Misc

KouroshS

As you can see, all the IRI defenders have ganged up on you. This is a very good sign. They see you as a danger since you so accurately display their enlightened and equitable world view

Thank you!

to all slaves, worshippers and paid agents, gather around!

Come join me for this important word. Come inside, tie the equidae outside however.

Your Farmandeh has commanded you to ignore our friend, so do it. Don't respond and don't disobey me again!

Thus spake Q.

Mule you said?

Yeah okay. I will leave it to you to define arrogant and snobbish. Very well.  

Now you see who is turning this into an Insult-festYou guys can not stop thos Shit can you? you must ran your filthy mouths over and over until you get your stinky point across. I hope you are proud of yourself now.You are delusional and you are a beekar and looking for an excuse for arguing with everyone. In other words, you are a bully. You are the Bache with sheesheye sheer who is feeding off Q. A noche if you will.

He could not have possibly worked me like a mule when he's got you. You take the top prize in being worked as a MULE. You faithful agent.

another paid agent here!

KouroshS I am also a fan of Q therefore you can call me a paid agent.

Q can be forward at certain times, but usually very accurate. I don't belive everything he believes. I'm not even Muslim. I like his general philosphy. You can become a fan, if you could understand. For example, his last paragraph he is teasing you with five different jump related expressions. Pure poetry!

sheeshaki jan baba basse digeh inghadr insecurity neshoon nadeh pesar!

KouroshS, yes, we are all paid agents, everyone except you

happy? you found us out! what a young genius, you!

this is comical to see. Q worked you like a mule. and here I was going to write to him that "bache gonah dareh". but you still think you are a gholdor from kuhestan. that is more arrogant, snobbish and shallow than anything.

Ananymous 8

Are you Yet another paid agent? hmm. Buisness must be good for Q.

And watch the language mr. You or no one else can tell me or anyone for that matter Base dige! this forum belongs to everyone whether you boys like it or not. This is not a ground for you Bullying practices. I maybe too young or immature, But at least i am not as arrogant, snobbish, shallow and bullish and definitely not as close and narrow minded, which is a sign of getting old by the way, as you are.

I hope you Understand this time around. Over and out.

NIAC succeeded in a tough washington fight

that is the great success and quality of NIAC. they put together a strong force against the AIPC candidate Harman and she had to back down for her own good. many american supporters helped. thank you for all your work for iranians.

to mr. Kourosh,
i respect Q in what he says. i don't care for your sideshow. i think you are too young/immature to know what is hitting you left and right. basse dige!

So Long Arrogant man.

"Hm... so now your attacks have been extended to Irandokht too! Remember just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they are not out to get you."

LOL. You are a bit crazy aren't you? Apparently you do not understand the meaning of "attcking". Oh well. Why am i not surprised. Irandokht accused me of something i had not done. She tried to preach things to me that i disagreed with, so we had a discussion. Boy. You have a devoted fan there. don't lose her.

Ahhh. so that is what you meant? Class as in stature...not a classroom. Only a genius like yourself could have figured that our... wow... My god. Speaking of fruitcake, Hey , pleasure meeting you fruitcake.

Now, On to your ranting and raving.

"What is up anyway? The fact remains I was having a discussion with two other people, you were not involved. You made this personal and attacked me with some caricature in your mind. Since you ascribed the motivations -- without knowing me -- I merely felt obliged to urge you to give psychoanalysis and discussions about 'insecurity' another chance. It could be very useful for your own life.

Who gives a damn whether you wanted me involved or not? This is a public forum. does it say Q at the door? No. Everyone comes here and posts opinions regardless of whether you want them to be involved or not.  Caruicature in my mind? somone once told me you have a very good command of the language...what the hell is Caricatuer in your mind?

Oh, so gave me a second chance? LOL The height of arrogance. Listen cowboy. Don't worry about what is useful for me and my life and stick to your own. I mean it. You see what you are doing again?

