MONARCHY

Historical fact. Jebhe Meli is Khaen

It is crystal clear that Dr.Karim Sanjabi claimed Khomanie is a democrat and Islamic republic is democratic. Why some people try to hide this important historical fact. Jebhe Meli was khaen to Iranian people and they have to have enough courage and come froward and apologize from Iranian and Pahlavi's family. Jebhe Meli along with mullahs and the other idiots were the reason to pursuaded shah to leave the country and put our nation in current situation. I don't understand why they don't want to admit their Khayanat.

                 GOAL : RESTORING MONARCHY

Its not about a person but about a state of mind !

 Aynak,

Afkar Cherik Fadayin khalgh (link kar nemikone vali jomlasho mishe khoond) bana bar khoshoonak va radicalisme afkarist khatarnak. Dar jameye motmaden jaye in afrad dar zendan boode az 30 sal pish ta emrooz (Brigade  rosso dar Italia,Action directe dar Faranseh, baader & meinhof dar Alman)!

Age ishoon tahavol dide, good for him vali farghi be haale ma nemikonad ! ishoon bad az 30 sal taze khodesho resoonde be afkar 30 pish bande va kheli iranie digar !   shahkar  karde?! bana bar in moshkel man injast ke ishoon bedoone inke dar nazar begirad ke afradi in pishraft zehni salha pish anjaam dadean be khod ejaze midahad tossie va rahnemayi dahad va dars democracy?(khodesho roshangara ya roshanfekr midoone in baram ajibe !!!) edea edea edea !

dar jameyi democrate gharb karname siasi afrad mohem mibashad va mibinid ke ba avalin khata az rade kharej mishavand !

pass chetor  dar jameye irani, hey khata mikonan, hey gool mikhorand,hey birahe miravand, vali bazam dar sahne khodeshoono midoonand va dars democracy midahand ????!!  (bahs man faghad ishoon nist balke kole nasle inha) pas key mikhan baznezeshtegi siasi begirand ?hich vaght ta 99 salegi edea roshanfekri mikonan ? come now  !!

 inha yek bar birahe raftand na ozr khahi kardeand taze talab kar haam hastand edea bar anke age donbal emmam oftadan taghsire shah boode !!! doroogh bozorgtar tar az in nashnide boodim !

 Felestin-Isreal issue is not Iran's business, ta injash haam pool naft Iran ziadi kharje "baradaran mosalmoon" shode va man in ra khianat be Iran midanam ! pas in afkar ke mosalmoon boodan mohemtar az mihan hast afkari zede mellist !!

ps;  gooyande TV nistam va ahle ghalam haam nistam tasavorat shoma be kol eshtebast ! 

ps: rajebe entekhab nohe system har fard Irani ba aghlo kherade khodesh entekhab khahad kard ! we all are free to choose ! 

آنچه دگران کاشتند که برای ما زهر شد. لااقل ما آن بکاریم تا ...

ایران برای همه ایرانیان
رای ایرانیان - دولت ایرانیان
نه ولایت وقیح نه پادشاه سفیه

Now, i understand much better !

 Ali keshtgar

there was a link in iranian.com of you in 80's and your lovely  democrats friends lol

//iranian.com/main/singlepage/2008/anti-revolutionaries

you can erase all the video in youtube but you can't erase our memories ! You (and all your friends) own Iranians a Big apologise for what you did in 1357. In afkar Vahshi Khorafati va Chapie Radical shoma bood ke baese badbakhtie 30 millions (va bad 70 millions irani) shode ! Ba che veghahati emrooz darse democracy be nasle ma midahid ? bar assase che karname siasi ?

zemnan link haye be zabane fransavi haam haast ke ishoon delesh baraye felestinia mitapeh ! (akhey delam koli sookht  !!)

Aghaye Ali Ketshar Afkar pooside shoma bood ke in fajearo afarid !!!!  Chetor Pedarane ma (ke dar haman zaman dar iran zendegi mikardand )Mesl shoma na cherik shodand va na asheghe emmam age begholetoon hamash tagsire systeme pishin boode???!! Dast vardarid az DOROOGH GOFTANHATOON  va masooliat karname nangin khodra ghabool konid ! Va Bazneshetegi shoma tabrik !

Aynak and others

Mashrooteh does not mean Shah does not get involved in politics. It means he does not get unchecked power. Mashrooteh has root "Shart" or "condition" meaning power of king is conditional.

