In recent days mass media have been broadcasting statements from an Israeli official, Matan Vilnai, that if true would have been quite shocking and extremely unnerving: `The deputy defence minister said the stepped-up rocket fire would trigger what he called a `bigger holocaust` in the Hamas-controlled coastal strip.`
The truth is fortunately quite different. The Hebrew word Mr. Vilani used is `shoah`, a common word in hebrew meaning simply catastrophe. So what is the source of confusion?
The massacre of about 6 million Jews and millions of Gypsies, gays, Jehovah Witnesses, Communists and dissidents by the Nazis and their allies before and during WWII is referred to in the English speaking world as `Holocaust`. The term itself is derived from Greek first coined to denote the holy burnt offerings to God in the temple in Jerusalem. As it is not hard to imagine, the Jews never referred to this tragic part of their history by that name in Hebrew. Instead that particular event is always denoted as `Ha-Shoah`, literally meaning `THE catastrophe`.
The simple definite article `Ha` (THE) might seem trivial but is very important in this context. The word `shoah` is a very common word used repeatedly in every day speaking and in various situations. However it is never used for the `Holocaust` without the complete form with the definite article preceding it, and completely consciously so. Mr Vilani therefore never used the term Holocaust.
The damage however is already done, and once more, just like the forged pictures during the Lebanon war, are broadcast by well known media outlets who should have known better and has given further ammunition to the enemies of the Jewish people in their propaganda war against them and their independent modern state of Israel. For instance It has already managed to inspire a hateful anti-semitic cartoon on this website.
Events like these show why freedom of speech and a venue to have free dialogue is so important in our world today. Thanks to the opportunity given to all of us in this website, and the free land in which it is able to continue to exist, we have a chance to talk about it and realize what the truth actually was. I hope one day all Iranians can have the blessing to live with such freedom in their own land.
Side Note: It was mentioned in the comment sections of another thread in this website that the case of Ahmadinejad`s by now infamous quote of `wiping Israel off the map` is a similar case. That is however unfortunately not so. This is Ahmadinejad`s quote: `The Imam said that this regime occupying Jerusalem (een rezhim-e eshghalgar-e qods) must [vanish from] the page of time (bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad).`
First of all, the regime in Iran does not make a distinction between the Israeli Government and the country of Israel, they are both referred to as the Zionist regime or the Zionist entity or as here the regime occupying Jerusalem. That`s because, as I am sure you know, the regime in Iran does not recognize Israel as a country and as a state. Unless you can show evidence that the officials of IRI ever distinguished between the state of Israel and the Israeli government, your version of his speech means the same thing as the eradication of the state of Israel.
Second he is very specifically speaking of what `must be done`, not as you claimed something that will just end up happening by itself. He is quoting his Imam as what muslims should actively pursue and make happen, not a prediction of what would eventually happen by itself. I know this is the kind of spin infamous characters like Juan Cole wanted o give to his remarks but it doesn`t stand the test of detailed analysis.
Furthermore, this was not a single and isolated quotation. He has repeatedly asked for the destruction of Israel, called it a filthy bacteria, as has his Imam Khomeini. It has also got to be seen in the context of speeches by Rafsanjani and others, who directly and openly and officially mused on the costs and benefits of nuking Israel.
The two cases are simply not comparable.
Recently by Zion | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
What would you do if they throw on you til?! | 36 | Jan 25, 2009 |
Well It's Over Folks, and Thank You | 44 | Jan 17, 2009 |
Compare Israeli treatment of civilians to that of Hamas | 2 | Jan 15, 2009 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Re: The Issue
by Zion on Wed Mar 05, 2008 11:28 AM PSTDear Ben, you are right. As you see I continue a debate only as long as it adds anything meaningful to the discussion and stop afterwards. :)
Anonym7, I agree with you, we need to have this dialogue. Difference of opinion is natural, we are individuals with different ways of looking at the world. As long as we talk to each other that is all fine.
Anonymous Observer, I have the same question as well. In my opinion, the reason there is so much fixation on Israel among Iranians is partly because it reflects the unresolved issues within the Iranian modern culture in a more pronounced way. I am thinking of expanding on this in another article soon.
Why Are We In This Constant Debate About Palestine?
by Anonymous Observer (not verified) on Wed Mar 05, 2008 07:16 AM PSTAside from the the "humanity" debate which may apply to any number of countries and suffering nations (i.e, Darfur, Somalia, North Korea...) can anyone clarify for me why we as Iranians should be fixated on the Israeli / Palestinian issue when our people are facing enormous social and economic problems such as out of control (I believe the highest rate in the world - here is a link to the subject as of 2005:
//www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?...) addiction, unemployment, inflation...etc.?