 "puttin words in one's mouth" isn't about who used the words first. It's about who is responsible for the beliefs. I was describing -- not in a speech to you, not even addressed to you! -- what some NIAC critics are doing. YOU insisted I was talking about myself, as in I'm doing the directing, and then made laughable claims that I should stop the directing and go to Iran.

What the hell did you Just say? Come again? Seems that you are losing your command of the eeeengeeleesh laagooegee...

I made Laguable claims? LOL oh ok. If you say so bro, You think you own this site don't you? Get over yourself. And if you don't think that half the audience and commentators don't think your comments are not laghable, You are fooling yourself.

 Ahhhhhh. you went through all that trouble just to demonstrate to me what idiom means? what a beekar person you must be. Speaking of the lady. I neither agree with you nor her. You mentioned sleep on it in a context of trying to make a condescending remark. If you are smart enough, you should realize that my objection was not merely to your using that particular idiom. I explained that to her and you many times, But unfortunately you both chose to ignore it, be selective and keep harping on one tiny issue. Let me ask you something genius. You had no right to take thing overboard with all the nonsense about my insecurities and the rest of chert o perts. Calling you commander Q was sarcasm, But when you took it out of context and decided to elaborate on it and really insult me and then you came up with all this "i wanted to give you a second chance" pure crap, you basically brought it upon yourself. Who the hell think you are anyways? You are just a commentator like the rest of us, That is it. Nothing less and nothing more.

"Well, yes, it was a rhetorical point. And no, I'm not "attesting" to it if you understand what I wrote. I used "lying hypocrite", by the way and I think it is better actually. You want an example of hypocrisy straight from the horse's mouth? Chew on this."

Yes you were attesting to it and now you are denying it by saying oh, it was only rhetorical. And By the way, when you use "lying hypocrite" in answering someone who calls you commander Q, that is like picking a freaking baseball bat and hitting someone, when that person may have merely nudged you. That was the extent of your reaction and that is how out of place it was. Now you are going around justifying it, in any stupid and dumbest way you can. Why do i have a feeling that your representative will follow up with another email...

It is not AT ALL up to you to decide what concerns me or not, Do you get it? You are a NOBODY on this site. You are so condescending and arrogant it is beyond belief and i have witnessed how many times that attitude has been laughed at and downplayed.Quit pretending you are the boss around here. And I Did not attack you. IN your paranoid mind it was perceive as an attack. For as long as i am a member on this site and for as long as JAhanshah and other owners and administrators agree with that, Just like others, I can make my own comment and don't have to worry about what people like you think and would say. You should be able to understand at least that much.

You keep repeating that I am angry because you know you have nothing more credible to say, hence you go on and on... How pathetic. Pepole had jumped ship from this blog long before you started with your sokhanrani. Go learn the meaning of the word OBVIOUSLY.

Good. Thank you for ignoring me. what a blessing. I never jumped at anyone's throat, as it is customary for you, on every single blog on this site. Again. It was not up to you to say what is fallacious and what is not. It never was and it never will be, So. get used it and try to live a normal life. 

ananymous 7 jan

Sheeshaki be khodet .

You can see that i have changed the name can't you?

You don't agree with my political views? oh lord. What am i to do now?

shabet khosh javoon.

Sassan aziz,

there was a massive conspiracy to remove the shah (with the BBC involved) and Khomeini was IN FACT of Indian descent. So, frankly, your charges of "psychobabble" and denial of "conspiracy" in Iranian affairs have no basis in reality!

My charge of "psychobabble"? It sounds like you have a problem with Kourosh, that's his charge, not mine. I'm on the level man. I already investigated about this conspiracy myself years go. Read all about it here.

KouroshS:

Hm... so now your attacks have been extended to Irandokht too! Remember just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they are not out to get you.

Oh and BTW, that was not me giving anybody any class tips, I have way too much respect for people on this thread to be doing so.

this was a reference to your calling me "laat". ("class" as in stature, not classroom). Coming from "sheeshaki" this was just the icing on the fruitcake since a class act, you are not.

But when someone in a moment of desparation and rage crosses that line and takes it upon himself to rant and rave,

Yea, I know just what you mean. Go on.

it leaves me no choice to get down to their level, Unfortunately, so they know what is up.