There is a governing body that checks power of king. Initially kings had a lot of power. Over time in West the power went to just ceremonial. I agree that if we have a king it should be a ceremonial position. But I don't see why a king should not be allowed to participate in politics. In West by tradition kings do not participate in politics. There is no reason why they could not run for office and get elected to anything. At the minimum they have a right to voice their opinion.

As for clergy in West they most definitely may run for office. Have you not heard of Reverend Jesse Jackson running for President. Because of their shady behavior we may decide to put a ban on clergy in office. At least for a number of years. But it is not a general requirement of democracy. To be clear nobody gets to tell others to not participate in politics. If you do not like him then don't vote for him. Are you now to be the new "guardian council"; no thank you.

No Arash

It will not be 80 years. Those days we did not have media as we got today. Information was tightly controlled and state has it fully run. Today it has taken about 30 years for people to start to come around.

Remember there are still Russians who support the revolution. There will always be vocal anti Shah supporters of revolution. But people are slowly coming around. I was never a revolutionary but disliked Shah. Now I changed my mind.

This is not about how smart you are but how much information you got. Why do you think RP is getting traction. Why do you think the older generation is least supportive. Not to mention how angry and worried they are getting.

It will take a long way

It took the Russians some 80 years to learn that they have done unjust to last russian Czar and his family. As iranians are not smarter than russians, it will take them probably another 50 years or more to realize what they have lost. The Pahlavi family are still attacked and criticised more than wonderful islamic regime.

the only view I agree with RP

is that he says Iranian people should select him. He has a bloody long time to wait and it won't be in this life.

He does not know a lot of people do not care for monarchy anymore.

رشید خان شما هم که مانند شاه پسر شدی شتر مرغ؟

کجای این حرف رو متوجه نمی شی؟  پادشاهی که در سیاست و دولت دخالت کند
مشروطه نمی شود.  همان گونه که روحانی که داخل سیاست شود دیگر روحانی نیست-
سیاستمدار است.  کی گفته یا حق دارد بگوید، رضا پهلوی به عنوان یک شهروند
ایرانی در سیاست شرکت نکند؟  ولی او به عنوان شاه مشروطه- چنین حقی ندارد.  
کما اینکه خمینی هم نداست.  در قدم کشور اروپایی و یا آمریکایی (چه شمالی
چه جنوبی) کشیش یا روحانی را سراغ دارید که در سیاست شرکت میکند؟    و بار
دیگر میپرسم، جز پادشاهی بحرین و عربستان کدام پادشاهی مشروطی را در اروپا -
میشناسید که در امور سیاسی دخالت کند؟   بودجه عرضه کند؟  در احزاب سیاسی
شرکت کند و نظریات سیاسی فرا دولتی بدهد ؟    اگر قرار است شاه  مشروط باشد
باید فرا جناحی باشد، باید فرا سیاسی باشد.   پس این "شاه" حق نظر در امور
سیاسی را ندارد و صرفا آنطور که گفته شد باید فقط جنبه تشریفاتی داشته
باش- که این به مذاق شما خوش نیامد.   حالا شما دوباره بیا سعی کن همان
روشی را  که ایران را پس از ۲۵ قرن به اینجا رسانده  تبلیغ کن.

آقایون و خانم های

شاه و سیاست:

اینکه ( شاه نباید در سیاست دخالت کند )

تازه آن قانون مشروطه خوراک آنروز جامعه ایران بوده و در دنیای امروز هیچ ارزش اجرائی ندارد چه رسد که به آن استناد کنیم .
بخوانید آن قانون را و ببینید که اگر امروز بخواهید آنرا اجرا کنید شاخ در نمیآورید ؟ آنهائی که به استناد آن قانون مشروطه اراجیف میبافند اصلآ  آنرا قبولش دارند ؟ به هر حال  عیبی ندارد ، تو دنیای مجازی و سوراخ سمبه ها خود بگویند و خود بشنوند ولی  ایران آینده جای امنی برای آنها نیست .

Monarch vs VF

Thank you dear aynak for a post that has some substance rather than personal attacks as we have witnessed here from the online version of RP's Shaban Bimokhs! Despite their unrelenting personal attacks at Mr. Keshtgar for having dared to question RP's modus operandi, the resident Shahollahis of IC have not even put up a serious rebuttal to his assertions to prove him wrong or mistaken! Such is the nature of Shahollahis who never see anything wrong done by their master, HIM ariamehr or his mini-me, RP! Just like the Hezbollahis who wouldn't even let anyone question the infallible VF, their Emam Khamenei, let alone listen and rebut!

