PAHLAVI

The best thing I have heard

"That's why there is no hope! The main problem is neither Pahlavi, nor
IRI, we are the problem. We as Iranians need to be educated on many
things!!"

This is the best thing I have heard in a long time in this forum, although I believe the IR is fundamentally and systematically a wrong type of government in almost every sense...

Living closer to Iran than most american-iranians I get to see more geniune iranians from Iran and this is basically the fundamental issue they bring up:

People have a hard time accepting that there are other people out there with perhaps thoughts. This is an essential seed for democracy to grow, without it there can be no democracy.

The funny thing is that these iranian "democrats" abroad respect democratic values in their own countries, but when iranians gather in a situation, all of a sudden democracy is not valid anymore! What makes us iranians less worthy of democracy!?

iran threatens closing the strait or hormoz

 //www.nytimes.com/2011/12/28/world/middleeast/iran-threatens-to-block-oil-route-if-embargo-is-imposed.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss

A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny.--Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn.

RE: Robert...

Mr Robert,

I sincerely believe you need to get educated on what a healthy debate is and on how to engage in it. I clearly told you that I am not writing under other names, but you still ...

You are saying: "I don't think you understand the difference between a personal attack, and questioning someone's credibility based on what they say and how they say it". Ok, please sit back, look at your comments and give one peace of critisicm based on "what I said". All you have done is judging and talking about "who I am", and you accused me of being someone else, being pro-regime etc. Are these personal or related to the topic of discussion? I am not going to continue this useless discussion with you, but as the last word, if I were you, I would take the very first advise (right at the beginning of this comment) very seriously.

I was expecting this attitude in Balatarin, but surprisingly...

That's why there is no hope! The main problem is neither Pahlavi, nor IRI, we are the problem. We as Iranians need to be educated on many things!!

Mr. Tizgam: I think you

Mr. Tizgam: I think you need to read this article. This is what is called analysis....and your credibility is as stained as Newt Gingrich.

//foreignpolicyblogs.com/2011/11/15/a-candid-discussion-with-jahanbegloo-and-khalaji/

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn Quotes. A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny.--Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn.

He has a point that we should think about it

Regardless of who the author is, He has a considerable point.

Long Live Iran 

Dear Ali Tizghadam Nasri

Or maybe Ali Nasri Tizghadam?  I don't think you understand the difference between a personal attack, and questioning someone's credibility based on what they say and how they say it.  You have written different articles on Gooya for example using the two versions of your different names.  Also from your blog and a very cursory internet search anyone can figure out that you are essentially pro-regime.  These two items are sufficient for me to question your credibility based on what you say and how you say it.  In contrast, a personal attack would be to use epithets, characterize your intelligence in an unflattering way, or refer to you as a monafegh (in the Koranic sense).  I haven't done any of those things.  Now, next time the little wheels in your little brain turn and turn (example of a personal attack) so you can launch another attempt at 'psychological warfare' - a favorite of the IRI, at least try to remove some of the evidence of your true political attachments from the internet.  Your little operation is laughably amateurish.  In case your getting all upset again, this isn't a personal attack either;  this is an objective assessment of your competence.

RE: Mr. Tizghadam's credibility...

Dear rogertborden54,

I am always using my real name, and do not have the habit of disguising myself. I think it is much more beneficial to critisize the content and avoid personal attacks. 

تحلیل شکمی آقای تیزقدم

علی‌ آقا مثل اینکه شما درس تحلیل رو در مکتب آسد علی‌ رهبر خوندی . بر هیچکس پوشیده نیست که جنگ از نظر رژیم اسلامی همیشه یک موهبت بیان  شده و تنها کسی‌ که خواهان جنگ است سید علی‌ گدا رهبره که فکر میکنه اینم مثل جنگ عراق میشه ولی‌ کور خونده . شما هم به دنبال اینید که مسئولیت وقوع جنگ رو به گردن کس دیگه بندازید . براتون متاسفم اینبار نیز کور خوندید  

Nicely said by Robert

"My question always is:  If Pahlavi is so insignificant and such a traitor, why do people get so scared when he makes any little move. "

I am not a rolyalist or monarchist. However, there is no denying that RP has a significant popular support. To ignore or exclude his supporter from any coalition is simply undemocratic. 

Frivolous

Clearly RP's symbolic action is unting some opposing political factions. Interestingly, frivolous commentary such as this only add to this movement's credibility.

ای کلک!

اومدی مثل سرکار استوار پولیتیک بزنی و مچ رضا پهلوی رو بگیری ولی دستت رو شد.

