Fighting Chance

A democratic victory in Iran would be great news for the peace process in the entire ME

Share/Save/Bookmark

Fighting Chance
by Fred
13-May-2010
 

First, some indisputable basic facts:

Republican Presidents have occupied the White House for twenty years of the thirty one years that Islamists have been ruling over Iran.

The bane of Islamists, the Iran Libya Sanction Act, ILSA, was signed into law by President Bill Clinton, a Democrat.

The proposed Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act which will replace ILSA has passed both Houses of Congress and is being prepared for President Obama’s signature. Democrats hold the majority in both Houses and White House’s current occupant is Democrat.

The Iraq Liberation Act making regime change in Iraq the official policy of the U.S. was signed into law by President Bill Clinton, a Democrat.

The end of brutal reign of Slobodan Milosevic was accommodated by President Bill Clinton, a Democrat.

It should be obvious where I am going with this. When it comes to confronting Anti-American, rabidly Anti-human being regimes, while Republicans have talked the talk it has been the Democrats who have walked the walk.

Now after many years of cat and mouse games over Islamists’ illegal weaponized nuke and many other criminal acts by the Islamists the passage of the fourth round of United Nations Security Council sanctions is all but a forgone conclusion. So is the ratcheting up the sanctions which U.S. and her allies will be imposing on top of those being imposed by UNSC.

It is my contention for the sanctions to have any chance of success; it has to be accompanied with the following:

1- Like the case in Iraq, regime change in Iran has to be the official policy of U.S. therefore giving fed up Iranians the hope needed to burden the upcoming sanctions’ hardships.

2- To allay ever present fears among Iranians who would love to see the back of the Islamist regime but are afraid of disintegration during its downfall, the U.S. has to publicly guarantee Iran’s territorial integrity.

3- The upcoming sanctions have to be so severe and airtight which would shorten the duration of hardship and increase the probability of success which would make the next step, military action unnecessary.

4- Open-ended material help has to be provided to the fed up Iranian people who actively oppose the Islamist regime in Iran especially the workers in various sectors of oil industry.

With both Houses of Congress and the White House in the hands of Democrats, Iranian people have a fighting chance to overcome their deadly Islamist nemesis.

A democratic victory in Iran would be great news not only for the American admiring, freedom loving Iranian people but for the peace process in the entire ME, the war against the barbaric homicidal Islamist terrorism and for humanity at large.

Make it airtight would you.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Recently by FredCommentsDate
ادا اطوار اسلامی
5
Dec 05, 2012
مسجد همجنسگرایان
1
Dec 05, 2012
Iranians are legitimate target
10
Dec 04, 2012
more from Fred
 
Sargord Pirouz

Fred, didn't you hear? There

by Sargord Pirouz on

Fred, didn't you hear? There has already been a democratic victory in Iran. It took place in 1979!


Fatollah

OHOI Fred

by Fatollah on

A victory for peace and peace process in the entire ME is achieved only if Israel gets rid of all her nuclear weapons and starts showing a bit respect to the conquered people! since when Israeli citizens or government wish for a democratic Iran, last time I remember the jewish controlled media helped establish this satanic regime in Iran, now the same people wants us to trust them, don't try to hard! never-the-less, keep them blogs coming ...


Marjaneh

Questions

by Marjaneh on

Hello Fresh Freddy

Thank you for  writing something worth reading, written clearly and with points in case...('not getting into the "domestics"...), which is why I am taking the time and am interested in answers to a few questions.

"1- Like the case in Iraq, regime change in Iran has to be the official
policy of U.S. therefore giving fed up Iranians the hope needed to
burden the upcoming sanctions’ hardships. "

It's illegal under the UN Charta to  change the regime of another sovereign state. (sorry, I can't remember which article number)

"2- To allay ever present fears among Iranians who would love to see
the back of the Islamist regime but are afraid of disintegration during
its downfall, the U.S. has to publicly guarantee Iran’s territorial
integrity."

What do you mean exactly by "territorial integrity" and "publicly guarantee" please?

And how would the U.S propose to do that? Details, please.(And also bearing in mind that it isn't Disneyland in Iraq and Afghanistan...)And more details on military, security, judiciary, funding etc...And more details, please.

"3- The upcoming sanctions have to be so severe and airtight which would
shorten the duration of hardship and increase the probability of
success which would make the next step, military action unnecessary. "

If that could work, that would be an ideal outcome, but sorry, Fred,  I need more details on the sanctions and the whole operation please. (I'm iffy about sanctions...)

 

"4- Open-ended material help has to be provided to the fed up Iranian
people who actively oppose the Islamist regime in Iran especially the
workers in various sectors of oil industry. "

Please, elaborate, e.g. how and why the oil industry sector workers foremost.

Thanks.

signed

neither stale nor lovelie but with a learning tick