What's interesting is that these folks, while preeching to others that no one has the right to tell people what to (or not to) do (albeit Mr. Keshtgar is merely making a suggestion rather than telling!), they don't even mention the Rastakhiz party (Shah's pet project) of which Shah had ordered all Iranians to either become a member or leave the country! I guess when they say "no one has the right," they mean except HIM the Shah and RP! Just like Khomeini and khamenei who are exceptions to the rules for Hezbollahis!

Giving people advise

We are all free to give advise but why should one take it? I would take the advise of one who has a good track record. Making a bad choice is bad enough but worse is not admitting and learning from it.

Here is a true story from my life. A few years ago I hired a financial adviser to manage some of my assets. He invested them in bank stocks. Needless to say it was a disaster. When I asked my adviser about the mess he said banks are a good investment. Basically he refused to accept he had made a bad decision. Having no option I dismissed him and took over personally. I managed to saved what was possible. The lesson was to not deal with a person who refuses to admit a mistake.

Here we got a person with a horrible track record of judgment. Why should Pahlavi or anyone pay attention to him. Did he ever get something right? If not then why should I think he is right now.

My personal advise to him and others like him is they should keep out of politics. Given their abysmal judgment they are the ones who I am weary of not RP!

In his whole life RP has not made any mistakes at the level of Mr. Keshtgar. But Keshtgar has not got one thing right.

I got to be a nut to listen to a person with a proven bad record as Keshtgar. You go ahead go give advise and pretend to matter.

بهترین جمله عینک هم جمله پایانی اوست

مهمترین جمله کشتگر جمله پایانی اوست:

" اما توصیه ام به آقای رضا پهلوی این است که اگر خود را وارث تاج و تخت
پادشاهی می داند، و قانون اساسی مشروطه را هم می پذیرد، از هم اکنون در
سیاست مداخله نکند."
برخی دوستان به نظر میاید که این جمله کشتگر را یا  بد متوجه شدند، یا با
اصل جدایی دولت  و سلطنت هرچند از نظر اسمی موافق اند، از نظر عملی به آن
اعتقادی ندارند، وگر اینگونه آشفته نمیشدند.
اصل مشروطه، که آنها که خود را مشروطه خواه می پندارند باید از آن پشتیبانی
کنند همین -- مداخله نکردن شاه در سیاست است.  این اصل به مذهب هم بر
میگردد. به این مفهوم که مذهب باید امری غیر سیاسی/دولتی  باشد. همانگونه
که وقتی غیر آن شد، نتیجه اش همین نظام ولی فقیه خواهد شد.   پرسشی که برای
من خواننده پیش آمده این است:
-اگر رضا پهلوی خواهان آغاز یک کنگره ملی است (که کار  بسیار خوبی نیز از
نظر من هم هست، چرا؟  چون آغازی است برای خارج شدن  از۴ چوب نظام اصلاح
ناپذیر کنونی)  آیا این با عنوان یک شهروند صورت می گیرد یا با عنوان مدعی
تاج و تخت؟   اگر اولی است، رضا پهلوی می تواند براحتی با بیان اینکه، به
مجموعه سلطنت /نظام پادشاهی اعتقادی ندارد، قال قضیه را برای یک بار و
همیشه خاتمه دهد.  در این صورت - دیگر هیچ کس نمی تواند او را مسئول کردار
پدر دانسته و تمام دیالوگ ان زمان روی محور  آنچه او پیشنهاد کرده: "ایجاد
کنگره ملی" خواهد گشت.   ولی متاسفانه و آنگونه که در مصاحبه با مسیح علی
نژاد هم مشخص بود، دانسته یا ندانسته رضا پهلوی خود را شتر مرغ می پندارد. 
به نظر می رسد که تصور می کند با طفره رفتن از بیان آشکار نقش خود - و
تعویق آن به رای مردم، می شود مسئله را ماست مالی کرد.  آنچه کشتگر به
درستی  بیان میکند شق دوم است:  اگر رضا پهلوی خود را وارث تاج و تخت می
داند، فرقش با خمینی که مذهب را با سیاست قاطی کرد چیست؟  مهمتر فرقش با
پدر خودش که بجای پادشاه مشروطه که طبق همان قوانین مشروطه از هر گونه
مسولیتی مبراست - سلطنت استبدادی کرد و هر گونه که بنگرید، حکومتش تنها
چیزی که نبود این بود: "مشروط"
مهمترین مسئله ای که هم میهنان باید به ان توجه کنند این است که جو زده
نشوند.  مهمتر از کنگره ملی - چگونگی بوجود آمدن ان، و مهمتر از سرنگونی
حکومت فعلی - ماهیت و چگونگی تشکیل بدیل آن است.  اگر قواعد بازی از ابتدا
صحیح گذاشته شد، شانس موفقیت ایران و ایرانیان، که همان رسیدن به برقرای
روش دمکرایتک برای مدیرت جامعه است بسیار بالا خواهد بود، وگرنه خشت اول
اگر کج نهاده شد، عاقبت حکومت رضا خان و خمینی خواهد بود.  