Can someone point me to an article that has been written recently on Iranian.com about ways to help the Iranian society combat addiction- as opposed to the myriad of emotionally charged, highly commenetd on Palestinian / Israeli conflict?
What is it with you people and your desire to be the standrad bearer of an Arab issue?
the dialog must go on! (to anonym, and ...)
by Anonym7 (not verified) on Wed Mar 05, 2008 07:06 AM PSTLike many of you I disagree with many things that Zion says, but I am glad that he is posting here. The dialogs such as the one that Q and Zion have must go on. I have argued with Zion on several other occasions and I have much more respect for him than some of these Iranian extremists such as the retard below who consistently calls those of us who disagree with him "evil", "islamofaschist" ...., regurgitating right wing radicals such as Rush Limbaugh, John Bolton and ....
The issue
by Ben Madadi on Wed Mar 05, 2008 07:04 AM PSTZion, you don't need convincing anybody, you wrote the article, some people read it, some agreed, while others didn't. Let it be ;)
The fact of the matter, as I see it, is that Iranian leaders shall not be preoccupied with distant foreign affairs that DO NOT affect their citizens' lives. Palestinians have their own Arab neighbours and they need to deal with their own problems in their own turn and Iran is not a desirable part in the whole issue. Any government shall take care of its own citizens, that is, any legitimate government. I doubt Iranians would normally see it as acceptable for their government to pay Hamas, Hezbollah and others with hundreds of millions of dollars. I truly doubt it. But Iranian government is not a legitimate and popular one. Ahmadinejad must not say things like that because it does not serve the interests of the Iranian people, PERIOD.
Spin!
by Ajam (not verified) on Wed Mar 05, 2008 06:22 AM PSTOh, yeah... That's where the problem lies, the semantics! I guess that now makes it alright for the "modern state of Israel" to raze Ghaza strip to the ground and bomb its "bacward" people to the stone age!!!
Now it is getting funny
by Zion on Wed Mar 05, 2008 04:49 AM PSTI won`t waste pixels to repeat what I have said and what evey intelligent being would understand. You are most welcome to keep defending your heroic president with repetitive nonsensical kindergarten arguments like a broken grammaphone.
Nice reply Q
by sadegh on Wed Mar 05, 2008 04:05 AM PSTNice reply Q...I think you're right on the money there.
Wrong Zion
by Q on Wed Mar 05, 2008 02:45 AM PSTWrong wrong again...
You are conviniently trying to put your own twisted self-serving explanation here. Nobody is buying it.
If someone is fanatical enough to actually want to bomb Israel and says so publically, that person has no qualms about repeating it. Either he is not a fanatic, or he really means it like USSR. You simultaniously say Ahmadinejad is reckless and careful. This puts you in a position to say: "yes, he's lying here, he's telling the truth there." In other words, his words mean whatever YOU say without objective verification. That's called cherry picking.
So juvenile...
So is your last question. I never said they are "essentially the same cateogry" I said, he has likened the destruction of Zionist entity (a government) to USSR. In the same way that it "disappeared", so will the Zionist "regime".
There must be dozens of reasons why IRI does not have diplomatic relations with Israel. This is not relevant. Quit wasting time.
Yes Exactly!
by Zion on Wed Mar 05, 2008 01:53 AM PSTOf course they are doing both. What is so incomprehensible for you there? They have been saying this for so long, they were pretty surprised when this time it suddenly provoked such reaction (so were many of us!), so they decided to tone down this particular case and take it up again when time is ripe. Ahmadinejad evidently has no qualms about deliberately creating reactions of this sort, but this one time his overlords figured they needed to pressure him to tone it down a bit.
`The only aspect of USSR that is important is that it has disappeared form the face of the earth.`
Exactly! That`s why this time they couldn`t use the older and more favourite comparison with South Africa for their damage control.
Now my question to you again: If Israel and USSR are in essentially the same category in the eyes of Islamists ruling Iran, why doesn`t the Islamic Republic have the same kind of mutual relationships with Israel, have the leader merely write some letters of crappy advice to Israeli heads of state and just mind its own business and let Israel fall apart as did Soviet Union?
Once again, you insert your own biased opinion
by Q on Wed Mar 05, 2008 01:26 AM PSTZion, you are seriously stretching. So, let me get this straight.
