FREE SPEECH
به زبان فارسی
PICTORY
LATEST MUSIC
SEARCH
$2 million lawsuit against me
05-Nov-2007
Mehdi Khalaji, an Iranian 'expert' at the Washington Institute for the Near East Policy (WINEP) has now officially filed a libel and defamation lawsuit against me in Canada and has claimed $2,000,000 damages. َQuite a modest champion of free speech, isn't he?
Why? Because I've been very critical about him serving the likes of Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, James Woosley and the rest of those filthy warmongers at the Washington Institute for the Near East Policy (WINEP), which was established by and is strongly associated with the Israeli Lobby's in the United States, according to Mearsheimer and Walt.
As a result, I have written that Khalaji, an advoacte of the economic warfare against Iran, is a traitor to his people and his country, as a result.
The new claims are again based on the same mistranslation of my writings on him which I exposed and refuted in length a while ago, when he threatened my hosting company (Florida-based Hosting Matters) that led them to promptly terminate the accounts I had with them.
Now apparently, with the backing of his friends at the Israeli lobby's think-tank, he is trying to bankrupt me by starting this silly legal procedure.
I would appreciate it if you could spread the word in your blogs or websites and also if you've got any tips on the right organisation or lawyer to approach. One way would be obviously Digging it.
Here is the full text of the claim if you like to see.
Here is also again his claims and my refutation. I wonder if the court had accepted the claim in the first place, had it known it was based on aa mistranslation of my writings:
These defamatory statements by Hossein Derakhshan directly and by innuendo:
a) state falsely that our client is a traitor to the government and people of Iran;
Mehdi Khalaji is hired by a think-tank, created by the Israeli lobbying group in the US (AIPAC)[1] and has openly advocated for military action[2] or economic sanctions[3] to overthrow the government of Iran[4]. Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz and James Woolsey, all strong advocates for regime change in Iran[5][6], are on its board[7].
Washington Institute for the Near East Policy (WINEP), Mr. Khalaji works for[8], has a clear agenda against Iran and that makes Mr. Khalaji, an Iranian citizen, a 'traitor' based on the definition of the word. (The American Heritage dictionary defines 'traitor' as “One who betrays one's country, a cause, or a trust.”[9])
b) state falsely that our client has worked for U.S. Vice-President Cheney's office; and by innuendo is a dupe or puppet of the U.S. government;
Mistranslated. The correct translation is that Mr. Khalaji “indirectly” and “through WINEP” gives advise to vice-president Cheney's office.
WINEP's director, Robert Satloff says that its products have been made accessible to “high-level Washington-based officials, prominent journalists, and senior diplomats.”[10] Vice-president's office is surly where many “high-level Washington-based officials” work and therefore WINEP's products, that includes Mr. Khalaji's contribution, reach Mr. Cheney's office.
There are also strong ties between WINEP and Cheney's office. For example, John P. Hannah, a deputy director of WNEP now serves[11] at a high position at the vice-president's office since 2001.
c) state falsely that our client has counselled the Vice-President of the United States of America to bomb our client's former offices in Iran;
Mistranslated. What I have written is that it is Mr. Cheney who wants to bomb Iran[12], not that Mr. Khalaji advises him to do so. Mehdi Khalaji has worked [13] as a section editor in a newspaper, titled Entekhab run by Taha Hashemi, a cleric appointee[14] of Ayatollah Khamenei in a government-funded organization related to the Qom's clerical school.
Mr. Khalaji wrote later in an article for the BBC Persian that the publishers of Entekhab had the personal support of Ayatollah Khamenei for the newspaper.[15]
A military attack on Iran surly could also destroy the building of Entekhab newspaper in central Tehran, where Mehdi Khalaji was once working.
d) state falsely that our client has counselled the Vice-President of the United States of America to bomb our thousands of men, women and children;
Mistranslated. Again, what I have written is that it is Cheney who wants to bomb Iran, not that Khalaji advises him to do so. Obviously thousands of men and women and children would be killed in a military strike against Iran.
e) state falsely that our client counsels enemies of Iran and of humanity;
Based on its output, it's clear that WINEP does not have a friendly policy toward Iran and openly advocates for regime change. So they are enemies of Iran and Khalaji counsels them.