این تجزیه تحلیلت هم خیلی آب دوغ خیاری بود!

Mr. Tizghadam's credibility...

...is unfortunately lacking.  He writes under different names (the other one being Ali Nasri), but what is clear is that he is a regime propagandist.  He is an example of the so-called third way within IRI, represented initially by the newspaper Entekhab and later by a web site of the same name.  They think they have way to power within IRI by positioning themeselves between the reformists and the various conservative factions.  It is hilarious to see him get so worked up over Reza Pahlavi's speech.  In the past few days he has written three aricles under his various aliases.  Just google him to corroborate all of this.  My question always is:  If Pahlavi is so insignificant and such a traitor, why do people get so scared when he makes any little move.  Chill folks, Hagh bar batel pirooz ast...right?

Mr. Tizghadam: Khaili ham

Mr. Tizghadam: Khaili ham rabt dard, agar nadashteh bashad, rabtesh midim. Negaran nabash Ali Agha. Hanooz ham dir nashodeh. mitoonid be mardom iran bepayvandid...

Nazi criminal are still at large and will be uncovered 

 //www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2011/0512/Demjanjuk-conviction-Top-5-Nazis-still-at-large/Sandor-Kepiro

“It’s not enough that faith claims to be the solution to all problems,” he wrote in Slate in 2009 after a Danish newspaper apologised for publishing cartoons of the prophet Muhammad. “It is now demanded that such a preposterous claim be made immune from a

تحلیل کشکی

به عقیده من، نویسنده این مقاله و بقیه طرفداران رژیم اسلامی در ایران، (از رفرمیست، تا منحرف و اصول گرا و غیره)، باید از رضا پهلوی خیلی‌ هم ممنون باشند که تقاضای دادگاه در کشور هلند برای این ادمکشان میکنه. وگرنه، وقتی‌ که دست ملت رنجدیده ایران به این دزدان وطن فروش آدمکش برسه، اینها باید دعا بکنند که سرنوشتشون به راحتی‌ اون معمر قذافی باشه..

وقایع دوران ریاست جمهوری آقای خامنه ای در این شکایت محلی ندارد

دوستان لطفا توجه کنید که شکایت آقای پهلوی هر گونه که تنظیم شده باشد نمیتواند به وقایع قبل از سال ۲۰۰۲ استناد کند چون در صلاحیت دادگاه کیفری بین المللی که آقای پهلوی سعی دارند این پرونده را از طریق شورای امنیت به آنجا بفرستند نیست. این دادگاه فقط به رخدادهای پس از ۲۰۰۲ رسیدگی می کند

Islamists are all over!

The world must get ready to confront these backwarded Islamists in particular IRR/IRI of IRAN.

عجب مغلطه ای

این را می گویند تحلیل کشکی و مغلطه از نوع سر هم بندی. این بهترین کار سیاسی رضا پهلوی بوده است. بر خلاف شما، بنده آن را به این صورت می بینم که اگر دادگاه خامنه ای را محکوم کند که این باعث می شود قدرتهای خارجی با مخالفان وارد گفتگو شوند و کشورهایی مانند چین و روسیه که از رژیم فعلی حمایت می کنند در شرایط سخت تری قرار بگیرند. اگر هم که خامنه ای محکوم نشود باز نظرها متوجه خامنه ای و حقوق بشر در ایران و مسئولیت خامنه ای در این مورد میشود. در هر دو صورت تاثیرات روانی بر خامنه ای را نیز نباید از نظر دور داشت.

میر حسین موسوی خامنه چی؟

ایندست استدلال هواداران کنار آمدن با نظام پربرکت دیگر نخ نما شده.

محکوم شدن نظام پربرکت به جنایت علیه بشریت که نمونه بارز آن در دوران ریاست جمهوری خامنه­ای و نخست وزیری میر حسین موسوی خامنه، صورت گرفته چه ربطی به جنگ دارد؟

البته ربط در  هواداری نویسنده این مقاله از میرحسین موسوی خامنه؛ است. برای اینکه  او هم بجای گفتن " محذوراتی دارم" برای جنایت علیه بشریت در دوران هشت سال زمامداریش باید پاسخ بدهد. مخصواً حالا که بر طبق تحقیق بنیاد برومند؛ حاجی موسوی از جنایات خبر داشته و دفاع هم کرده.

کشورهایی که بخواهند دنبال بهانه برای جنگ با نظام پربرکت باشند؛ خود وحوش اسلامیست هفته و تقریباً روزی نیست که چند بهانه چاق و چله برای اینکار تقدیم نکنند.