زیر سایه امپریالیسم !؟

The children and the adults - circa 1352 Iran

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=buTlBLGdUfo&feature=youtu.be&t=1m27s 

"As a Marxist my address is to the people and history."

A thoughtless, restless, and clearly confused, young malcontent. That, I would think, will be the most generous judgment of Iranian history, regarding you, Mr. Golesorkhi. 

//www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=vM8R8Noe1w8  

Roohet shaad! 

-  

Think Clearly, Speak Straight, and Act Decisively.  Only then will you be an Iranian.

We already know

How various people from Arj to myself think about RP. I doubt any of us are going to be going for a different position. Therefore I ask what is the point of this article? The is not the boss of anyone.

He has his own position and that is his business. He has no right to tell RP or anyone what to do. That part is neither his business nor within his power. Sir go on and say what you wish; it makes no difference to me.

The same goes for others like Amirkabir. Sir maybe RP is useless to you. But it is not really you who decide his importance to me. I guess after all these years people still don't know one simple thing. You do not get to tell others what to do.

Gunga Din while you're at it, also "de-bunk" Rastakhiz

and SAVAK's cooperation with Hojatieh.

Mosaddeghists lies debunked

Here are their lies debunked:

1.        
"Shah created the the atmosphere in
which Khomeini came to power by eliminating all secular and
democratic political entities."  Pahlavi II, continued and
completed the work of Pahlavi I by removing the last vestiges of the clerical
influence in areas like women's right to vote and participation in political.
educational and judicial discourse. Mohammad Reza Shah's Iran was
secular in every respect. Even political figures of Baha'i and Zoroasterian
faith were admitted to the key positions regardless of their faith. The official
faith of the country though remained Islam. After Mosaddeg's total disregard
for democratic institutions such as the press, parliament and people, the Shah
had to reintroduce them gradually and he started the process until the
Mosaddeghist-Mullah alliance of 1979 stopped the process.

2.        
" RP's defending of 28
Mordad coup as "legal" and "legitimate" is a tell-tale
indication of his interpretive notion of 'gleality' and 'legitimacy." Prince Reza
Pahlavi did not defend or confirmed any thing. He only questioned the very
legitimacy of Mosaddegh's defiance against the Shah's decree which removed him
from office. Mosaddeghists' horror at puttig their idol's legality under
scrutiny is understandable but not also pitiable. No independent and credible
author or historian can reject the suggestion that 28 Mordad was a vote of no
confidance to Mosaddegh by a abstaining nation.

3.        
" RP's relation to the Pahlavi regime is not defined by a
father-son  realtionship, but by his representation of the institution of
monarchy and advocacy of Phlavi dynasty. Hence, people have every right to
question him on the records of the previous reigns of Pahlavi dynasty if
he is to reclaim the throne!" People have
questioned and the vote is still to be cast (in favour by all accounts) but what
Mosaddeghist should watch out is people's vote on Jebeh (zed) Melli and their
dark records!

4.        
" One's personal comportment
and mien are a totally separate entitiy from his/her conducts in
an institutional role! RP'e personal demeanors may seem affable as a
private person, but once in charge of such an institution as
Iranian monarchy with an undemocratic and despotic history, he would
have committments to his throne that would put him at odds with the people and
their rights -- as is the norm in all life-time ruling regimes!" When desparation turns into
exasperation then false assumptions begin to emerge. ALL democratic eurporean
and non European monarchies had a non-democratic past but none of that stopped
them from continuing with a refromed institution that had deep roots in their
cultural heitage. The
institution of monarchy is alive and potent for as long as there are Shahnameh,
Nezami and Hafez and Sadi as four of the pillars of our cultural heritage.

More lies the be debunked? :)

Misleading points

The writer falsely links the appearance of Islamic government to the event of 1953. Wrong.