What is up anyway? The fact remains I was having a discussion with two other people, you were not involved. You made this personal and attacked me with some caricature in your mind. Since you ascribed the motivations -- without knowing me -- I merely felt obliged to urge you to give psychoanalysis and discussions about 'insecurity' another chance. It could be very useful for your own life.

I put words in your mouth? Directing the battle was your own creation and is something you came up with in your e-speech to me on this same thread.

"puttin words in one's mouth" isn't about who used the words first. It's about who is responsible for the beliefs. I was describing -- not in a speech to you, not even addressed to you! -- what some NIAC critics are doing. YOU insisted I was talking about myself, as in I'm doing the directing, and then made laughable claims that I should stop the directing and go to Iran.

You were the one who "wanted to let me in on a secret" LOOOL that never failed you in these types of arguments.

Yes, that secret was about projection of insecurity onto others. Damn good observation, if I may say so myself.

Did i make the crap up about you or were you being a laat by sayin SLEEP ON IT And you may come up with another plan tomorrow? You said that twice. What kind of BS was that supposed to mean?

Yes, this idiom is not insulting. It's often self-referential. Just like the lady told you, it means think about it, it does not have multiple definitions. See for yourself.

And here you are Attesting to being one by saying it is better to be a laat than a hypocrite.

Well, yes, it was a rhetorical point. And no, I'm not "attesting" to it if you understand what I wrote. I used "lying hypocrite", by the way and I think it is better actually. You want an example of hypocrisy straight from the horse's mouth? Chew on this.

Yes yo do. You do need to meet somoeone and get to know them before you can make a judgement on them. It does not matter how many messages and comments you have read on them or about them.

So, exactly how much did you know about me before you began attacking me in a conversation that didn't concern you?

Your anger and insecurity has now bore the fruit of serious boredom for spectators who are jumping ship from this blog. You obviously are angry, jumping down people's throats, seeing some strawman of a dragon and jumping into action with arguments just as fallacious. But since you have clearly jumped the shark, I will jump on the bandwagon to ignore you as well.

Kourosh_jAn

Kourosh (AKA sheeshaki). I don't agree with your political views, but you appear to be an interesting person. Thanks for your complements.

I Got worked up again? what

I Got worked up again? what is this, a fight? You are the one who needs calming down, rushing to defend your beloved savior.

I know what it means. Please stop repeating yourself. The expression sitting on it, means something even worse. I am not making anything up.

Yes yo do. You do need to meet somoeone and get to know them before you can make a judgement on them. It does not matter how many messages and comments you have read on them or about them.

You wanted to save me from "more hurt feelings"? What hurt feelings? Why would i need you to save me from anything? Save your "angelic blessings" for those who need it. I've got people who are more qualified, in my eyes, than youfor "saving me from hurt feelings" when the need be, Thanks but no thanks.

 We all possess a certain level of command in our spoken and written words, and to say that we use certain terms or slangs "that some don't get" is absolutely meaningless. In fact it is so arrogant.

Oh i am so happy that you are done, because frankly i was starting to develop a headache. You think Q makes valid and accurate points on dr.parsi's statements, Good for you. I am sure he is so proud of you. I DON'T. I also do not need your generous permission on going ahead with discussing something or not. Are you a site administrator or something, or you just take it upon yourself to call the shots, out of your unquenchable love for Q?

KouroshS

I see you got all worked up again, please calm down.

Sleep on it only means one thing! the other one you're thinking about is about sitting not sleeping. You can't make up expressions no matter how hard you try.

I don't need to see you or meet you to know your style of commenting. I have seen you argue with many people even before you were registered as sheeshaki. 

I am not going to argue with you, the only reason I told you about the espression was to save you from more hurt feelings, because I realized you didn't understand the meaning of it. Q has a very good command of the English language and sometimes he uses expressions and slangs that some don't get.  Now it's obvious that you had it confused with another expression.

