On March 31, Washington took its first step toward engagement with Tehran through a diplomatic encounter with the Iranian government at the Afghanistan conference in the Hague. Even though the initial contact was awkward, it was clearly a step forward for the Obama administration, and both countries agreed that the opium/heroin trade was a destructive force in both the region and the world. As such, the United States should consider using collaboration on counternarcotics as an effective means to jump-start diplomacy with Iran. Although such an approach would be difficult, it could succeed if both sides focused solely on law enforcement, without the intrusion of politicians, intelligence operatives, and diplomats.
Background
Afghanistan produces roughly 90 percent of the world's opiates -- principally opium and heroin -- and the resulting drug trade fuels the Taliban's war effort. The Taliban is becoming increasingly reliant on this illicit multibillion-dollar industry to fund its operations in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and there is evidence of growing al-Qaeda involvement.
The UN's 2008 World Drug Report states that more than half of the world's opiate users -- over 9.3 million people -- reside in Asia and are found mostly along the major drug trafficking routes from Afghanistan. More than 2.3 million of the users live in the Middle East and Southwest Asia, many in Afghanistan and Iran.
Estimates for the number of Iranian users vary widely. Iranian government sources report that between 1.2 million and 2 million Iranians are addicted to opiates, while other estimates are generally higher, especially when frequent users are added to the figures. In other words, at least 2.5 percent of the adult population is addicted, and since 90 percent of Iranian users are male, 5 to 8 percent of adult men in Iran are using opiates regularly.
Opiates are the traditional intoxicant of choice in Iran, with opium use well established in tradition, in contrast to the negative social image of alcohol consumption. Opium was a significant problem in Iran before World War II, when it was the drug's leading international producer. In the decades before the revolution, much progress was made in addressing drug addiction, but the problem roared back after 1979.
Part of the problem was government attitude, since not all clerics disapproved of opium. The problem is compounded by geography, since Iran has served for many years as a major transshipment route for opium and heroin to Turkey, Europe, and other international destinations. As in many other countries, outside traffickers, in this case Afghans, work with Iranian organized crime to create the infrastructure necessary within Iran to support the transshipment of Afghan opiates to Western markets. The Afghan traffickers pay their Iranian partners with product rather than cash, thus contributing to the development of markets and increased demand inside Iran.
Not only is the Iranian addiction rate extremely high, a number of Iranian military personnel have been killed in the line of duty as a result of drug-related violence. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), whose al-Quds Force is the country's primary support organization for regional terrorists, is at the same time a main actor in the fight against drug trafficking. A number of IRGC units appear to be involved in both tasks, which poses a significant problem for U.S.-Iranian counternarcotics cooperation.
Another potential obstacle for a collaborative effort is the perception that Washington supports at least one of the major organizations smuggling opiates into Iran, Jundallah, an ethnically Baluch "political" group also known as Iranian People's Resistance Movement. This organization has engaged in acts of terrorism against the Iranian government, and its leader has spoken on Voice of America.
The Way Forward
The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) should be allowed to establish direct communication and cooperation with its Iranian law enforcement counterparts. Iranian officials have sought this kind of arrangement in the past, and some senior U.S. State Department leaders have even lobbied for it; however, previous administrations have prohibited the DEA from moving forward.
This year the DEA is cohosting -- with its Mexican counterparts -- its twenty-seventh annual International Drug Enforcement Conference (IDEC) in Cancun, Mexico. The IDEC has grown from a five-country, Western-hemisphere-centric endeavor, to a global effort involving approximately one hundred nations. Ninety-one countries participated in the 2008 event in Istanbul, Turkey. The IDEC venue could provide an ideal opportunity to open relations between the DEA and Iranian law enforcement, as well as other law enforcement agencies from around the globe, ultimately paving the way for a new era of cooperation between the United States and Iran.