Shia clergies had a long history of battle to take power in Iran. It started during Mashroteyat when group of clergies along with people were gathered in front of Majlis and shouting loudly "Mashroteh Nemikhahi, Deen e Mobin khahem". Means we don't want constitional monarch, we want relgion government. Needless to say all those uprising such as Sheikh Mohamad Kheyabani in city of Tabriz (he was shia clergy). Mirza Khochak khan Jangali in providence of Gilan who was devoted muslim and wanted to apply the principals of Islam to Iranians. Ayatollah Hadi Modares who was saying "our religion is the same as our politic and our politica is the same as our religion". This is the same statement khomaini claimed and mullahs are repeating these days.

   The event in 1953 had been meant to prevent Iran from falling to the hand of Soviet Union through Tudeh party. Mark Gasiorowski gives details from the event in his book.

                         GOAL : RESTORING MONARCHY

The losing battle!

Excellent points by Mr. Keshtgar! Indeed, supporters of Pahlavis are risking irrevlevance by insisting on trying to exhume and resurrect the decomposed body of Iranian monarchy rather than concentrating on the democratic nature of a potential alternative to IRI! Perhaps that explains RP's position on fence-sitting and leaving the door open for any role that would be handed to him by the people!

Here are the points Mr. Keshtgar aptly underlines that seem to be the seminal premise of future discussions with regards to RP and his claims: 

1- Shah created the the atmosphere in which Khomeini came to power by eliminating all secular and democratic political entities.

2- RP's defending of 28 Mordad coup as "legal" and "legitimate" is a tell-tale indication of his interpretive notion of 'legality' and 'legitimacy.'

3- RP's relation to the Pahlavi regime is not defined by a father-son  realtionship, but by his representation of the institution of monarchy and advocacy of Phlavi dynasty. Hence, people have every right to question him on the records of the previous reigns of Pahlavi dynasty if he is to reclaim the throne!

4- One's personal comportment and mien are a totally separate entitiy from his/her conducts in an institutional role! RP'e personal demeanors may seem affable as a private person, but once in charge of such an institution as Iranian monarchy with an undemocratic and despotic history, he would have committments to his throne that would put him at odds with the people and their rights -- as is the norm in all life-time ruling regimes!

Shoma ki hastid ke tahin o taklif mikodid ?

آقا شما بد جوری سوزنتون (و افکارتون) گیر کرده !

امسال شماها کی‌ هستند که صبح تا شب بعد از سی‌ و اندی سال جز خورده از شاه فقید یا فرزندش کار مفیدتری ندارند ؟

جالب اینجاست که پرونده سیاسی تک تک شماها سیاه می‌باشد. کاش میشد که امسال شما مصو لیت پذیر بودند بر آنچه بر سر ملت آوردند، به چه حقی‌ پشت پوشش آزادی‌خواهی خود را پنهان می‌کنید و شاه فقید مصو ل تک تک عملیات خود میدانید. این خودش نشانیی از نپختگی ذهن سیاسی شما است (به آزادی مطبوعاتی یا حزبی آن زمان یا این زمان ربطی نداره که شما نمیخواهید مثل یک مرد بالغ به اندیشید و سهیم بر آنچه که گذشت)

نسل شما تا حدودی دستکاری بر تاریخ مصر ما کرده است که خودشو خوب جلوه بدهد، اما متأسفانه برای شما نسل من خشونت و مسهبی  دو آتشه بودن تک تک شما را به خوبی‌ بر یاد دارد، و این افکار شما بود که این فاجعهٔ رو پیاده کرد و نه پادشاهی که دست مسهب را از امور جامعه کوتاه کرده بود !

بر مثال ل آیا نوهٔ مصدق ( قهرمان ملی شما) جناب هدیتلله متین دفتری که وکیلِ " حقوق بشر" می‌بود با حزب خودش همدست مهدی بزرگان در این فاجعه دست نداشته ؟

 از شما توصیه و یا راهنمایی‌ بر آنچه که دموکراسی‌ باید باشد یا نباشد احتیاجی نیست ! هرچه کرده‌اید برای هفت پشتمون بست بوده است ! راهنمایی‌ شما مساوی با چاه نمایی می‌باشد

Et pour votre gouverne on ne refait pas le monde avec des SI

I Agree with areyo barzan Too

the author has no Right To tell anyone what to Do.  RP is currently the best choice we have to lead the oppositions in order to dismantle this barbaric IRR.

Time to hit the archives

Salaam to all.

This is an interesting [1] little read. 

The Persian Regenesis - Bruce Hopper, Foreign Affairs, 1935 

//www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/69501/bruce...    