This post is about NIAC, Dr Parsi, and the statement he made which was significant, accurate and valuable. If you want to discuss that then go ahead, but if you need to argue about "sleep on it" or who started it, then sorry, I am done.

IRANdokht

Conspiracy

Q writes:

"This fundemental lack of respect for Iranians explains the refusal to even accept the Revolution as real and instead indulge in the conspiracy theories about how "BBC killed the Shah" after "recruiting Khomeini from Punjab, India."

Are you seriously denying the existence of a "conspiracy" by western powers (and BBC) to remove the Shah? Moreover, by all verifiable evidence, Ayatollah Khomeini's father was IN FACT an Indian, so where is the "psychobabble" or "conspiracy" here?

To deny the existence of a conspiracy by western powers, including the BBC, in the removal of Reza Shah, Mossadegh and the late Shah is sheer DENIAL of history!

We all know that Islamists and IRI apologists love to re-write "history" to fit their own twisted agenda, but by all OBJECTIVE standards, there was a massive conspiracy to remove the shah (with the BBC involved) and Khomeini was IN FACT of Indian descent. So, frankly, your charges of "psychobabble" and denial of "conspiracy" in Iranian affairs have no basis in reality!

Nice try.

Irandokht

 if you happened to read carefully through the remarks of ananymous 7 and Q, specially the former, He intentionally made a point out of insulting me by using that name in a very inappropriate manner and he did the same in a few other places. How that scaped your intelligent and sharp mind is incredible.

why do you think that i  am taking personal insults to a new level? How? In my very first reply, i stayed on the issue and criticized them for their position. What do i see next? that i am angry...i am insecure and blah blah... I  called Q , farmanede Q,that was sarcasm on my part, but then he unleased all that stuff about my insecurity and how i am powerless to change things and... all other nonsense, and in your judgment i am the one who has takenn personal insult to a new level? Would you kiss the hand of someone who calles you insecure and that you don't know what the hell you are talking about? Why could'n he just pick a name and throw it at me and we would have just left it at that?

Just so you know, I know what Sleep on it means and could be used in either way, The respectful way and the impolite way. Judging by the elegance with which Q started his message to me , he left me no doubt that he sure was not going for the respectful one. When someone tells you "do us all a favor and sleep on it" instead of Why don't you take a moment to think about it. He is looking to start trouble.

I did not say one word, i did not hold anything against anybody until I was given the middle finger by these guys and so i had to play it on their level and return the favor.

 Please don't take it upon yourself to be the Judge here. You were the one who made the statement to me on the "Husband beats wife" thread, that you knew that i was the kind of person who wants to argue to the end and will not give up until he has proven everyone that he is right and they are wrong, as if you have met me in person so many times and you know exactly who I am and what i stand for. That was so out of line and so uncalled for. It would be good if you Try to work on these issues, Before you start pointing out other people's problems. 

Kourosh khan

Apparently you don't know the expression "sleep on it". It simply means "yekam roosh fekr kon"

You are taking personal insults to a new level. It's ok to disagree with people but you're going too far calling them names and insulting the ones who do not agree with you.

If you're called sheeshaki is simply because you had selected that to be the username with which people woud have to address you. To hold that against others is simply childish. 

IRANdokht

Q...

Too Old to see properly right? Wake up Bud. The name is not sheeshaki anymore. You Do get that, do you not?So Damn pathetic that when out of credible things to say, you keep going back to one tiny and totally insignificant matter and blow it outta proportion just to satisfy your ego

Oh and BTW, that was not me giving anybody any class tips, I have way too much respect for people on this thread to be doing so. But when someone in a moment of desparation and rage crosses that line and takes it upon himself to rant and rave, it leaves me no choice to get down to their level, Unfortunately, so they know what is up.

 I put words in your mouth? Directing the battle was your own creation and is something you came up with in your e-speech to me on this same thread.  You were the one who "wanted to let me in on a secret" LOOOL that never failed you in these types of arguments. Here. Do you remember where that came from now? Are you happy?