Given the grave consequences of the illegal US-led invasion of Iraq, I believe those who supported and administered that invasion are enemies of humanity. At least two of these people, Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle are on WINEP's board where Khalaji counsels and WINEP had repeatedly and openly supported the invasion.[16]
f) incites others to follow the defamer Hossein Derakhshan's lead by spitting in our client's face;
Mistranslated. The correct translation reads “I don't know what name you want to give this conscious intellectual contribution by Mr. Khalaji to the most merciless and dirtiest enemies of Iran and humanity. But I know that if someday I face him in person, instead of saying hello, I will through a big spit on his face.” There is nothing inciting others to do anything here.
g) state falsely that our client holds and publicizes the belief that political change is not possible from within Iran;
This is not false. Mehdi Khalaji finishes his presentation at the AFPC meeting with the following paragraph in which he bluntly rejects the possibility of reform (5' 55 form the video)[17]:
“The majority of people might not be [unclear word] to the political agenda of the government, but instead suffer from its policy and restrictions upon social freedom without possessing any concrete effective means for any change or reform. Idealism has been reconstructed not only in terms of government's perception of politics, but also in terms of citizens public ambitions. Thus, the regime seems to be more solid and stable as ever before. Therefore the prospect of the prospect for political change is dark.”
Moreover, in an interview with Radio Zamaneh he adds “well, for me the Islamic Republic is similar to Dariush Mehrjooie's film, 'Ejarehneshin-ha.' The owner of the building... doesn't permit any minor changes... Then what will happen? The whole building collapses.”[18]
h) state falsely that our client struggles to converse and express himself in the English language;
Mistranslated. Correct translation reads “Mehdi Khalaji, while sweating to read smoothly from the English translated text of his article.”
But it is true that Mr. Khalaji has problems, at least in terms of reading, pronunciation and intonation. The recorded video of his speech (mentioned above) clearly shows that Khalaji mispronounces or struggles to read and pronounces many words including 'entirety,' 'unprecedented' and ' judicial.'
i) state falsely that our client counsels the government of the United States of America to choose military action and economic sanctions against Iran, over and instead of diplomatic talks;
Mistranslated. The correct translation reads that Khalaji “tried to show why political change from within is impossible in Iran and therefore the U.S., in order to remove 'the increasing threat by Iran against world piece' should not negotiate with Iran. Instead, through economic sanctions (or implicitly even through military invasion if its it was feasible.)”
Khalaji said these words in a conference to an audience at the AFPC, not to the government. I didn't quoted from him, but sumerised in my own words what could he ultimately mean by his speech.
The words in quotation mark ('the increasing threat by Iran against world piece') refers to a widely used theme by the media and the politicians and by doing so I'm trying to mock the sterotypical aspect of those words.
j) state falsely that our client's academic research paper are in reality thinly veiled instruction manuals on how to locate and attack the weaknesses of the legitimate government of Iran;
In May 2006, Mehdi Khalaji says to a Wall Street Journal reporter “Western countries must push the internal conflicts inside the Iranian government.”[19]
In July 2007, in an article published on WINEP's website, Khalaji writes:
“For the West, there are many advantages if Iran's leadership is weakened by internal disputes. Such an Iran would be busier domestically and therefore less able to concentrate on foreign adventures. It would also be more aware of its weaknesses and therefore more likely to compromise. To be sure, a weak Supreme Leader would presumably have less authority to impose difficult compromises on objecting factions. That, however, seems like a price worth paying in order to see a less powerful revolutionary leadership.“[20]
k) state falsely that our client is a proponent of, and openly supports, civil unrest, revolution and a regime change in Iran through the use of the military, and violence if necessary; and
Mistranslated. I never implied Khalaji supports violent change. It is Khalaji's employer, the Washington Institute, who has advocated regime change through violence.
