HAMJENS

He Didn't Say "We Have No Gays in Iran"!

The moron president said:

"We don't have (as many) gays in Iran as you do in America".

The girl translated it wrong then by the time she tried to correct it people booed.

He is right about this. In America there are more gay dating posts in dating sites than straight posts. During shah when straight sex was OK and free we hardly had more than 1 or 2 gays in one area. Now with a ban on boy/girl sex men have resorted to all kinds of perverted sex including homosexuality.

Did I mention I hate rap. Rap is 1 letter short of CRAP.

I hope it leaves Iranian music as fast as it entered it.

I don't see how it could be true if they are devoted moslems.

I am not saying it is impossible, since if they cannot have women, I wouldn't be surprised if some, not all, would want to have something that doesn't get pregnent.

As for the photos of men holding hands - we know better. The guy says it is a feminin culture. The idiot shows his ignorant of the culture or want to demonize it. How many times have we held the hands of our friends whom we were close to emotionally, before we came to the west? This kind of stereotyping is done as a campaign against these idiots who are really disgrace to men! Photos are always are re-touched in the villages which is all of afghanestan. non-sense!

The commentator is a paki who works for the western media and falsely describes how taleban was formed. Taleban was formed by the coordiantion of Pakistan and the US in order to control Afghanestan.

That's fascinating. It

That's fascinating. It confirms the previous comment. Thanks Yolanda.

......

This video said that in Afghanistan there is (was?) strong homosexual tradition that older men adopt young boys as students, lovers, and concubines.....

//link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid271557392?bctid=1151557602

I found this video when I was reading about "Taliban" in Wikipedia. The video link is listed in Wikipedia. I am not 100% sure if the allegation is true.

"

The Pahlavis, all mullahs, and all public figures associated with the Green Movement  must disclose the source and the amount of their wealth/income.

The movement isn't dead

The 1979 "revolution" took 9 months to succed  in overthrowing thegovernment,give this one some time and support.

"You should not be afraid of the ideology but of the determination and will of the men behind it"

"A drowning man is not troubled by rain" Persian Proverb

Afkooni down below?

I heard the Pashtunes like to sleep with little boys.

"You should not be afraid of the ideology but of the determination and will of the men behind it"

"A drowning man is not troubled by rain" Persian Proverb

This article & S.F gay comedian Irani of Day! we're going gay!

Good! The Green movement is dead and now we want to change this site as an educational tool to convince all these anti-gay Iranians how dead wrong they are for believing in what they believe in! We all should start embracing the gays, otherwise there is something wrong with our brains or/and culture!  

Slowly, but surely! I guess, we need to start the division, now that we overthrew the regime! Brilliant! Aren't we? 

Phobia

A phobia  is an intense and deep fear of certain situations, activities, things, animals, or people. The main symptom of this disorder  and abnormality is the excessive and unreasonable desire to avoid the feared stimulus. When the fear is beyond one's control, and if the fear is interfering with daily life, then a diagnosis under one of the anxiety disorders can be made.

Homophobia being one case that we see amplified by the gentleman Holden over and over and over gain in his repetitive and bigoted comments.

-YT 

Dear Holden

I need to sign off.  But let me tell you what I think,  you can not find a universal standard or argument against the rights of all citizens including homosexuals in a society with a civilized legal system such as the US.  All you can safely say is that you do not like their practices and that they are against YOUR moral standards and see if anyone will consider that strong enough based on which to deny homosexuals their un-alienable (according to the US constitution) rights.

On the minority/majiority issue please note the majiority can not vote the rights of minority null.   They are considered unalienable (sorry).    

I am not sure about your economic model, please provide the exact math.  

Homosexuals in America are among the highest earners.

have a great weekend. 

"...they are not worried..."

I am sure you understand what a financial/economical model is. It has nothing with my being worried. Its sustainability is the main, let say, factor.

Therefore, a homosexual population lives off heterosexual population like a parasite. No derogatory remark intended.

The homosextual population

by not having children has more dispensable income and can care for its retired parents much better.  And if they are not worried about the next genration to support them, why should you be.  

"...she should not inherit..."

The heterosexual financial model is the natural way of collecting tax/manpower from one generation in order to provide for the retired one. An aging homosexual population, therefore, becomes a financial burden to the natural one.

There is no problem with "she", and "her husband". With, or without a child. Why?

What is a heterosexual financial model? Children?

If it means children, then should childless couples be denied same rights as couples with children.  So if a woman does not have a child she should not inherit from her husband?   

"...the purpose of Homosexual sex is not reproduction..."

Which takes us to the next level of our "little talk". Homosexuals are asking for the same financial benefit which exist in the natural heterosexual societies, such as marriage, inheritance, spousal retirement, etc. These benefits are built based on, and sustainable, only, upon a heterosexual financial model. 

I wish you a good weekend too

Tackling the issue of overpopulation by the practice of homosexuality is like mandatory size reduction of people's stomach in order to fight food shortage in some parts of the world. Or is it?

There is no confusion :-)

There is no confusion, the purpose of Homosexual sex is not reproduction.  They are not confused........  

Holden

Let's cut it short, B/S.

Live and let live.

As for "any confusion between the two is unnatural", you certainly belong to the other kind, unnatural.

"unnatural"

What is Unnatural is the energy you are expending pushing your agenda. That is what is truly Unnatural. Peace Out Amigo,

Holden

I can see that you and I are very different.  I believe in "law of logic".  You believe in "law of nature".  Logically speaking, overpopulation has become a serious threat to mankind survival. At this point "reproduction" has little value in sustaining the human life.  It is more of an animalistic instinct that needs to be satisfied.

You seem to be more of a black/white thinker.  I am more interested in abstract thinking. 

Have a good weekend. 

"...matter Senior..."

Which takes us to the interesting subject of differentiation in body systems, namely, digestive, and reproductive. Any cofusion between the two is unnatural.

Holden

Could not agree more with you Senior.

You do realize that though In this case You are the Minority and Your M & J certainly can not be tolerated LOL. Well said.

Holden

 Natural Laws of survival Are Natural laws which can not be defined or determined by You or anyone else for that matter Senior.

SO techincally Homosexuals are free to be part of the nature and practice what they do based on those very same laws.

Mumbo Jumbo??

You are right. I could not have said it better. Then the majority rules. No minority mumbo jumbo allowed.

"Sorry. I don't understand..."

No, they are not formed in the vacuum. 

They are only, and very simply based on the natural law of survival which includes "reproduction".

KouroshS

I agree with your comment.  However, I am very interested in Holden's response to my question. 

Mumbo Jumbo??

Individual characters ARE natural values which COLLECTIVELY form Social values.

Quit playing with words.

Holden

Sorry.  I don't understand your statement.  Are you saying our social values are formed in a vaccum?!!

Sensationalism?!!! 

"An individual's sexual orientation..."

Individual characters are irrelevant to the natural, and social/collective values.

A society can't be run by sensationalism. 

Holden: You missed the point

An individual's sexual orientation is not a reflection of his/her character.