Let you understand what? You are beyond hope. Did i make the crap up about you or were you being a laat by sayin SLEEP ON IT And you may come up with another plan tomorrow? You said that twice. What kind of BS was that supposed to mean?And here you are Attesting to being one by saying it is better to be a laat than a hypocrite.  I rest my case.

LOL "Sheeshaki" calls me "laat"!!!

It must be the first time in history that someone running around calling himself sheeshaki is giving "class" tips to other people.

Kourosh, don't be such an obvious hypocrite. You started, attacking me (anyone can read below and verify). You ascribed all kinds of motivations and values and psychoanalysis to me, personally and other people and now you can't take the heat yourself? Such a typical double-standard.

You put words in my mouth (like I direct people in Iran) and then get upset that I don't live up to them! That's mature! You accuse me having made a "claim" that I have "never failed in any argument". Where is the claim?

Let me understand. You can make up crap about me and when I call you on your BS, I'm "laat" ? Better "laat" than a lying hypocrite any day, my friend.

Funny how the price of "shots" coming from you are inflated, but the ones you're eating are always "cheap".

-Farmandeh Q from California Mansion Headquarters

PS. BBC's Mullah: Thank you for the timely demonstration of my "psychobabble" theories. I owe you one buddy!

PHONY Revolution

KoroushS --

I agree with much of what you say, EXCEPT, that you're wrong, the "Islamic" revolution of 1979 was NOT real as you submit to likes of Q, who is an IRI apologists of the highest order.

The fraudulent 1979 revolution was MANUFACTURED -- yes, manufactured! -- by western oil companies, who had been hurt by the Shah's aggressive oil policies, with America and England massively supporting and even financing our national suicide. And the orchestrator of this hugely ignorant upheaval was none other than the BBC, the propaganda machine of the British government.

Yes, there was discontent, but it was NOT of a revolutionary nature. The mullahs stoked the fire, LITERALLY, by setting Cinema Rex on fire on August 19th, 1978 -- to not only mock the 25 year anniversary of 28 Mordad, but to sabotage the recent agreement made between the monarchy and the non-violent wing of the Shia establishmet, i.e., mullah Shariatmadari -- killing over 400 innocent movie goers (women and children burned alive) so as to blame it on SAVAK and the Shah and thereby throw the country into a revolutionary spiral.

This was perhaps the greatest act of terrorism and treason in the history of Iran, and mullah Khomeini and his band of terrorists (Rafsanjani, Khalkahli, etc.) were responsible! They hired their beloved Palestianian thugs to lock the doors and set the cinema on fire, sacrificing innocent women and children for their own twisted and selfish power grab!

The mullahs are just like the Nazis! They even learned their tricks from the Nazis, who were responsible for the Reichstag Fire. And just like the Nazis, the mullahs blamed the fire on their enemies, and got away with it. The Nazis blamed the fire on the communists, even fooling some Jews to vote for Hitler!

Yes, the revolution was manufactured, BIG TIME! Like a Hollywood movie! And let's not even get into the MASSIVE EXAGGERATION of the Shah's crimes, which even the former revolutionaries like Akbar Ganji have PUBLICLY admitted!

The revolution was NOT real! It was a FRAUD sold to the Iranian people by England, Jimmy Carter, and their oil companies, with the BBC in charge of misinformation! There's a reason why mullah Hendi khomeini was called "Ayatollah BBC" during the revolution!

STAY HOME ON SHAM "ELECTION" DAY
AND HUMILIATE THE MULLAHS!

Ananymous 7

I don't need to actually be confusing people like you. It comes with the package.

Cheap and pathetic shots, such as the one you took at me, deserve no replies. Khoda roozito jaye dige bede.

Q

I knew that the Laat within you would eventually come shining through and would take over. people in iran should indeed be proud that laats and psycho-babblers outside iran's borders are cheering for them to achieve democracy and reform on their own. What a role model. 

Talk is cheap friend

Wow, that was a fast and entertaining story you felt like you had to explain.

claim that you never failed in any argument.

when and where was this claim made? Can you back it up at all? (hint: you can't.)