After initial exchanges, the next step is to share intelligence and evidence, ideally though the establishment of a DEA office in Tehran. The DEA has the largest U.S. law enforcement presence abroad (eighty-six offices in sixty-seven countries), made possible only by the acceptance of DEA agents as federal narcotics officers, not spies. Gaining that acceptance in Iran will be a great challenge, and it certainly would not happen overnight. But it is important to set long-term goals. Although no foreign government has succeeded in working with Iran in this manner -- and the recent conviction of a foreign journalist as a spy is alarming -- the DEA has been extraordinarily effective in sharing related leads and sensitive drug intelligence with their counterparts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and other countries throughout the region and the world.
The Challenge
Policing is a science, and complex counternarcotics policing is even more challenging. Senior politicians from both countries becoming involved in police business could be disastrous. Since the problem will be compounded by the role of the IRGC, a reflexively anti-American force, the challenge will be to find a way for cooperation among senior law enforcement leaders, working at a "cop-to-cop" level.
From there, law enforcement officials could conduct collaborative work on efforts to address drug demand reduction and treatment, with professionals from those disciplines taking the lead. In this context, it is discouraging that Iran arrested two brothers, Arash and Kamiar Alaei, as they were heading to the 2008 international AIDS conference where they were due to be awarded a prize for their work with mostly drug-addicted AIDS victims. The brothers were convicted as spies on the charge that their foreign collaboration was promoting the "soft overthrow" of the Islamic Republic -- a preoccupation of Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, who sees cooperation with foreigners as potentially dangerous to his regime.
To succeed, any U.S. effort to cooperate with Iran on counternarcotics efforts must draw upon the DEA's successful and decades-long experience with law enforcement partners from around the globe. Although Iran does not subscribe to U.S. terrorist designations of the Taliban and al-Qaeda, it is nonetheless in Iran's interest to work aggressively with the United States to target the drug-trafficking activities of these groups, which destabilize Iran and the region.
Michael Braun retired recently from the Drug Enforcement Administration, after a twenty-three-year career with the agency. From 2005 until his retirement, he served as the DEA's assistant administrator and chief of operations, overseeing the agency's 227 domestic and 86 foreign offices. View this commentary on PolicyWatch.
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
abarmard
by anonymous fish on Tue Apr 28, 2009 01:52 PM PDTjust as long as you don't come back with some excuse for his vicious rantings. :-)
i might have sounded harsh but i can not make it any clearer how i feel about people like him and the devil incarnate. you use the term "this land" like it's a patch of garden. it isn't. this is MY homeland. just as precious to me as your vatan is to you.
drugs are a significan problem in iran. why would anyone want to dismiss ANY help in eradicating such a problem which is destroying your youth? i simply don't understand.
anonymous fish
by Abarmard on Tue Apr 28, 2009 08:18 AM PDTDon't feel like answering today, too long. Sorry, delete.
I wonder what the US is doing in Afghanestan.
by Shadooneh (not verified) on Mon Apr 27, 2009 05:39 PM PDTThe Taleban, as much as I abhor them, eradicated the opium poppy growing in that country until the "Anglos" showed up. Then Afghans started producing 75 per cent of the world opimum and a major share of the world heroin production! Why?!!!
//www.opioids.com/afghanistan/index.html
sign of love?
by anonymous fish on Mon Apr 27, 2009 05:15 PM PDTplease. spare me the bullshit...:-) there is extremely little constructive about anything gol-dust has EVER said about the US. he has this in common with many people. and believe me... i have a large loving family myself. we DO criticize one another. but it's ALWAYS done with love. AND preceded and followed with encouraging and loving comments made to ensure that i or anyone else understands the difference between constructive criticism and pure HATE. if my iranian family were to do this, i would distance myself from them as well. it has NOTHING to do with being comfortable with one another. it has to do with RESPECT. whether for an individual or for the country in which you have taken residence and taken advantages of the freedoms and democracies it offers.
you act like "living somewhere and complaining about that place" as "a relief" to "just do that". we're not talking about a restaurant or a bar. we're talking about allegiance and loyalty to something or someone and SOMEWHERE. it's not a concept to be dismissed like a cup of coffee.
be careful of the word "assume". you couldn't begin to know what i do for my country.
so. relax when i hear such drivel from someone like gol-dust? i don't think so. you prefer to defend your country. i intend to defend MINE.
peace out.