Per my read:

1) Islam was already identified as a divisive, or clearly insufficient, "formula" for the regional states to achieve their rebirth and "brotherly cooperation".  Thus, the angoolak of the "beloved" British Empire.

2) "Vigorous" Nationalism was understood to be both the key to the "unexpected" resurrection of the "Phoenix", and as a mutually acceptable regional framework for effective "cooperation" and "treat[ies]".

3) Iran was understood be the "key" and a strategic concern.

4) Iran was leading the way in the region.  

and last but certainly not least

5) The IRANIAN Pahlavi Monarchy was a "new formula" unlike the monarchy of the tribal "Shah"s from the steppes of Turan.

- notes: 

[1]: Do use the search features and hit the archives.  Sort by date, and start from oldest. "Anglo-Saxons" certainly did their research and their big brains have been on it for long time.  Have you, dear Iranians, conducted your research?  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Thayer_Mahan [America is Iran's natural strategic ally. Truly, it is a no brainer.  Europe and Russia our natural strategic enemies.  Even a bimokh would get this ..] 

URL pattern for date sorted search of the FA archives: 

//www.foreignaffairs.com/search/your%20search...   

e.g. //www.foreignaffairs.com/search/iran%20nationalism?s=dd  

Hack the url to jump to the older entries by fiddling with the page number, e.g. to go to page 35

//www.foreignaffairs.com/search/iran%20nation...

Enjoy your readings.

- 

Think Clearly, Speak Straight, and Act Decisively.  Only then will you be an Iranian.

Time to be fair and impartial

Mr. Keshtgar makes no sense. While we should not forget our history, we must not use it selectively for political purposes, and impose our views on other Iranians. Mellioun had their chance during the revolution, however, they failed because of their devision, lack of leadership, and bad judgement.

Many elite Iranians who supported the revolution were educated and some lived in the free world. They had access to all informations about A. Khomeini, his past activities, and his books. They were ignorant or chose not to inform majority of people within the country. They painted a utopian picture of Islamic regime for the Iranians.

I agree with Areyo Barzan (//iranian.com/main/blog/areyo-barzan/time-put-or-shut), Afshinazad, Rebecca, Rashid, and VPK.  After a fair and reliable referendum, people of Iran will decide what form of regime is suitable for them. The key is to make sure that no power previledge is given to a person or a religeon, in the new "Ghanoon-e Assasi", like they did give to foghaha, in Constitutional Monarchi, and Islamic Republic.

Yes, Reza Pahlavi must stay off politics&formulating future Iran

provided, that folks like  Javadsha javid, Keshtgar, mossadeghollahis, sabzollahis, ommaties & chapollolahis who were instrumental in bringing Islamic republic to power stay off politics & giving opinions-perscriptions. If your sense of judgement  sucked then, I'm sure your sense of judgment sucks now. So for the good of the country stay quiet & let those with clean hands get in. you need first to account for your partnership as 5th columns of  the Qadessi republic before acting as reborn secular pundits. 

ps* I'm independent, neutral on Reza Pahlavi, find his mother to be one of the main culprits behind ommatie revolution via her cozying up & appointments of omaru ommatie cults such as Seyed Nasr, Naraghi , etc at top posts of sensitive educational. media & cultural departments.  Future of Iran is neither Monarchism nor Arabo Ommaties but independent Iranophilles.

Cheers!!!

Talk is cheap.

Mr. Keshtgar and any friends he has should either do something effective or shut up. Reza Pahlavi isn't telling Mr. Keshtgar what to do and what not to do, so he should be extended the same courtesy.  Quite honestly a bit rich coming from a person who belonged to an ideologically violent group and who hasn't managed to work with any given group of "comerades" for very long.  Talk and advice is very cheap.  

Pendaar Joon

I find notting good (NEEK) anout a hypocrite coward who is ashamed of his own identity and political orientation. so excuse me if I am not calling you neek

Frankley I must admit that you have lot of nerve to show your face around here again and pretend to be  a democracy advocate.

Have you got the aproval of Ali Gedaa and AN for this.

P.S "be bachehaye ettelaaaat sallam beresoon lol "

and what was the point of that irrelevent video again???

P.S what are you afraid of? just answer the question mate.

//iranian.com/main/blog/areyo-barzan/time-put-or-shut

WHO DO YOU THINK CAN LEAD US OUT OF THE CURRENT MESS

WHOSE CLOSET ARE YOU HIDDING IN lol