When it comes down to this kind of straw-reaching I know any chance for a real discussion it's over. So like I said, sleep on it and maybe you'll have a better story tomorrow.

Kourosh jAn

Kourosh jAn, Can we call you Kourosh-Seeshaki to eliminate confusion, you are confusing simple minded people like me?
thanks,

Thank you Dr. Phil for that

Thank you Dr. Phil for that thorough analysis. I may be angry but you are paranoid and create all the possible diversions you can from the main point.

It is of no use arguing and going back and forth with someone like you. At least i am not as arrogant as you are to claim that you never failed in any argument. LOL ok sherlock. keep dreaming these sweat dreams and that i am wasting everyone's time on this site. Well guess what i i have just joined the ranks of you and your buddies.

Yes i t was me in that chatroom who talked to you and NO i did not say i had respect for your positions on this site. Don't make things up. You happened to throw something at fred that was a bit funny and i liked that. That was the end of that. The name sheeshaki was kind of stuck on my account for some techniqual reasons and i asked jahanshah to change that for me. Quit playing these childish games.

Anyways. I let you be on your way to benefit the audience and i will be on mine to waste more time Ok? LOL alrite then.|See you around pal.

Kourosh you need to calm down and take a deep breath

You are angry and are not making any sense. It sadly appears that your common sense and communications skills suffer greatly when you are in this state, reducing you to the point of incomprehension.

Do us all a favor and go sleep on it.

Playing with names and words, as you guys do would not do much to your already tainted reputation.

Oh really? I'm playing with words and names? Excuse me, but I went through your track and I can't figure out why everybody is responding to you call you sheeshaki? And why are you replying to messages for "sheeshaki"?

//iranian.com/main/blog/jahanshah-javid/i...

Could it be because you're playing with words and names? Are you the same sheeshaki who met me in the chat room and said you respected me and liked my replies to Fred? Didn't you say you laughed hard when I called Fred "a lapdog who swallowed a dictionary" ?

Are you really that "do-roo" and insecure as to have to be nice and respectful to my face, but change your account just so you can attack me as someone else? AND you dare talk about "playing with names" ? AND you try to scare me with "reputation" ? At least I'm honest with myself and my readers.

Let me let you in on a little secret that has rarely failed me on these online discussions.

Those who are the most insecure, constantly project their own insecurities onto other people that they viciously attack.

You are a prime example, be it about personal attacks or political philosophy.

"You are not waiting for something to happen?"

No, I already told you.

"Like i said YOU ARE WAITING, TO SEE SOMETHING HAPPEN. That is all."

OK, if you say so.

"OF course you don't care much about a change. Why should you? "

Wait, so if I don't care about change, what am I "waiting" for to "happen"?

"No. I want you to go iran to cause and induce this slow change and movemnet"

I thought you said I don't care about change! Why should I go to Iran and help make it happen if I don't care?

Look, I don't ask for much. But when someone goes to extraordinary trouble to create fantasies about who I am and what I want, and orders me around in these fantasies, I expect at least a little internal consistency.

Dear "Sheeshaki",

I'm sorry that my "conclusions" below stung you so hard, you had to switch accounts and come attack me out of nowhere and completely derail and personalize this discussion. The fact is you are angry. You don't like the reality, and you feel powerless in changing it. So you lash out to cope with this insecurity. But you have to understand that you are making no sense. What's worse is you "throwing around" terms like "reputation" and "playing with names" which are silly and full of hypocrisy.

Worst of all is the waste of everybody's time on the site.

thank you sheeshaki!

"I wish i could see you on Jon steward's show. "

It is Jon Stewart not Steward. Nevertheless I also wish I could see myself in his show. I do agree with many views of Jewish liberals such as Jon.
BTW, I support Iranian nuclear program, I would even be a stronger supporter of it if I knew its objective was to make Iran nuke capable. I am a strong supporter of deterrence. As I have said many times, I wish IRI total success IF (note the big IF) it is building nukes.
Hope, that clears our misunderstandings 'big noise'.

Ananymous 7

 Look up those terms before you throw them around. 

