Iranian Diaspora Needs to Act

What happens in Iran affects Iranians living outside Iran

Share/Save/Bookmark

Iranian Diaspora Needs to Act
by Josh Shahryar
28-Apr-2010
 

Since my involvement with the Iran issue - both as a journalist and a human rights activist - I had rarely had the opportunity to hear the Iranian-American side of the story. This was changed on April 17 when I participated in the New Generation, New Perspectives, New Media Forum hosted by Columbia University. While, for many, the forum was a unique opportunity to get informed about Iran and the current situation, for me it brought about a revelation that proved both enlightening and worrying.

Many of the speakers at the forum expressed a sentiment unique to the Iranian community: "We may live in the West, but our hearts are in Iran." This is precisely the reason Iranian-Americans are suffering from the ABCD-dilemma. A few years ago, I watched a very enlightening movie about Indian-Americans being emotionally divided between their homeland and their adoptive country. The movie was aptly named "American Born Confused Deshi," deshi being a Hindi word for someone from India.

Some of the Iranian-Americans I met in the forum are not American-born. They grew up in Iran and have moved to the US in the past decade or so. And the same goes for many Iranians that I've met outside the forum. The sentiment is almost universal. They don't really feel like they can break ties with Iran and refuse to use their power as Americans to sway American politics and at the same time, don't feel like they can dictate what Iranians do inside Iran.

The best example of this is that whenever an Iranian calls for protests inside Iran and they are not within the country, other folks jump almost instantaneously with the cry, "No interference!" Well, how could this be interference if it is coming from an Iranian? This is where the roots problem lie.

The Iranian Diaspora has so far led a very symbolic and largely ineffective role in what is happening in their country because of these self-imposed restraints. True, there were many protests in the few months after the June 12 election. However, thus far there are very few PACs, lobbying groups and such to work to promote the cause for Iran's democratization. Furthermore, few intellectuals are willing to openly come out and declare their support for the Green Movement.

And let's not underestimate the power of political involvement. Israelis and Jews - many of them having an emotional bond with Israel - have worked successfully over the years to promote the cause of Israel. They have been so effective that some have created conspiracy theories to delegitimize their success or somehow stain it. The truth is, the citizens of another nation can be both American and at the same time help their country in a way that it does not harm the national interests of the United States.

Israel is perhaps he the most prominent example, but there are Cuban-Americans, Mexican-Americans, Armenian-Americans and several other nationalities who have managed to sway US foreign policy to help their brethren. Why Iranians have not been able to do so is unfortunate.

At a time when the Green Movement in Iran needs support from the Iranian Diaspora, it is almost absent. With the exception of the National Iranian-American Council, which does not openly support the Green Movement, there is scarcely anyone to represent the Green Movement in the US or abroad. Iranian Nobel Prize-laureate Shirin Ebadi has been making the rounds in Europe and the US to shore up support, but her work is humanitarian in nature.

What the Green Movement urgently needs from the Iranian Diaspora, especially in the United States, is to come together and form a strong voice of political support for the cause of Iran's democratization - if not outright liberalization. This is especially important since the Iranian government allegedly already has several organizations rooting for it clandestinely.

At the same time, a united Iranian Diaspora could serve well as a communicator of the wishes of the Iranian people. So far, what the Green Movement wants has been muddied by the fact that it has largely remained leaderless. While Iranians in the West cannot substitute that, they can certainly join hands to give them a clear voice abroad at least.

While monarchists, communists, leftists, liberals, conservatives and just 'confused' Iranians bicker and disagree, time is running out. Whether they get together or not is their choice. But if they do not choose to forgo their differences and create a single voice for of Iran's democratization, Iran's cause abroad would remain voiceless.

What happens in Iran affects Iranians living outside Iran. They have the right and the power to help the situation. What is holding them back is both their differences and their reluctance to embrace both identities. The truth is this: You can be an Iranian and an American. You can be a Canadian and an Iranian. You can be a European and an Iranian. It is time to come out and express that identity.

A democratic and free Iran is also going to help the security of the West and speed up the democratization of the Middle East - something everyone living in the West wishes - even if that's not what some politicians want. It is time to make sure that the voice you have is heard. It is time for Iran as well as your country of residence to see you in action.

First published in HuffingtonPost.com.

AUTHOR
Josh Shahryar is a journalist and human rights activist. Follow him on Twitter: twitter.com/JShahryar.

Share/Save/Bookmark

 
Sargord Pirouz

Josh, you're not exactly

by Sargord Pirouz on

Josh, you're not exactly advocating Iranian-Americans advance the interests of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Specifically, you are encouraging Iran-Americans advocate the US government make attempts at intervening in the internal partisan politics of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

How would Americans feel if China attempted to intervene in the partisan politics of the US government? I dare say it would be resented by an overwhelming majority. The same would apply to most any country, especially- given the history- Iran.

Of course, if you're advocating American inspired subversion, well then you are simply validating the declarations put forth by VEVAK and the IRGC.


Zara

Josh...

by Zara on

I think you are missing much of the complexity of the diaspora community and also much that really has been done. It's not at all true that "few intellectuals are willing to openly come out and declare their
support for the Green Movement"--a great many intellectuals and artists have declared support, often in ways that mean they cannot return to Iran until there is a real change. Many people have been willing to go on record and speak out in ways big and small that involved dropping anonymity--which in itself was a signal of commitment and hope.

Also, Iranian-Americans may be responsible for many actions that were very significantly helpful to the Greens but the source not recognized.  I wouldn't be surprised, for example, if Google's actions around updating the maps,  quick release of the Farsi translator, etc. had something to do with Iranian-Americans at Google.  And much, much more effort around keeping information flowing--efforts like your own with the advantage of knowing Farsi, or having personal connections with reliable sources inside Iran.  As for NIAC, they don't have to wear green to be doing green work, and that's a measure of their skill, not a failing. 

But when you call for a "united Iranian diaspora" you ignore the deep divisions in this community, and the sometimes bizarre illusions held by people who left Iran thirty years ago - a whole generation - under extreme circumstances and haven't been back since.  Hang out here at iranian.com for a while and you'll hear an incredible variety of crackpot voices as well as sincere ones, not to mention the sincere crackpots. 

Finally, if there was a clear path where influencing US foreign policy could have a beneficial outcome for the Greens, a lot more effort would be happening in that direction.  The best possible action from Washington is still no action.

The story's not over, and I should add that many of us are very grateful to you for the work you've done.  Thank you.

 

 


Rastgoo

well said

by Rastgoo on

well said josh.  I think there are a few potential leaders such as Fatemeh Haghighatjoo, Mohsen Kadivar and Mohsen Sazegara.  Of these I think Sazegara is the most active. No doubt there are going to be those who will reply that "these are all akhonds and we should not back them", "they are from this regime and same as the rest of them".  You know the usual monarchist/MKO line that has held us back for 30+ years.