You think Iran both actively calls for Israel's destruction AND does damage control when asked about it? So he is telling the truth when he says he wants to destroy Israel but he's lying when he says he wants it to disappear like USSR? So if that's what he really wants (apparently enough to state it repeatedly) why deny it?
How selective can you possibly get?
Your analysis of "USSR" is completely irrelevent and shows your desperation. The only aspect of USSR that is important is that it has disappeared form the face of the earth. Don't waste our time with your meaningless comparisons of nation-states and "acceptance." A shameless attempt at confusion and avoiding the real issue. Very typical.
USSR?
by Zion on Wed Mar 05, 2008 12:19 AM PSTQ, your president`s USSR analogy was a very stupid damage control. It was damage controle because his own statement, his predecessors statements and his own later statements all show clearly that Islamic Republic`s position has always been a call to actively destroy Israel. It was stupid, because USSR was a closed communist cage of different states and nations. Israel is a one nation state, not a union of several ones to disintegrate, a state with free press where dissent is legal and deomcracy is in action.
Now that we are at it, if your leaders see Israel as yet another soviet union and nothing more, why is it that Islamic Iran saw no ethical problems with recognizing the Soviet Union, although some of its republics actually used to be parts of Iran a relatively short time before, but does not recognize Israel? Any thoughts on that?
To Gol dust and her/his associates
by Kurdish Warrior (not verified) on Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:19 PM PSTI'm not an Israeli fan however what I don't understand is why you are defending Palestinians, when they supported Saddam in Iran-Iraq war. Even now they are getting fund, Money that belongs to Iranian nation. Please justify your support because I'm lost. So far Israel has been nothing but rhetoric that it's going to attack Iran which I doubt, on the other hand Hammas and Fatah are fighting each other, killing their own kind, with our money...please enlighten me, if I'm mistaken.
Zion (ist) shame on you all for killing palestinian familes!
by gol-dust on Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:41 PM PSTZion, stop your damn PR game! the problem with you all is that you think you can fool the world all the time! no matter what you call it, it is a holocust and you know it! just get out of this site, before you bring your holocust to iran! you guys are the reason for all the mid east wars! go to hell you racists and anti humanity!
Zion what part of "USSR" don't you understand?
by Q on Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:30 PM PSTdid anyone die with USSR got wiped off the map? Why are you avoiding this question?
Jamshid: What happened to Rosie T and Sasha?
by I'mWorried (not verified) on Tue Mar 04, 2008 09:53 PM PST.
Zion and Jamshid playing ping pong
by AnonymousReferee (not verified) on Tue Mar 04, 2008 09:14 PM PSTHar do sar o tahe yek karbasand.
Zion, Go to Israel!
by Anonymo (not verified) on Tue Mar 04, 2008 09:06 PM PST..and leave us alone!
Israeli crimes are a shame for humanity!
When humanity looks back at this era it would wonder in shame that how this crime can go on for decades....
and sahme on you too!
my great observation (to Kashani)
by Anonym7 (not verified) on Tue Mar 04, 2008 09:06 PM PSTKashani says: "Zion, great observation. Very true facts. The reality is theee evil leftist and IRI apologists Iranians on this site and ..."
Kashani, many extremists in this site are getting better and more civilized but you. key_mikhAi_Adam_beshi?
You will never get any apologies from them
by Zion on Tue Mar 04, 2008 08:51 PM PSTDear Jamshid, you will never get any such apologies. Different people act according to their self interests. It is not surprsing that the palestinians took Saddam`s side in the Iran-Iraq war. What is surprising is that an Iranian government shoul be backing Palestinians so unreservedly. Instead of wasting time with demanding anything of the palestinians, a responsible true represntative government of Iran should simply recognize its friends and foes and sort its priorities in order and act accordingly in the political scene in the future. Act to the benefits of its people and to the support of its natural allies, and rationally towards other parties that do not belong to its circel of friends. You will see that even the palestinians will start treating you with respect. Not with opportunism as they do now, for obvious reasons, but with actual respect. That is the way the world is.
Oh, my poor
by Gholdor (not verified) on Tue Mar 04, 2008 08:45 PM PSTOh, my poor baby...Israel......I feel petty for you.....please kill more Palestinian babies and women....Please extinct them quickly....and hide the corpses under the media carpet.....the faster and more frequent you kill them, the earlier you finish the job.......The balance of population is getting better and better already ........ EXCEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEPT, dont's forget.......God is watching you! Be wary of God.......Remember the God does not belong to any race.....We all belong to God.....AND.....he's the protector of the oppressed.