In February 2007, Jeffery White, a defence fellow at the Washington Institute, writes[21]:
“The choices for dealing with the Iranian challenge, both in and outside Iraq, are not clear, and the consequences of making the wrong choices are dire. But by the time the choices are clear, it will be too late for anything but acquiescence to the presence of a nuclear-armed Iran driven by hostility toward the West -- or a war to prevent it. “
But in his interview with Radio Zamaneh he explicitly advocates for a 'fundamental change', defining it as the removal of Ayatollah Khamanei, the Supreeme leader of the Islamic Republic, in a similar fashion to non-violent revolutions in Eastern Europe. He then adds that this fundamental change is “impossible without foreign assistance.”[22]
l) clearly evidence a personal vendetta being waged by Hossein Derakhshan against our client, under the guise of alleged "commentary."
Before Khalaji started working for the Washington Institute, I had written positive posts about him and his writings. [23] [24]
But since he started working for the neo-conservative Washington Institute with its clear agenda to overthrow the Islamic Republic, even through military action if necessary, I have been critical about Khalaji's contribution to such entity. The same way I have been critical of Mohsen Sazgera who was a fellow there before Khalaji. [25]
I have never met Khalaji and never had anything personal against him, either in public or private and what I have written about him is only based on his work.
At the same time, I am a established commentator on Iranian affairs. Aside from my bilingual blog that I have written in the past six years, I am a columnist for The Guardian[26], Washington Post[27] websites. My writings have also appeared on The New York Times[28], International Herald Tribune[29],, BBC News[30], Die Zeit[31], etc. and I have been interviewed by various print or broadcast media on Iranian affairs. [32]
- ^ //www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/mear01_.html
- ^ //www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC05.php?CID=2520
- ^ //www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC04.php?CID=257
- ^ //www.washingtoninstitute.org/download.php?file=Soref2006.pdf
- ^ //www.antiwar.com/lobe/?articleid=4200
- ^ //www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3422.htm
- ^ //www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC11.php?CID=133
- ^ //www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC10.php?CID=33
- ^ //www.answers.com/topic/traitor
- ^ //www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC11.php?CID=21
- ^ //rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/2926
- ^ //www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/18834.html
- ^ //news.gooya.eu/politics/archives/2007/04/058513.php
- ^ //www.shareh.com/new/persian/magazine/hawzah/61/01.htm
- ^ //www.bbc.co.uk/persian/iran/story/2005/08/printable/050803_mj-mkhalaji-qom-press.shtml
- ^ //www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC05.php?CID=1486
- ^ //www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAhLUjGPJ8Y
- ^ //www.radiozamaneh.org/special/2007/04/post_188.html
- ^ //www.opinionjournal.com/wsj/?id=110008382
- ^ //www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC05.php?CID=2638
- ^ //www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC05.php?CID=2567
- ^ //www.radiozamaneh.org/special/2007/04/post_188.html
- ^ //i.hoder.com/archives/2003/08/030805_007814.shtml
- ^ //i.hoder.com/linkdooni/2004_03.html
- ^ //i.hoder.com/archives/2005/03/050322_013794.shtml
- ^ //commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/hossein_derakhshan/index.html
- ^ //blog.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/hossein_derakhshan/
- ^ //www.nytimes.com/2006/01/28/opinion/28Derakhshan.html
- ^ //www.iht.com/articles/2006/01/30/opinion/edhossein.php
- ^ //news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4947354.stm
- ^ //www.zeit.de/2005/27/Iran
- ^ //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hossein_Derakhshan#References
Related article by Mehdi Khalaji:
آزادی و مسئولیت
| Recently by hoder | Comments | Date |
|---|---|---|
راه گلشیفته را باز نگه داریم | 18 | Oct 13, 2008 |
عدم خشونت خوب است، ولی فقط برای ما؟ | 10 | Sep 17, 2008 |
آمریکا را در همین اتاق تاریک نگه داریم | 12 | Aug 11, 2008 |
RECENT COMMENTS
IRANIANS OF THE DAY
| Person | About | Day |
|---|---|---|
| نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
| Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
| Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
| احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
| Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
| Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
| گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
| Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
| محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
| Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Jahanshah Javid, Hezbollah in Disguise!
by Justice (not verified) on Wed Nov 28, 2007 06:51 AM PSTJahanshah Javid, Hezbollah in Disguise!
