week later. These assaults were aggressive acts with the intent to trigger a chain reaction that would overthrow regional peace and stability that have been achieved through years of Arab-Iranian hard work to strike durable regional balance of forces. Though the Foreign Ministry of the IRI at the time failed to document these armed adventures for the attention of the United Nations, perhaps for an ill-conceived ‘crisis control’ exercise, Abu Dhabi seems to have concluded misguidedly that its repeated violation of the 1971 MoU and its reprehensive armed mischief against regional peace can be tolerated by the peace-loving people of the region for ever.

Sir, perhaps it is time to remind Abu Dhabi of its duties as a member of the United Nations towards maintenance of peace and security in the region and in the world at large by abandoning its illegitimate claims to Iranian islands of Greater Tunb, Lesser Tunb and Abu Musa and to stop acts of aggression against Iran, her national interests and her territorial integrity.

Yours sincerely

Pirouz Mojtahed-Zadeh, Ph.D.
Professor of Political Geography & Geopolitics – TM University – Tehran
Chairman of Urosevic Research Foundation – London
590 Field End Road, Eastcote/Ruislip, Middlesex HA4 0QZ
Tel/Fax: London = +44-208-422 7992
Tel/Fax: Tehran = +98-21-8868 9376
e.mail: pirouz_mojtahedzadeh@hotmail.com

7th September 2008 


Share/Save/Bookmark

 
Abarmard

Pirouz Mojtahed-Zadeh

by Abarmard on

Thank you for taking the time and writing about this important matter.

We all have to put our ideological differences aside when it comes to our national security and sovereignty. Thank you again and please update us if you receive any response.


default

Anglophil

by Amir Kbabir's final verdict (not verified) on

The author has written nothing more than was also printed by Persian Kayhan a few days ago in Tehran. Nothing new and earth shattering in this letter to the UN.

What is interesting is that the author does not mention anything about the conspiracies of the British in Iran of today and the past 300 years. Why? Because looking at his address and you can see his association with England (like all other pro-IRI).

So, now I am asking him why did he not forward a copy of this letter to the British Prime Minister and their Embassy in Tehran? Anybody knows that the entire issue of the three islands lies with the British and the way they approached the language of the contract.

Iranians have to beware that most of the verbal attacks on the Americans and Israel that are blamed on Iranians are in fact propagated by the British agents living in Iran, in USA and all over the world trying to keep Iran hostile with the world, so that they can get the cheap oil out of Iran. This letter is nothing more than another 20,000 letters UN receives everyday.

I would have been impressed if he had addressed the letter to the British Prime Minister, the real responsible authority in this matter.


default

First Things First!

by Killjoy (not verified) on

Reading the article above, I could not help thinking there were more urgent domestic issues with which Iranians need to be concerned and solve before dealing with the issues raised in the article.

Let's get rid of the warmongering regime of IR which has brought more harm to Iran and Iranians since its inception and has done everything in its power to instigate wars with Iran's neighbors and other countries in the region.

Let's change the name of our country from "Islamic Repubic of Iran" back to what it was before 1979.

Let's review what the regime in Tehran has said and done since it came to power, before getting all worked up because of what some Arab neighbors say.

Let's scrutinize IR's undemocratic and inhuman domestic policies and examine its warmongering foreign policy before pointing a blaming finger at Iran's neighbors.

After establishing a lawful government in Iran, Iranians can start worrying about how to sort out their problems with their neighbors and other countries in the region.

Revising historical facts, highlighting less urgent or less important issues in order to cover up the tyrannical nature of the regime and blaming others for what has gone wrong, has been a major task of IR's propaganda machine since 1979.


samsam1111

I have followed your views on seda-sima, Keyhan, resalat

by samsam1111 on

& most inside Iran media..Sir :

I read Your letter now . Some folks here may not know Your views well .but I DO & it makes me wonder on an issue ..I have seen You defending the cultural & political views of this regime on every interview with different media groups..the latest being the one with ISNA (khabar gozari-daneshjouyan-mosalman-Iran)..You on every occasion have sided with policies of the regime including expanding of Arab-Iranian relationships .You constantly give advice to Iran,s foreign ministry as how to put down anti regime "propaganda" .. As an Academic don,t You think that a big reason that these Arabs keep demanding more is because the Pan-Omatist regime in Tehran has no respect for Iranian heritage & beat the drum on Arabization of Iran? Isn,t this regime the one who begs Arab league to accept it,s application to become a guest member of the Arab league? and Arabs keep refusing it..Isn,t this a tragedy? Why are You blaming the west for what Arabs are doing to us? isn,t it because You can,t point the finger to our own Irani government that through it,s anti patriotic attacks on our ancient heritage has opened the door for buncha taazis to sing abu atta?..You are not speaking on behalf of me when You side with regime on all it,s cultural post Qadesiyeh policies. As a matter of fact Your superficial nationalistic article is simply the means for a subtle anti Yankee content just like the regime You defend on every occasion viemently. Iran & V-ran are 2 different entities all together.

Regards!

 


Parthian

great job..

by Parthian on

The only thing is I would stay away from conspiracy theories. Again, What is U.S rhetoric, or Israel have to do with this? Long before these two countries came into existance, there were problems in i.e. Persian vs. Arab in that region.


default

Thank you Sir

by Amir Nasiri (not verified) on

Dr. Mojtahed-Zadeh,

This was a great letter. You spoke on behalf of 70 million and more Iranians.

Your letter was sincere and honest. It showed great passion and love for the country as well as the fact and the truth was presented very well.

I beg you please start a petition campaign as we did with the Persian Gulf, so that we put an end to the greedy, zealous and jealous Arab countries in the Gulf who have for centuries committed crime and shown hostility against our country and our people.

We need to let the Arabs now that when it comes to Iran and it territorial integrity Iranians become one and one nation.

We will not lose an inch to an Arab.

Arab countries have shown that not only the support terrorism globally bu they participate in it. 9/11 and many other terrorist acts committed by them shows that the majority of Arab believe in hostility, war and terrorist activities. Where as Iranian, we hate fundamentalist and fanatic regime but our governmnet loves it.

Therefor, my friends and compatriot, this is a serious issue and one that we all must unite as are other issues.


default

Grateful

by Gilda (not verified) on

Thank you indeed for your efforts. It is important for the international community to know that Iranians will rise up to defend the integrity of their country.


default

To Farokh

by Al Nahyan All Zakar fee ommatol arabieh (not verified) on

I think Israel has very little to do with this, you should always name the British. They are behind the entire issue.

The author fails to name the British as the hand behind the UAE as well.


farokh2000

United Nations?

by farokh2000 on

Thanks Pirouz for this excellent letter.

I am wondering if UN has any Authority to intervene in any conflicts anymore. We all witnessed how they stood on the side and let US invade 2 Countries and murder their innocent people and still has not demanded that they leave these Countries.

My guess is the UN is under control and power of US at this point and it is nothing but the Mouth piece for them.

All of these troubles in that region of the World are caused by US and Israel, yet UN has done nothing about it, even a mere condemnation of their actions.