Dear anonymous fish
by Abarmard on Mon Apr 27, 2009 04:48 PM PDTDon't be so harsh. It's a sign of love when you criticize something. You should know since you must have seen the Iranian families do that all the time; unless they don't feel comfortable enough showing that side;).
There is nothing wrong with living somewhere and complain about that place. For many people that is a relief. And how do you know, sometimes people go to a more relax country just to do that.
In the grand scheme of things, you don't do anymore for this land than he does, I assume, so relax :)
Happy Monday.
gol-dust
by anonymous fish on Mon Apr 27, 2009 01:56 PM PDTit must really suck to have to live here in america.... which you clearly hate. do you EVER have anything nice to say about the US... you know... that place where you live and enjoy the freedoms she offers? it must be the bain of your existence having to live in this cesspool of humanity. everything wrong in iran is the fault of the US. everything wrong in the world is the fault of the US. and now... when the US wants to work with iran in controlling the worst drug producers which would in turn lead to positive results in iran's social structure, confidence and economy... you've just GOT to demonize america AGAIN.
the US doesn't really NEED iran for anything. if nothing else, this would provide a "co" effort which would hopefully lead to other "co" endeavors.
to listen to you... one could clearly come to the conclusion... it just ain't worth it.
OmidKarimi
by Abarmard on Mon Apr 27, 2009 05:04 AM PDTExcellent point
cooperation is good news
by Niloufar Parsi on Sat Apr 25, 2009 03:42 AM PDTbut counter-narcotics is a losing game. natural drugs should be legalised and regulated - like alcohol, they should be available to adults with quality control over their production. adults should have the right to experiment with drugs and no one has the right to interfere with that!
drugs are as old as history and civilization, and they have always been part of human culture with different drugs being preferred by different cultures. some, like marijuana and opium, are natural plants. why fight plants?! what does it say about us when so much resource and effort and blood-shedding is dedicated to fighting naturally available herbs?!
Peace!
Ive noticed that american
by OmidKarimi on Sat Apr 25, 2009 02:57 AM PDTIve noticed that american officials and politicians become mighty brave and want to have ties with Iran in this and that field... AFTER they are out of office and power..
----------------------------------
For movies/clips about Iranian society, check out my website at: //www.IranBebin.com
US cannot control next door Mexico,but wants to control Afghans!
by gol-dust on Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:12 PM PDTWhat business the US has all the way in Afghanestan where people hate them? They are playing the same failed games as they have for the past few decades in Central and So. America!
Controlling the drug is not the real reason that US goes to other countries! That is only an alibi! World domination, in this case Central & S/E Asia, and securing the oil pipes are the real reasons!
In fact, US is not really interested in controlling the cartel, as long as they are collaborating with them! US was helping Afghanestan to produce more narcotics so they could use the money to fight the Soviets instead of the US paying the tab!
Why should the US care about the Afghans not producing narcotics? Do they really feel bad to see the Afghan and Iranian addicts? Of course not! They would love to see the whole region addicted so they can continue plundering the region from all its natural resources including the oil and gas!
US doesn't to want to see the money go into talibans' hands buying weapons to fight the US! Another word, as the US has put sanctions on Iran in order to cripple the government and bring IRI to its knees, so they would finally give in to the US demand and become subservient as the Shah was. They want to cripple the Afghan's fighters so they can control Afghanestan and Pakestan.
Remeber, Talebans were created by the US and were under US control as Osama was!
US realizes that they need Iran's help to achieve their goal, so they find a cause which Iran has interest in and they want to exploit itl They tried threats of war and put sanctions that didn't work, and now they use this new approach!
After they use Iran to defeat the taleban, they'll use Taleban to defeat Iran! How many times do they think that we can be fooled?
Iranians, Afghans are good people, and US and Israel along UK and so on want to take advantage of their naivite! Go home please! You are not a real friend! You are the imperialst and we don't want you there, unless you change your attitute and treat us as equals, which would not going to happen. Otherwise you wouldn't be called the US that is loved around the globe!
US government was built on the shoulders of the mafia drug dealers and now they want to fight narcs in afghanestan?!!!!! Who are we kidding? Good dreaming!