Hezbollah's Front Businesses in America!
Part one
//iranpoliticsclub.net/politics/shiite-season...
part two
//iranpoliticsclub.net/politics/shiite-season...
Economy is for jackasses !
by The11Ave (not verified) on Mon Nov 26, 2007 10:59 AM PSTKhomeini is your hero? Your English readers might find this piece of information useful that Khoemini is the person who said "Economics is for donkeys.", say it's worthless. And the misrable economic condition of Iran is the direct consequence of his "Brilliant" mind. You might want to talk back that we pay the price for sanctions and war and ... But Japan had an even worse situation after being nuked twice in WW2. Now where they are and where we are. You tell me . . .
Well, if you still want to promote Khomeini's stupid ideas and pretend that he's been the most brilliant mind ever existed on the planet, my answer is "Cut the crap please, would you?"
Mr. Hoder, Zionists have damaged Iran far more than $2 M
by Ahmad Bahai (not verified) on Sun Nov 18, 2007 08:30 PM PSTHossain Agha,
The price that you have to pay (of course I hope you don't have to) to these zionist bunch an dtheir stooges is nothing compared to the price that our nation has paid in terms of death and destruction as a result of sanctions and the like (thanks to zionsists). Zionists only enjoy when others suffer. Look at the Palestinians lives, and all other lives that the zionsists have destroyed. Lets hope one day, they will get a taste of it themselves.
khomeini is your hero? Go to
by nobody (not verified) on Tue Nov 13, 2007 04:24 AM PSTkhomeini is your hero?
Go to hell in your hero's arm and don't ask for help any more, every body knows you .
Tell every one how did you ended up with marjan,your ex-wife?
Tell every one about the flat you had in canada and how did you sell it before devorce.
Tell every one whose the owner of that flat right now and shut the fuck up.
It is incredibly sad that
by Farhad Kashani (not verified) on Thu Nov 08, 2007 02:13 PM PSTIt is incredibly sad that people like Hoder, an Iranian, who calls himself a liberal, advocate against regime change in Iran! If there is anyone who is a warmonger , is you and your likes. Because the only way for us to stop a devastating war against iran is to advocate and work towards a change of a regime that is mongering war against the world since it’s existence and imposed a bloody 8 years war , the longest in modern history, longer than world war II on the Iranian people. If we cannot show the world that we don’t support this regime, how do we expect for them to have any sympathy for us? How can we expect them to sit on their behind waiting for Iranians like Hoder to take matters into their own hand and salvage their country? And if Hoder and Hoder-likes belive the existence of the Islamic regime is justified, then, once we saw the B52s above Tehran, the only ones to blame are ourselves .
Kalaji used to
by Anonymous^1/2 (not verified) on Wed Nov 07, 2007 04:45 PM PSTkoon Hoder meezashteh!?
HODER TALKS THE TRUTH 90%
by quazi (not verified) on Wed Nov 07, 2007 02:06 PM PSTWE got your back hoder ... let me know if i can do anything
www.myspace.com/sahand
paslarzeh@hotmail.com
If I were the lawyer for
by Javadkachal (not verified) on Wed Nov 07, 2007 07:18 AM PSTIf I were the lawyer for you,
I would ask the guy to answer three questions then based on the fact that you are both Persian i hope although some actions do not prove it, then the case would be dismissed.
here are th equestions for the other side:
1. Do you think or believe that Masoud rajavi the MKO guy who helpoed saddam in the past is Kha-en or not?
2. Do you believe a war should get started against the people f Iran or the gov?
3. Have you helped or adviced any western oraganizations secret or openly to pursuade them to start or think of war against your country>?