A well-entrenched and sanction-monger? LOL 

attacking Q as farmande Q LOOL. I wish i could see you on Jon steward's show.  A real comedy talent is going to waste here right before our eyes.

Q and ananymous 7

Playing with names and words, as you guys do would not do much to your already tainted reputation. You could feed off darwin's theories and talk about your atheism all you want. all it does is to add fuel your discredirted and worn-out and unpopular claims.

You want a thoughtful response? You need to come up with one and as you say formulate one first before expecting one. YOur comments were filled with examples of a kid sitting on his ammooo's lap... and a kid crying and making excuses...I suppose those were used to supplement your thoughtful suggestions?

You are not waiting for something to happen? You are not directing things by chanting empty slogans while sitting by your computer? Then what is it that you are doing? Ignoring the obstacles that exist in iran if there shall be an uprising. Ignroing the fact that it is ann established fact that there is a wealth of talent and capable people living in iran, and it is not about NOT TRUSTING THEM, but because  if something should happen, with the way this regime has inflitrated and established its millitary side among the people, that the odds are in favor of any movemnet losing steam in the very first movemnets of its creation? YOu. YOU are that control-obssessed freak without even realizing it. And you call this "respect" for iranians. Just when do you think This "enough people"  inside iran are willing and ready to do this? Like i said YOU ARE WAITING, TO SEE SOMETHING HAPPEN. That is all. then to top it off, you are putting your foot down and say that there is DEFENITELY nothing we can do to make things change up until that point. So we just leave things the way they are until something just pops. Meanwhile, People continue to suffer and perish and even die. I supposed that is when you and others can look at each other and say: It is time todo something.

OF course you don't care much about a change. Why should you? You have got your convenint life style here in USA. Both you and ananymous 7 use the most pathetic of excuses to support the nulcear programs. YOu are not advocating it but if it happens it is ok by you and you would understand LOL what a diplomatic way of making an statement. Means you are covering all your bases, just in case.

No. I want you to go iran to cause and induce this slow change and movemnet that you are talking about. I want you to be the one who takes the first step and go there and hold meetings and seminars and help people get ready and gather enough of them so they can start the movement. let your respect for iranians show and shine through, by being there with them. Stop ranting and Take charge.

KouroshS, your insecurity is on display

Don't you people have any other response besides "Yes, but You TOO!"

Is it the insecurity that prevents you from formulating a thoughtful response? Do you always feel like you have an answer, to say something right away? What is that, if not insecurity?

It doesn't even make sense! I said IF you are obsessed with regime change, you should do the decent thing and move to Iran and do it grass roots instead of crying to Uncle Sam to do the hard work for you.

Oh yeah. You are waiting so people in iran do something on their own. I forgot. That makes you a "director" of the battle as well.

I know, you feel smart for your "genius" idea of turning this around to make it about me, personally. But your sadly comical comeback is nonsensical. I'm not waiting for anything! Even if I was just waiting, that doesn't make me a director. Only control-obsessed insecure freaks think they can "lead" 70 Million Iranians from their PC.

I have enough respect for Iranians to understand that any political change will happen when enough people inside Iran are willing to make it happen. Period. There is nothing I (and most definitely YOU) can do about it before that point.

I'm not obsessed with regime change. I'm more concerned about American/Israeli bombs that could fall on the heads of my family in Iran, Gaza style. I'm not a nuclear advocate but completely understand Anonym7's calls for the deterrent.

So your call for me to go to Tehran makes no sense, but you did use it to deflect attention from the kind of bankrupt agenda that "remote commanders" I mentioned have been practicing from London, LA and Washington for years.

Q

Q, as you know, you and I significantly differ ideologically and also have many political differences. I must however admit that you are doing/saying something very right when a very well entrenched war/sanction monger such as the one below attacks you as "Farmande Q".
best

regarding the nukes, sheeshaki!

sheeshaki, I don't believe in god. That is why I believe Iran should build the nukes and implement/complement the existing deterrence. Hopefully Iran already has some nukes.