BLAH BLAH BLAH.......Can't justify ethnic cleansing
by Ye Irani (not verified) on Tue Mar 04, 2008 08:29 PM PSTOnly Jews who suffered holocaust can understand what Palestinians are going through....NOT the zionists!
Justice must prevail for all humanity.....
Anonym7
by Zion on Tue Mar 04, 2008 08:24 PM PSTI hope so too. If we all survive these lunatics, that day will inevitably come.
Q, do you see the word `side note` on the article itself? How am I changing the subject. I do not accpet your point because it is not a valid one. This is no game of I-concede-one-thing-you-do-too-just-to-be-even. Ifyou have a valid point, I`ll accept it. As far as you don`t I can`t.
There is no real distinction between saying `Zionist entity must be wiped off the map` or `Zionist regime must be vanished from teh face of time` or any other variation of this. The message is the same. The link to Wikipedia of the actual persian transliterated form with word for word translation of the words. End of story.
Zion, great observation.
by Farhad Kashani (not verified) on Tue Mar 04, 2008 07:32 PM PSTZion, great observation. Very true facts. The reality is theee evil leftist and IRI apologists Iranians on this site and elsewhere spare no effort on blaming others, specially U.S and Israel, for the actions of our own regime and our own people because they have been brainwashed by the Marxist Islamist propaganda machine represented in Hezb Toodeh, Khomeini, Soroush, Shariati...and others.
Zion, I get it! It's laughable!
by Q on Tue Mar 04, 2008 07:14 PM PSTnow you are forced to redefine the "main point" of the article? That's rich!
This is a sleazy and typical way to get out of facing the clear evidence that from Project Censorship that I provided for you.
As usualy you want to bash Iran and Islam like you typically do, but will never give an inch even when there is clear proof in front of you. Your thoughtful response? Some BS about how I must be making it up!!! Good one!
It was mistranslated. Would it kill you to admit this and correct your mistake in the article? I think it would. Why? It's not about truth with you. You are just a foot soldier defending Zion.
This really helps clarify where you come from, Zion, keep it up.
Fact is that Zionists are killers and blood suckers.
by Ali M (not verified) on Tue Mar 04, 2008 06:59 PM PSTNo Confusion about that!
Indeed Abarmard (to Zion)
by Anonym7 (not verified) on Tue Mar 04, 2008 06:45 PM PSTZion, as Abarmard said Iran and Israel have no reason to attack each other. There are extremists in both sides though. I am sure you remember that Yitzhak Rabin was assassinated by Yigal Amir, a right-wing Israeli radical.....
Anyhow, hope to see the day that Israeli tourists come to Isfahan, visiting simply beautiful Jacob synagogue and ... (I visited it a couple years ago).
Indeed Abarmard
by Zion on Tue Mar 04, 2008 06:00 PM PSTthe question however is why shoudl the Islamic Republic of Iran view Israel, for the past 29 years, as a threat? Israel has no enmity with Iran and is now being forced to defend itself and take constant postion against the regime in Iran.
Israel and Iran are not enemies
by Abarmard on Tue Mar 04, 2008 05:53 PM PSTThe way I see it is that Israel sees Iran a threat and Iran sees Israel a threat, while both have no reason to attack one another. If time permits I will elaborate on this in my future article.
I don't believe that any Israeli would take the word Holocaust in vain. I believe that this is mis interpretation and should be left alone.
metzenbaum
by Zion on Tue Mar 04, 2008 05:42 PM PSTYes you are right. I said the same thing.
חורבן churban meaning `ruin`, comes from the verb le-hitcharben, `to make a mess of something` and is also used in some circles but it is not as prevelant as Ha-shoah.
Thanks.
Daryush and Q
by Zion on Tue Mar 04, 2008 05:32 PM PSTThe main point of the article is of how the media distorts and propagates wrong information against Israel all the time, despite the usual claim that the Zionist control the media. It was a BBC reporter for instance who wrote she had tears falling for Arafat`s death. Makes you wonder what kind of `objective` or Zionist controlled media would they be.
The issue of Ahmadinejad was a side note in response to a point raised before. The fact that you insist on whitewashing it proves nothing. Ahmadinjead has utterd much worse words against Israel than this, as have all the other officials of this regime in the past 29 years. He was forced to back off and use double talk afterwards inthis particular case, but what he said is documented and clear, as I have already explained. That you have written about this before and tried to defend the regime in Iran as usual is no surprise to me, neitehr is it of any value since you have already proved here many time that the things you claim are simply not true.