4. Do you still consider yourslef an Iranian?
If the answers to these is yes then usiung persian Farhang argument that this qualifies as a kahen without any further arguments, then the judge can easily decide to dismiss the whole thing.
If you call someone madar... then you need to prove it or get lashes from m,ullas.
so it is in my opinion nothing if those questions are answered as yes.
Anyway from Now on I suggest to all persian and irani moslem or jew or christian or aethiest to use clean language, not for fear of lawsuit but the sake of children who come here and read the blogs.
No mention of madar khahar ammeh,,,etc.
be nice and even if someone is wrong or bad just say what you think is happening let people judge.
for rajavi for instance you can say:
It is unbelieveable that a man from Iran has gone to Iraq and has helped saddam. how is the world does he consider himslef persian. so we must write in history books what came from a good mother who raised his son who was hungry for power so much that he finally sold his country,. By the way bakhtiar aslo sold., he admitted on persian Tv in LA that he got money from saddam 6 million for fighting the new regime.
Anyway even if you forgot your ancestors then think of the children.
bliss you all.
Khalaji is a jew
by Anonymousisajew (not verified) on Tue Nov 06, 2007 09:57 PM PSTKhalaji is an arab jew. He is an Iranian wannabee. Why would anyone take him and the jew establishment seriously?
Derakhshan desrves whatever he gets
by The-Truth (not verified) on Tue Nov 06, 2007 03:38 PM PSTNobody is blaming Derakhshan for calling Khalaji a traitor, he actually is a bit of a traitor for associating himself with the Bushites. But the fact that Derakhshan has praised and defended the fucked up IRI regime and its leaders makes the majority of Iranians, specially those outside of Iran, who dislike IRI, to laugh at him instead of sympathizing with him. I mean, at least the Neo-conservatives are Anti-Iranian for strategic reasons, the Mullahs on the other hand, after getting so much from Iran and Iranians, say things like, I quote Khomeini, "We do not worship Iran; We worship Allah. Patriotism is another name for paganism; I say let this land of Iran burn, I say let this land go up in smoke provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world". IMO it would be really hilarious if Derakhshan loses the lawsuit.
Politics is a contact sport.
by Anonymous-today (not verified) on Tue Nov 06, 2007 12:47 PM PSTPolitics is a contact sport. If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. I'm not a fan of overtly antagonistic language that Derakhshan and people like him use in their polemics but that's the nature of politics. If you think this is limited to Iranians just watch some American cable news. There is nothing in Derakhshan's writing against Khalaji that is libelous; calling other people traitor is not cause for suing unless your reference is in the context of specific events and actions, e.g. passing secrets to a foreign government. It is however inflammatory language that is not always conducive to dialogue. Now, you may say but how else can you respond to people like Khalaji who are actively counseling people with clear violent agendas towards Iran? Haven't people on the Right and even some on the Left of Iranian political spectrum described MKO as traitors for throwing their lot with Saddam? After all, MKO's stated goal was overthrowing of the hated regime? My point is that the political discussion in Iran has been for too long contaminated with sloganeering. Bring down the rhetoric. Use more reason than verbal chomagh. This so-called suit though appears to be an attempt to intimidate. It doesn't seem to have much of a basis. Love him or hate him but Derakhshan at least can take it as well as he dishes it out. Haven't seen him blink regardless of the vitriolic language used against him, here and on other sites.
Let this story end, once and for all
by karineh on Tue Nov 06, 2007 11:53 AM PSTNo matter how much you guys hate Hoder, it is not going to change the fact that this lawsuit is a sad joke. Please read a bit about this "victimized" Khalaji and see what he stands for. I truly hope that Khalaji will loose this case and that once and for all this case will be closed for Hossein and others.
