What the Odyssey can tell Egyptians

I don’t see much cause for optimism


What the Odyssey can tell Egyptians
by Saideh Pakravan

In the Odyssey, Homer has Ulysses barely make his escape through a strait guarded on one side by the monster whirlpool Charybdis and on the other by the cave-dwelling hydra Scylla. Ever since, the expression “being caught between Charybdis and Scylla” has meant the impossible proposition of choosing between two evils.

This is what is happening now with the looming Egyptian presidential elections. On the one hand, the Muslim Brotherhood reneging (no surprise there) on its word not to present a candidate and naming Khairat El-Shater as their choice (he has been quoted as declaring that establishing sharia law is his “ultimate goal”.) On the other, as a possible counterweight, the now declared presidential bid of Omar Suleiman, a former army general and intelligence chief. The smattering of other candidates will not make a difference.

The Egyptians are left with not much of a choice. It’s either Charybdis and stricter application of Islamic law or Scylla, the secular but repressive dictatorship of yet another general. If they vote for the Brotherhood, they will have to accept a moderate Islamic state, except that there is no such thing. The French-Algerian journalist Mohammad Sifaoui, a secular Muslim himself, brilliantly demonstrates that there is no moderate Islamic state as there is no moderate Islam. Case in point, Prime Minister Erdogan’s AK Party in Turkey, which has managed to have Islamic law, in one guise or another, seep into every aspect of Turkish life, gradually destroying Ataturk’s secular legacy. Erdogan will be pulling a Putin in the next presidential elections, running—and certainly winning—while grooming the present president, Gül, also an Islamist, to replace him as prime minister. With two mandates, that’s Turkey for the next ten years, at the end of which it will no doubt have turned into a rigid Islamic state.

But back to Egypt. If Egyptians elect Suleiman instead, there’s bound to be a crackdown on the Brotherhood such as the movement has known throughout presidents up to Mubarak’s overthrow.

Like many people, I was hopeful, at the start of the Arab spring, that the people would achieve what Iranians couldn’t obtain in 2009—bring to power a more palatable government and have a say in the way their countries are run.

Given the present mess in Egypt, Libya, Yemen, not to mention Syria, given the establishment of a “moderate” Islamic regime in Tunisia, given the entirely predictable rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, I don’t see much cause for optimism. The only reason to still hope is that, over the last couple of centuries, the trend of history has, with some hiccups, gone into the direction of more liberty. Western democracies, so reviled by governments such as Iran’s, are well established and functioning, despite the problems and woes to be expected in an open society, while the awful dictatorships and repressive regimes elsewhere will fall. They may be replaced for a while by similar ones but they will fall.

Visit Saideh Pakravan's blog. thecounterargument.wordpress.com


Recently by Saideh PakravanCommentsDate
Good cinema, bad history
Nov 18, 2012
My house has many rooms
Oct 24, 2012
Radical Islamism falling apart? Inshallah!
Sep 30, 2012
more from Saideh Pakravan

Too much

by MRX1 on

I don't know what it is that you guys keep expecting from these movements and their societies and you keep getting disappointed in the end.............

Turkey which is supposedly most progressive and secular country in the region is barely hanging on and so what are you expecting from Egypt and on others.

I tend to think  differently. I think Arab gravitation towards Islam is natural as drinking water. Islam is Arabs culture and they feel comfortable with it. Islam is not an alian culture imposed on them like it is imposed on iran per say. What arabs are doing, are going back to their roots (fresh start) and from there may be they can find a way out and it probably will be not be jeffersonian secualr swedish style democracy that you guys are hoping for but so be it.

The lesson here is, we Iranian people should  go back to our roots and our culture.we need to resurect our culture,language,our icons and figure it whowe are once again then we can start porgressing as we should.

Azin Izadifar

"If they vote for the Brotherhood,

by Azin Izadifar on

they will have to accept a moderate Islamic state, except that there is no such thing." well said