Anyone working for CASMII
by tolonbeh (not verified) on Tue Nov 06, 2007 10:08 AM PSTAnyone working for CASMII and NIAC has no credibility and obviously is a morally bankrupt person. Derakhshan is even baddtar. Akhund Khamenei married him to Derakhshan's first wife. Derakhshan syas he doesn't know Khamenei? Inghadr doroogh nagoo. Khalaji beh to sharaf dareh.
i have no idea who the
by Anonymousnokkk (not verified) on Tue Nov 06, 2007 08:52 AM PSTi have no idea who the parties are and what things have been said.
In general I do not like name calling but if someone else did it they have to prove it.
Even in Iran u cannot call anyone madar gha...
or you get lashes.
In the west lashes do not exist.
However for calling someone Kha-en may not be too bad of a word.
Here is why. It does not reduce the value of a person if the person is taking side with opposite of his own land. 70 million irani would say masoud rajavi was khaen because he had joined saddam. no proof is needed and that is exactly the definition.
So if i were a judege and it was explained to me what language is used and what it means i would throw out the case. An apology is good enough. and people should not call each other bad names and they should believe in goftare nik pendare ni, kerdare nik. I am not sure if any of the two parties of the conflict have used or applied any of these principles to their lives. If they did we would be celebrating kids birthdays and norooz and victory of Nalbandian.
Agents of what?
by Bahram the iranian (not verified) on Tue Nov 06, 2007 08:47 AM PSTagents or mercenries are the ones who are getting fed of $75 millions dollars assigned by US congress to regime change in Iran(read desroy Iran) and this is just what they say publicly,.CIA budget is not disscused, I bet there is so much in that for Iran and some Ey-ranians. Come forward and confess who is getting how much?I support my Iran and you can call me an agent of IRI, at least my bosses are from Iran too. they are not white,black ,semetics or elese.
وکیل تسخیری با حقوق پرس تی وی
شادمهر مردانی (not verified)Tue Nov 06, 2007 07:38 AM PST
هودر جان، چند روز پیش که در پرس تی.وی (ارگان انگلیسی زبان جمهوری اسلامی) دیدمت خیلی خوشحال شدم. میخواستم ببینم که آیا برای شرکت در تبلیغات رژیم پولی هم بهت دادند که باهاش وکیلی تسخیری دست و پا کنی؟
opps....
by Kouroush Sassanian (not verified) on Tue Nov 06, 2007 07:08 AM PSTHere is a suggestion - tell the other side you will self-deport to Iran if they dismiss their lawsuit against you.
How come all these people
by unregistered (not verified) on Tue Nov 06, 2007 05:11 AM PSTHow come all these people criticising HODER, use the same foul language? Every other word is shit this, shit that. Is that the high point of your vocabularies or you are just too shy going to the next level of your literary abilities and blend in some fuck words too?
Is that how you have been raised in your California homes and families or is it just your interpretation of free (foul) speech?
You should apply to get a 2 mil grant from your IRI masters!
by Mazyar Eshghabadi (not verified) on Tue Nov 06, 2007 05:07 AM PSTDear Hoder, since you have sold your soul to the IRI and became one of their filthy agents aboard, you may ask (and I am pretty sure you would be elligable) for a 2 million grant from Beit al-Ankaboot aka. Seyed Ali Khamenei's office in Qom.
Shame on you for being such a traitor and part of the propaganda machine for the IRI inteligence ministry.
تو خیلی وقته که بازی رو باختی!
نسیم (not verified)Tue Nov 06, 2007 04:59 AM PST
هودر! تو خیلی وقته که bankrupt شدی و بازی رو باختی. همانوقتی که خمینی رو امام و رهبر خودت خوندی و از مفسدین دین فروش جمهوری اسلامی دفاع کردی، باید فکر چنین روزهایی رو میکردی! جالب اینجاست که خودت به اسرائیل وابسته ای و اسرائیل رفتی و حالا شاکیان حملات شخصی ات را وابسته به اسرائیلی ها میکنی.
دلم واقعا به حال خانواده ات میسوزه که بخاطر خودفروشی های تو، اینقدر از ملت فحش خوردند...
$2 million lawsuit against me
by A.S (not verified) on Tue Nov 06, 2007 01:51 AM PSTDear Hoder
The $2m charge is not against you, but all those who have respect and value for free speech. You must fight this to the very end. You have noting to loose, but everything to gain. I have no doubt you find many lawyers who are very happy to defnd you on probono bases.
Good luck
Kudos to Khalaji
by Holy Moly (not verified) on Tue Nov 06, 2007 01:04 AM PSTThis is great news. Good work Mahdi!
Hey Hoder, you deserve it and much worse. Will do you just right.
I hope you will be crushed under it and what will follow so you won't be able to raise even one of your shitty fingers.
You mullah sucker piece of shit.
JJ: Are you afraid of IRI?
by kouroush Sassanian (not verified) on Mon Nov 05, 2007 09:48 PM PSTJJ:
Are you afraid of IRI? You must if you keep deleting my posts! What's the matter you don't want to take a dump on khomeini's grave. I do and many others! Don't be afraid!
Now, on to the IRI agent. I hope you are judged as khoemini would have judged a person - pursuant to sharia law.
if there was only.........
by Bahram the iranian (not verified) on Mon Nov 05, 2007 09:37 PM PSTone Iranian who has made a diferrence when It comes to e-media and blog industry that would be Hossien.He is the father of blog revoultion in Iran Having said this I dont agree with every thing He has written. My heart goes to you on this matter.
You need to fight back for
by freespeech supporter (not verified) on Mon Nov 05, 2007 09:04 PM PSTYou need to fight back for free speech.
contact www.kgoam810.com . there are two talk show hosts that support freedom of speech.
the station in in San franccisco. They say bad against politicians and criticise them and no one can bother them.
one host Ray at www.raytal.com
and the other Bernie ward are great Americans who can perhaps interview you and get you support.
Once a man chooses a political life he should not be afraid of name calling or critisim. It is ridiculous. How many times did you see a movie and called the guy who played as a bad boy in the movie role SOB?
I thnk calling the nation of iran as evil was also bad and illegal. People should pretest name calling there as well. Since the people from iranian origin were discriminated against at jobs at schools,....as the result. SO the persian community should support freedom of speech but not when it hurts the people. one individual in politics should not get angry
as a kid.
perhaps the guy's actions is politically motivated and nothing to do with you in essence and he wants to emphasize on his political agenda.
what a silly world we live in.
Hey Hoder! I have asked you this question before...
by Curious Man (not verified) on Mon Nov 05, 2007 06:26 PM PSTWhat do you do for living? How do make the ends meet? Are you on Canadian welfare program? Do you get monthly stipend from the Islamic Republic? Has Rafsanjani opened up a private bank account for you? Are you independently wealthy? Have you won the Canadian lottery jackpot?
I am a highly educated person living in America who has gone to school for 24 years and the best I can do is to live paycheck by paycheck!
You, on the other hand, spend all of your time blogging and yet there is no indication that you actually work!? I wonder if you Hava Meekhoree and Kaff Mereenee!? Please help me to understand how you manage to do it?
Hoder is an embodiment of IRI...
by Anonymous^2 (not verified) on Mon Nov 05, 2007 05:04 PM PSTHe and the entire Islamic Republic must be destroyed for the good of Iran and humanity.
Re: Babak123
by jamshid on Mon Nov 05, 2007 04:33 PM PSTThe traitors among us is YOU and your likes. YOU are the ones who are not Iranians.
i support you in unploting
by babak123 (not verified) on Mon Nov 05, 2007 04:30 PM PSTi support you in unploting the traitor iranin who lives among us. they are practicaly not iranian just people with identity crisis which blame the iranian government for their failure. they lashed on anyone who offer anything than their cacoon.
Hoder has just published facts
by Lida Ameri (not verified) on Mon Nov 05, 2007 04:22 PM PSTI have to say I'm very impressed by your research to back up your claims about Khalaji. I think if all these guys here read it, they would realise you have said nothing but the truth, backed up by facts, Hoder.